Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide Election Contests Involving Elective Municipal Officials

Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 252-2021Supreme Court Issuances

The Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 252-2021 designates specific Regional Trial Court (RTC) branches across various judicial regions in the Philippines to exclusively handle election contests involving elective municipal officials. This update is essential due to the upcoming local and national elections and aims to ensure a speedy and efficient judicial process for election-related disputes. The designated special courts will prioritize these cases over others, except for certain writ petitions, and will continue to function as such even after changes in judicial personnel. The order supersedes a previous directive and is effective immediately, ensuring that all election protests and quo warranto petitions are managed systematically within the specified courts.

December 20, 2021

SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 252-2021

RE : Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide Election Contests Involving Elective Municipal Officials

 

WHEREAS, under Section 1, Rule 2, The 2010 Rules of Procedure for Municipal Election Contests (The 2010 Rules), Regional Trial Courts (RTCs) shall have exclusive original jurisdiction over all election contests involving elective municipal officials;

WHEREAS, under Section 11, Rule 2, The 2010 Rules, the Supreme Court shall designate the RTCs within a judicial region that shall take cognizance of election protests and petitions for quo warranto;

WHEREAS, under Section 13, Rule 14, The 2010 Rules, the designated election courts shall give preference to election contests over all other cases, except petitions for writs of habeas corpus, amparo and habeas data;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the pertinent provision of the 2010 Rules, Administrative Order No. 07-2019, dated 15 January 2019, designating Regional Trial Court branches as Special Courts to hear, try and decide election contests involving elective municipal officials was issued;

WHEREAS, the list in Administrative Order No. 07-2019 has to be updated because a number of municipalities have been upgraded to cities and newly-created RTCs have been organized;

WHEREAS, it is expected that election cases will be filed in courts in view of the forthcoming 09 May 2022 local and national elections, and the other elections thereafter;

NOW, THEREFORE, in the interest of a speedy and efficient administration of justice and pursuant to Section 11, Rule 2, The 2010 Rules, the following branches of the RTCs are hereby designated to exclusively and speedily hear, try and decide election protests and petitions for quo warranto involving elective municipal officials within their respective territorial jurisdictions during local and national elections, until otherwise revoked by the Court:

 

STATION

BRANCH

 

 

NATIONAL CAPITAL JUDICIAL REGION

 

PASIG CITY

Branch 262

 

 

FIRST JUDICIAL REGION

BENGUET

 

LA TRINIDAD

Branch 62

 

Branch 63

 

 

ILOCOS NORTE

 

LAOAG CITY

Branch 14

 

Branch 65

 

 

LA UNION

 

SAN FERNANDO CITY

Branch 27

 

Branch 66

 

 

PANGASINAN

 

LINGAYEN

Branch 38

 

Branch 69

DAGUPAN CITY

Branch 40

 

Branch 41

URDANETA CITY

Branch 46

 

Branch 48

 

 

SECOND JUDICIAL REGION

CAGAYAN

 

TUGUEGARAO CITY

Branch 3

 

Branch 10

APARRI

Branch 7

 

 

ISABELA

 

CITY OF ILAGAN

Branch 18

CAUAYAN CITY

Branch 40

SANTIAGO CITY

Branch 36

 

 

NUEVA VIZCAYA

 

BAYOMBONG

Branch 27

 

 

THIRD JUDICIAL REGION

 

 

BATAAN

 

BALANGA CITY

Branch 3

 

Branch 92

MARIVELES

Branch 95

 

 

BULACAN

 

MALOLOS CITY

Branch 14

 

Branch 15

 

Branch 20

 

Branch 21

 

Branch 78

 

Branch 81

 

 

NUEVA ECIJA

 

CABANATUAN CITY

Branch 25

 

Branch 30

GUIMBA

Branch 31

GAPAN CITY

Branch 35

STO. DOMINGO

Branch 89

 

 

PAMPANGA

 

CITY OF SAN FERNANDO

Branch 41

 

Branch 47

GUAGUA

Branch 49

 

Branch 52

ANGELES CITY

Branch 58

 

Branch 59

 

Branch 117

 

 

TARLAC

 

TARLAC CITY

Branch 64

 

Branch 110

PANIQUI

Branch 106

 

 

