Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016

DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16Dec 29, 2016Other Rules and Procedures41 min read

DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16 outlines supplemental guidelines for ranking delivery units to determine eligibility for the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016. The circular is based on Executive Order No. 201 (s. 2016) and specifies that delivery units within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) will be ranked according to performance indicators, with top performers receiving higher bonuses. The ranking categories include "Best," "Better," and "Good Delivery Units," with specific point systems established for various performance metrics, such as budget utilization and timely submission of reports. The guidelines emphasize a results-oriented approach to enhance government personnel performance and accountability. The circular is effective immediately upon issuance.

What is Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016 about?: DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16 outlines supplemental guidelines for ranking delivery units to determine eligibility for the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016. The circular is based on Executive Order No. 201 (s. 2016) and specifies that delivery units within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) will be ranked according to performance indicators, with top performers receiving higher bonuses. The ranking categories include "Best," "Better," and "Good Delivery Units," with specific point systems established for various performance metrics, such as budget utilization and timely submission of reports. The guidelines emphasize a results-oriented approach to enhance government personnel performance and accountability. The circular is effective immediately upon issuance.
What type of law is DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16?: Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016 (DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16) is a Philippine Other Rules and Procedures enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
When was Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016 enacted?: Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016 (DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16) was enacted on Dec 29, 2016.
What is the citation for Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016?: Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016, DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16, Dec 29, 2016 (Philippines)

Law Information

Reference Number: DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16
Date Enacted: Dec 29, 2016
Category: Other Rules and Procedures
Subcategory: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Jurisdiction: Philippines
Enacting Body: Congress of the Philippines

December 29, 2016

DENR MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 012-16

SUBJECT

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016

1.0 BACKGROUND

1.1 Executive Order No. 201 s. 2016 provides that the existing PBB granted to qualified government personnel shall be enhanced to strengthen its result orientation. The Inter-Agency Task Force (IATF) on the Harmonization of National Government Performance Monitoring, Information and Reporting Systems created under Administrative Order No. 25 (s. 2011) shall prescribe the conditions on eligibility and procedures for the grant of the enhanced PBB, including the ranking system to recognize differences in levels of performance.

1.2 Pursuant to the above, Memorandum Circular No. 2016-1 dated 12 May 2016 was issued by the Task Force prescribing the Guidelines on the Grant of the FY 2016 PBB. The Task Force further issued Memorandum Circular No. 2016-2 dated 12 October 2016 containing the Guidelines on the Identification and Determination of Delivery Units (DUs).

1.3 In accordance with Memorandum Circular No. 2016-2, the Line Bureaus and Attached Agencies shall be treated as agencies separate from the DENR and shall have a separate ranking of their DUs. As separate agencies, they shall develop the ranking indicators to be used in performance assessment of their respective DUs.

1.4 DENR Memorandum Circular No. 2016-10 dated 27 October 2016 was issued containing the Guidelines on Ranking Delivery Units as Basis for Granting the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016. It is stipulated in the Guidelines that the Line Bureaus and Attached Agencies are required to develop the ranking indicators of their respective delivery units and submit to the Performance Management Group (PMG) for approval.

2.0 PURPOSE

This Memorandum Circular is issued identifying the ranking indicators of the delivery units of the Line Bureaus (EMB and MGB) and Attached Agencies (NWRB, NAMRIA, PCSDS).

3.0 RANKING OF DELIVERY UNITS

3.1 The Delivery Units eligible to the PBB shall be force ranked according to the following:

Ranking	Performance Category

Top 10%	Best Delivery Unit
Next 25%	Better Delivery Unit
Next 65%	Good Delivery Unit

3.2 As stipulated in DENR Memorandum Circular No. 2016-10 dated 27 October 2016 (Guidelines on Ranking DUs as Basis for Granting the PBB for FY 2016), the accomplishments on the Ranking Indicators shall cover forty percent (40%) of the total performance rating of the DUs. cTDaEH

3.3 Annex A to E shows the approved Ranking Indicators of the delivery units, including the corresponding Point System and Means of Verification (MOVs), within the Line Bureaus and Attached Agencies.

4.0 EFFECTIVITY

This Circular shall take effect immediately.

By Authority of the Secretary:

(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA

Undersecretary for Policy and Planning and Chair, Performance Management Group

ANNEX A

RANKING INDICATORS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED BONUS (PBB)

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BUREAU (EMB)

DELIVERY	RANKING INDICATORS	POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
UNITS
Office of the Director	1.	No. of permits and clearances issued vis-à-vis targets by the Central Office by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
110% & above	12	- Verification with MIS
101% to 109%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
2.	No. of draft policy/guideline endorsed vis-à-vis targets to DENR Policy and Planning by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Copy of draft policies endorsed to the DENR Policy and Planning (e-mail screenshot, receiving copy)
110% & above	12
101% to 109%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
3.	No. of EMB policies/guidelines issued vis-à-vis targets by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Copy of EMB Policies/Guidelines Issued
110% & above	12
101% to 109%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
4.	Budget utilization rate by end of 2016 (Allotment vs. Obligations)	Utilization Rate	Points	- Copy of report on budget utilization prepared by the Budget Section
100%	12
95%-99%	11
90%-94%	10
80%-89%	9
75%-79%	8
70%-74%	7
65%-69%	6
60%-64%	5
55%-59%	4
50%-54%	3
45%-49%	2
Less than 44%	1
All Central Office Divisions	1.	Quarterly Physical Accomplishment Reports based on approved WFP submitted to PPPDD on the 5th day of the following month	Submission	Points	- Copy of Reports submitted to Central Office PPPDD (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
2.	DPCR based on approved OPCR submitted to Personnel on July 15, 2016	Submission	Points	- Copy of DPCR submitted to the Personnel Section, Central Office (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
3.	Budget utilization rate by end of 2016 (Allotment vs. Obligations)	Utilization Rate	Points	- Copy of report on budget utilization prepared by the Budget Section
100%	12
95%-99%	11
90%-94%	10
80%-89%	9
75%-79%	8
70%-74%	7
65%-69%	6
60%-64%	5
55%-59%	4
50%-54%	3
45%-49%	2
Less than 44%	1
4.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to DENR Citizen's Charter Team on July 1, 2016	Submission	Points	- Copy of Report on SECSIME submitted to the DENR Citizen's Charter Team thru email (screenshot)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
5.	EMB Division's Annual Narrative Accomplishment Reports based on prescribed format submitted to OD by end of December 2016	Completeness	Points	- Copy of Report submitted to the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Complete	12
1st Revision based on completeness	6
2nd Revision based on completeness	4
3rd Revision based on completeness	2
4th Revision and above based on completeness	1
Submission	Points
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
AFMD		75% of the total personnel with Quarterly Leave Credits updated for 2016	Percentage	Points	- Copy of Reports submitted to the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
88%-100%	12
76%-87%	11
75%	10
74%	9
73%	8
72%	7
71%	6
70%	5
69%	4
68%	3
67%	2
66% and below	1
PPPDD		EMB Quarterly Accomplishment Reports submitted to DENR Planning, every 5th day of the following month after the quarter	Submission	Points	- Copy of reports submitted to DENR Planning thru email (screenshot)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
EEID		List of Special Events conducted with summary narrative report submitted to the Office of the Director by end of December 2016	Submission	Points	- Copy of report submitted to the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
EQD		60% of permits and clearances issued earlier than the prescribed timeframe by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
131% and above	12	- Verification with MIS
101%-129%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
CCD		Ecosystem Based Adaptation (EBA) training conducted with report submitted to the Office of the Director within 15 days after the training	Submission	Points	- Copy of report submitted to the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
ERLSD		100% submission of Laboratories assessed with reports submitted by end of December 2016	Submission	Points	- Copy of reports received by the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
SWMD		60% of Ten Year SWM Plans received were evaluated and endorsed for approval by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings of SWM Plans submitted to PPPDD
131% and above	12	- Copy of Reports submitted to the Solid Waste Management Commission (receiving copy)
101%-129%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
LD		Legal opinions rendered within 15 days upon receipt of document	Submission	Points	- Copy of reports on legal opinions submitted to the Office of the Director (e-mail screenshot, receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
EIAMD		60% of ECC applications received were endorsed to the Office of the Director within the prescribed timeframe by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
131% and above	12	- Verification with MIS
101%-129%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
REGIONALOFFICES	1.	Budget Utilization rate by end of December 2016	Utilization Rate	Points	- Copy of Report prepared by the Central Office Budget Section
100%	12
95%-99%	11
90%-94%	10
80%-89%	9
75%-79%	8
70%-74%	7
65%-69%	6
60%-64%	5
55%-59%	4
50%-54%	3
45%-49%	2
Less than 44%	1
	2.	Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs) based on DBM-COA Joint Circular No. 2014-01 "Guidelines Prescribing the Use of Modified Formats of the Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs)" submitted to COA and DBM	Submission	Points	- Copy of BFARs received by COA
Submitted 3 days ahead	12	- Copy of BFARs received by DBM
2 days ahead	11	- Copy of BFARs verified by Central Office Accounting or Budget
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
3.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to DENR Citizen's Charter Team on July 1, 2016.	Submission	Points	- Copy of Report on SECSIME submitted to DENR Citizen's Charter Team (email-screenshot, receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12	- Verification with the DENR Citizen's Charter Team
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
4.	OPCR based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to PPPDD on deadline set	Submission	Points	- Copy of OPCR submitted to Central Office PPPDD (email-screenshot, receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
5.	70% of property, plant and equipment data for the last 5 years (2011-2015) reconciled based on audit findings submitted to COA by end of November 2016	Percentage	Points	- Copy of Report on PPE submitted to COA (receiving copy)
71%-100%	12
70%	11
61%-69%	10
56%-60%	9
51%-55%	8
46%-50%	7
41%-45%	6
36%-40%	5
31%-35%	4
26%-30%	3
21%-25%	2
1%-20%	1
No PPE data reconciled	0
Submission	Points
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted	9
1 day late
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
6.	2016 Annual Procurement Plan based on DBM Circular Letter 2013-14 dated November 29, 2013 submitted to Procurement Service-DBM (GPPB) on June 13, 2016	Submission	Points
Submitted 3 days ahead	12	- Copy of APP emailed to Procurement
2 days ahead	11	- Service-DBM (GPPB) (Screenshot)
Submitted on time	10	- Verification with the GPPB or PBB Taskforce
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
7.	60% of permits and clearances applications issued earlier than the prescribed timeframe by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points
131% and above	12	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
101%-129%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
8.	No. of sites/facilities monitored and/or inspected with reports submitted by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
110% and above	12
101% to 109%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
	9.	Monthly Physical Accomplishments Reports based on approved WFP submitted to PPPDD every end of the month	Submission	Points	- Copy of Reports submitted to Central Office PPPDD (email-screenshot, receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) JACQUELINE A. CAANCAN	(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA
OIC, Assistant Director	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

