Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court
OCA Circular No. 161-2018 outlines the automatic revocation of the authority of designated assisting judges to hear and decide inhibited cases in the event of the designation of an acting presiding judge or the appointment of a new presiding judge. This revocation occurs without the need for a further court resolution. However, exceptions apply if the case is already past the trial stage or if the acting or presiding judge has a valid reason to inhibit themselves from the case. All judges and clerks of court are directed to strictly comply with this guideline.
Quick Answers
- What is Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court about?
- OCA Circular No. 161-2018 outlines the automatic revocation of the authority of designated assisting judges to hear and decide inhibited cases in the event of the designation of an acting presiding judge or the appointment of a new presiding judge. This revocation occurs without the need for a further court resolution. However, exceptions apply if the case is already past the trial stage or if the acting or presiding judge has a valid reason to inhibit themselves from the case. All judges and clerks of court are directed to strictly comply with this guideline.
- What type of law is OCA Circular No. 161-2018?
- Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court (OCA Circular No. 161-2018) is a Philippine Supreme Court Issuances enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court enacted?
- Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court (OCA Circular No. 161-2018) was enacted on Jul 26, 2018.
- What is the citation for Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court?
- Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court, OCA Circular No. 161-2018, Jul 26, 2018 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- OCA Circular No. 161-2018
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Office of the Court Administrator Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
July 26, 2018
OCA CIRCULAR NO. 161-2018
| TO | : | All Judges and Clerks of Court of the First and Second Level Courts |
| SUBJECT | : | Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in the Court upon the Designation of An Acting Presiding Judge or Assumption of Duty of the Newly-Appointed Presiding Judge, with Exceptions |
In accordance with the 4 April 2018 Resolution of the Court En Banc, directing the Office of the Court Administrator to issue a policy guideline that the authority of the designated assisting judge to hear and decide inhibited cases pending in the court is ipso facto revoked once there is a designation of an acting presiding judge or assumption to duty of the newly-appointed presiding judge without further need of a Court resolution, all concerned are accordingly DIRECTED to OBSERVE and IMPLEMENT the following:
The authority of an assisting judge to hear and decide inhibited cases pending in the court where he/she is designated is ipso facto revoked upon the designation of an acting presiding judge or assumption of duty of the newly-appointed presiding judge without further need of a Court resolution except when: (a) the inhibited case has already been submitted for decision or is already past the trial stage, i.e., where all the parties have finished presenting their evidence prior to the designation of an acting presiding judge or appointment of the regular presiding judge, in which case, the designated assisting judge shall decide/resolve the case in accordance with the guidelines provided for in A.M. No. 04-5-19-SC (Resolution Providing Guidelines in the Inventory and Adjudication of Cases Assigned to Judges Who are Promoted or Transferred to Other Branches in the Same Court Level of the Judicial Hierarchy); or (b) there is a ground for the acting/presiding judge to inhibit from the case.
Strict compliance is hereby enjoined. DETACa
(SGD.) JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZCourt Administrator
Cite This Law
Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court, OCA Circular No. 161-2018, Jul 26, 2018 (Philippines)
Ipso Facto Revocation of the Authority of the Designated Assisting Judge to Hear and Decide Inhibited Cases Pending in Court, OCA Circular No. 161-2018 (Phil. 2018)
Related Laws
- Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide Election Contests Involving Elective Municipal OfficialsSupreme Court Administrative Order No. 252-2021 • Dec 20, 2021 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Re: Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide Terrorism Cases and Counter-Terrorism Financing Cases<--!03222022-->A.M. No. 21-08-07-SC • Mar 22, 2022 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Submission of Quarterly Reports by Regional Trial Courts Ordered to Hear, Try and Decide Drugs CasesOCA Circular No. 01-2017 • Jan 9, 2017 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Amendment to Section 8 (b), Chapter V, A.M. No. 03-8-02-SC (Raffle and Re-Assignment of Cases in Ordinary Courts Where Judge is Disqualified or Voluntarily Inhibits Himself/Herself from Hearing the Case)OCA Circular No. 100-2018 • May 21, 2018 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Re: The Rules of Procedure for Admiralty Cases [Designation of Pilot Admiralty Courts to Hear, Try, and Decide Admiralty Cases]<--!11262019-->A.M. No. 19-08-14-SC (Resolution) • Nov 26, 2019 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide Environmental CasesSupreme Court Administrative Order No. 23-08 • Jan 28, 2008 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law