ZAMBALES

 

IBA

Branch 71

OLONGAPO CITY

Branch 74

 

Branch 97

 

 

FOURTH JUDICIAL REGION

REGION 4-A

BATANGAS

 

BATANGAS CITY

Branch 3

 

Branch 8

TANAUAN CITY

Branch 66

BALAYAN

Branch 10

LIPA CITY

Branch 12

 

 

CAVITE

 

CAVITE CITY

Branch 16

TAGAYTAY CITY

Branch 134

IMUS CITY

Branch 22

 

Branch 121

TRECE MARTIRES CITY

Branch 131

 

 

LAGUNA

 

STA. CRUZ

Branch 91

 

Branch 176

SAN PABLO CITY

Branch 29

CALAMBA CITY

Branch 35

 

Branch 92

 

 

QUEZON

 

LUCENA CITY

Branch 57

 

Branch 58

GUMACA

Branch 173

 

 

RIZAL

 

ANTIPOLO CITY

Branch 97

 

Branch 100

 

Branch 138

SAN MATEO

Branch 76

 

Branch 175

MORONG

Branch 80

 

Branch 159

BINANGONAN

Branch 67

 

 

REGION 4-B

PALAWAN

 

PUERTO PRINCESA CITY

Branch 49

 

Branch 52

 

 

FIFTH JUDICIAL REGION

ALBAY

 

LEGASPI CITY

Branch 2

 

Branch 6

 

Branch 10

LIGAO CITY

Branch 11

TABACO CITY

Branch 18

 

 

CAMARINES SUR

 

NAGA CITY

Branch 19

 

Branch 61

 

Branch 62

LIBMANAN

Branch 29

PILI

Branch 32

IRIGA CITY

Branch 37

 

Branch 60

 

 

CAMARINES NORTE

 

DAET

Branch 39

 

 

MASBATE

 

MASBATE CITY

Branch 45

 

Branch 47

SORSOGON

 

SORSOGON CITY

Branch 53

 

 

SIXTH JUDICIAL REGION

AKLAN

 

KALIBO

Branch 5

 

Branch 9

 

 

ANTIQUE

 

SAN JOSE

Branch 12

 

 

CAPIZ

 

ROXAS CITY

Branch 15

 

Branch 17

 

 

ILOILO

 

ILOILO CITY

Branch 22

 

Branch 24

 

Branch 29

 

Branch 35

BAROTAC VIEJO

Branch 66

 

 

NEGROS OCCIDENTAL

 

BACOLOD CITY

Branch 42

 

Branch 49

 

Branch 50

SAN CARLOS CITY

Branch 59

 

 

SEVENTH JUDICIAL REGION

BOHOL

 

TAGBILARAN CITY

Branch 47

 

Branch 49

 

 

CEBU

 

ARGAO

Branch 93

MANDAUE CITY

Branch 55

 

Branch 84

 

Branch 86

BARILI

Branch 96

BOGO CITY

Branch 79

 

Branch 80

 

 

NEGROS ORIENTAL

 

DUMAGUETE CITY

Branch 33

 

Branch 39

 

Branch 42

 

 

EIGHTH JUDICIAL REGION

LEYTE

 

TACLOBAN CITY

Branch 6

 

Branch 34

ORMOC CITY

Branch 47

 

 

SAMAR

 

CATBALOGAN CITY

Branch 29

 

 

NINTH JUDICIAL REGION

ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE

 

DIPOLOG CITY

Branch 6

 

Branch 9

 

 

ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR

 

PAGADIAN CITY

Branch 19

 

Branch 21

 

 

ZAMBOANGA SIBUGAY

 

IPIL

Branch 37

 

 

TENTH JUDICIAL REGION

AGUSAN DEL NORTE

 

BUTUAN CITY

Branch 2

 

Branch 3

 

 

BUKIDNON

 

MALAYBALAY CITY

Branch 8

 

 

MISAMIS OCCIDENTAL

 

OROQUIETA CITY

Branch 13

 

 

MISAMIS ORIENTAL

 

CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY

Branch 17

 

Branch 21

 

Branch 41

 

 

ELEVENTH JUDICIAL REGION

DAVAO DEL NORTE

 

TAGUM CITY

Branch 30

 

 

DAVAO DEL SUR

 