ANNEX B

MINES AND GEOSCIENCES BUREAU (MGB)

DELIVERY	RANKING	POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
UNITS	INDICATORS
Office of the Director and All Divisions	1.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR1)	Utilization Rate	Point System	- Report (hard or e-copy) of utilization rate by the Finance Management Division
- Obligation Rate: Ratio of Amount Obligated Budget versus Allotment	101% and above	12
	100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
2.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR2)	Utilization Rate	Point System	- Report (hard or e-copy) of utilization rate by the Finance Management Division
- Disbursement Rate: Ratio of Amount Disbursed versus Obligated Amount	101% and above	12
	100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
3.	2017 PPMP Submitted to PPIAD within the Prescribed Deadline	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted PPMP (hard or e-copy) to the Planning, Policy and International Affairs Division;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up Document Action and Tracking System (DATS);
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the PPIAD
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
4.	2017 WFP Submitted within the Prescribed Deadline	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted WFP (hard or e-copy) to the Planning, Policy and International Affairs Division;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the PPIAD
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
5.	OPCR/DPCR Submitted to PPIAD within the Deadline	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted DPCR (hard copy) to the Planning, Policy and International Affairs Division;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the PPIAD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
6.	Percentage of IPCR submitted within the Deadline	Percentage Submission within the Deadline	Point System	- Submitted IPCR (hard copy) to the Administrative Division;
101% and above	12	- Filled-up DATS;
100%	11	- Ranking is the percentage of submission by the divisions on the deadline;
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
7.	Monthly Accomplishment Reports submitted to the PPIAD on the 1st day of the following month	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted Monthly Accomplishment Report (hard copy) to the PPIAD;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the PPIAD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Planning, Policy and International Affairs Division	8.	Consolidated Monthly Accomplishment Report submitted to DENR on the 5th Day of the following month	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted Monthly Accomplishment Report (hard or e-copy) to the DENR;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before deadline	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of the final draft report by the Office of Director;
4 days before deadline	99%	10
3 days before deadline	98%	9
2 days before deadline	97%	8
1 day before deadline	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after deadline	93%	4
3 days after deadline	92%	3
4 days after deadline	91%	2
5 days after deadline	90%	1
Mineral Economics Information and Publication Division	9.	Quarterly Metallic Mineral Production Report submitted to the Office of the Director 60 days after the quarter	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted Quarterly Metallic Mineral Production Report received by the Office of the Director;
21 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
20 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the OD;
18 days before	99%	10
16 days before	98%	9
14 days before	97%	8
12 days before	96%	7
10 days before	96%	6
8 days before	94%	5
6 days before	93%	4
4 days before	92%	3
2 days before	91%	2
on deadline	90%	1
Legal Service Division	10.	Contracts reviewed within 15 days from receipt of document	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the reviewed contract;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of the review by the division concerned;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Metallurgical Technology Division	11.	Research Study Conducted with 1st Semester Progress Reports Submitted to OD on the end of the semester, and the Annual Report submitted to OD by EO of December	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the 1st Semester Progress Report and Annual Report
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of the review by the OD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
deadline
4 days after	91%	2
deadline
5 days after	90%	1
deadline
Lands Geological Survey Division	12.	Groundwater Resources Assessment with Reports Submitted to the OD (complete with 1:250,00 maps) pursuant to the WFP	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the Report received by the OD;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before deadline	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of Report by the OD;
4 days before deadline	99%	10
3 days before deadline	98%	9
2 days before deadline	97%	8
1 day before deadline	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after deadline	93%	4
3 days after deadline	92%	3
4 days after deadline	91%	2
5 days after deadline	90%	1
Mining Tenements Management Division	13.	Number of Mining Rights Audited as to Work Program with Travel Reports Submitted by EO December 2016	Percentage Submission by EO December 2016	Point System	- Copy of Submitted Reports (hard copy) to the Office of the Director;
101% and above	12	- Filled-up DATS;
100%	11	- Ranking is the percentage of submission on the deadline;
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
Mine Safety Environment and Social Development Division	14.	Number of Mining Rights Audited as to SHES Program with Reports Submitted by EO December 2016	Percentage Submission by EO December 2016	Point System	- Copy of Submitted Reports (hard copy) to the Office of the Director;
101% and above	12	- Filled-up DATS;
100%	11	- Ranking is the percentage of submission on the deadline;
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
Mining Technology Division	15.	Minahang Bayan Proposal Endorsed by MGBROs that were Evaluated with corresponding Report of Evaluation submitted to OD by EO December 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Evaluation Report received by the OD;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Includes only endorsed MB proposal received by MTD NLT 15 December 2016;
4 days before	99%	10	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of Report by the OD;
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Marine Geological Survey Division:	16.	Coastal Geohazard Report of LGUs Assessed Submitted on 31 December 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the Coastal geohazard Report received by the OD;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of Coastal Geohazard Report by the OD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Administrative Division	17.	Needs Assessment Report and 5 Year (2017-2021) HR Plan submitted by EO December 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the Needs Assessment Report and HR plan received by the OD;
21 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
20 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of both documents by the OD;
18 days before	99%	10
16 days before	98%	9
14 days before	97%	8
12 days before	96%	7
10 days before	95%	6
8 days before	94%	5
6 days before	93%	4
4 days before	92%	3
2 days before	91%	2
on deadline	90%	1
Finance Management Division	18.	FAR 1B Submitted to DENR	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the submitted BFARs;
21 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
20 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of the documents by the DENR;
18 days before	99%	10
16 days before	98%	9
14 days before	97%	8
12 days before	96%	7
10 days before	95%	6
8 days before	94%	5
6 days before	93%	4
4 days before	92%	3
2 days before	91%	2
on deadline	90%	1
Office of the Director/	19.	Policy Clarifications Issued within 15 days from receipt of document	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the Policy Clarification with endorsement;
Assistant Director:	6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of draft policy clarification by the OD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Regional Offices	20.	Permitting: Number of mining permits/contracts issued and agreements endorsed for approval	Accomplishment over Target	Point System	- Copy of Mining Permits/
101% and above	12	Contracts Issued and Agreements endorsed for approval;
