Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System
The CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04, dated June 29, 2004, endorses proposed amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System (CPES) for government infrastructure projects to the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). This resolution highlights the necessity for all procuring entities to evaluate contractors' performance using the NEDA-approved CPES Guidelines, which were initially established in 1998 but require updates due to implementation challenges. The CPES aims to standardize performance evaluation criteria, facilitate project monitoring, and enhance contractor accountability in infrastructure projects, including roads, bridges, and buildings. The proposed amendments have undergone pilot testing and validation, ensuring that they align with current industry needs and practices.
Quick Answers
- What is Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System about?
- The CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04, dated June 29, 2004, endorses proposed amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System (CPES) for government infrastructure projects to the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). This resolution highlights the necessity for all procuring entities to evaluate contractors' performance using the NEDA-approved CPES Guidelines, which were initially established in 1998 but require updates due to implementation challenges. The CPES aims to standardize performance evaluation criteria, facilitate project monitoring, and enhance contractor accountability in infrastructure projects, including roads, bridges, and buildings. The proposed amendments have undergone pilot testing and validation, ensuring that they align with current industry needs and practices.
- What type of law is CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04?
- Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System (CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04) is a Philippine Other Rules and Procedures enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System enacted?
- Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System (CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04) was enacted on Jun 29, 2004.
- What is the citation for Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System?
- Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System, CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04, Jun 29, 2004 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Other Rules and Procedures
- Subcategory
- Construction Industry
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
June 29, 2004
CIAP BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 14-04
ENDORSING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES OF THE CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM (CPES) TO THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NEDA) BOARD COMMITTEE ON INFRASTRUCTURE (INFRACOM) FOR APPROVAL
On motion duly seconded.
WHEREAS, Section 12, Annex E of the Implementing Rules and Regulations, Part A (IRR-A) of R.A. 9184 or the Government Procurement Reform Act, requires all procuring entities implementing government infrastructure projects to evaluate the performance of their contractors using the NEDA-approved Constructors Performance Evaluation System (CPES) Guidelines for the type of projects being implemented;
WHEREAS, the existing CPES Guidelines promulgated in 1998 need to be updated to address implementation problems encountered;
WHEREAS, for this purpose, the Inter-Agency Committee on CPES composed of representatives from the Departments of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Transportation and Communications (DOTC), Science and Technology (DOST), Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) and Bases Conversion Development Authority (BCDA), held workshops in 2002 and formulated draft amendments to the CPES Guidelines for Road, Bridge, Housing, Building, Port and Harbor Projects;
WHEREAS, the draft amendments were pilot-tested in infrastructure projects of the DPWH, DOTC, PPA and BCDA and the same were validated with other concerned sectors such as the Philippine Constructors Association, Inc. (PCA), the National Contractors Association of the Philippines (NACAP), and the NEDA Infrastructure Staff; EcHTDI
WHEREAS, the Philippine Domestic Construction Board (PDCB), in its 03 November 2003 Regular Meeting, passed PDCB Board Resolution No. 2003-04, recommending approval of the proposed amendments;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Construction Industry Authority of the Philippines, after due deliberations in its 43rd Regular meeting, RESOLVES, as it is hereby RESOLVED, to endorse to the NEDA Board Committee on Infrastructure (INFRACOM) for approval the proposed amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System (CPES) for Road, Bridge, Housing, Building, Port & Harbor Projects, hereto attached as Annex A and made an integral part of this Resolution.
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
June 29, 2004, Makati City.
For the CIAIP Board:
Undersecretary ADRIAN S. CRISTOBAL, JR.(Representing DTI Secretary and CIAP Chairman Cesar A.V. Purisima)
Attested by:
(SGD.) KATHRYN JOSEPHINE T. DELA CRUZActing Board Secretary
Republic of the Philippines)
City of Makati ) s.s.
SUBSCRIBED and SWORN TO before me, Notary Public for and in the Municipality of Makati City on September 18, 2004 by KATHRYN JOSEPHINE T. DELA CRUZ, Officer-in-Charge and Acting Board Secretary of the CIAP, with Community Tax Certificate No. 15239353 issued at Makati City on 17 February 2004. AEHTIC
(SGD.) MARIMEL D. PORCIUNCULA
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires on December 31, 2005
Doc. No. 412
EVALUATION OF CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCEImplementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of Republic Act No. 9184
1. SUBJECT AND SCOPE
All procuring entities implementing government infrastructure projects are mandated to evaluate the performance of their contractors using the NEDA-Approved Constructors Performance Evaluation System (CPES) Guidelines for the type of project being implemented. These guidelines cover all infrastructure projects awarded by the government regardless of contract amount and funding source. CPES evaluation shall be done during construction and upon completion of each government project. To ensure continuous implementation of CPES, all procuring entities concerned are required to include in their Projects' Engineering and Administrative Overhead Cost the budget for the implementation of CPES pursuant to NEDA Board Resolution No. 18 (s. 2002).
2. EVALUATION GUIDELINES
For project types which do not have specific CPES Guidelines, the procuring entities concerned may formulate and adopt their own implementing Guidelines specific to their needs provided the NEDA-INFRACOM poses no objections to their adoption, and provided further that said Guidelines are made known to all prospective bidders.
3. IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISM FOR CPES
All procuring entities implementing infrastructure projects are required to establish CPES Implementing Units (IUs) in their respective offices/agencies/corporations. The CPES Implementing Units shall be responsible for the implementation of the CPES Implementing guidelines, including but not limited to, the supervision of Constructors Performance Evaluators (CPEs) to be accredited by the Construction Industry Authority of the Philippines (CIAP). The procuring entity's CPES IU shall be responsible for the following: a) pre-screening of applications of CPEs, b) funding for CPEs accreditation training and seminars; and c) yearly evaluation of CPEs.
4. SUBMISSION AND DISSEMINATION OF EVALUATION RESULTS
All procuring entities implementing CPES shall submit the results of their performance evaluation to the CIAP on a monthly basis or as often as necessary. The procuring entity's CPES-IU shall likewise develop and maintain a databank and disseminate the CPES reports to the concerned units/departments within the procuring entity and to other interested users.
5. UTILIZATION OF EVALUATION RESULTS
The CIAP shall consolidate all of the CPES evaluation results received and shall disseminate the same to all procuring entities concerned. The CPES rating and other information shall be used by the concerned government agencies for the following purposes: a) pre qualification/eligibility screening of constructors; b) awarding of contracts; c) project monitoring and control; d) issuance of Certificate of Completion; e) policy formulation/review; f) industry planning; g) granting of Incentives/Awards, and, in adopting measure to further improve performance of contractors in the prosecution of government projects.
CONSTRUCTORS' PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM (CPES) IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES FOR
ROAD, BRIDGE, HOUSING, BUILDING, PORT AND HARBOR PROJECTS
1. GENERAL
Section 12, Annex E of the Implementing Rules and Regulation, Part A (IRR-A) of R.A. 9184 or the Government Procurement Reform Act, requires all procuring entities implementing government infrastructure projects to evaluate the performance of their contractors using the NEDA-approved Constructors Performance Evaluation System (CPES) guidelines for the type of project being implemented. Section 12, likewise, requires all procuring entities to include in their Projects' Engineering and Administrative Overhead Cost, the budget for CPES implementation pursuant to NEDA Board Resolution No. 18 (s. 2002); to establish CPES Implementing Units in their respective offices/agencies/corporations; and to use the CPES ratings for the following purposes: a) prequalification/eligibility screening; b) awarding of contracts; c) project monitoring & control; d) issuance of Certificate of Completion; e) policy formulation/review; f) industry planning; g) granting of incentives/awards; and in adopting measures to further improve performance of contractors in the prosecution of government projects. IDSETA
2. OBJECTIVES
The CPES was developed in order to:
2.1 Establish a uniform set of criteria for rating the performance of constructors;
2.2 Develop a centralized base of information on performance rating of constructors for licensing, pre-qualification, quality improvement, and other purposes of government agencies, project owners, financing and insurance companies and other interested parties; and
2.3 Contribute in ensuring that infrastructure projects should conformed with the specified requirements of project owners.
3. SCOPE
The guidelines shall be used in the performance evaluation of constructors undertaking government road, bridge, housing, building, port and harbor projects as follows:
3.1 Local constructors licensed by and registered with the Philippine Contractors Accreditation Board (PCAB);
3.2 Foreign constructors licensed by the PCAB; and
3.3 Joint ventures and consortia licensed by the PCAB.
4. DEFINITION OF TERMS
4.1 Constructor — deemed synonymous with the term builder and hence, any entity including joint venture and consortium licensed by PCAB who undertakes or purports to have the capacity to undertake or submits a bid for infrastructure projects.
4.2 Constructors' Performance Evaluation System (CPES) — a system of grading the performance of a constructor for a specific kind of projects using a set of criteria, approved by the NEDA-INFRACOM.
4.3 Constructors' Performance Evaluators (CPE) — an individual or group of evaluators accredited by CIAP tasked to undertake performance evaluation of a constructor's project using the CPES guidelines and/or evaluation requirements of the construction industry.
4.4 Corrective Action Plan (CAP) — is a plan of action proposed by the constructor to the concerned agency's implementing office which is aimed to correct the non-conformance findings on the project based on the CAR issued by the CPE(s). The CAP shall include the constructor's specific actions and timetable to immediately correct the findings subject to the approval by the head of the concerned implementing office or his authorized representative.
4.5 Corrective Action Request (CAR) — a form wherein the CPE records his/her validated finding(s) including corresponding location(s) which do not conform to any of the checklist criteria requiring immediate actions by the constructor.
4.6 CPES Implementing Unit (IU) — the unit of an agency responsible for the implementation of CPES.
4.7 During Construction — reckoned from the time the constructor receives the Notice to Proceed (NTP) up to substantial completion of the projects or the period covering the contract effectivity date as stated in the NTP up to the date of substantial project completion.
4.8 Infrastructure Projects — refers to construction, improvement or rehabilitation of roads and highways, airports and air navigation facilities, railways, ports, flood control and drainage, water supply and sewerage, irrigation systems, dams, buildings, communication facilities, dredging and reclamation, power generating plants, power transmission and distribution facilities and other related construction projects.
4.9 Implementing Office (OI) — refer to the unit(s) or department(s) within the agency assigned to supervise the implementation of infrastructure projects.
4.10 Percentage Weight — the weight for a specific item of work, computed by dividing its cost during the actual or latest accomplishment by the total cost of all items of work during the rating period.
4.11 Preventive Action Plan — is a plan of action proposed by the constructor to the concerned agency's implementing office which is aimed to prevent the recurrence of non-conformance findings on his on-going and/or future projects
4.12 Rate — the score for each item of work evaluated, derived using the criteria in evaluating the workmanship and materials aspects.
4.13 Relative Percentage Weight — refers to the weight of an item of work to be rated, computed by dividing the percentage weight of the item of work to be rated by the sum of the percentage weight of all items of work to be rated.
4.14 Relative Rate — the product of the relative percentage weight and the rate for each item of work.
4.15 Spot — an area selected from the identified location of on-going and/or completed items of work which will be subject for evaluation/inspection.
