Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide Environmental Cases

Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 23-08Supreme Court Issuances

Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 23-08, issued on January 28, 2008, designates specific branches of first and second level courts in the Philippines as Special Courts to adjudicate environmental cases. These courts will handle violations of various environmental laws, including the Clean Air Act and the Fisheries Code, among others. The order outlines procedures for case assignments, including raffling in multi-sala stations, and stipulates that these courts continue their functions despite changes in judges. It also provides guidelines for handling situations where judges are disqualified or inhibit themselves from presiding over cases. The order aims to improve the efficient administration of justice in environmental matters.

January 28, 2008

SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 23-08

RE : Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide Environmental Cases

In the interest of an efficient administration of justice and pursuant to Sec. 23 of B.P. Blg. 129, the following branches of the first and second level courts are hereby designated as Special Courts to try and decide violations of environmental laws, including but not limited to the following:

1. Revised Forestry Code (P.D. No. 705)

2. Marine Pollution (P.D. No. 979)

3. Toxic Substances and Hazardous Waste Act (R.A. No. 6969)

4. People's Small-Scale Mining Act (R.A. No. 7076)

5. National Integrated Protected Areas System Act (R.A. No. 7586)

6. Philippine Mining Act (R.A. No. 7942)

7. Indigenous People's Rights Act (R.A. No. 8371)

8. Philippine Fisheries Code (R.A. No. 8550)

9. Clean Air Act (R.A. No. 8749) EScHDA

10. Ecological Solid Waste Management Act (R.A. No. 9003)

11. National Caves & Cave Resources Management Act (R.A. No. 9072)

12. Wildlife Conservation & Protection Act (R.A. No. 9147)

13. Chainsaw Act (R.A. No. 9175)

14. Clean Water Act (R.A. No. 9275)

committed within their respective territorial jurisdictions.

REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS

NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 1, Manila

Br. 41, Manila

Br. 101, Quezon City

Br. 108, Pasay City

Br. 127, Kaloocan City

Br. 58, Makati City

Br. 152, Pasig City (cases originating from Pasig City)

Br. 266, Pasig City (cases originating from Taguig City)