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
21.	Monitoring: Number of sites and facilities monitored and/or inspected with reports issued	Accomplishment over Target	Point System	- Copy of Monitoring Reports endorsed to Regional Director;
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
22.	Enforcement: Number of violations or complaints acted upon with reports issued	Accomplishment over Target	Point System	- Copy of Monitoring Reports endorsed to Regional Director;
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
23.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR 1) — Obligation Rate: Ratio of Amount Obligated Budget versus Allotment (BUR1 & BUR2)	Utilization Rate	Point System	- Report (hard or e-copy) of utilization rate by the Finance Management Division
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
24.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR 2) — Disbursement Rate: Ratio of Amount Disbursed versus Obligated Amount	Utilization Rate	Point System	- Report (hard or e-copy) of utilization rate by the Finance Management Division
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
25.	Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs) based on DBM-COA Joint Circular No. 2014-01 Guidelines Prescribing the Use of Modified Formats of the Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs)" submitted to COA and DBM	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted BFAR to COA and DBM;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12
5 days before	100%	11
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
26.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to DENR Citizen's Charter Team on July 1, 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted SECSIME to DENR HRDS
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the DENR HRDIS;
5 days before	100%	11
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
27.	OPCRs submitted based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to OSEC (USEC for Policy, Planning and Foreign-Assisted Programs) on September 30, 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted OPCR to OSEC;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by MGB CO
5 days before	100%	11
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
28.	Percentage of property, plant and equipment data for the last 5 years (2011-2015) reconciled based on audit findings submitted to COA by end of November 2016	Percentage Reconciliation (QUALITY)	Percentage	Point System	- Certificate of Reconciliation with notation of the COA duly received by MGB CO
71%-100% reconciled	101%	12
70% reconciled	100%	11
61%-69% reconciled	99%	10
56%-60% reconciled	98%	9
51%-55% reconciled	97%	8
46%-50% reconciled	96%	7
41%-45% reconciled	95%	6
36%-40% reconciled	94%	5
31%-35% reconciled	93%	4
26%-30% reconciled	92%	3
21%-25% reconciled	91%	2
1%-20% reconciled	90%	1
Submission Date (TIMELINESS)	Percentage	Point System	- Certificate of Reconciliation with notation of the COA duly received by MGB CO
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12
5 days before deadline	100%	11
4 days before deadline	99%	10
3 days before deadline	98%	9
2 days before deadline	97%	8
1 day before deadline	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after deadline	93%	4
3 days after deadline	92%	3
4 days after deadline	91%	2
5 days after deadline	90%	1
29.	Number of VRAs conducted with Report Submitted by EO December 2016	Accomplishment over Target	Point System	- Copy of VRA Reports endorsed to Regional Director;
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) ATTY. DANILO U. UYKIENG	(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA
OIC, Director	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

ANNEX C

PALAWAN COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STAFF (PCSDS)

DELIVERY UNITS	RANKING INDICATORS	POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
OED, EMED, DMD North, DMD South, DMD Calamian, EZMED (6 DUs)	1.	Number of permits and clearances issued	Quantity = accomplishment	- 100 permits and clearances issued by end of December 2016
–––––––––––––––– x 100
target
This formula will also be applied in all Quantity measures below.
All Delivery Units	2.	Number of sustainable development forums, conferences, and workshops conducted	Same as item no. 1.	- 6 forums and conferences organized, conducted and facilitated by 2016 the end of December
	3.	Number of division Work and Financial Plans based on Planning Guidelines submitted to EPRPD	- 1 FY 2017 division Work and Financial Plans based on Planning Guidelines submitted to EPRPD on the prescribed deadline
AD = Actual date of submission of the required document
PD = Prescribed deadline based on the internal memo/circular
DR = Date of reckoning = date of issuance of internal memo/circular prescribing the deadline of submission of the required document
This formula will also be applied to Ranking Indicators Nos. 4, 7, 8, 9, and 12.
	4.	Percentage submission of division monthly accomplishment reports based on targets compliant to prescribed format submitted to EPRPD	Same as item no. 3.	- 100% Accomplishment Reports based on targets compliant to prescribed format submitted to EPRPD
- 12 monthly accomplishment reports (every 25th day of the current month)
	5.	Division Budget Utilization Rate (BUR) by end of November 2016	DU score = (Actual DU BUR ÷ 90%) x 100%	- 90% budget utilization rate (disbursement) by end of November 2016
- Ratio of Total obligations to total releases	- Ratio of Total Obligations to Total Releases
- Ratio of Total Disbursement to total Obligations	- Ratio of Total Disbursement to total Obligations
	6.	Ageing of cash advances	- Submission of liquidation documents after travel and after use of operational cash advances
AD = Actual date of submission of the required document
PD = Prescribed deadline based on the internal memo/circular
DR = Date of reckoning = date of issuance of internal memo/circular prescribing the deadline of submission of the required document
This formula will also be applied to Ranking Indicator No. 13.
Based on existing guidelines (item 5.1.3 of COA Circular 97-002 dated February 10, 1997 and Sec. 16 of EO No. 248 dated May 29, 1995), the prescribed deadlines for different types of cash advances incurred are as follows:
• TEV (local) — within 30 days upon return to permanent official station
• TEV (foreign) — within 60 days upon return to permanent official station
• Special Activities — within 30 days after each 15 days/end of month day period
• Petty Cash Fund — within 20 days after the end of the year
	7.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through Continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to AFD-HR Unit	Same as item no. 3.	- 1 Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring & Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to AFD-HR Unit on the prescribed deadline
	8.	2016 DPCR commitment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to EPRPD for review on the prescribed deadline	Same as item no. 3.	- 2016 DPCR commitment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to EPRPD for review by on the prescribed deadline
	9.	2016 DPCR ratings based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to EPRPD for review on the prescribed deadline	Same as item no. 3.	- 2016 DPCR ratings based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to EPRPD for review on the prescribed deadline
	10.	Percentage of the employees in the Division who submitted 2016 IPCR Commitment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to HR unit for review on the prescribed deadline	# of employee who submitted within the deadline	- Percentage of employees in the DU who submitted to HR Unit the 2016 IPCR commitment based on approved SPMS guidelines on or before the prescribed deadline
–––––––––––––––––––––– x 100
total number of employers in the DU
	11.	Percentage of the employees in the Division who submitted 2016 IPCR Ratings based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to HR unit for review on the prescribed deadline	# of employee who submitted within the deadline	- Percentage of employees in the DU who submitted to HR Unit the 2016 IPCR ratings based on approved SPMS guidelines on or before the prescribed deadline
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––– x 100
total number of employees in the DU
	12.	2016 division PPMP based on Revised IRR of RA 9184 submitted to AFD on the prescribed deadline	Same as item no. 3.	- 2016 PPMP submitted on the prescribed deadline
	13.	100% submission of SALN to AFD on the prescribed deadline	Same as item no. 6.	- 100% submission of SALN to AFD on prescribed deadline