4.16 Upon Completion — refers to 100% completion of the project as claimed. by the constructor.
5. FUNCTIONAL/DEPLOYMENT FLOWCHART
The sequential activities to be undertaken by the CPES Implementing Unit (IU), Constructors Performance Evaluators (CPE), Constructor, Implementing Office (IO), and Construction Industry Authority of the Philippines (CIAP) are presented hereunder. The CPES Functional/Deployment Flowchart is illustrated in Annex 1.
5.1 Listing of Projects by the IU
The IU shall prepare the list of all road, bridge, housing, building, port and harbor projects of the agency which have been issued Notice to Proceed (NTP) on a monthly, basis upon receipt of documents "a" and "b" as listed in Section 10.1 hereof from the Implementing Offices concerned. Thereafter, the. IU shall determine the frequency and tentative date(s) of the evaluation to be undertaken by the CPE for each project based on the following parameters: STEacI
a. During Construction — A minimum of two evaluations shall be performed by the CPE, except those projects with duration of less than two months, which must be evaluated at least once. The number of evaluation beyond the prescribed minimum shall be determined by the IU based on the size, nature and complexity of the project and shall be subject to approval by the proper authorities within the agency. The first evaluation shall be performed when the project is at least thirty percent (30%) physically complete or as may be required by the CPES-IU using the S-curve or other appropriate means to determine whether there is substantial work completed for evaluation.
b. Upon Completion — only one evaluation shall be performed by the CPE right after the constructor claims one hundred percent (100%) completion of the project.
5.2 Consolidation and Review of Documents by the IU
Prior to the tentative evaluation date(s), the IU shall require the IO concerned to submit copies of documents "c" to "f" as listed in Section 10.1 hereof and consolidate all of the submitted project documents for subsequent use of the CPE. The punchlist listed as document "g" shall form part of the documentary requirement for the "'upon completion" evaluation only. Based on the status of the project, the IU shall determine the most appropriate evaluation date(s) and fills out the CPES Evaluation Forms to be used for such evaluation.
5.3 Assignment of CPE and Provision of Documents by the IU
The IU shall coordinate and schedule the most appropriate evaluation date(s) of the CPE. Also, the IU shall provide the CPE with all the necessary documents for evaluation. The CPE shall be selected by the IU from the evaluators accredited by CIAP.
5.4. Review of IU — Supplied Documents and Pre-determination of Spots for Evaluation by the CPE
The CPE Upon receipt of the documents supplied by the IU shall review the same and enter pertinent data (e.g. standards and tolerances) in the appropriate spaces provided for in the CPES checklist. The CPE shall also select spots randomly for evaluation prior to site inspection.
5.5 Finalization of Evaluation Date(s) and Notification of Agency's and Constructor's Project Engineer
The IU shall finalize the date(s) of actual evaluation based on latest project updates provided by the concerned IO and the agreements made by the CPE. The IU shall, likewise, notify the agency's and constructor's project. engineer before the actual evaluation date(s) within 24 hours for projects located in urban areas where . communications are accessible and three (3) working days for projects located in remote areas. The presence of constructor and/or its representatives is a requirement during CPES project site evaluation.
5.6 Notification, of CPE, CPE Resource Persons/Witnesses by the CPES IU.
The CPES IU shall inform the CPE and CPE resource persons/witnesses as enumerated in Section 9.2 hereof of the evaluation date(s). The CPES IU shall request their presence on said date(s) and specified venue. The resource persons/witnesses are to provide valuable inputs to the CPE.
5.7 Consolidation and Submission of Documents by Constructor's. Project Engineer
The constructor's project engineer shall consolidate documents "a" & "b" as listed in Section 10.2 hereof and present the same during the on-site pre-evaluation meeting to be conducted by the CPE.
5.8 Conduct of On-site Pre-Evaluation Meeting among CPE, Resource Persons and Witnesses
Prior to actual evaluation, the CPE and its resource persons/witnesses shall meet to discuss the following: purpose and mechanics of CPES; scope and status of each work item (percentage of accomplishment) to be evaluated; documents supplied by the constructor's project engineer; and other factors affecting the implementation of the project. Based on said discussion, the CPE shall update/validate all of the standards/tolerances on relevant checklists to be used.
5.9 Conduct of Actual Evaluation by CPE
Based on the pre-determined spots to be evaluated, the CPE and its resource persons/witnesses, shall undertake the necessary evaluation and records findings in relevant checklists. The CPE may list additional criteria in relevant checklists if needed and corresponding findings. The CPE shall also take photos and/or videos to substantiate its findings.
Should there be a need to assess the constructor's performance during the warranty period, the IU may request the CPE to undertake such evaluation. The evaluation results shall be submitted by the CPE to the IU and/or concerned units of the agency.
5.10 Conduct of Post-Evaluation Meeting
a. Validation of Findings by CPE
The CPE leader shall convene a meeting to be attended by the CPE members, resource persons and witnesses to deliberate on the findings and validate the causes for such.
b. Finalization of Evaluation Rating and CAR(s) by CPE
Based on validated findings, the CPE shall meet to finalize its evaluation rating as well as CAR(s), if any, using relevant forms. Each CAR, however, shall be prepared in duplicate copies.
c. Presentation /Issuance of Rating and CAR(s) by CPE
The CPE leader shall reconvene the meeting with the CPE members, resource persons and witnesses in order for him to present the evaluation rating and issue the duplicate copies of the CAR(s) to the constructor's project engineer. acHCSD
d. Agreement on Rating and CAR(s) by Constructor's Project Engineer
The constructor's project engineer can either agree or disagree with the rating and in all or some of the CAR(s). Should there be agreements on the rating contained in the summary rating sheet and all CAR(s), the CPE leader shall request said engineer to affix his signature in spaces provided for in all copies of said documents. Thereafter, said engineer shall be given duplicate copies of the CAR(s). But in case of disagreements with the rating or any of the CAR(s), the CPE leader shall inform said engineer that these shall be settled by an appropriate adjudicating body to be designated by the agency. In cases where the constructor and/or its representatives are absent during the CPES project evaluation, even after advance and proper notification, the CPES Rating of the constructor will be considered final and binding.
e. Monitoring of Constructor's Compliance on CAR by CPES-IU
To ensure and check constructor's compliance on CAR, the CPES-IU shall require the government project engineer to submit a Monitoring Report to the concerned Implementing Office, copy furnished the CPES-IU, to validate compliance to CAR/PAR. Emphasis should be on projects with "Remove and Replace" proposed CAP and taking into consideration the pledged date of corrective action by the constructor. If possible, photos shall be attached to provide evidence on the works undertaken.
5.11 Submission of Accomplished. Rating Sheet, Constructor's Performance Summary Report and CAR(s) by CPE
Immediately after the completion of the evaluation, the CPE leader shall submit to the IU the original copies of the accomplished rating sheet (cover sheet, checklists and summary, sheet), Constructor's Performance Summary Report and CAR(s). The CPE leader shall, likewise, prepare a report indicating the documents to be submitted to the agency's designated adjudicating body, in case when there is appeal made by the constructor.
5.12 Preparation and Implementation of Corrective Action Plan (CAP) and Preventive Action Plan (PAP) by the Constructor
Based on the non-conformance findings prepared by CPE, the constructor shall prepare and submit the corresponding CAP to the Head of the IO for his assessment and subsequent approval. If the CAP is approved by the IO Head, the constructor's Project Engineer (PE) shall implement the plan and to be monitored by the Project Owner's PE. However, if CAP is disapproved, the constructor's PE has to submit another CAP proposal for approval by the IO Head. The constructor has to submit PAP proposal if similar findings by the CPE occurred twice or more. The process of PAP's approval is similar to CAP's.
5.13 Review of CPES Rating, Preparation of Reports, and Dissemination of Information by IU
The IU, upon receipt of the CPES rating sheet and Constructor's Performance Summary Report for a particular project and visit, shall review the completeness, accuracy and consistency of its contents. Should the contents be in order, the IU shall submit it to the Agency Head, concerned IO and other departments/units which are needing those information. The concerned IO shall monitor the constructor's implementation of all the recommendations made by the CPE on the noted non-conformances. This shall be supported by videos or photos before, during and after rectification has been made. After the constructor has satisfactorily completed all the corrections made, the IO shall submit the reports to the IU.
The IU shall submit to CIAP's PDCB an authenticated photocopy of the Constructor's Performance Summary Report on a monthly basis.
5.14 Databanking by IU and CIAP
All original copies of the CPES rating sheets shall be filed and pertinent data stored in a computer by the CPES IU for easy access and processing of information in the future. This unit shall serve as the agency's databank for all CPES information and documents pertaining to its projects and constructors.
CIAP's PDCB, on the other hand,. shall establish the CPES central data bank and maintain linkages with concerned agencies to ensure timely and continuous submission of authenticated copies of accomplished Constructor's Performance Summary Report and to facilitate information sharing among users of CPES data.
6. ASPECTS OF EVALUATION
The performance of the constructor shall be evaluated "during construction" and "upon completion" of a project. The assigned weights and aspects to be evaluated "during construction" and "upon completion" shall vary depending on the kind of project as follows:
6.1 During Construction — with a weight of 60% for road, bridge, port and harbor projects, and 70% for housing and building projects, the maximum weight for the following criteria shall be:
|
Criteria
|
Maximum Rating
|
| Workmanship |
0.40
|
| Materials |
0.30
|
| Time |
0.10
|
| Facilities |
0.03
|
| Environmental, Safety and Health (ESH) |
0.07
|
| Resources Deployment |
0.10
|
|
——
|
|
| Total |
1.00
|
|
===
|
The assigned weight for housing and building projects is higher than that for road and bridge projects in view of the complexity of the nature of the former projects. In general, the evaluation "during construction" is assigned heavier weight to encourage constructors to immediately attain satisfactory performance and be able to maintain it until substantial work has been accomplished.
6.2 Upon Completion — with a weight of 40% for road, bridge, port and harbor projects, and 30% for housing and building projects, the maximum weight for the following criteria shall be: caAICE
|
Criteria
|
Maximum Rating
|
| Workmanship |
0.40
|
| Materials |
0.30
|
| Time |
0.30
|
|
——
|
|
| Total |
1.00
|
7. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION
7.1 During Construction
a. Workmanship [Maximum Rating of 0.40]
Workmanship refers to the quality and quantity of on-going and/or completed items of work, which are verifiable, in accordance to approved plans and specifications. This aspect covers the utilization of the correct methodology needed in producing the desired quality of work. In rating this aspect, efficiency of methodology shall be considered.
In assessing/evaluating workmanship, the following procedures shall be observed: a) before going to the project site, the CPE shall identify the location of on-going and/or completed items of works based on the approved plan, and b) from the location identified, the CPEs shall select spots randomly for evaluation. The combined area of spots shall not be less than 10% of the on-going and/or completed items of works. Checklists for Workmanship for roads and bridges, housing and building, and ports and harbor projects are presented in Annexes 2, 3 & 4, respectively. Refer to Section 11.4a hereof in determining the rating for workmanship.