Br. 170, Malabon City

Br. 272, Marikina City

Br. 208, Mandaluyong City

Br. 196, Parañaque City

Br. 201, Las Piñas City

Br. 205, Muntinlupa City

Br. 171, Valenzuela City

FIRST JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 5, Baguio City

Br. 10, La Trinidad, Benguet

Br. 12, Laoag City

Br. 28, San Fernando City

Br. 39, Lingayen, Pangasinan

Br. 44, Dagupan City, Pangasinan

Br. 47, Urdaneta City EHSCcT

SECOND JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 5, Tuguegarao City

Br. 9, Aparri, Cagayan

Br. 17, Ilagan, Isabela

Br. 27, Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya

THIRD JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 1, Balanga City

Br. 19, Malolos City

Br. 29, Cabanatuan City

Br. 32, Guimba, Nueva Ecija

Br. 36, Gapan City

Br. 41, City of San Fernando, Pampanga

Br. 51, Guagua, Pampanga

Br. 59, Angeles City

Br. 65, Tarlac City

Br. 69, Iba, Zambales

Br. 75, Olongapo City

FOURTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 4, Batangas City

Br. 11, Balayan, Batangas

Br. 88, Cavite City

Br. 20, Imus, Cavite

Br. 27, Sta. Cruz, Laguna

Br. 32, San Pablo City

Br. 36, Calamba City

Br. 51, Puerto Princesa City

Br. 60, Lucena City

Br. 70, Binangonan, Rizal

Br. 71, Antipolo City

Br. 75, San Mateo, Rizal

Br. 78, Morong, Rizal

FIFTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 1, Legaspi City

Br. 13, Ligao City

Br. 15, Tabaco City

Br. 25, Naga City

Br. 32, Pili, Camarines Sur

Br. 35, Iriga City

Br. 38, Daet, Camarines Norte

Br. 53, Sorsogon City

Br. 47, Masbate City DaHSIT

SIXTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 2, Kalibo, Aklan

Br. 11, San Jose, Antique

Br. 15, Roxas City

Br. 28, Iloilo City

Br. 44, Bacolod City

SEVENTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 23, Cebu City

Br. 28, Mandaue City

Br. 54, Lapu-Lapu City

Br. 34, Dumaguete City

Br. 47, Tagbilaran City

EIGHTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 9, Tacloban City

Br. 29, Catbalogan, Samar

NINTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 8, Dipolog City

Br. 16, Zamboanga City

Br. 20, Pagadian City

TENTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 4, Butuan City

Br. 10, Malaybalay City

Br. 12, Oroquieta City

Br. 39, Cagayan de Oro City AHcCDI

ELEVENTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 1, Tagum City

Br. 16, Davao City

Br. 18, Digos City

Br. 35, General Santos City

TWELFTH JUDICIAL REGION

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 4, Iligan City

Br. 10, Marawi City

METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS

STATION/BRANCH

Br. 3, Manila

Br. 8, Manila

Br. 36, Quezon City

Br. 48, Pasay City

Br. 49, Kaloocan City

Br. 67, Makati City

Br. 70, Pasig City

MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS IN CITIES

FIRST JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 4, Baguio City

Br. 3, Dagupan City

SECOND JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 4, Tuguegarao City

THIRD JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 1, Angeles City

Br. 1, Cabanatuan City

Br. 2, City of San Fernando, Pampanga

Br. 3, Olongapo City

Br. 1, San Jose del Monte City aIcDCH

FOURTH JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 1, Antipolo City

Br. 2, Lipa City

Br. 1, San Pablo City

FIFTH JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 2, Legaspi City

Br. 2, Naga City

SIXTH JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 3, Bacolod City

Br. 9, Iloilo City

Br. 2, Roxas City

SEVENTH JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 7, Cebu City

Br. 3, Mandaue City

Br. 1, Tagbilaran City

NINTH JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 2, Zamboanga City

TENTH JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 2, Butuan City

Br. 5, Cagayan de Oro City

Br. 3, Ozamis City

ELEVENTH JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 7, Davao City

Br. 1, Gen. Santos City

TWELFTH JUDICIAL REGION

Br. 1, Iligan City

The following guidelines shall be observed:

1. In multi sala stations where no branches of the first and second level courts are herein designated to try and decide environmental cases, the cases shall be raffled among the branches thereat which shall try and decide such cases according to existing issuances. ISCcAT

2. All single sala first and second level courts are considered special courts for the above purpose.

3. The Special Courts herein designated shall continue to be included in the raffle of cases, criminal, civil and other cases.

4. The branches thus designated as Special Courts shall continue to perform their functions as such within the purview of this Administrative Order even after the retirement, promotion, dismissal, suspension, transfer or detail of the judges appointed/designated to preside over them. Their successors, whether permanent or temporary, shall act as Presiding Judges of these Special Court unless the Supreme Court otherwise directs.

5. All environmental cases covered by this Order wherein pre trial in case of civil cases has already commenced and when the accused is already arraigned in case of criminal cases shall remain in the branches where they are originally assigned, otherwise these cases shall be assigned by raffle in case there are two or more designated Special Courts or when there is only one (1) in the station, the cases shall be unloaded to the said Special Court. The transferred environmental cases shall be considered as raffled cases to the Special Courts hence the branch which unloaded the environmental cases shall be assigned newly filed cases to replace the cases removed from said branch. ECaTDc

6. In the event of inhibition of the presiding judge of the Special Courts, the following shall be observed: 1strellaws08

a. Where there is only one (1) Special Court in the station, the pairing system for multi branch stations under Circular No. 7 dated September 23, 1974 shall apply;

b. Where there are two (2) Special Courts in the station, the Executive Judge shall immediately assign the case to the other Special Court; and

c. Where there are three (3) or more Special Courts in the station, the Executive Judge shall immediately assign by raffle to the other Special Courts.

 In case all the Presiding Judges of the other Special Courts are also disqualified or inhibit themselves, the case shall be forwarded to the pairing judge of the Special Court which originally handled the said case. If the pairing judge is also disqualified or inhibits himself/herself, the case shall be raffled to the other regular courts. At the next raffle, a newly filed case shall be assigned to the disqualified or inhibiting judge to replace the case so removed from his/her court.

d. Where a judge of a single sala first level court is disqualified or inhibits himself/herself, the Order of Inhibition shall be referred to the Executive Judge who shall assign the case by raffle among the judges in his administrative area of supervision, the assigned judge shall try and decide the same in the court where it was originally filed; cDCIHT

e. Where the judge of a single sala RTC is disqualified or inhibits himself/herself, the Order of Inhibition shall be referred to the Executive/Presiding Judge of the nearest RTC station. If the nearest station is a multi sala branch, the Executive Judge shall assign the case to the same Special Court in the station, if there is any. If the presiding judge of the Special Court is disqualified or inhibits himself/herself, the case shall be raffled among the judges in the station. In all instances, the case shall be tried by the assigned judge in the court where the case was originally filed.

This Order shall take effect upon its issuance.

(SGD.) REYNATO S. PUNOChief Justice

(SGD.) LEONARDO A. QUISUMBINGAssociate Justice

(SGD.) CONSUELO YNARES-SANTIAGOAssociate Justice

(Per Revised A.M. No. 99-12-88-SC)