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) NELSON P. DEVANADERA	MARLO D. MENDOZA
Executive Director	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

ANNEX D

NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES BOARD (NWRB)

DELIVERY UNITS	RANKING INDICATORS	POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
Accomplishments	No. of Points
PPD, WRD, WUD, MED, AFD and EDO/DEDO	1.	Submissions of IPCR accomplishment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to NWRB HR Section on the prescribed date	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Copy of Certification of submitted IPCRs from HR
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	9
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
	2.	Percentage of IPCRs (accomplishment — 1st semester) based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to NWRB HR Section on the prescribed date	100%	12	Copy of Certification of submitted IPCRs from HR
95%	10
90%	8
85%	6
80%	4
75%	2
70%	1
PPD, WRD, WUD, MED, AFD	3.	Final submission of Division's monthly physical/financial accomplishment report based on targets compliant to prescribed format to PPD/EDO on the set deadline	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of Division's WFP
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	8
Submitted on time	6
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	5
2 days beyond	4
3 days beyond	3
4 days beyond	2
5 days beyond	1
6 days beyond	0
	4.	Submission of 2017 Division's Work and Financial Plan based on the prescribed format submitted to PPD on the set deadline	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of Division's 2017 WFP
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	8
Submitted on time	6
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	5
2 days beyond	4
3 days beyond	3
4 days beyond	2
5 days beyond	1
6 days beyond	0
	5.	Submissions of DPCR Accomplishment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to NWRB HR Section on the prescribed date	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Copy of DPCR submitted to NWRB HR Section
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	9
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
	6.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through Continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to NWRB Citizen's Charter Team on the set deadline	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Copy of 1 core process per division submitted to NWRB Citizens Charter Team
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	9
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
EDO/DEDO	7.	Submission of approved NWRB monthly physical and financial accomplishment report based on targets compliant to prescribed format to DENR on the set deadline	Submitted 2 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of NWRB WFP
Submitted 1 day before deadline	10
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	6
2 days beyond	5
3 days beyond	4
4 days beyond	3
5 days beyond	2
6 days beyond	1
7 days beyond	0
	8.	Submission of approved 2017 NWRB Work and Financial Plan based on the prescribed format submitted to DENR on the set deadline	Submitted 5 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of NWRB 2017 WFP
Submitted 3 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	8
Submitted on time	6
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	5
2 days beyond	4
3 days beyond	3
4 days beyond	2
5 days beyond	1
6 days beyond	0
	9.	Approval and submission of OPCR Accomplishment based on approved SPMS guidelines to OSEC (USEC for Policy, Planning and Foreign-Assisted Programs) on the prescribed date	Submitted 5 days before deadline	12	Copy of OPCR submitted to DENR
Submitted 3 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	9
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
	10.	Draft Minutes of Board Meeting submitted to the Executive Director on the set deadline	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Draft copy of minutes of Board Meeting attested by the Executive Director
Submitted 2 days before deadline	11
Submitted 1 day before deadline	10
Submitted on time	9
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
	11.	Minutes of Execom Meeting submitted to the Executive Director on the set deadline	Submitted 5 calendar days before deadline	12	Copy of Minutes of Execom Meeting attested by the Executive Director
Submitted 4 calendar days before deadline	11
Submitted 3 calendar days before deadline	10
Submitted 2 calendar days before deadline	9
Submitted 1 calendar day before deadline	8
Submitted on time	7
Submitted 1 calendar day beyond deadline	6
2 calendar days beyond	5
3 calendar days beyond	4
4 calendar days beyond	3
5 calendar days beyond	2
6 calendar days beyond	1
7 calendar days beyond	0
PPD	12.	No. of water regulation policies/plans endorsed to EDO/Board by the end of 2016	Over 100%	12	Copy of Board Resolution
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
Below 90%	0
WRD	13.	No. of water permits approved by end of December 2016	Over 110%	12	Copy of Board Resolution
106%-110%	11
100%-105%	10
93%-99%	9
86%-92%	8
79%-85%	7
72%-78%	6
65%-71%	5
58%-64%	4
51%-57%	3
44%-50%	2
36%-43%	1
Below 36%	0
WUD	14.	No. of Certificates of Public Convenience (CPC) and CPC-related cases decided by end of December 2016	Over 110%	12	Copy of Board Resolution
106%-110%	11
100%-105%	10
93%-99%	9
86%-92%	8
79%-85%	7
72%-78%	6
65%-71%	5
58%-64%	4
51%-57%	3
44%-50%	2
36%-43%	1
Below 36%	0
MED	15.	Percentage of submitted reports that resulted in the issuance of notice of violations and penalties imposed by end of December 2016	Over 110%	12	Copy of Notices/orders issued
106%-110%	11
100%-105%	10
93%-99%	9
86%-92%	8
79%-85%	7
72%-78%	6
65%-71%	5
58%-64%	4
51%-57%	3
44%-50%	2
36%-43%	1
Below 36%	0
AFD	16.	Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs) based on DBM-COA Joint Circular No. 2014-01 Guidelines Prescribing the Use of Modified Formats of the Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs)" submitted to COA and DBM	All BFARs submitted 2 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of reports
All BFARs submitted 1 day before on deadline	11
Submitted on deadline	10
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	9
2 days beyond	8
3 days beyond	7
4 days beyond	6
5 days beyond	5
6 days beyond	4
7 days beyond	3
8 days beyond	2
9 days beyond	1
No submission	0

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) DR. SEVILLO D. DAVID, JR., CESO III	(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA
Executive Director	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

ANNEX E

NATIONAL MAPPING AND RESOURCE INFORMATION AUTHORITY (NAMRIA)