In case there are on-going or completed additional works or variation orders, which are verifiable, at the time of inspection, these shall be rated if said variations were approved by at least agency's Project Engineer.
b. Materials [Maximum Rating of 0.30]
To impress upon the constructors the importance of materials in producing the desired quality of an item of work, this aspect is viewed separately from workmanship as another factor in assessing performance.
Materials means the quality, quantity and type of construction materials including asphalt and ready-mixed concrete, and components supplied by entities other than the constructors as required in the contract. The constructor gets the full rating of 0.30 for materials in a particular item of work if he complies with all the five (5) criteria in the checklist for materials in Annex 5. Refer to Section 11.4b in rating materials.
Alternative construction materials used by the constructor may also be considered by the CPE in rating the materials aspect, provided there are supporting documents consisting of the approval by the owner's authorized personnel and test results. If a work item does not require the use of materials (e.g., demolition of existing structure, excavation, or scraping), the constructor automatically gets 0.30 in this aspect provided he gets the full rating in the workmanship aspect for such work item. However, if the particular item of work was not done or inadequately complied with, the rating for material shall be 0.00. Furthermore, when a particular item of work was not rated since it is no longer visible and cannot be verified, the material aspect for such item of work shall not be rated.
Materials for on-going or completed additional works, which are verifiable, at the time of inspection shall also be rated provided said variations were approved by at least the agency's Project Engineer.
Unlike the workmanship and materials aspects which are evaluated on a per item of work, the following four (4) aspects shall be appraised during each visit without particular attention to the work items completed/being completed by the constructor.
c. Time [Maximum Rating of 0.10]
This refers to the over-all accomplishment in accordance with the approved PERT/CPM or approved program of work. The constructor gets a full rating of 0.10 if he is on or ahead of schedule but gets a lower score if there is any delay or slippage attributable to his fault. The score shall depend on the percentage of delay as reflected in the checklist for time aspect presented in Annex 6. Refer to Section 11.4c in rating the time aspect.
In case there are on-going or completed additional works or variation orders, time would be rated based on effective PERT CPM and S-Curve approved by at least agency's project engineer. In case it has not yet been approved by agency's project engineer, time shall be rated based on the latest approved PERT CPM and S-curve.
d. Facilities [Maximum Rating of 0.03]
The facilities being referred to here are those set up by the constructor prior to the actual start of the project. This aspect covers the provision of project signboard, sanitary and/or field and on-site office facilities which includes the surveying, transport and communication and other equipment, appliances, utensils and other items as required in the contract. The constructor merits a full rating of 0.03 if he complies with the criteria enumerated in the checklist for facilities presented in Annex 7, Refer to Section 11.4d in rating this aspect.
In case the contract does not indicate any provision for camp facilities, to be checked are the sanitary, field and on-site office facilities provided by the constructor for its technical staff and workers.
e. Environmental, Safety and Health (ESH) [Maximum Rating of 0.07]
The constructor must learn to care for his environment and must try his best not to pollute during project prosecution. He must observe safety and health measures as required in the general and/or special contract provisions, and safeguard the lives of his workers and those of the general public. The constructor gets a full rating of 0.07 if he complies with the criteria enumerated in the checklist for ESH presented in Annex 8. Refer to Section 11.4e in rating this aspect. IEAHca
f. Resources Deployment [Maximum Rating of 0.10]
In this aspect, to be evaluated is the constructor's ability to deploy on time, based on the approved PERT/CPM or program of work, the required/pledged facilities and resources such as materials, equipment in good running condition and manpower. Refer to Section 11.4f in rating this aspect. Resources deployment checklist is presented in Annex 9.
Should there be on-going additional works or variation orders at the time of inspection not yet covered by approved variation order, the provision on this matter as stated in Section 7.1-c shall likewise be adopted.
7.2 Upon Completion
a. Workmanship [Maximum Rating of 0.50]
Workmanship is one of the three aspects to be evaluated when the project is one hundred percent (100%) complete.
The punchlists prepared by the inspectorate team may serve as additional reference for project evaluation. The constructor shall merit a full rating of 0.50 for a particular item of work if he satisfies the criteria in the checklist. Spots comprising not less than ten percent (10%) of the entire project shall be the sample size used in evaluating this aspect.
b. Time [Maximum Rating of 0.30]
In rating the aspect of time, comparison shall be made between the approved contract completion time including time extensions granted and actual project completion time. Completion of a project on time includes demobilization and final clean-up.
The constructor shall get a full rating of 0.30 if he is on or ahead of schedule but if the project is delayed due to his fault, he gets 0.00 regardless of the number of days delayed.
c. Materials [Maximum Rating of 0.20]
In rating the aspect of material, a full rating of 0.20 shall be given to materials in a particular item of work if he complies with all the six (6) criteria in the checklist for materials in Annex 5.
8. CPES IMPLEMENTING UNIT
To ensure the effective implementation of CPES, each government agency undertaking road, bridge, housing, building, port and harbor projects shall either create an independent unit or integrate the CPES functions in an existing unit with similar functions which shall act as the CPES Implementing Unit (IU). Ideally, the IU should be under the office of agency head but it could also be attached to the agency's audit or monitoring group. Its organization and functions are as follows:
8.1 Organization
The CPES (IU) shall be composed of the following:
a. Unit supervisor — shall act as the head of the unit;
b. Technical personnel — shall assist the head in the performance of the unit's technical functions; and
c. Administrative personnel — shall perform all the administrative and coordinative requirements of the unit.
8.2 Functions
The IU shall have technical and administrative/coordinative functions as follows:
a. Technical
a.1 Undertake agency's responsibility in the CPE accreditation processes which consist of: a) selection, coordination, endorsement and pre-screening of applications of CPE applicants; b) facilitate conduct of CPES required training and seminars; and c) undertake yearly performance evaluation of CPEs.
a.2. Orient in-house CPE members and resource persons/witnesses as enumerated in Section 9 hereof regarding CPES as well as provide the CPE with the necessary documents and references.
a.3 Review and prepare necessary CPES reports.
a.4 Act as member of the CPE as required.
b. Administrative/Coordinative
b.1 List all projects to be subjected to evaluation using CPES and identify/assign personnel to compose the CPE.
b.2 Schedule orientation-seminar on CPES for in-house CPE members and resource persons/witnesses.
b.3 Generate latest project status, schedule CPE site visits, coordinate visit with the agency's project engineer and constructor concerned, and file/safekeep all CPES related documents.
b.4 Provide the CPE with CPES documents implementing guidelines and forms, and prepare CPE travel documents as required.
b.5 Databanking and dissemination of CPES reports and documents to all concerned users within the agency, CIAP's Philippine Domestic Construction Board (PDCB),. and other interested users.
9. CONSTRUCTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATOR/S (CPE)
Each government agency shall have the option of tapping in-house staff, third party evaluators or combination of both either as group/team or individual to compose the CPE. For those agencies whose CPE will be composed of in-house evaluators only or combination of in-house and third party evaluators, such in-house evaluators could either be assigned on a permanent or ad-hoc basis. It is necessary that all CPE members are not in any way involved with the project to be evaluated in order for them to give an objective and unbiased evaluation of the constructor's performance. cCEAHT
9.1 Minimum Qualification of CPE Evaluators
All CPE evaluators shall be accredited by the CIAP based on the minimum qualifications as follows:
a. Licensed Engineer or Architect.
b. Must have at least 5 years experience in the actual implementation of project.
c. In full enjoyment of his/her civil rights, must not have been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude or of any other crime for which the penalty imposed upon him/her is over six (6) months of imprisonment.
d. Willing to undergo all screening requirements and accreditation course for CPES evaluators to be conducted by the CIAP's PDCB or any of its accredited training institutions.
Professionals who have substantially complied with the minimum requirements stated in items "a" to "c" above, and who by reason of trainings or experiences in construction, conducted lectures on CPES accreditation courses upon invitation by the CIAP's PDCB are automatically accredited as CPE evaluators.
9.2 Composition of CPE Evaluators
Based on the abovementioned options in the creation of CPEs, the composition for each shall be:
a. With Voting Power
|
Options
|
In-house CPE
|
Third Party CPE
|
Combination of
|
|
|
|
|
In-house and Third
|
|
|
|
|
Party CPE
|
| Group or | One (1) Engineering | Two (2) or more | One (1) Engineering or |
| Team | or Architectural staff | Private individuals not | Architectural staff |
| occupying supervisory | connected with the | occupying supervisory | |
| position accredited by | project to be evaluated | position accredited by | |
| the CIAP who shall act | accredited by CIAP. | the CIAP who shall act | |
| as the CPE leader. | as the CPE leader. | ||
| One (1) or more | One (1) or more | ||
| Engineering or | Private individuals not | ||
| Architectural staff | connected with the | ||
| accredited by the | project to be evaluated | ||
| CIAP. | accredited by CIAP. | ||
| Individual | One (1) Engineering | One (1) Private or | |
| Architectural staff | individual, not | ||
| occupying supervisory | connected with the | ||
| position accredited by | project to be evaluated | ||
| the CIAP. | accredited by CIAP. |
b. Without Voting Power
RESOURCE PERSONS/WITNESSES
one (1) or more — Owner's and Constructor's Project Engineer and/or Consultant assigned in the project to act as resource person(s).
one (1) — (Optional) Representative from any of the CIAP accredited constructors' associations nearest to the project site, knowledgeable in project implementation to act as witness
one (1) — (Optional) Representative from the Local Government Unit (LGU) where the project is located to act as witness.
one (1) — (Optional) Representative from the end-user (e.g. social, religious, or civic organization)
10. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED FOR EVALUATION
The CPE should have the following documents for its review and reference during actual evaluation which shall be supplied by the IU and the constructor's project engineer:
10.1 IU-Supplied Documents
a. Contract documents: approved contract agreement, contract drawing, general and special/local provisions including plans and specifications, method of construction, safety and health measures
b. Approved constructor's construction program: CPM work schedule or bar chart, materials/manpower schedule, equipment schedule, organizational chart, financial chart such as S-curve or cash flow
c. Constructor's statistical reports: physical progress/status, equipment and manpower schedules based on the latest approved PERT/CPM
d. Materials testing procedures, records of tests and results, materials quality control program
e. Constructor's operational set-up: general lay-out of facilities, project office and quarters, warehouse, shops for repair/maintenance carpentry/rebar
f. List of subcontractors or suppliers
g. Punchlist (for final visit upon completion)
h. Relevant checklists, CPES evaluation form and cover sheet
10.2 Constructor's Project Engineer-Supplied Documents
a. Project log book
b. Updated records of tests/results and materials quality control program monitoring reports
c. Other related reports
11. CPES EVALUATION FORMS
The CPES evaluation form and cover sheet to be used by the CPE is contained in Annex 11 and this shall be reproduced by the IU for distribution to all CPE(s) concerned prior to site visits. THAECc
11.1 Part I — Cover Sheet
Part 1 of the form is the cover sheet, which is to be filled up by the owner's' project engineer contains the following general information: name and address constructor; name and address of owner/authorized managing officer; valid license number; ARC category; nationality of constructor; project name, location; funding source; name of constructor's project manager and materials engineer; name of government construction manager; original and revised contract amount and duration; scheduled date of project start and actual date started; and scheduled date of project completion and actual date completed (number of days advance/delayed also indicated). Other necessary information pertaining to the project may also be included on this portion.
