Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004
On October 21, 2014, the Supreme Court of the Philippines issued Administrative Order No. 77-14, revoking specific provisions from Administrative Circular No. 44-2004 due to changing economic circumstances and the need for a more modern judiciary. The revoked provisions included restrictions on filling vacant positions, creating new positions, allowing overtime, hiring casual employees, and retaining consultants, among others. New guidelines are to be issued to align with current operational needs, while existing regulations concerning official conduct and resource use remain unaffected. The order emphasizes a shift towards efficiency and the prudent management of judicial resources.
Quick Answers
- What is Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004 about?
- On October 21, 2014, the Supreme Court of the Philippines issued Administrative Order No. 77-14, revoking specific provisions from Administrative Circular No. 44-2004 due to changing economic circumstances and the need for a more modern judiciary. The revoked provisions included restrictions on filling vacant positions, creating new positions, allowing overtime, hiring casual employees, and retaining consultants, among others. New guidelines are to be issued to align with current operational needs, while existing regulations concerning official conduct and resource use remain unaffected. The order emphasizes a shift towards efficiency and the prudent management of judicial resources.
- What type of law is Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 77-14?
- Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004 (Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 77-14) is a Philippine Supreme Court Issuances enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004 enacted?
- Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004 (Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 77-14) was enacted on Oct 21, 2014.
- What is the citation for Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004?
- Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004, Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 77-14, Oct 21, 2014 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 77-14
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Administrative Orders
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
October 21, 2014
SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 77-14
REVOKING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 44-2004 1
Considering that the economic circumstances that necessitated the issuance of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004 2 are no longer prevailing, and since many provisions contained therein are now anachronistic to the demands of a modern and reform-oriented judiciary, the following paragraphs of said Circular are hereby REVOKED, effective immediately:
"B. Filling up of Vacant Positions
No vacant positions in the plantilla of the courts of all levels shall be filled up except (a) judicial positions, (b) those in the offices of the Chief Justice and Associate Justices, or (c) when warranted by the exigency of the service or the need to strengthen further the capacities, effectiveness and efficiency of offices as part of the APJR.
This provision shall not apply to vacant positions already declared open for filling-up and applicants for which have already been considered by the Selection and Promotions Boards for the Supreme Court and for the Lower Courts."
"C. Creation of New Positions
No new positions may be created unless justified by a compelling need therefor in order not to prejudice the effective and efficient delivery of justice or to hamper the pursuit of the goals of the APJR."
"D. Overtime Service
Effective 15 September 2004, no more overtime work with pay shall be allowed except (a) when so required by the Chief Justice or Associate Justices but only for a maximum of three personnel for each of their offices; (b) for the official drivers of the Chief Justice and the Associate Justices; and (c) when work has to be done even beyond office hours due to compelling reasons or in emergency situations."
"E. Hiring of Casual Employees
Effective immediately, and subject to the last sentence of the succeeding paragraph, no new casual employees shall be hired.
Upon the expiration of the appointments of incumbent casual employees in the Supreme Court, no extension or renewal thereof shall be allowed unless the appointees' services are extremely and urgently needed in the highest interest of public service: Provided that at most only sixty percent (60%) of the present casual employees may be retained effective January 2005, and provided, further, that their performance ratings for the immediately preceding six (6) months are at least very satisfactory. Should there be a need to appoint new casual employees to replace those whose appointment could not be extended or renewed because of failure to score a very satisfactory performance rating, new casuals may be appointed, provided, however, that the maximum limit herein fixed starting January 2005 shall not be exceeded." IaHCAD
"F. Hiring of Consultants and Contractual Laborers
(1) The consultancy contracts of incumbent consultants shall no longer be renewed upon their expiration unless there is an absolute necessity for the continuation of their service either because (1) their work cannot be done by the organic personnel of an office, or (2) it is a requirement under a grant or loan agreement.
No new consultant shall be hired, except when required under a grant or loan agreement for a program or project covered by the APJR.
(2) The number of laborers or those covered by contracts for services in the Supreme Court should be reduced by at least forty percentum (40%). The head of the Maintenance Division shall submit a list of at most the 60% who may be retained. Only those who have been rendering very satisfactory in the immediately preceding six (6) months may be retained."