DELIVERY UNITS		POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
	Accomplishments	No. of Points
All Branches	RANKING INDICATORS			Report on Budget Utilization Rate
1.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR)	100%	12
	- Ratio of Total obligations to total releases	90%-99%	8
	- Ratio of Total Disbursement to total Obligations	80%-89%	4
		below 80%	0
2.	Physical Accomplishment Rates	95%-100%	12	Physical Performance Report as of Dec. 31, 2016
90%-94%	9
86%-89%	6
80%-85%	3
below 80%	0
3.	Branch monthly Physical Accomplishment Reports (PARs) based on targets and using the prescribed ISO forms submitted to Planning and Policy Division (PPD)	Submitted on deadline	12	PPR Monitoring Chart
1 day beyond deadline	10
2 days	8
3 days	6
4 days beyond	0
4.	2016 BPCR/DPCR Commitments/	submitted before deadline	12	Summary of submitted BPCRs/DPCRs
	accomplishments based on approved SPMS Guidelines submitted to NAMRIA PPD and HRMS	Submitted on deadline	11
		1 day beyond deadline	10
		2 days	9
		3 days	8
		4 days	7
		5 days	6
		6 days	5
		7 days	4
		8 days	3
		9 days	2
		10 days	1
		beyond 10 days	0
5.	Percentage of timely submission of IPCR Commitments/	100% Submitted	12	Summary of IPCR Submissions for January to June and July to December 2016
	accomplishments based on approved SPMS Guidelines submitted on prescribed due date	95%-99%	11
		90%-94%	10
		86%-89%	9
		80%-85%	8
		75%-79%	7
		70%-74%	6
		65%-69%	5
		60%-64%	4
		55%-59%	3
		50%-54%	2
		below 50%	0
6.	2017 Branch Project Procurement Management Plan (PPMP) based on Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of RA 9184 (Government Procurement Reform Act) submitted to Admin/Supplies	submitted before deadline	12	Branch Consolidated PPMP
Submitted on deadline	11
1 day beyond deadline	9
2 days	7
3 days	5
4 days	3
5 days	1
Office of the Administrator	7.	All incoming documents	within 5 days	12	Record Books/Receiving Copy/Routing Slip
	within 6 days	10
	within 7 days	8
	within 8 days	6
	within 9 days	4
	within 10 days	2
	within 11 days
	& beyond	0
8.	Continued implementation of Quality Management System (QMS) ISO 9001:2008
a. 2	Management Reviews conducted	2 reports	12	Management Review Reports (MRR)
	0	0
b. 1	External Audit Passed	100% (passed)	12	CIP Surveillance Audit Report
	Failed	0
9.	Representation in regional and international meetings, workshops and conferences	within 30 days	12	Official travel report/after conference reports
	within 45 days	8
	within 60 days	4
	beyond 60 days	0

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) DR. PETER N. TIANGCO, CESO I	(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA
Administrator	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

Cite This Law

Standard Citation

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016, DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16, Dec 29, 2016 (Philippines)

Bluebook Style

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016, DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16 (Phil. 2016)

Browse More Other Rules and Procedures

Explore other laws in the Other Rules and Procedures category.

View All Other Rules and Procedures

Need Help Understanding This Law?

Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.

Ask AI About This Law

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016

DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16Dec 29, 2016Other Rules and Procedures41 min read

Quick Answers

What is Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016 about?

What type of law is DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16?

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016 (DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16) is a Philippine Other Rules and Procedures enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.

When was Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016 enacted?

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016 (DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16) was enacted on Dec 29, 2016.

What is the citation for Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016?

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016, DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16, Dec 29, 2016 (Philippines)

December 29, 2016

DENR MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 012-16

SUBJECT

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016

1.0 BACKGROUND

2.0 PURPOSE

This Memorandum Circular is issued identifying the ranking indicators of the delivery units of the Line Bureaus (EMB and MGB) and Attached Agencies (NWRB, NAMRIA, PCSDS).

3.0 RANKING OF DELIVERY UNITS

3.1 The Delivery Units eligible to the PBB shall be force ranked according to the following:

Ranking	Performance Category

Top 10%	Best Delivery Unit
Next 25%	Better Delivery Unit
Next 65%	Good Delivery Unit

3.3 Annex A to E shows the approved Ranking Indicators of the delivery units, including the corresponding Point System and Means of Verification (MOVs), within the Line Bureaus and Attached Agencies.

4.0 EFFECTIVITY

This Circular shall take effect immediately.

By Authority of the Secretary:

(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA

Undersecretary for Policy and Planning and Chair, Performance Management Group

ANNEX A

RANKING INDICATORS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED BONUS (PBB)

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BUREAU (EMB)

DELIVERY	RANKING INDICATORS	POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
UNITS
Office of the Director	1.	No. of permits and clearances issued vis-à-vis targets by the Central Office by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
110% & above	12	- Verification with MIS
101% to 109%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
2.	No. of draft policy/guideline endorsed vis-à-vis targets to DENR Policy and Planning by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Copy of draft policies endorsed to the DENR Policy and Planning (e-mail screenshot, receiving copy)
110% & above	12
101% to 109%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
3.	No. of EMB policies/guidelines issued vis-à-vis targets by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Copy of EMB Policies/Guidelines Issued
110% & above	12
101% to 109%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
4.	Budget utilization rate by end of 2016 (Allotment vs. Obligations)	Utilization Rate	Points	- Copy of report on budget utilization prepared by the Budget Section
100%	12
95%-99%	11
90%-94%	10
80%-89%	9
75%-79%	8
70%-74%	7
65%-69%	6
60%-64%	5
55%-59%	4
50%-54%	3
45%-49%	2
Less than 44%	1
All Central Office Divisions	1.	Quarterly Physical Accomplishment Reports based on approved WFP submitted to PPPDD on the 5th day of the following month	Submission	Points	- Copy of Reports submitted to Central Office PPPDD (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
2.	DPCR based on approved OPCR submitted to Personnel on July 15, 2016	Submission	Points	- Copy of DPCR submitted to the Personnel Section, Central Office (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
3.	Budget utilization rate by end of 2016 (Allotment vs. Obligations)	Utilization Rate	Points	- Copy of report on budget utilization prepared by the Budget Section
100%	12
95%-99%	11
90%-94%	10
80%-89%	9
75%-79%	8
70%-74%	7
65%-69%	6
60%-64%	5
55%-59%	4
50%-54%	3
45%-49%	2
Less than 44%	1
4.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to DENR Citizen's Charter Team on July 1, 2016	Submission	Points	- Copy of Report on SECSIME submitted to the DENR Citizen's Charter Team thru email (screenshot)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
5.	EMB Division's Annual Narrative Accomplishment Reports based on prescribed format submitted to OD by end of December 2016	Completeness	Points	- Copy of Report submitted to the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Complete	12
1st Revision based on completeness	6
2nd Revision based on completeness	4
3rd Revision based on completeness	2
4th Revision and above based on completeness	1
Submission	Points
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
AFMD		75% of the total personnel with Quarterly Leave Credits updated for 2016	Percentage	Points	- Copy of Reports submitted to the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
88%-100%	12
76%-87%	11
75%	10
74%	9
73%	8
72%	7
71%	6
70%	5
69%	4
68%	3
67%	2
66% and below	1
PPPDD		EMB Quarterly Accomplishment Reports submitted to DENR Planning, every 5th day of the following month after the quarter	Submission	Points	- Copy of reports submitted to DENR Planning thru email (screenshot)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
EEID		List of Special Events conducted with summary narrative report submitted to the Office of the Director by end of December 2016	Submission	Points	- Copy of report submitted to the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
EQD		60% of permits and clearances issued earlier than the prescribed timeframe by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
131% and above	12	- Verification with MIS
101%-129%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
CCD		Ecosystem Based Adaptation (EBA) training conducted with report submitted to the Office of the Director within 15 days after the training	Submission	Points	- Copy of report submitted to the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
ERLSD		100% submission of Laboratories assessed with reports submitted by end of December 2016	Submission	Points	- Copy of reports received by the Office of the Director (email-screenshot or receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
SWMD		60% of Ten Year SWM Plans received were evaluated and endorsed for approval by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings of SWM Plans submitted to PPPDD
131% and above	12	- Copy of Reports submitted to the Solid Waste Management Commission (receiving copy)
101%-129%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
LD		Legal opinions rendered within 15 days upon receipt of document	Submission	Points	- Copy of reports on legal opinions submitted to the Office of the Director (e-mail screenshot, receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
EIAMD		60% of ECC applications received were endorsed to the Office of the Director within the prescribed timeframe by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
131% and above	12	- Verification with MIS
101%-129%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
REGIONALOFFICES	1.	Budget Utilization rate by end of December 2016	Utilization Rate	Points	- Copy of Report prepared by the Central Office Budget Section
100%	12
95%-99%	11
90%-94%	10
80%-89%	9
75%-79%	8
70%-74%	7
65%-69%	6
60%-64%	5
55%-59%	4
50%-54%	3
45%-49%	2
Less than 44%	1
	2.	Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs) based on DBM-COA Joint Circular No. 2014-01 "Guidelines Prescribing the Use of Modified Formats of the Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs)" submitted to COA and DBM	Submission	Points	- Copy of BFARs received by COA
Submitted 3 days ahead	12	- Copy of BFARs received by DBM
2 days ahead	11	- Copy of BFARs verified by Central Office Accounting or Budget
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
3.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to DENR Citizen's Charter Team on July 1, 2016.	Submission	Points	- Copy of Report on SECSIME submitted to DENR Citizen's Charter Team (email-screenshot, receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12	- Verification with the DENR Citizen's Charter Team
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
4.	OPCR based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to PPPDD on deadline set	Submission	Points	- Copy of OPCR submitted to Central Office PPPDD (email-screenshot, receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
5.	70% of property, plant and equipment data for the last 5 years (2011-2015) reconciled based on audit findings submitted to COA by end of November 2016	Percentage	Points	- Copy of Report on PPE submitted to COA (receiving copy)
71%-100%	12
70%	11
61%-69%	10
56%-60%	9
51%-55%	8
46%-50%	7
41%-45%	6
36%-40%	5
31%-35%	4
26%-30%	3
21%-25%	2
1%-20%	1
No PPE data reconciled	0
Submission	Points
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted	9
1 day late
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
6.	2016 Annual Procurement Plan based on DBM Circular Letter 2013-14 dated November 29, 2013 submitted to Procurement Service-DBM (GPPB) on June 13, 2016	Submission	Points
Submitted 3 days ahead	12	- Copy of APP emailed to Procurement
2 days ahead	11	- Service-DBM (GPPB) (Screenshot)
Submitted on time	10	- Verification with the GPPB or PBB Taskforce
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0
7.	60% of permits and clearances applications issued earlier than the prescribed timeframe by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points
131% and above	12	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
101%-129%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
8.	No. of sites/facilities monitored and/or inspected with reports submitted by end of December 2016	Percentage	Points	- Listings submitted to Central Office PPPDD
110% and above	12
101% to 109%	11
100%	10
99%	9
98%	8
97%	7
96%	6
95%	5
94%	4
93%	3
92%	2
91% and below	1
	9.	Monthly Physical Accomplishments Reports based on approved WFP submitted to PPPDD every end of the month	Submission	Points	- Copy of Reports submitted to Central Office PPPDD (email-screenshot, receiving copy)
Submitted 3 days ahead	12
2 days ahead	11
Submitted on time	10
Submitted 1 day late	9
2 days late	8
3 days late	7
4 days late	6
5 days late	5
6 days late	4
7 days late	3
8 days late	2
Submitted 9 days late and beyond	1
No Submission	0