11.2 Parts II and III — Rating Sheets
The CPE shall use Parts II and III of the form during the "construction phase" first and second visits, respectively. In case the CPE intends to conduct more than two (2) visits during this phase, Part II of the form may be reproduced to correspond to the additional number of visits it shall make. Part III shall be used for the final visit.
For Parts II and III, the CPE shall list the items of work evaluated during the visit, their corresponding percentage weights and relative percentage weights, and their rates and relative rates for both workmanship and material aspects. As defined in Section 4 hereof, the percentage weight of a particular item of work subjected to evaluation shall be computed by dividing its total cost by the total contract amount while the relative percentage weight of said. item of work shall be computed by dividing its percentage weight by the sum of the percentage weight of all evaluated items of work. The relative rate for each item of work for both aspects, which shall be computed by multiplying the rate for each item of work with corresponding relative percentage weight, shall be added and later on reflected in the Summary of Ratings along with ratings for the other aspects covered.
For Part III, the CPE, after completing the Summary of Ratings shall compute the "During Construction" Weighted Rating (A). This can be computed by adding all of the Ratings obtained for each visit during construction phase, dividing the sum of Ratings by the number of visits made, and then multiplying the quotient by sixty (60%) for road and bridge, port and harbor, projects or seventy (70%) for housing and building projects.
11.3 Part IV — Rating and Summary Sheet
For Part IV, which will be used for the "upon completion" visit, the CPE shall list the items of work evaluated and their corresponding percentage weights and relative percentage weights, and their rates and relative rates for the workmanship aspect. After adding all of the relative rates, the sum along with the ratings for the time aspect shall be reflected in the Summary of Ratings. To determine the "upon completion" Weighted Rating (B), the CPE shall multiply the Total Rating by forty (40%) for road and bridge, port and harbor projects and thirty (30%) for housing and building projects. The Over-all Rating, on the other hand, shall be computed by adding the "during construction" Weighted Rating (A) and "upon completion" Weighted Rating (B) and multiply the sum by one hundred percent (100%).
However, in case there are on-going or completed additional works not yet covered by an approved variation order or request for time extension which is not yet approved during the visit, the CPE using a separate form shall fill up all relevant portions such as the Rate column for the workmanship and material aspects, time and resources deployment. The ratings therewith shall be used in updating the appropriate form, either Part II, III or IV, only upon approval of the variation order or time extension.
The CPE head and members, resource persons/and witnesses present during each visit shall always affix their signature in the spaces provided for in Parts II, III and IV.
11.4 CPES Checklist
The checklist for each criteria are made to aid the accredited CPEs in the objective evaluation of constructors' performance. These checklists are coded mainly for data banking purposes.
a. Checklist for Workmanship
For identification purposes, the. checklist for workmanship for Road, Bridge, Housing, Building, Port and Harbor are coded with letters RBWS, HBWS, and PHWS, respectively. The first two letters refer to type, e.g. RB stands for Road and Bridge, and WS refers to workmanship.
The checklist for Workmanship is contained in Annex 2 for Road and Bridge Projects, Annex 3 for Port and Harbor Projects and Annex 4 for Housing and Building Projects. The CPE shall select from the checklists those items of work which are applicable for evaluation/assessment. Criteria are set for each items of work but the CPE may add other criteria in the blank spaces provided for. All additional criteria shall be submitted to CIAP for coding purposes.
The following items of work in the CPES checklist for workmanship contain identified critical criteria (in bold and italicized text; e.g. Item 311-No cracks) for which noncompliance is deemed a major defect:
1. Item 310 — Bituminous Concrete Surface Course (Hot Laid)
2. Item 311 — Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP)
3. Item 508 — Concrete Works (Road & Bridge)
4. Item 902 — Concrete Works (Road & Bridge)
5. Item 303 — Concrete Works (Housing & Building)
6. Item 902 — Concrete Works (Ports & Harbor)
Spots with a single major defect shall forfeit all points for the rest of the criteria in the checklist. Further, if the number of complying spots for any one of the identified critical complying spots are less than
The CPE shall evaluate/assess the pre-determined spots based on the criteria set for each item of work and determine if there is non-compliance or full compliance. If criteria is not applicable, CPE should place NA (not applicable) at results box. ESIcaC
Determining Results, Score, Total Score and Rate.
a.1 Determine the number of non-compliance or full compliance per criteria.
a.2 Results = Compliance / Number of spots
a.3 Score = Results x 0.40
a.4 Total Score = Sum of all the scores
a.5 Rate of an Item of Work = Total Score (a) / No. of Criteria (b)
b. Checklist for Materials
The checklist for Materials is contained in Annex 5 and starts with MAT followed by the blank space which is for the corresponding number of the item of work being evaluated. There are five (5) criteria for this aspect and all criteria shall be rated. Compliance to each criteria means full score of one (1) and non-compliance means score of zero (0).
If constructor complies with criteria number 1 which is compliance to test requirements, then the remaining 4 criteria need to be evaluated. If the constructor does not comply with criteria number 1, however, the remaining 4 criteria shall also be evaluated for CAR/PAR purposes but the final rating is automatic zero (0).
Determining Results, Score, Total Score and Rate.
a.1 Results = If criteria is complied (C) = 1 and if not-complied (NC) = 0.
a.2 Score = Compliance = 1 x 0.30; Non-compliance = 0 x 0.00
a.3 Total Score = Sum of all the Score (a).
a.4 Determine number of criteria = 5 (b).
a.5 Rate = Total Score (a) / No. of Criteria, (b).
c. Checklist for Time
The checklist for Time is contained in Annex 6. Part one is for "During Construction" and Part Two is for "Upon Completion".
Determining Results, Score and Rate.
a.1 Place check in the results box for the corresponding percentage of delays or ahead in schedule.
a.2 Equivalent Score is set for each criteria.
a.3 Rate is equal to score. (Rate Score)
d. Checklist for Facilities
The checklist for Facilities is contained in Annex 7. The CPE should verify from the site if the criteria set for facilities are complied (C) or not complied (NC). Compliance means score of one (1) and non-compliance means score of zero (0). The CPE shall select only the criteria which are applicable.
Determining Results, Score, Total Score and Rate.
a.1 Results = If criteria is complied (C) = 1 or not-complied (NC) = 0.
a.2 Score = Compliance = 1 x 0.03; Non-compliance = 0 x 0.00.
a.3 Total Score = Sum of all the Scores (a).
a.4 Determine number of criteria = 5 (b).
a.5 Rate = Total Score (a) / No. of Criteria (b).
e. Checklist for Environmental, Safety and Health (ESH)
The checklist for ESH is contained in Annex 8. These were lifted from the Department Order (DO) No. 13, series of 1998 of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) entitled Guidelines Governing Occupational Safety and Health in the Construction Industry. The CPE should verify if each criteria set for this aspect is being. strictly implemented by the constructor. The CPE shall select only the criteria which are applicable.
Determining Results, Score, Total Score and Final Rating.
a.1 Results = If criteria is complied (C) = 1 and if not-complied (NC) = 0.
a.2 Score = Compliance = 1 x 0.07; Non-compliance = 0 x 0.00
a.3 Total Score = Sum of all the Score (a).
a.4 Determine number of criteria = 16 (b).
a.5 Rate = Total Score (a) / No. of Criteria (b).
f. Checklist for Resources Deployment
The checklist for Resources Deployment is contained in Annex 9. The CPE should check the actual deployment of resources (materials, manpower and equipment) and verify if the constructor complies or does not comply as per latest approved resources schedule. All criteria shall be rated. STcADa
Determining Results, Score, Total Score and Rate.
a.1 Results = If criteria is complied (C) = 1 or not compliance (NC) = 0.
a.2 Score = Compliance = 1 x 0.10 ; Non-compliance = 0 x 0.00
a.3 Total Score = Sum of all the Score (a).
a.4 Determine number of criteria = 3 (b).
a.5 Rate = Total Score (a) / No. of Criteria (b).
11.5 Corrective Action Request
The CPE shall issue CARs to the constructor for every non-conformance findings exceeding fifty percent (50%) of the total number of spots in every item of work evaluated on the project. The IO shall approve and monitor the implementation of the corrective action plan submitted by the constructor.
11.6 Constructors Performance Summary Report
The CPEs shall process and summarize all their findings on the project in the Constructor's Performance Summary Report (Annex 12) and submit it to IU. The IU shall review and finalize the report prior to submission to the CIAP and other departments within the agency for databanking and other purposes.
12. INFORMATION UTILIZATION AND DATA BANKING
The CPES rating and other information contained in the authenticated copies of Constructors Performance Summary Report (Annex 12) to be regularly provided by government agencies concerned to CIAP's PDCB and centrally maintained by the same shall be made available to all interested users either electronically or in hard copy/diskette for the following purposes:
12.1 Prequalification of Constructors — Supply the Prequalification, Bids and Award Committees (PBACs) with necessary information in the review of constructors' technical capabilities which is a requirement in IB 6.3 of the amended IRR of PD 1594.
12.2 Agency Shortlist — Provides agencies a basis for preparing/updating their shortlists for awarding of contract either by negotiated contract or simplified public bidding.
12.3 Awarding of Contracts — Provides agencies additional reference in reviewing or evaluating constructors' capability/performance in order to ensure appropriate awarding of contract.
12.4 Project Monitoring and Control — Provides agencies a good. reference for monitoring and control of the following aspects: a) contract provisions and specifications; b) problems encountered; c) compliance on safety and health regulations; and d) compliance on environmental regulations.
12.5 Issuance of Certificate of Completion and/or Final Acceptance of Project — Provides agencies additional basis for the review/evaluation of constructors' compliance on all Corrective Action Requests, (CAR) regarding defects.
12.6 Policy Formulation/Review — Provides agencies information for the evaluation of effectiveness and applicability of the IRR of PD 1594 in the aspects of prequalification, bidding, award and contract implementation.
12.7 Industry Planning — Provides agencies information on the level of performance of constructors undertaking government projects and problems encountered which can serve as additional reference for the preparation of plans and programs for the development of construction industry.
12.8 Granting of Credential/Incentives/Awards — Provides agencies a basis for the review of technical performance of constructors to ensure appropriate granting of recognition/incentives to good performers.
13. APPLICABILITY
These guidelines shall be applied to all constructors of all national government agencies and instrumentalities, including government owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs) undertaking road, bridge, housing, building, ports and harbor projects.
Project Management Offices (PMOs) of Local Government Units (LGUs) and private entities may also use these guidelines to evaluate their constructors project performance.
14. EFFECTIVITY
These guidelines shall become effective upon approval by the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) Board's Committee on Infrastructure (INFRACOM) and fifteen (15) days after publication by CIAP.
