Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the practice of law
On August 4, 1988, the Supreme Court issued Circular No. 13-88 regarding the indefinite suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from practicing law. This decision stemmed from Administrative Case No. 1892, where Villanueva was found guilty of gross misconduct, failing to meet the required standards of mental and moral fitness expected of legal practitioners. The Court emphasized that attorneys are expected to assist in the administration of justice, and Villanueva's actions were deemed a mockery of the judicial system. He will remain suspended until he can demonstrate rehabilitation and the capacity to uphold the law.
Law Information
- Reference Number
- Supreme Court Circular No. 13-88
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
August 4, 1988
SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR NO. 13-88
| TO | : | The Court of Appeals, Sandiganbayan, Court of Tax Appeals, All Judges of the Regional Trial Courts, Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts, Municipal Circuit Trial Courts, Shari'a Courts and Integrated Bar of the Philippines |
| SUBJECT | : | Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the practice of law |
For the information and guidance of all concerned, quoted hereunder is the disposition portion of the DECISION of the Court En Banc, promulgated on July 29, 1988, in ADMINISTRATIVE CASE NO. 1892, entitled "Atty. Luis V. Artiaga, Jr. vs. Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva", suspending respondent from the practice of law, to wit:
"The practice of law is a privilege accorded only to those who measure up to certain standards of mental and moral fitness. For a counsel who has been sworn to assist in the administration of justice and to uphold the rule of law, respondent has miserably failed to live up to the standards expected of a member of the Bar. Instead of assisting in the speedy disposition of cases, he made a mockery of our system of justice, thus deserving to be censured and penalized by the Court. No doubt, respondent is guilty of gross misconduct in office.
"WHEREFORE, the respondent is hereby SUSPENDED INDEFINITELY from the practice of law from date of notice until such time that he can demonstrate to the court that he has rehabilitated himself and deserves to resume the practice of law. Let this decision be noted in the bar records of respondent.
"SO ORDERED". cd
Manila, August 4, 1988.
(SGD.) MAXIMO A. MACEREN Court Administrator
Cite This Law
Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the practice of law, Supreme Court Circular No. 13-88, Aug 4, 1988 (Philippines)
Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the practice of law, Supreme Court Circular No. 13-88 (Phil. 1988)
Related Laws
- Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from Practice of LawAdministrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 13-88 • Aug 4, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the Practice of LawOCA Circular No. 13-88 • Aug 4, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. RubenR. Aldea from the Practice of LawAdministrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 03-88 • Jan 21, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. Narciso L. Santiago from Practice of LawAdministrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 5-88 • Feb 12, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. Samuel C. Occena from the Practice of LawSupreme Court Circular No. 4-88 • Jan 26, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. Geronimo Manalo from the Practice of LawSupreme Court Circular No. 14-86 • Nov 25, 1986 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law