Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91
Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91 outlines guidelines for managing absenteeism and tardiness among civil service employees. It defines habitual absenteeism as unauthorized absences exceeding 2.5 days monthly for three months, and habitual tardiness as arriving late ten times in a month for two consecutive months. Sanctions for violations include suspension for the first offense and dismissal for the second. Department heads are responsible for verifying sick leave claims and ensuring compliance with attendance reporting. The Circular emphasizes strict enforcement of these rules to maintain workplace discipline.
Quick Answers
- What is Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91 about?
- Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91 outlines guidelines for managing absenteeism and tardiness among civil service employees. It defines habitual absenteeism as unauthorized absences exceeding 2.5 days monthly for three months, and habitual tardiness as arriving late ten times in a month for two consecutive months. Sanctions for violations include suspension for the first offense and dismissal for the second. Department heads are responsible for verifying sick leave claims and ensuring compliance with attendance reporting. The Circular emphasizes strict enforcement of these rules to maintain workplace discipline.
- What type of law is Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91?
- Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91 (Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91) is a Philippine Supreme Court Issuances enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91 enacted?
- Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91 (Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91) was enacted on Feb 14, 1991.
- What is the citation for Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91?
- Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91, Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91, Feb 14, 1991 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
February 14, 1991
SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR NO. 1-A-91
| TO | : | All Judges and Employees of the Regional Trial Courts, Shari'a District Courts, Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, Municipal Trial Courts, Municipal Circuit Trial Courts, and Shari'a Circuit Courts |
Quoted hereunder is Memorandum Circular No. 04, Series of 1991, of the Civil Service Commission, for the information and guidance of all concerned:
"The Civil Service Commission, pursuant to its mandate as the central personnel agency of the government, hereby promulgates the following guidelines and rules on absenteeism and tardiness:
A. Habitual Absenteeism:
1. An officer or employee in the civil service shall be considered habitually absent if he incurs unauthorized absences exceeding the allowable 2.5 days monthly leave credit under the leave law for at least three (3) months in a semester or at least three (3) consecutive months during the year:
2. In case of claims of ill health, heads of department or agencies are encouraged to verify the validity of such claim and, if not satisfied with the reason given, should disapprove the application for sick leave. On the other hand, cases of employees who absent themselves from work before approval of their application should be disapproved outright; and
3. In the discretion of the Head of any department, agency or office, any government physician may be authorized to do a spot check on employees who are supposed to be on sick leave. Those found violating the leave laws, rules or regulations shall be dealt with accordingly, by filing appropriate administrative cases against them.
B. Habitual Tardiness
Any employee shall be considered habitually tardy if he incurs tardiness, regardless of the number of minutes, ten (10) times a month for at least two (2) months in a semester or at least two (2) consecutive months during the year.
C. Sanctions
1. The following sanctions shall be imposed for violation of the above guidelines:
a) for the first violation, the employee, after due proceedings, shall be meted the penalty of 6 months and 1 day to 1 year suspension without pay:
b) for the second violation, and after due proceedings, he shall be dismissed from service.
Reports on punctuality and attendance of all employees should be submitted to the Personnel Office or Administrative Officer of every department or agency not later than two (2) weeks after the end of every semester (June and December).
Heads of Departments or Agencies shall oversee the strict implementation of this Circular and may prescribe their own internal rules and regulations in the use of bundy clock, logbook, pass slip and/or application for leave of absence.
(SGD.) PATRICIA A. STO. TOMASChairman"
Please be guided accordingly.
Manila, February 14, 1991.
(SGD.) JOSUE N. BELLOSILLOCourt Administrator
Cite This Law
Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91, Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91, Feb 14, 1991 (Philippines)
Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91, Supreme Court Circular No. 1-A-91 (Phil. 1991)
Related Laws
- Supreme Court Circular No. 2-86Supreme Court Circular No. 2-86 • Mar 11, 1986 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Additional Requisites for Petitions Filed with the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals to Prevent Forum Shopping or Multiple Filing of Petitions and ComplaintsSupreme Court Revised Circular No. 28-91 • Feb 8, 1994 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Supreme Court Circular No. 18-87Supreme Court Circular No. 18-87 • Jul 29, 1987 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Prescribing the Rules Governing Appeals to the Court of Appeals from a Final Order or Decision of the Court of Tax Appeals and Quasi-Judicial AgenciesSupreme Court Circular No. 1-91 • Feb 27, 1991 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Implementation of Sec. 12, Art. XVIII of the 1987 Constitution and Complementing Administrative Circular No. 1 of January 28, 1988 on Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme CourtSupreme Court Revised Circular No. 1-88 • Jul 1, 1991 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Administrative Circular No. 1 (January 28, 1988) Re: Effective Docket ControlSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 1-A-88 • Jul 5, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law