DIGOS CITY

Branch 19

 

 

SOUTH COTABATO

 

KORONADAL CITY

Branch 43

SURALLAH

Branch 44

POLOMOLOK

Branch 63

 

 

SARANGGANI

 

ALABEL

Branch 47

 

Branch 50

 

 

TWELFTH JUDICIAL REGION

LANAO DEL NORTE

 

ILIGAN CITY

Branch 3

 

Branch 6

 

 

LANAO DEL SUR

 

MARAWI CITY

Branch 10

 

 

MAGUINDANAO

 

COTABATO CITY

Branch 27

 

 

NORTH COTABATO

 

KIDAPAWAN CITY

Branch 61

MIDSAYAP

Branch 28

 

For purposes of this Administrative Order, the cases referred herein shall be limited to election protests and petitions for quo warranto involving elective municipal officials. All other election-related cases shall be raffled among the regular courts in the station. aScITE

In stations where there is only one (1) branch designated as Special Court, the election contest shall be automatically assigned to the said branch. If there are two (2) or more branches designated as Special Courts in a station, the election contest/s shall be raffled among the designated branches. All single-sala courts are considered Special Courts for the above purpose and for this reason shall give priority to these cases in their trial calendars. In multiple-sala stations where there are no Special Courts designated for the purpose, the cases shall be raffled among the regular courts therein.

The Special Courts herein designated, all single-sala courts, and the branches where the election contests are raffled in case of multiple-sala stations where there is no designated special court, shall try and decide the election contests in accordance with The 2010 Rules of Procedure for Municipal Election Contests.

The Special Courts herein designated shall continue to be included in the raffle of cases, criminal and civil, provided that the Executive Judges of the RTCs concerned shall exclude the designated Special Courts from such raffle whenever in their judgment the caseload of these courts will prevent them from conducting the continuous trial of the election contests.

The Branches thus designated as Special Courts shall continue to perform the functions as such within the purview of this Administrative Order even after the retirement, promotion, transfer, or detail of the judges appointed/designated thereat. Election contests filed after the Special Courts became vacant due to retirement, promotion, transfer, or detail of the presiding/acting judge shall still be raffled/assigned to the said Special Courts. The judge designated to preside over the vacant Special Court shall take cognizance of the cases unless the Supreme Court designates another judge.

In the event of disqualification and voluntary inhibition of the judge of the designated Special Court, the following guidelines shall be observed:

(1) Where there is only one Special Court in the station, the pairing system for multiple-sala stations subject of Circular No. 7 dated September 23, 1974, as amended, shall apply; and

(2) Where there are two or more Special Courts in the station, the Executive Judge shall immediately assign the case by raffle to the other or another Special Court. In case the Presiding Judge of the other special court is also disqualified or inhibits himself/herself, the case shall be forwarded to the pairing judge of the Special Court which originally handled the said case. If the pairing judge is also disqualified or inhibits himself/herself, the case shall be raffled to the other regular courts. At the next raffle, an additional case shall be assigned to the disqualified or inhibiting judge/s to replace the case so removed from his/her/their court.

If the judge in a single-branch court voluntary inhibits himself/herself, the Order of Inhibition shall be transmitted to the pairing judge who shall then hear and decide the case in the court of origin, The determination of the pairing judge shall be in accordance with Annex "A" of A.M. No. 03-8-02-SC dated February 15, 2004 (Guidelines on the Selection and Appointment of Executive Judges and Defining their Powers, Prerogatives and Duties), as amended. Where the pairing judge who sits in a single-branch RTC is also disqualified or voluntarily inhibits himself/herself, the matter shall be referred by the Clerk of Court to the Executive Judge of the next nearest single-branch or multiple-branch RTC of the single-branch Special Court which originally handled the inhibited case for assignment by raffle, in case of multiple-branch RTC, among the judges in the station. However, the case shall remain in the court of origin.

This Administrative Order supersedes Administrative Order No. 07-2019 dated 15 January 2019, and shall take effect immediately. HEITAD

(SGD.) ALEXANDER G. GESMUNDOChief Justice

(SGD.) ESTELA M. PERLAS-BERNABESenior Associate Justice

(SGD.) MARVIC M.V.F. LEONENAssociate Justice