ANNEX 1
CPES FUNCTIONAL/DEPLOYMENT FLOWCHART
ANNEX 2
CHECKLIST FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE
| CPES Checklist for Workmanship | |
| Item 100 | Clearing and Grubbing |
| Item 101 | Removal of Structure |
| Item 102 | Excavation |
| Item 103 | Structure Excavation |
| Item 104 | Embankment |
| Item 105 | Subgrade Preparation |
| Item 106 | Compaction Equipment and Density Control Strips |
| Item 107 | Overhaul |
| Item 200 | Aggregate Subbase Course |
| Item 201 | Aggregate Base Course |
| Item 202 | Crushed Aggregate Base Course |
| Item 203 | Lime Stabilized Road Mix Base |
| Item 204 | Portland Cement Stabilized Road Mix Base |
| Item 205 | Asphalt Stabilized Road Base |
| Item 206 | Portland Cement Treated Plant Mix |
| Item 300 | Aggregate Surface Course |
| Item 301 | Bituminous Prime Coat |
| Item 302 | Bituminous Tack Coat |
| Item 303 | Bituminous Seal Coat |
| Item 304 | Bituminous Surface Treatment |
| Item 305 | Bituminous Penetration Macadam Pavement |
| Item 306 | Bituminous Road Mix Surface Course |
| Item 307 | Bituminous Plant Mix Surface Course — General |
| Item 308 | Bituminous Plant Mix Surface Course — Cold Laid |
| Item 309 | Bituminous Plant Mix (Stockpile Maintenance Mixture) |
| Item 310 | Bituminous Concrete Surface Course |
| Item 311 | Portland Cement Concrete Pavement |
| Item 400 | Piling (Timber, Steel) |
| Item 400 | Piling (Concrete) |
| Item 401 | Railing (Steel, Timber) |
| Item 401 | Railing (Masonry, Concrete) |
| Item 500 | Pipe Culvert and Storm Drain |
| Item 502 | Manhole Inlets and Catch Basins |
| Item 503 | Cleaning and Reconditioning of Existing Drainage Structures |
| Item 504 | Riprap and Grouted Riprap |
| Item 507 | Sheet Piles (Steel, Concrete) |
| Item 507 | Sheet Piles (Timber) |
| Item 508 | Concrete Slope Protection |
| Item 602 | Monuments, Markers and Guide Posts |
| Item 603 | Guardrail (Steel/Aluminum, Concrete, Timber) |
| Item 603 | Guardrail (Masonry) |
| Item 604 | Fencing |
| Item 605 | Road Signs |
| Item 606 | Pavement Markings |
| Item 607 | Reflective Pavement Studs |
| Item 608 | Topsoil |
| Item 609 | Springgings |
| Item 610 | Sodding |
| Item 611 | Tree Painting |
| Item 900 | Form Works |
| Item 901 | Reinforcing Steel Bars |
| Item 902 | Concrete Works |
DELAY FAULT OF: ____ Constructor ____ Project Owner ____ Others
CAUSES OF DELAY (Please indicate codes as listed below): ____________
Constructor-related Problems
C-W01 Insufficient manpower deployed in project site
C-E01 Breakdown of equipment/equipment not operational
C-E02 Lack/Insufficient/Inadequate equipment deployed in project site
C-M01 Lack/Inadequate/Insufficient supply of construction materials
C-R01 Lack of financial resources aCSEcA
Agency-related Problems
A-V01 Delays in the approval of variation orders
A-T01 Delays in the approval of contract time extension
A-S01 Delays in the approval of suspension order
A-D01 Changes in construction designs
A-F01 Delays in the releases of funds
A-R01 Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition problem (squatter relocation problems, relocation of utilities, i.e. PLDT, MERALCO posts and other similar cases)
A-P01 Delays in acquisition of necessary permits
Other-related Problems
O-W01 Unfavorable weather condition (occurrence of natural calamities; occurrence of flooding/siltation on site; unworkable ground condition)
O-P01 Insurgence or peace and order problems/civil disturbances
O-T01 Third party intervention
O-C01 Additional Commission on Audit (COA) requirements
Note: In rating time, only delay that are attributable to the constructor should be reflected in the rating
ANNEX 7
CHECKLIST FOR FACILITIES
ANNEX 8
CHECKLIST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY AND HEALTH
ANNEX 9
CHECKLIST FOR RESOURCES DEPLOYMENT
ANNEX 10
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST (CAR) FORM
ANNEX 11
CPES EVALUATION FORM
Part I - General Information Sheet
Part II - During Construction Rating Sheet
Part III - During Construction Rating Sheet
Part IV - Upon Completion Rating Sheet
ANNEX 12
CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY REPORT
General Information Sheet
Non-Compliance Findings
List of Problems Encountered and
Proposed Corrective Action
Note: This summary report shall be submitted by the CPES IU to CIAP based on the evaluation results
CONSTRUCTORS PERFORMANCE SUMMARY REPORT
| Project Owner | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Project Implementing Office | : ____________________________________ | ||
| General Information | |||
| Name of Constructor/s | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Share of each Firm (if JV) | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Name of AMO | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Address | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Valid License Number | : ____________________________________ | ||
| PCAB/ARC Category | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Contractors Association | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Nationality (Local/Foreign) | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Project Data | |||
| Date of Evaluation | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Project Type | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Project Name | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Project Location | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Funding Source | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Scope of Work | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Status | : ____________________________________ | ||
| Name of Constructor/Gov't Proj Manager | : __________________________ | ||
| Name of Constructor/Gov't Proj Engineer | : __________________________ | ||
| Name of Constructor/Gov't Mat'ls Engineer | : __________________________ | ||
| Name of Constructor Cost Engineer | : __________________________ | ||
| Consultant/Consulting Firm | : __________________________ | ||
| Contract Cost, Original | : P________ | Revised : ______ | as of ________ |
| Contract Duration, Original | : _________ | Revised : ______ | as of ________ |
| Scheduled Start Date | : _________ | Revised : ______ | as of ________ |
| Actual Date Started | : _________ | ||
| Scheduled Completion Date | : _________ | Revised : ______ as of __________ | |
| % Planned Physical Accomplishment for the Month | : ____________ | ||
| Actual Physical Accomplishment for the Month | : ____________ | ||
| Slippage for the Month | : ____________ | ||
| Variation Order (Php, M) | : ____________ | ||
| Time Extension (C. D.) | : ____________ | ||
| Summary of Ratings | |||
| No. of Visit | : ____________ | ||
| Workmanship | (0.40/0.50) | : ____________ | |
| Materials | (0.30/0.20) | : ____________ | |
| Time | (0.10/0.30) | : ____________ | |
| Facilities | (0.03) | : ____________ | |
| Environment, Safety & Health | (0.07) | : ____________ | |
| Resources Deployment | (0.10) | : ____________ | |
| VISIT RATING | ____________ | ||
| FINAL RATING | : | _____________ | |
| QUALITATIVE DESCRIPTION | : | _____________ |
D. Narrative Reports
— Please highlight major positive and negative performances of constructor in summary form.
— Non-compliance of Corrective Action Request (CAR) of (no. Visit)
— Others/Remarks:
CPES EVALUATORS:
|
Name
|
Signature
|
|
| Team Leader |
_______________________
|
_______________________
|
| Members |
_______________________
|
_______________________
|
|
_______________________
|
_______________________
|
Noted by:
_____________________
Head, CPES-IU
ANNEX 13
SCHEDULE OF MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING ITEMS OF WORK OF THE DPWH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES AND AIRPORTS
(Applicable for Irrigation and Flood Control Projects)
| Part C | Earthworks (Items 102, 103, 104, 105, 106) |
| Part D | Sub-base and Base Course (Items 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207) |
| Part E | Surface Course (Items 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, |
| 309, 310) | |
| Part F | Bridge Construction (Items 311, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, |
| 40.7, 408, 409, 410, 411) | |
| Part G | Drainage and Slope Protection (Items 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505, |
| 506, 507, 508, 509) | |
| Part H | Miscellaneous Structure (Item 600, 601, 602, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608, |
| 609, 610, 611) | |
| Part I | Materials Details (Items 700, 701, 702, 703, 703A, 704, 705, 706, 707, |
| 708, 709, 710, 711, 712, 713, 714) |
SCHEDULE OF MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING ITEMS OF WORK OF THE DPWH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES AND AIRPORTS, 1998, (VOLUME II)
|
PART C - EARTHWORK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEMS OF WORK
|
MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS
|
||||
| Item 100 - Clearing & Grubbing | None | ||||
| Item 101 - Removal of Structures & | None | ||||
| Obstruction | |||||
| Item 102 - Excavation | Same tests as for Items 103, 104 and 105, | ||||
| whichever is applicable. | |||||
| Item 103 - Structure Excavation | |||||
| If excavated materials are wasted, | If excavated materials are incorporated into the work: | ||||
| the volume involved shall be | For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | ||||
| reported so that Quality | 1-G, Grading Test | ||||
| Control requirements may be | 1-P, Plasticity Test (LL, PL, PI) | ||||
| adjusted accordingly. | 1-C, Laboratory Compaction Test | ||||
| Submit Project Engineer | For every 150 mm layer in uncompacted depth: | ||||
| Certificate of Waste | 1-D, Field Density HSCcTD | ||||
| Item 1.04 - Embankment | For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | ||||
| 1-G, Grading Test | |||||
| 1-P, Plasticity Test (LL, PL, PI) | |||||
| 1-C, Laboratory Compaction Test | |||||
| For each 500 sq. m. of each layer of compacted fill | |||||
| or fraction thereof at least one group of three in-situ | |||||
| density tests. The layers shall be placed not | |||||
| exceeding 200 mm in loose measurement or based | |||||
| on the result. of compaction trials. | |||||
| Item 105 - Sub-grade Preparation | Same tests as for Item 104 | ||||
| Item 106 - Compaction Equipment and | Same tests as for Items 104, 105, 200, 201, 202, | ||||
| Density Control Strips | 203, 204, 205, 206 and 300. | ||||
| Item 107 - Overhaul | None | ||||
| PART D - SUBBASE AND BASE COURSE | |||||
| ITEMS OF WORK | MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS | ||||
| Item 200 - Aggregate Subbase Course | For every 300 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | ||||
| 1-G, Grading Test | |||||
| 1-P, Plasticity Test (LL, PL, PI) | |||||
| For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-C, Laboratory Compaction Test | |||||
| For every 2500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-CBR, California Bearing Ratio Test | |||||
