Efficient Use of Paper Rule

November 13, 2012

EN BANC

A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC

EFFICIENT USE OF PAPER RULE

RESOLUTION

WHEREAS, to produce 500 reams of paper, twenty trees are cut and 100,000 liters of water are used, water that is no longer reusable because it is laden with chemicals and is just released to the environment to poison our rivers and seas; ICHAaT

WHEREAS, there is a need to cut the judicial system's use of excessive quantities of costly paper, save our forests, avoid landslides, and mitigate the worsening effects of climate change that the world is experiencing;

WHEREAS, the judiciary can play a big part in saving our trees, conserving precious water, and helping mother earth.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Supreme Court En Banc hereby issues and promulgates the following:

SECTION 1. Title of the Rule. — This rule shall be known and cited as the Efficient Use of Paper Rule.

SECTION 2. Applicability. — This rule shall apply to all courts and quasi-judicial bodies under the administrative supervision of the Supreme Court.

SECTION 3. Format and Style. — a) All pleadings, motions, and similar papers intended for the court and quasi-judicial body's consideration and action (court-bound papers) shall be written in single space with a one-and-a-half space between paragraphs, using an easily readable font style of the party's choice, of 14-size font, and on a 13-inch by 8.5-inch white bond paper; and

b)All decisions, resolutions, and orders issued by courts and by quasi-judicial bodies under the administrative supervision of the Supreme Court shall comply with these requirements. Similarly covered are the reports submitted to the courts and transcripts of stenographic notes.

SECTION 4. Margins and Prints. — The parties shall maintain the following margins on all court-bound papers: a left hand margin of 1.5 inches from the edge; an upper margin of 1.2 inches from the edge; a right hand margin of 1.0 inch from the edge; and a lower margin of 1.0 inch from the edge. Every page must be consecutively numbered. SIcEHD

SECTION 5. Copies to be Filed. — Unless otherwise directed by the court, the number of court-bound papers that a party is required or desires to file shall be as follows:

a. In the Supreme Court, one original (properly marked) and four copies, unless the case is referred to the Court En Banc, in which event, the parties shall file ten additional copies. For the En Banc, the parties need to submit only two sets of annexes, one attached to the original and an extra copy. For the Division, the parties need to submit also two sets of annexes, one attached to the original and an extra copy. All members of the Court shall share the extra copies of annexes in the interest of economy of paper.

Parties to cases before the Supreme Court are further required, on voluntary basis for the first six months following the effectivity of this Rule and compulsorily afterwards unless the period is extended, to submit, simultaneously with their court-bound papers, soft copies of the same and their annexes (the latter in PDF format) either by email to the Court's e-mail address or by compact disc (CD). This requirement is in preparation for the eventual establishment of an e-filing paperless system in the judiciary;

b. In the Court of Appeals and the Sandiganbayan, one original (properly marked) and two copies with their annexes;

c. In the Court of Tax Appeals, one original (properly marked) and two copies with annexes. On appeal to the En Banc, one original (properly marked) and eight copies with annexes; and

d. In other courts, one original (properly marked) with the stated annexes attached to it.

SECTION 6. Annexes Served on Adverse Party. — A party required by the rules to serve a copy of his court-bound paper on the adverse party need not enclose copies of those annexes that based on the record of the court such party already has in his possession. In the event a party requests a set of the annexes actually filed with the court, the party who filed the paper shall comply with the request within five days from receipt. HTCISE

SECTION 7. Date of Effectivity. — This rule shall take effect on January 1, 2013 after publication in two newspapers of general circulation in the Philippines.

Manila, November 13, 2012.

 

(SGD.) MARIA LOURDES P. A. SERENOChief Justice

 

(SGD.) ANTONIO T. CARPIOAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, JR.Associate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) TERESITA J. LEONARDO-DE CASTROAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) ARTURO D. BRIONAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) DIOSDADO M. PERALTAAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) LUCAS P. BERSAMINAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) MARIANO C. DEL CASTILLOAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) ROBERTO A. ABADAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) MARTIN S. VILLARAMA, JR.Associate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) JOSE PORTUGAL PEREZAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) JOSE CATRAL MENDOZAAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) BIENVENIDO L. REYESAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

 

(SGD.) ESTELA M. PERLAS-BERNABEAssociate JusticeSupreme Court of the Philippines

Published in The Philippine Star on November 30, 2012.