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) JACQUELINE A. CAANCAN	(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA
OIC, Assistant Director	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

ANNEX B

MINES AND GEOSCIENCES BUREAU (MGB)

DELIVERY	RANKING	POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
UNITS	INDICATORS
Office of the Director and All Divisions	1.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR1)	Utilization Rate	Point System	- Report (hard or e-copy) of utilization rate by the Finance Management Division
- Obligation Rate: Ratio of Amount Obligated Budget versus Allotment	101% and above	12
	100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
2.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR2)	Utilization Rate	Point System	- Report (hard or e-copy) of utilization rate by the Finance Management Division
- Disbursement Rate: Ratio of Amount Disbursed versus Obligated Amount	101% and above	12
	100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
3.	2017 PPMP Submitted to PPIAD within the Prescribed Deadline	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted PPMP (hard or e-copy) to the Planning, Policy and International Affairs Division;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up Document Action and Tracking System (DATS);
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the PPIAD
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
4.	2017 WFP Submitted within the Prescribed Deadline	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted WFP (hard or e-copy) to the Planning, Policy and International Affairs Division;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the PPIAD
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
5.	OPCR/DPCR Submitted to PPIAD within the Deadline	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted DPCR (hard copy) to the Planning, Policy and International Affairs Division;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the PPIAD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
6.	Percentage of IPCR submitted within the Deadline	Percentage Submission within the Deadline	Point System	- Submitted IPCR (hard copy) to the Administrative Division;
101% and above	12	- Filled-up DATS;
100%	11	- Ranking is the percentage of submission by the divisions on the deadline;
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
7.	Monthly Accomplishment Reports submitted to the PPIAD on the 1st day of the following month	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted Monthly Accomplishment Report (hard copy) to the PPIAD;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the PPIAD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Planning, Policy and International Affairs Division	8.	Consolidated Monthly Accomplishment Report submitted to DENR on the 5th Day of the following month	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted Monthly Accomplishment Report (hard or e-copy) to the DENR;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before deadline	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of the final draft report by the Office of Director;
4 days before deadline	99%	10
3 days before deadline	98%	9
2 days before deadline	97%	8
1 day before deadline	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after deadline	93%	4
3 days after deadline	92%	3
4 days after deadline	91%	2
5 days after deadline	90%	1
Mineral Economics Information and Publication Division	9.	Quarterly Metallic Mineral Production Report submitted to the Office of the Director 60 days after the quarter	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted Quarterly Metallic Mineral Production Report received by the Office of the Director;
21 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
20 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the OD;
18 days before	99%	10
16 days before	98%	9
14 days before	97%	8
12 days before	96%	7
10 days before	96%	6
8 days before	94%	5
6 days before	93%	4
4 days before	92%	3
2 days before	91%	2
on deadline	90%	1
Legal Service Division	10.	Contracts reviewed within 15 days from receipt of document	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the reviewed contract;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of the review by the division concerned;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Metallurgical Technology Division	11.	Research Study Conducted with 1st Semester Progress Reports Submitted to OD on the end of the semester, and the Annual Report submitted to OD by EO of December	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the 1st Semester Progress Report and Annual Report
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of the review by the OD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
deadline
4 days after	91%	2
deadline
5 days after	90%	1
deadline
Lands Geological Survey Division	12.	Groundwater Resources Assessment with Reports Submitted to the OD (complete with 1:250,00 maps) pursuant to the WFP	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the Report received by the OD;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before deadline	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of Report by the OD;
4 days before deadline	99%	10
3 days before deadline	98%	9
2 days before deadline	97%	8
1 day before deadline	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after deadline	93%	4
3 days after deadline	92%	3
4 days after deadline	91%	2
5 days after deadline	90%	1
Mining Tenements Management Division	13.	Number of Mining Rights Audited as to Work Program with Travel Reports Submitted by EO December 2016	Percentage Submission by EO December 2016	Point System	- Copy of Submitted Reports (hard copy) to the Office of the Director;
101% and above	12	- Filled-up DATS;
100%	11	- Ranking is the percentage of submission on the deadline;
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
Mine Safety Environment and Social Development Division	14.	Number of Mining Rights Audited as to SHES Program with Reports Submitted by EO December 2016	Percentage Submission by EO December 2016	Point System	- Copy of Submitted Reports (hard copy) to the Office of the Director;
101% and above	12	- Filled-up DATS;
100%	11	- Ranking is the percentage of submission on the deadline;
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
Mining Technology Division	15.	Minahang Bayan Proposal Endorsed by MGBROs that were Evaluated with corresponding Report of Evaluation submitted to OD by EO December 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Evaluation Report received by the OD;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Includes only endorsed MB proposal received by MTD NLT 15 December 2016;
4 days before	99%	10	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of Report by the OD;
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Marine Geological Survey Division:	16.	Coastal Geohazard Report of LGUs Assessed Submitted on 31 December 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the Coastal geohazard Report received by the OD;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of Coastal Geohazard Report by the OD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Administrative Division	17.	Needs Assessment Report and 5 Year (2017-2021) HR Plan submitted by EO December 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the Needs Assessment Report and HR plan received by the OD;
21 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
20 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of both documents by the OD;
18 days before	99%	10
16 days before	98%	9
14 days before	97%	8
12 days before	96%	7
10 days before	95%	6
8 days before	94%	5
6 days before	93%	4
4 days before	92%	3
2 days before	91%	2
on deadline	90%	1
Finance Management Division	18.	FAR 1B Submitted to DENR	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the submitted BFARs;
21 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
20 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of the documents by the DENR;
18 days before	99%	10
16 days before	98%	9
14 days before	97%	8
12 days before	96%	7
10 days before	95%	6
8 days before	94%	5
6 days before	93%	4
4 days before	92%	3
2 days before	91%	2
on deadline	90%	1
Office of the Director/	19.	Policy Clarifications Issued within 15 days from receipt of document	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Copy of the Policy Clarification with endorsement;
Assistant Director:	6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Filled-up DATS;
5 days before	100%	11	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt of draft policy clarification by the OD;
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
Regional Offices	20.	Permitting: Number of mining permits/contracts issued and agreements endorsed for approval	Accomplishment over Target	Point System	- Copy of Mining Permits/