| For every layer of 150 mm of compacted depth/ | |||||
| based on the results of compaction trials: | |||||
| At least one group of three in-situ density tests | |||||
| for each 500 sq.m. or fraction thereof. | |||||
| Item 201 - Aggregate Base Course | For every 300 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | ||||
| 1-G, Grading Test | |||||
| 1-P, Plasticity Test (LL, PL, PI) | |||||
| For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for : (Grading, Plasticity and | |||||
| Abrasion) | |||||
| 1-C, Laboratory Compaction Test | |||||
| For every layer of 150 mm of compacted depth/ | |||||
| based on the results of compaction trials: | |||||
| At least one. group of three in-situ density tests | |||||
| for each 500 sq.m. or fraction thereof. | |||||
| Item 202 - Crush Aggregate Base Course | Same tests as for Item 201 | ||||
| For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-F, Fractured Face | |||||
| Item 203 - Lime Stabilized Road | A. | Soil Aggregate | |||
| Mix Base Course Amount of Lime | For every 300 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | ||||
| to be added: | 1-G, Grading Test | ||||
| 3 to 12 mass percent of dry | 1-P, Plasticity Test (LL, PL, PI) | ||||
| aggregate | For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for : (Grading, Plasticity and | |||||
| Abrasion) | |||||
| B. | Mix | ||||
| For every 300 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-C, Laboratory Compaction Test | |||||
| 1-UC, Unconfined Compression Test | |||||
| 1-CBR, California Bearing Ratio Test | |||||
| C. | Compacted Base Course | ||||
| For every layer of 150 mm of compacted depth: | |||||
| 1-D, Field Density Test for every 150m or | |||||
| fraction thereof | |||||
| D. | Hydrated Lime | ||||
| For every 100 t or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test | |||||
| Item 204 - Portland Cement Stabilized Road | A. | Soil Aggregate | |||
| Mix Base Course | Same tests as for Item 203 | ||||
| Amount of Cement to be added: 6 | B. | Cement | |||
| to 10 mass % of dry soil | 1-Q Quality Test for every 2000 bags of fraction | ||||
| aggregate | thereof | ||||
| C. | Water | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test/Project Engineer's Certificate | |||||
| D. | Mix | ||||
| For every 300 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-C, Laboratory Compaction Test | |||||
| 1-UC, Unconfined Compression Test | |||||
| 1-CBR, California Bearing Ratio Test | |||||
| E. | Compacted Base Course | ||||
| For every layer of 150 mm compacted depth | |||||
| 1-D, Field density Test for every I 50m or | |||||
| fraction thereof | |||||
| 1-T, thickness determination for every 150 m or | |||||
| fraction thereof | |||||
| Item 205 - Asphalt Stabilized Road Mix Base | A. | Soil Aggregate | |||
| Course | Same tests as for Item 203 | ||||
| Amount of Asphalt to be added: 6 | B. | Emulsified Asphalt | |||
| to 10 mass % of dry soil | 1-Q, Quality Test for every 40 to 200 drums or | ||||
| aggregate. | fraction thereof | ||||
| C. | Mix | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 203 | |||||
| D. | Compacted Base Course | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 203 | |||||
| Item 206 - Portland Cement Treated Plant Mix | A. | Soil Aggregate | |||
| Base course | Same tests as for Item 203 | ||||
| Amount of Asphalt to be added: 6 | B. | Portland Cement | |||
| to 10 mass % of dry soil aggregate | For every 2000 bags of fraction thereof: | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test | |||||
| C. | Water | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test/Proj. Engr's Certificate | |||||
| D. | Same tests as for Item 204 | ||||
| E. | Compacted Base Course | ||||
| For every layer of 150 mm compacted depth | |||||
| 1-D, Field Density Test for every 150 m or | |||||
| fraction thereof | |||||
| 1-T, Thickness determination for every 150m | |||||
| or fraction thereof | |||||
| Item 207 - Aggregate Stockpile | Same tests as specified in Item No. of the Specs. | ||||
| PART E - SURFACE COURSE | |||||
| ITEMS OF WORK | MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS | ||||
| Item 300 - Aggregate Surface Course | For every 300 cu. m. or fraction thereof: | ||||
| 1-G, Grading Test | |||||
| 1-P, Plasticity Test (PI, LL, PI) | |||||
| For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-C, compaction Test for: (Grading, plasticity | |||||
| and Abrasion) | |||||
| For every layer of 150 mm of compacted | |||||
| depth/based on the results of compaction trials. | |||||
| At least on group of three in-situ density tests | |||||
| for each 500 sq. m. or fraction thereof. | |||||
| for crushed Gravel or Crushed Stone, 1500 | |||||
| cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-F, Fractured face | |||||
| Item 301 - Bituminous Prime Coat | Quantity: 1 to 2 L/sq.m. | ||||
| 1-Q, quality Test for every 40 t or 200 drums | |||||
| Item 302 - Bituminous Tack Coat | Quantity: 0.2 to 0.7 L/sq.m. | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality test for every 40 t or 200 drums | |||||
| Item 303 - Bituminous Seal Coat | A. | Bituminous Materials | |||
| Quantity: 0.2 to 1.5 L/sq.m. | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for every 40t or 200 drums | |||||
| B. | Cover Aggregates | ||||
| Quantity: From 5 to 14 kg/sq. m. | |||||
| For every 75 cu.m./200 kg. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-G, grading Test | |||||
| Item 3.04 - Bituminous Surface Treatment | A. | Aggregates | |||
| Quantity: | |||||
| Using Cut-Back Asphalt or Asphalt Cement - | |||||
| 13.6 to 38.0 kg/sq.m. | |||||
| Using Emulsified Asphalt - 13.6 to 19.04 | |||||
| Kg/sq.m. | |||||
| For every 75 cu.m./200 kg. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-G, grading Test | |||||
| 1-P, Plasticity Test (PL, LL, PI) | |||||
| For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for: (Grading, Plasticity, | |||||
| Abrasion, Stripping and Bulk specific Gravity) | |||||
| 1-F, Fractured Face | |||||
| B. | Bituminous Materials | ||||
| Quantity: | |||||
| Using Cut-back Asphalt or Asphalt Cement - | |||||
| 1.58 to 2.04 L/sq.m. | |||||
| Using Emulsified asphalt - 1.58 to | |||||
| 2.04 L/sq.m. Same test as for Item 301 | |||||
| Item 305 - Bituminous Penetration Macadam | A. | Aggregates | |||
| Pavement | Quantity: | ||||
| 1. | Using asphalt Cement or Rapid Curing | ||||
| Course (Crushed) -------- 90 Kg/sq.m. | |||||
| Key (Crushed) --- (13 & 11) ---- 24 kg/sq.m. | |||||
| Cover Crushed & Screened) ----- 8 kg/sq.m. | |||||
| 2. | Using Emulsified Asphalt | ||||
| Course (Crushed) ---- 90 kg/sq.m. | |||||
| Choker (Crushed) ---- 10 kg/sq.m. | |||||
| Key (Crushed) ----- 18 kg/sq.m. | |||||
| Cover (Crushed or Screened) ---- 8 kg/sq.m. | |||||
| Same test as for Item 304 | |||||
| B. | Bituminous Materials | ||||
| Quantity: 7.2 to 11 L/sq.m. | |||||
| Same tests as for Item 301 | |||||
| Item 306 - Bituminous Road Mix Surface | A. | Aggregates | |||
| Course | Same tests as for Item 304 | ||||
| B. | Bituminous Materials | ||||
| Quantity: | |||||
| 1. | Using Cut-Back Asphalt - 4.5 to 7.0 mass % | ||||
| of total dry aggregate | |||||
| 2. | Using Emulsified Asphalt - 6.0 to 10.0 mass | ||||
| % of total dry aggregate Same test as for | |||||
| Item 301 | |||||
| C. | Mix | ||||
| Tests: For every 75 cu.m./130 t or fraction | |||||
| thereof: | |||||
| 1-G, grading | |||||
| Test 1-Ext., Extraction | |||||
| 1-Sty., Stability | |||||
| 1-C, Laboratory Compaction | |||||
| D. | Hydrated Lime | ||||
| For every 100 t or fraction thereof: | |||||
| Tests: 1-Q, quality Test | |||||
| E. | Compacted Pavement | ||||
| For each full day's operation: | |||||
| Tests: D & T ( Density and Thickness Test) - at | |||||
| least one (1) but not more than (3) samples shall | |||||
| be taken. | |||||
| Item 307 - Bituminous Plant-Mix Surface | A. | Aggregates | |||
| Course General | For every 75 cu.m. 1200 t or fraction thereof: | ||||
| 1-G & P, Grading and Plasticity Tests for every | |||||
| 1500 cu.m. of fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-Q, quality Test for: (Grading, Plasticity, | |||||
| Abrasion, Stripping and Bulk Specific Gravity) | |||||
| 1-F, Fractured Face | |||||
| B. | Bituminous Materials | ||||
| Quantity: 5.0 to 8.0 mass % of total dry | |||||
| aggregate | |||||
| Tests: 1-Q, Quality Test for each 40 t of fraction | |||||
| thereof | |||||
| C. | Mix | ||||
| For every 75 cu.m. /130 t of fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-G, Grading Test | |||||
| 1-Ext., Extraction | |||||
| 1-Sty., Stability | |||||
| 1-C, Laboratory Compaction | |||||
| D. | Hydrated Lime | ||||
| For every 100 t or fraction thereof | |||||
| E. | Mineral filler | ||||
| For every 75 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-G & P, grading and Plasticity Tests (LL, PL, PI) | |||||
| For each full day's operation: | |||||
| D & T (Density and Thickness Tests) - at least | |||||
| one (1) but not more than three (3) samples shall | |||||
| be taken. | |||||
| Item 308 - Bituminous Plant Mix, Surface | A. | Aggregate | |||
| Course, Cold laid | Same tests as for Item 307 | ||||
| B. | Bituminous Material | ||||
| Quantity: | |||||
| Using Cut-Back Asphalt - 4.5 to 7.0 mass % of | |||||
| total dry aggregate | |||||
| Using Emulsified Asphalt - 6.0 to 10.0 mass % | |||||
| of total dry aggregate | |||||
| Tests: 1-Q, Quality Test for every 40t or 200 | |||||
| drums | |||||
| C. | Mix | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 D. Hydrated Lime | |||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| E. | Mineral Filler | ||||
| For every 75 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-G & P; Grading and Plasticity Tests (LL, PL, PI) | |||||
| F. | Compacted Pavement | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| Item 309 - Bituminous Plant Mix (Stockpile | A. | Aggregate | |||
| Maintenance Mixture) | Same tests as for Item 307 | ||||
| B. | Bituminous Materials | ||||
| Quantity: 4 to 10 Mass % of total mix | |||||
| Tsts: 1-Q, Quality Test for every 40t or 200 | |||||
| drums | |||||
| C. | Mix | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| D. | Hydrated Lime | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| E. | Mineral Filler | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| F. | Compacted Pavement | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| Item 310 - Bituminous Concrete Surface | A. | Aggregate | |||
| Course, Hot-Laid | Same tests as for Item 307 | ||||
| B. | Bituminous Materials | ||||
| Quantity: 5 to 8 Mass % of total dry aggregates | |||||
| C. | Mix | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| D. | Hydrated Lime | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| E. | Mineral Filler | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| F. | Compacted Pavement | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 307 | |||||
