Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from Practice of Law
On August 4, 1988, a circular was issued regarding the indefinite suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the practice of law, following a decision by the Court En Banc. The ruling stemmed from Administrative Case No. 1892, where it was determined that Villanueva failed to uphold the required standards of mental and moral fitness expected from legal practitioners. His actions were deemed as gross misconduct, undermining the integrity of the justice system. The suspension will remain in effect until he can demonstrate rehabilitation and fitness to resume legal practice.
Law Information
- Reference Number
- Administrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 13-88
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Administrative Supervision of Courts Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
August 4, 1988
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF COURTS CIRCULAR NO. 13-88
| TO | : | The Court of Appeals, Sandiganbayan, Court of Tax Appeals, All Judges of the Regional Trial Courts, Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, Municipal Trial Courts, Municipal Circuit Trial Courts, Shari'a Courts and Integrated Bar of the Philippines |
| SUBJECT | : | Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the Practice of Law |
For the information and guidance of all concerned, quoted hereunder is the dispositive portion of the DECISION of the Court En Banc, promulgated on July 29, 1988, in ADMINISTRATIVE CASE NO. 1892, entitled "Atty. Luis V. Artiaga, Jr. vs. Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva", suspending respondent from the practice of law, to wit:
"The practice of law is a privilege accorded only to those who measure up to certain standards of mental and moral fitness. For a counsel who has been sworn to assist in the administration of justice and to uphold the rule of law, respondent has miserably failed to live up to the standards expected of a member of the Bar. Instead of assisting in the speedy disposition of cases, he made a mockery of our system of justice, thus deserving to be censured and penalized by this Court. No doubt, respondent is guilty of gross misconduct in office.
"WHEREFORE, the respondent is hereby SUSPENDED INDEFINITELY from the practice of law from date of notice until such time that he can demonstrate to the court that he has rehabilitated himself and deserves to resume the practice of law. Let this decision be noted in the bar records of respondent.
"SO ORDERED". cd
Manila, August 4, 1988.
(SGD.) MAXIMO A. MACEREN Court Administrator
Cite This Law
Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from Practice of Law, Administrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 13-88, Aug 4, 1988 (Philippines)
Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from Practice of Law, Administrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 13-88 (Phil. 1988)
Related Laws
- Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the practice of lawSupreme Court Circular No. 13-88 • Aug 4, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. Enrique C. Villanueva from the Practice of LawOCA Circular No. 13-88 • Aug 4, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. Narciso L. Santiago from Practice of LawAdministrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 5-88 • Feb 12, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. RubenR. Aldea from the Practice of LawAdministrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 03-88 • Jan 21, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. Eduardo Singayao from Practice LawAdministrative Supervision of Courts Circular No. 11-88 • May 27, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Suspension of Atty. Samuel C. Occena from the Practice of LawSupreme Court Circular No. 4-88 • Jan 26, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law