"H. Creation of Committees
No more committees or task forces shall be created except (1) when urgently needed as determined by the Chief Justice, or (2) when required to expedite the implementation of a program or project under the APJR."
"J. Seminars, Workshops, or Conferences
For CY 2005, workshops, thinkshops, seminars, conferences, or other similar activities funded from the regular appropriations or from savings shall be limited only to those which are extremely or urgently necessary in relation to a specific program, project, or activity of the Judiciary, subject to the approval of the Chief Justice. If funded from (a) grant or loan, they may (be) conducted or held pursuant to the terms and conditions of the grant or loan at least the counter-part cost to the Judiciary (sic).
For the rest of CY 2004, workshops, thinkshops, seminars or conferences which have already been scheduled must be re-evaluated as to their necessity and urgency. Only those whose cancellation would greatly affect the timetable for the effective implementation of a program, project, or activity may be conducted.
In this regard, the chiefs or heads of offices who have already scheduled workshops, thinkshops, seminars or conferences must submit to the Chief Justice not later than 30 September 2004, a revised schedule in compliance with the criteria herein provided."
"K. Meetings
Unless warranted by justifiable cause, the holding of luncheon meetings should be avoided. Service of light snacks is sufficient."
"L. Travels
1. Foreign Travels
The only foreign travels that may be allowed are those of Members or personnel of the Judiciary for the purpose of attending international conferences, seminars, trainings or the like which are funded by the organizers or sponsors of the international program; or by the Supreme Court with respect to programs, projects, or activities under the APJR: provided that, in either case only 50% of the daily allowance and of the representation allowance authorized under Joint Resolution No. 2 of the CFAG, or any amendment thereto, shall be granted; and provided, further, that no clothing and pre-departure allowances under Joint Resolution No. 4, or any amendment thereto, shall be given."
In order to reflect the current and realistic requirements of the service, updated guidelines on the foregoing revoked provisions shall be issued forthwith. In the meantime, related requests for the same following the issuance of this Order, shall be processed on a case-to-case basis by the Office of the Chief Justice.
The revocation of the above-stated provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004 shall not, until further notice, affect existing memoranda and circulars referred to in the said Circular, particularly with respect to strict observance of official time; use of SC vehicles, fuel consumption, and automotive maintenance services; emergency purchases; and use of equipment and supplies for official purposes. DTIACH
Issued this 21st day of October 2014.
(SGD.) MARIA LOURDES P. A. SERENOChief Justice
Footnotes
1. Adopting Effective Measures to Reduce Expenditures and Increase Savings in Appropriations in the Judiciary.
2. Issued by Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide, Jr. on 10 September 2004.
Cite This Law
Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004, Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 77-14, Oct 21, 2014 (Philippines)
Revoking Certain Provisions of Administrative Circular No. 44-2004, Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 77-14 (Phil. 2014)
Related Laws
- Amending Section 4, Letter H of Amended Administrative Circular No. 35-2004Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 14-05 • Jan 1, 2005 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Adopting CSC and DBM Joint Circular No. 2, s. 2004 on Non-monetary Remuneration for Overtime Service RenderedSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 18-05 • Apr 4, 2005 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Submission of Monthly Report Cases Using the Approved New Forms under Administrative Circular No. 81-2012 Dated September 17, 2012, in Addition to the Monthly Report of Cases under Administrative Circular No. 4-2004 Dated February 4, 2004OCA Circular No. 83-13 • Jun 27, 2013 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Reiteration of Administrative Circular No. 20-2002 Dated April 24, 2002OCA Circular No. 57-07 • May 24, 2007 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Strict Observance of Administrative Circular No. 3-98OCA Circular No. 93-04 • Aug 4, 2004 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Declaring the Applicability to Officials and Employees of the Lower Courts of Administrative Circular No. 22-2004 Entitled "Prescribing Guidelines in the Grant of Loyalty Award for Officials and Employees of the Supreme Court and the Presidential Electoral Tribunal "Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 58-04 • Nov 20, 2004 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law