| Item 311 | Portland Cement | A. | Cement | ||
| Concrete Pavement | Quality: 9.00 bags cu.m. (40Kg/bag) | ||||
| Tests: For every 2000 bags or fraction thereof 1-Q, | |||||
| Quality Test | |||||
| B. | Fine Aggregate | ||||
| Quantity: 1 0.05 cu.m./cu.m. concrete (if | |||||
| rounded coarse aggregate is used) | |||||
| 2. 0.54 cu.m./cu.m. concrete (if angular coarse | |||||
| aggregate is used) | |||||
| Tests: For every 1500 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| a. For a source not yet tested, or failed in | |||||
| previous quality test: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test For: Grading, Elutriation | |||||
| (Wash), Bulk Specific Gravity, Absorption | |||||
| Mortar Strength, Soundness, Organic Impurities, | |||||
| unit Weight, % Clay Lumps and Shale. | |||||
| b. For a source previously tested and passed | |||||
| quality test: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for: Grading, Elutriation | |||||
| (Wash), Bulk Specific Gravity, Absorption | |||||
| Mortar Strength. | |||||
| For every 75 cu.m. or fraction thereof 1-G, Grading | |||||
| Test | |||||
| C. | Course Aggregate | ||||
| Quantity: | |||||
| 1. | 0.77 cu.m/cu.m concrete (if rounded coarse | ||||
| aggregate is used) | |||||
| 2. | 0.68 cu.m/cu.m concrete (if angular coarse | ||||
| aggregate is used) | |||||
| Tests: For every 1500 cu.m or fraction | |||||
| Thereof | |||||
| a. | For a source previously tested and passed quality | ||||
| tests: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for: Grading, Bulk | |||||
| Specific Gravity, Absorption and Abrasion | |||||
| For every 75 cu. m or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-G Grading Test | |||||
| D. | Water | ||||
| Tests: 1-Certificate from Project Engineer or 1-Q, | |||||
| Quality Test, if source is questionable | |||||
| E. | Joint Filler | ||||
| 1. | Poured Joint Filler | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test on each type of ingredient for | |||||
| each shipment | |||||
| 2. | Premolded Joint Filler | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test on each thickness of filler for | |||||
| each shipment | |||||
| F. | Special Curing Agents | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for each shipment | |||||
| G. | Steel Bars | ||||
| For every 10,000 kg. or fraction thereof for each | |||||
| size | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for Bending, Tension and | |||||
| Chemical Analysis | |||||
| H. | Concrete | ||||
| Flexural Strength Test on Concrete Beam | |||||
| Sample | |||||
| 1-set consisting of 3 beam samples shall | |||||
| represent a 330 sq. m of pavement, 230 mm | |||||
| depth or fraction thereof placed each day. | |||||
| Volume of concrete not more than 75 cu.m. | |||||
| I. | Completed Pavement | ||||
| Thickness determination by concrete core | |||||
| drilling on a lot basis | |||||
| Five (5) holes per km per lane or five (5) holes | |||||
| per 500 m when 2 lanes are soured concurrently. | |||||
| PART F - BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION | |||||
| ITEMS OF WORK | MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS | ||||
| Item 4.00 - Piling | A. | Timber Piles | |||
| 1-Inspection Report for each size and shipment | |||||
| of timber | |||||
| B. | Concrete Piles | ||||
| a. | Concrete | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 405 | |||||
| b. | Reinforcing Steel | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 404 | |||||
| C. | Structural Piles | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test/Mill Test Certificate | |||||
| 1-IR, Inspection Report | |||||
| Item 401 - Railings | A. | Concrete | |||
| Same tests as for Item 405, Class C | |||||
| B. | Reinforcing Steel | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 404 | |||||
| Item 402 - Timber Structures | 1-Q, Quality Test on Manufacturer's Certificate | ||||
| for each type of materials used | |||||
| 1-Inspection Report for each type and shipment of | |||||
| timber | |||||
| Item 403 - Metal Structures | 1-Q, Quality Test or Mill Test Certificate for each | ||||
| type of materials used | |||||
| 1-Inspection Report for each type and shipment of | |||||
| metal used | |||||
| Item 404 - Reinforcing Steel | A. | Bar reinforcement for concrete for every 10,000 | |||
| kg or fraction thereof for each size: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for bending, Tension and | |||||
| Chemical Analysis | |||||
| B. | Wire and Wire Mesh | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test | |||||
| Item 405 - Structural Concrete | A. | Cement | |||
| Quantity: (40 kg/bag) | |||||
| Class A | 9.0 bags/cu.m. of concrete | ||||
| Class B | 8.0 bags/cu.m. of concrete | ||||
| Class C | 9.5 bags/cu.m. of concrete | ||||
| Class P | 11.0 bags/cu.m. of concrete | ||||
| Tests: For every 2000 bags or fraction thereof | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test | |||||
| B. | Fine Aggregate | ||||
| Quantity: cu.m./cu.m. of concrete | |||||
| For Rounded | For Angular | ||||
| Class A | 0.50 | 0.54 | |||
| Class B | 0.45 | 0.52 | |||
| Class C | 0.53 | 0.59 | |||
| Class P | 0.44 | 0.47 | |||
| Tests: For every 1500 cu.m or fraction thereof | |||||
| a. | For a source not yet tested or failed in | ||||
| previous quality test | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for: Grading, Elutriation | |||||
| (Wash), Bulk Specific Gravity, Absorption, | |||||
| Mortar Strength, Soundness, Organic Impurities, | |||||
| Unit Weight, % Clay Lumps and Shale | |||||
| b. | For a source previously tested and passed | ||||
| quality test: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for: Grading, Elutriation | |||||
| (Wash), Bulk Specific Gravity, Absorption, and | |||||
| Mortar Strength | |||||
| For every 75 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-G, Grading Test | |||||
| C. | Coarse Aggregates | ||||
| Quantity: cu.m./cu.m. of concrete | |||||
| For Rounded | For Angular | ||||
| Class A | 0.77 | 0.68 | |||
| Class B | 0.82 | 0.73 | |||
| Class C | 0.70 | 0.68 | |||
| Class P | 0.68 | 0.65 | |||
| Tests: For every 1500 cu.m or fraction thereof | |||||
| a. | For a source not yet tested or failed in | ||||
| previous quality tests: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for: Grading, Bulk | |||||
| Specific Gravity, Absorption, Abrasion, | |||||
| Soundness and Unit Weight | |||||
| b. | For a source previously tested and passed | ||||
| quality test: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for Grading, Absorption, | |||||
| Bulk Specific Gravity and Abrasion | |||||
| For every 75 cu.m. or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-G, Grading Test | |||||
| D. | Water | ||||
| 1-Certificate from Project Engineer | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test, if source is questionable | |||||
| E. | Premolded Filler for expansion joints | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test on each thickness of filler for | |||||
| each shipment | |||||
| F. | Steel Reinforcement | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for every 10,000 kg or fraction | |||||
| thereof for each size | |||||
| G. | Concrete | ||||
| Compressive strength test on concrete cylinder | |||||
| samples. 1 set consisting of 3 concrete cylinder | |||||
| samples shall be taken from each day's pouring | |||||
| and to represent not more than 75 cu.m of | |||||
| concrete or fraction thereof. | |||||
| Item 406 - Prestressed Concrete Structures | A. | Concrete | |||
| Same tests as for Item 405, Class P | |||||
| B. | Steel Reinforcement | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 404 | |||||
| C. | Wire Strand | ||||
| 1-Q, for every 20 t or fraction thereof | |||||
| Item 407 - Concrete Structures | Same tests as for Items 403, 404, 405 and 411. | ||||
| Elastomeric Bearing Pad will be tested to determine | |||||
| its quality | |||||
| Item 408 - Steel Bridges | Same tests as for Items 403 and 411 | ||||
| Painting: 1-Q, One 20-L can for every 100 cans or | |||||
| fraction thereof or | |||||
| 1-Q, One 4-L can for every 100 cans or fraction | |||||
| thereof | |||||
| Item 409 - Welded Structural Steel | Same tests as for Item 403 and Inspection Report | ||||
| Item 410 - Treated or Untreated Timber | Inspection Report for Timber | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test for preservatives | |||||
| Item 411 - Paint | 1-Q, One 20-L can for every 100 cans or fraction | ||||
| thereof or | |||||
| 1-Q, one 4-L can for every 100 cans or fraction | |||||
| thereof | |||||
| PART G - DRAINAGE AND SLOPE PROTECTION | |||||
| ITEMS OF WORK | MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS | ||||
| Item 500 - Pipe Culverts and Storm Drains | A. | Pipes | |||
| Pipe for every 50 pieces: Strength, Absorption | |||||
| and Dimension | |||||
| Alternative Requirements: | |||||
| 1-set consisting of 3 concrete cylinder samples | |||||
| for not more than 25 pipes cast in the field, and | |||||
| 1-Inspection Report for each size for not more | |||||
| than 25 pipes cast in the field | |||||
| B. | Mortar for Joint | ||||
| Cement, Fine Aggregates and Water - Same tests | |||||
| as for Item 405 | |||||
| Item 501 - Underdrains | A. | Concrete Pipe (Non-Reinforced) | |||
| 0.5% of the number of pipes of each size but not | |||||
| less than 2, for strength, absorption and | |||||
| dimension Alternative Requirements: 1-set | |||||
| consisting of 3 concrete cylinder samples for not | |||||
| more than 25 pipes cast in the field, and | |||||
| 1-Inspection Report for each size for not more | |||||
| than 25 pipes cast in the field. | |||||
| B. | Clay Pipe | ||||
| 1-Pipe for every 200 pieces each size, with a | |||||
| minimum of 2 specimens for strength, absorption | |||||
| and dimension. | |||||
| Item 502 - Manholes, inlets and Catch | A. | Concrete | |||
| Basins | Same tests as for Item 405, Class A | ||||
| B. | Lids, Cast Iron Frames and Grating | ||||
| Inspection Report | |||||
| Item 503 - Cleaning and Reconditioning | Inspection Report | ||||
| Existing Drainage Structures | |||||
| Item 504 - Riprap and Grouted Riprap | Same tests as for Item 505 | ||||
| Item 505 - Stone Masonry | A. | Cement | |||
| Quantity: 2 bags/cu.m. of concrete | |||||
| Tests: For every 2,000 bags or fraction thereof: | |||||
| 1-Q, Quality Tests | |||||
| B. | Fine Aggregate | ||||
| Quantity: 0.17 cu.m./cu.m. of concrete | |||||
| Tests: for every 2,000 bags or fraction thereof | |||||
| 1-Q, quality Test for: (Same as for Item 405) | |||||
| For every 75 cu.m. or fraction thereof: DIESHT | |||||
| C. | Stone | ||||
| Inspection Report | |||||
| D. | Water | ||||
| 1-Certificate from Project engineer or | |||||
| 1-Q, quality Test, if source is questionable | |||||
| Item 506 - Hand-Laid Embankment | Inspection Report | ||||