101% and above	12	Contracts Issued and Agreements endorsed for approval;
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
21.	Monitoring: Number of sites and facilities monitored and/or inspected with reports issued	Accomplishment over Target	Point System	- Copy of Monitoring Reports endorsed to Regional Director;
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
22.	Enforcement: Number of violations or complaints acted upon with reports issued	Accomplishment over Target	Point System	- Copy of Monitoring Reports endorsed to Regional Director;
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
23.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR 1) — Obligation Rate: Ratio of Amount Obligated Budget versus Allotment (BUR1 & BUR2)	Utilization Rate	Point System	- Report (hard or e-copy) of utilization rate by the Finance Management Division
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
24.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR 2) — Disbursement Rate: Ratio of Amount Disbursed versus Obligated Amount	Utilization Rate	Point System	- Report (hard or e-copy) of utilization rate by the Finance Management Division
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
25.	Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs) based on DBM-COA Joint Circular No. 2014-01 Guidelines Prescribing the Use of Modified Formats of the Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs)" submitted to COA and DBM	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted BFAR to COA and DBM;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12
5 days before	100%	11
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
26.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to DENR Citizen's Charter Team on July 1, 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted SECSIME to DENR HRDS
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by the DENR HRDIS;
5 days before	100%	11
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
27.	OPCRs submitted based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to OSEC (USEC for Policy, Planning and Foreign-Assisted Programs) on September 30, 2016	Submission Date	Percentage	Point System	- Submitted OPCR to OSEC;
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12	- Reckoning date for ranking is the date of receipt by MGB CO
5 days before	100%	11
4 days before	99%	10
3 days before	98%	9
2 days before	97%	8
1 day before	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after	93%	4
3 days after	92%	3
4 days after	91%	2
5 days after	90%	1
28.	Percentage of property, plant and equipment data for the last 5 years (2011-2015) reconciled based on audit findings submitted to COA by end of November 2016	Percentage Reconciliation (QUALITY)	Percentage	Point System	- Certificate of Reconciliation with notation of the COA duly received by MGB CO
71%-100% reconciled	101%	12
70% reconciled	100%	11
61%-69% reconciled	99%	10
56%-60% reconciled	98%	9
51%-55% reconciled	97%	8
46%-50% reconciled	96%	7
41%-45% reconciled	95%	6
36%-40% reconciled	94%	5
31%-35% reconciled	93%	4
26%-30% reconciled	92%	3
21%-25% reconciled	91%	2
1%-20% reconciled	90%	1
Submission Date (TIMELINESS)	Percentage	Point System	- Certificate of Reconciliation with notation of the COA duly received by MGB CO
6 days or more before deadline	101%	12
5 days before deadline	100%	11
4 days before deadline	99%	10
3 days before deadline	98%	9
2 days before deadline	97%	8
1 day before deadline	96%	7
on deadline	95%	6
1 day after deadline	94%	5
2 days after deadline	93%	4
3 days after deadline	92%	3
4 days after deadline	91%	2
5 days after deadline	90%	1
29.	Number of VRAs conducted with Report Submitted by EO December 2016	Accomplishment over Target	Point System	- Copy of VRA Reports endorsed to Regional Director;
101% and above	12
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) ATTY. DANILO U. UYKIENG	(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA
OIC, Director	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

ANNEX C

PALAWAN COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STAFF (PCSDS)

DELIVERY UNITS	RANKING INDICATORS	POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
OED, EMED, DMD North, DMD South, DMD Calamian, EZMED (6 DUs)	1.	Number of permits and clearances issued	Quantity = accomplishment	- 100 permits and clearances issued by end of December 2016
–––––––––––––––– x 100
target
This formula will also be applied in all Quantity measures below.
All Delivery Units	2.	Number of sustainable development forums, conferences, and workshops conducted	Same as item no. 1.	- 6 forums and conferences organized, conducted and facilitated by 2016 the end of December
	3.	Number of division Work and Financial Plans based on Planning Guidelines submitted to EPRPD	- 1 FY 2017 division Work and Financial Plans based on Planning Guidelines submitted to EPRPD on the prescribed deadline
AD = Actual date of submission of the required document
PD = Prescribed deadline based on the internal memo/circular
DR = Date of reckoning = date of issuance of internal memo/circular prescribing the deadline of submission of the required document
This formula will also be applied to Ranking Indicators Nos. 4, 7, 8, 9, and 12.
	4.	Percentage submission of division monthly accomplishment reports based on targets compliant to prescribed format submitted to EPRPD	Same as item no. 3.	- 100% Accomplishment Reports based on targets compliant to prescribed format submitted to EPRPD
- 12 monthly accomplishment reports (every 25th day of the current month)
	5.	Division Budget Utilization Rate (BUR) by end of November 2016	DU score = (Actual DU BUR ÷ 90%) x 100%	- 90% budget utilization rate (disbursement) by end of November 2016
- Ratio of Total obligations to total releases	- Ratio of Total Obligations to Total Releases
- Ratio of Total Disbursement to total Obligations	- Ratio of Total Disbursement to total Obligations
	6.	Ageing of cash advances	- Submission of liquidation documents after travel and after use of operational cash advances
AD = Actual date of submission of the required document
PD = Prescribed deadline based on the internal memo/circular
DR = Date of reckoning = date of issuance of internal memo/circular prescribing the deadline of submission of the required document
This formula will also be applied to Ranking Indicator No. 13.
Based on existing guidelines (item 5.1.3 of COA Circular 97-002 dated February 10, 1997 and Sec. 16 of EO No. 248 dated May 29, 1995), the prescribed deadlines for different types of cash advances incurred are as follows:
• TEV (local) — within 30 days upon return to permanent official station
• TEV (foreign) — within 60 days upon return to permanent official station
• Special Activities — within 30 days after each 15 days/end of month day period
• Petty Cash Fund — within 20 days after the end of the year
	7.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through Continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to AFD-HR Unit	Same as item no. 3.	- 1 Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring & Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to AFD-HR Unit on the prescribed deadline
	8.	2016 DPCR commitment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to EPRPD for review on the prescribed deadline	Same as item no. 3.	- 2016 DPCR commitment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to EPRPD for review by on the prescribed deadline
	9.	2016 DPCR ratings based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to EPRPD for review on the prescribed deadline	Same as item no. 3.	- 2016 DPCR ratings based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to EPRPD for review on the prescribed deadline
	10.	Percentage of the employees in the Division who submitted 2016 IPCR Commitment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to HR unit for review on the prescribed deadline	# of employee who submitted within the deadline	- Percentage of employees in the DU who submitted to HR Unit the 2016 IPCR commitment based on approved SPMS guidelines on or before the prescribed deadline
–––––––––––––––––––––– x 100
total number of employers in the DU
	11.	Percentage of the employees in the Division who submitted 2016 IPCR Ratings based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to HR unit for review on the prescribed deadline	# of employee who submitted within the deadline	- Percentage of employees in the DU who submitted to HR Unit the 2016 IPCR ratings based on approved SPMS guidelines on or before the prescribed deadline
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––– x 100
total number of employees in the DU
	12.	2016 division PPMP based on Revised IRR of RA 9184 submitted to AFD on the prescribed deadline	Same as item no. 3.	- 2016 PPMP submitted on the prescribed deadline
	13.	100% submission of SALN to AFD on the prescribed deadline	Same as item no. 6.	- 100% submission of SALN to AFD on prescribed deadline