| Item 507 - Sheet Piles | A. | Timber Sheet Piles | |||
| Inspection Report | |||||
| B. | Concrete Sheet Piles | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 400 | |||||
| C. | Steel Sheet Piles | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 403 | |||||
| Item 508 - Concrete Slope Protection | A. | Bed Course | |||
| Same tests as for Item 200 | |||||
| B. | Steel Reinforcement | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 404 | |||||
| C. | Concrete | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 405 | |||||
| Item 509 - Gabions | 1-Q, Quality Test for each shipment | ||||
| PART H - MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE | |||||
| ITEMS OF WORK | MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS | ||||
| Item 600 - Curb and/or Gutter | A. | Concrete | |||
| Quantity: 0.078 cu.m./m (Curb only) | |||||
| 0.092 cu.m./m (Curb and Gutter, type A) | |||||
| 0.149 cu.m./m (Curb and Gutter Type B) | |||||
| 0.074 cu.m./m (Curb and Gutter Type C) | |||||
| Same tests as for Item 405 | |||||
| B. | Joint Filler | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 311 | |||||
| Item 601 - Sidewalk | A. | Concrete | |||
| Same tests as for Item 405, Class A | |||||
| B. | Premolded Expansion Joint Filler | ||||
| Same tests as item 311 | |||||
| Item 602 - Monuments, Markers and Guide | A. | Concrete | |||
| Posts | Same as for Item 405 | ||||
| B. | Reinforcing Steel | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 404 | |||||
| C. | Timber | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 410 | |||||
| D. | Paint | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 411 | |||||
| F. | Paint | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 411 | |||||
| Item 604 - Fencing | A. | Barbed Wire, Chain Link Fabric | |||
| 1-Q, quality Test | |||||
| B. | Concrete Post | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 405 | |||||
| Steel Reinforcement: Same test as for Item 404 | |||||
| Item 605 - Road Sign | Inspection Report | ||||
| Item 606 - Pavement Markings | Same tests as for Item 411 | ||||
| Item 607 - Reflective Pavement Studs. | Inspection Report | ||||
| Item 608 - Topsoil | Inspection Report | ||||
| Item 609 - Sprigging | Inspection Report | ||||
| Item 610 - Sodding | Inspection Report | ||||
| Item 611 - Tree Planting | Inspection Resort | ||||
| PART I - MATERIALS DETAILS | |||||
| ITEMS OF WORK | MINIMUM TEST REQUIREMENTS | ||||
| Item 700 - Hydraulic Cement | Same tests as for Item 405 | ||||
| Item 701 - Construction Lime | 1-Q, Quality test for every 100 t or fraction thereof | ||||
| (Hydrated) | |||||
| Item 702 - Bituminous Materials | Same tests as for Items 301, 302, 303, 306, 307, | ||||
| 308, 309 and 310 | |||||
| Item 703 - Aggregates | Same tests as for Item of Work specified in the | ||||
| Bill of Quantities | |||||
| Item 703A - Mineral filler | Same tests as for Item 307 | ||||
| Item 704 - Masonry Units | 1-Q, Quality Test for every 10,000 units or | ||||
| fraction thereof | |||||
| Item 705 - Joint Materials | Same tests as for Item 311 and 500 | ||||
| Item 706 - Concrete, Clay, Plastic and Fiber | A. | Concrete Pipes | |||
| Pipes | Same tests as for Item 500 | ||||
| B. | Clay and other types of pipes | ||||
| Refer to the applicable requirements of | |||||
| AASHTO | |||||
| Test and Specification | |||||
| Item 707 - Metal Pipe | Same tests as for Item 400 | ||||
| Item 708 - Concrete Curing Materials & | 1-Q, Quality Test for each shipment | ||||
| Admixtures | |||||
| Item 709 - Paints | Same tests as for Item 411 | ||||
| Item 710 - Reinforcing Steel and Wire, Rope | A. | Reinforcing Steel | |||
| Same tests as for Item 404 | |||||
| B. | Wire Rope | ||||
| Same tests as for item 406 | |||||
| Item 711 - Fence and Guardrail | A. | Fence | |||
| Same tests as for Item 604 | |||||
| B. | Guardrail | ||||
| Same tests as for Item 603 | |||||
| Item 712 - Structural Metal | Same tests as for Items 403 and 409 | ||||
| Item 713 - Treated and Untreated Timber | Same tests as for Item 410 | ||||
| Item 714 - Water | 1-Certificate from Project Engineer or | ||||
| 1-Q, Quality Test, if source is questionable |
ANNEX 14
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL STANDARDS (CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) FOR MANDATORY IMPLEMENTATION
LIST OF PHILIPPINE NATIONAL STANDARDS (CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) FOR MANDATORY IMPLEMENTATION
|
|
|
BPS
|
|
CLASSIFICATION/NAME OF MATERIALS
|
DESIGNATION NO.
|
|
| Cement and Lime | ||
| Portland cement — Specification |
PNS 7:2000
|
|
| Pozzolan cement — Specification |
PNS 63:1989
|
|
| Ceramic and Ceramic Products |
|
|
| Sanitary wares — Specification |
PNS 156:1992
|
|
| Electric Wires and Cables |
|
|
| Unplasticized polyvinyl chloride (uPVC) electrical conduit — Specification |
PNS 14:1983
|
|
| Thermoplastic Electric Wires and Cables |
PNS 35:1990
|
|
| Electrical products- Polyvinyl chloride insulated flexible cords — Specification |
PNS 163:1994
|
|
| Lamps and Related Equipment |
|
|
| Ballast for tubular fluorescent lamps — General and safety requirements |
PNS 12-1:1997
|
|
| Ballast for tubular fluorescent lamps — Performance requirements |
PNS 12-2:1997
|
|
| Ballast for high pressure mercury vapor lamps — Specification |
PNS 105:1986
|
|
| AC supplied electronic ballasts for tubular fluorescent lamps Part 1: General |
PNS 135-1:1997
|
|
| and safety requirements |
|
|
| AC supplied electronic ballasts for tubular fluorescent lamps Part 2: |
PNS 135-2:1997
|
|
| Performance requirements |
|
|
| Circuit breakers, Moulded case — Specification |
PNS 519:1997
|
|
| Low voltage switchgear and controlgear Part 2: Circuit Breaker |
PNS 1573:1997
|
|
| Unplasticized polyvinyl chloride (uPVC) electrical conduit — Specification |
PNS 14:1987
|
|
| Double-capped fluorescent lamps — Performance specifications |
PNS IEC 60081:2001
|
|
| Lamps — Self ballasted lamps for general lighting services — Part 1: Safety |
PNS 603-1:1993
|
|
| requirements |
|
|
| Lamps — Self ballasted lamps for general lighting services — Part 2: Performance |
PNS 603-2:1993
|
|
| requirements |
|
|
| Lamps and related equipment — Electromagnetic ballast — Energy standards and |
PNS 12-3:2000
|
|
| labeling requirements |
|
|
| Single-capped fluorescent lamps — Performance specification Section 1: |
PNS 1261:1995
|
|
| General |
|
|
| Class H Fuses — Specification |
PNS 13:1999
|
|
| Fuseholders — Specification |
PNS 56:1996
|
|
| Edison screw lampholders — Specification |
PNS 80:1997
|
|
| Safety specifications for incandescent lamps — Part 1: Tungsten filament lamps |
PNS 38-1:1995
|
|
| for domestic and similar general lighting purposes |
|
|
| Tungsten filament lamps for domestic and similar general lighting purposes- |
PNS 38-2:1995
|
|
| Part 2: Performance requirements |
|
|
| Lampholders for tubular fluorescent lamps and starterholders — Specification |
PNS 42:1997
|
|
| Liquid tight flexible steel conduit — Specification |
PNS 164:1988
|
|
| Plugs and socket-outlets for household and similar purposes Part 1: General |
PNS 1486-1:1996
|
|
| requirements |
|
|
| Plugs and socket-outlets for domestic and general use standards |
PNS 1572-1:1997
|
|
| Electrical products — Boxes for rigid metal conduits |
PNS 1829:1999
|
|
| Pressure sensitive PVC tapes for electrical insulation — Specification |
PNS 79:1992
|
|
| Glow-starters for fluorescent lamps |
PNS 45:1997
|
|
| Knife switches — Specification |
PNS 118:1992
|
|
| Snap switches for general use — Specification |
PNS 57:1996
|
|
| Switches for household and similar fixed-electrical installations Part 1: |
PNS 1485-1:1996
|
|
| General requirements |
|
|
| Pressure sensitive adhesive polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tapes — PVC electrical tapes |
PNS 79:1992
|
|
| Lumber and Wood Products |
|
|
| Plywood — Specification |
PNS 196:2000
|
|
| Pipes and Fittings |
|
|
| High density polyethylene (PE) pipes for potable water supply — Specification |
PNS 55:1986
|
|
| Polybutylene (PB) pipes for potable water supply — Specification |
PNS 152:1987
|
|
| Unplasticized polyvinyl chloride (uPVC) pipes for potable water supply — specification |
PNS 65:1993
|
|
| Grey iron pipes for pressure water lines — Specification |
PNS 1991:2002
|
|
| Steel |
|
|
| Steel- Black & hot-dipped zinc-coated (galvanized) longitudinally welded steel |
PNS 26:1992
|
|
| pipes for ordinary use — Specification |
|
|
| Re-rolled steel bars for concrete reinforcement — Specification |
PNS 211:2000
|
|
| Steel bars for concrete reinforcement — Specification |
PNS 49:2000
|
|
| Galvanized steel sheets and coils — Specification |
PNS 67:2000
|
|
| Galvanized steel sheets & coils, pre-painted — Specification |
PNS 201:1990
|
|
| Cold-reduced carbon steel sheet of commercial and drawing qualities: |
PNS 127:2004
|
|
| Specification |
|
|
| Hot-dip zinc-coated carbon steel sheets |
PNS 1990:2004
|
|
| Continuous hot-dip aluminum zinc-coated steel sheets |
PNS 1993:2004
|
|
| Continuous hot-dip zinc /5% aluminum alloy coated steel sheets |
PNS 2003:2004
|
|
| Steel wire nails — Specification |
PNS 136:2000
|
Cite This Law
Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System, CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04, Jun 29, 2004 (Philippines)
Proposed Amendments to the Implementing Guidelines of the Constructors Performance Evaluation System, CIAP Board Resolution No. 14-04 (Phil. 2004)
Related Laws
- Endorsing Amendments to the Constructors Performance Evaluation System Implementing Guidelines to the NEDA Board's Committee of Infrastructure (INFRACOM) for ApprovalCIAP Board Resolution No. 04-14 • Mar 26, 2014 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Endorsing Amendments to the CPES Implementing Guidelines to the NEDA Board's Committee of Infrastructure (INFRACOM) for ApprovalCIAP Board Resolution No. 10-11 • Mar 25, 2011 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Implementing Guidelines of Executive Order No. 150, s. 2021GCG-CPCS Implementing Guidelines No. 2021-01 • Jan 12, 2022 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Prescribing a Consultant's Performance Evaluation System (ConsPES) for Infrastructure ProjectsDPWH Department Order No. 100-17 • Aug 4, 2017 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Guidelines on the Enhanced Career Executive Service Performance Evaluation System (CESPES)CESB Resolution No. 1136-14 • Feb 10, 2014 • Other Rules and Procedures
- A Resolution Approving the Proposed Amendments to the CPES Implementing Guidelines for Infrastructure ProjectsNEDA Board Committee on Infrastructure (INFRACOM) Resolution No. 03-11 • Sep 13, 2011 • Implementing Rules and Regulations
Browse More Other Rules and Procedures
Explore other laws in the Other Rules and Procedures category.
View All Other Rules and ProceduresNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law