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) NELSON P. DEVANADERA	MARLO D. MENDOZA
Executive Director	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

ANNEX D

NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES BOARD (NWRB)

DELIVERY UNITS	RANKING INDICATORS	POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
Accomplishments	No. of Points
PPD, WRD, WUD, MED, AFD and EDO/DEDO	1.	Submissions of IPCR accomplishment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to NWRB HR Section on the prescribed date	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Copy of Certification of submitted IPCRs from HR
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	9
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
	2.	Percentage of IPCRs (accomplishment — 1st semester) based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to NWRB HR Section on the prescribed date	100%	12	Copy of Certification of submitted IPCRs from HR
95%	10
90%	8
85%	6
80%	4
75%	2
70%	1
PPD, WRD, WUD, MED, AFD	3.	Final submission of Division's monthly physical/financial accomplishment report based on targets compliant to prescribed format to PPD/EDO on the set deadline	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of Division's WFP
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	8
Submitted on time	6
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	5
2 days beyond	4
3 days beyond	3
4 days beyond	2
5 days beyond	1
6 days beyond	0
	4.	Submission of 2017 Division's Work and Financial Plan based on the prescribed format submitted to PPD on the set deadline	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of Division's 2017 WFP
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	8
Submitted on time	6
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	5
2 days beyond	4
3 days beyond	3
4 days beyond	2
5 days beyond	1
6 days beyond	0
	5.	Submissions of DPCR Accomplishment based on approved SPMS guidelines submitted to NWRB HR Section on the prescribed date	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Copy of DPCR submitted to NWRB HR Section
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	9
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
	6.	Major frontline service (Citizen's Charter) per division based on DMC No. 2015-04 "Service Excellence through Continuous Systems Innovation Monitoring and Evaluation (SECSIME)" submitted to NWRB Citizen's Charter Team on the set deadline	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Copy of 1 core process per division submitted to NWRB Citizens Charter Team
Submitted 2 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	9
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
EDO/DEDO	7.	Submission of approved NWRB monthly physical and financial accomplishment report based on targets compliant to prescribed format to DENR on the set deadline	Submitted 2 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of NWRB WFP
Submitted 1 day before deadline	10
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	6
2 days beyond	5
3 days beyond	4
4 days beyond	3
5 days beyond	2
6 days beyond	1
7 days beyond	0
	8.	Submission of approved 2017 NWRB Work and Financial Plan based on the prescribed format submitted to DENR on the set deadline	Submitted 5 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of NWRB 2017 WFP
Submitted 3 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	8
Submitted on time	6
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	5
2 days beyond	4
3 days beyond	3
4 days beyond	2
5 days beyond	1
6 days beyond	0
	9.	Approval and submission of OPCR Accomplishment based on approved SPMS guidelines to OSEC (USEC for Policy, Planning and Foreign-Assisted Programs) on the prescribed date	Submitted 5 days before deadline	12	Copy of OPCR submitted to DENR
Submitted 3 days before deadline	10
Submitted 1 day before deadline	9
Submitted on time	8
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
	10.	Draft Minutes of Board Meeting submitted to the Executive Director on the set deadline	Submitted 3 days before deadline	12	Draft copy of minutes of Board Meeting attested by the Executive Director
Submitted 2 days before deadline	11
Submitted 1 day before deadline	10
Submitted on time	9
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	7
2 days beyond	6
3 days beyond	5
4 days beyond	4
5 days beyond	3
6 days beyond	2
7 days beyond	1
8 days beyond	0
	11.	Minutes of Execom Meeting submitted to the Executive Director on the set deadline	Submitted 5 calendar days before deadline	12	Copy of Minutes of Execom Meeting attested by the Executive Director
Submitted 4 calendar days before deadline	11
Submitted 3 calendar days before deadline	10
Submitted 2 calendar days before deadline	9
Submitted 1 calendar day before deadline	8
Submitted on time	7
Submitted 1 calendar day beyond deadline	6
2 calendar days beyond	5
3 calendar days beyond	4
4 calendar days beyond	3
5 calendar days beyond	2
6 calendar days beyond	1
7 calendar days beyond	0
PPD	12.	No. of water regulation policies/plans endorsed to EDO/Board by the end of 2016	Over 100%	12	Copy of Board Resolution
100%	11
99%	10
98%	9
97%	8
96%	7
95%	6
94%	5
93%	4
92%	3
91%	2
90%	1
Below 90%	0
WRD	13.	No. of water permits approved by end of December 2016	Over 110%	12	Copy of Board Resolution
106%-110%	11
100%-105%	10
93%-99%	9
86%-92%	8
79%-85%	7
72%-78%	6
65%-71%	5
58%-64%	4
51%-57%	3
44%-50%	2
36%-43%	1
Below 36%	0
WUD	14.	No. of Certificates of Public Convenience (CPC) and CPC-related cases decided by end of December 2016	Over 110%	12	Copy of Board Resolution
106%-110%	11
100%-105%	10
93%-99%	9
86%-92%	8
79%-85%	7
72%-78%	6
65%-71%	5
58%-64%	4
51%-57%	3
44%-50%	2
36%-43%	1
Below 36%	0
MED	15.	Percentage of submitted reports that resulted in the issuance of notice of violations and penalties imposed by end of December 2016	Over 110%	12	Copy of Notices/orders issued
106%-110%	11
100%-105%	10
93%-99%	9
86%-92%	8
79%-85%	7
72%-78%	6
65%-71%	5
58%-64%	4
51%-57%	3
44%-50%	2
36%-43%	1
Below 36%	0
AFD	16.	Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs) based on DBM-COA Joint Circular No. 2014-01 Guidelines Prescribing the Use of Modified Formats of the Budget and Financial Accountability Reports (BFARs)" submitted to COA and DBM	All BFARs submitted 2 days before deadline	12	Receiving copy of reports
All BFARs submitted 1 day before on deadline	11
Submitted on deadline	10
Submitted 1 day beyond deadline	9
2 days beyond	8
3 days beyond	7
4 days beyond	6
5 days beyond	5
6 days beyond	4
7 days beyond	3
8 days beyond	2
9 days beyond	1
No submission	0

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) DR. SEVILLO D. DAVID, JR., CESO III	(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA
Executive Director	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

ANNEX E

NATIONAL MAPPING AND RESOURCE INFORMATION AUTHORITY (NAMRIA)

DELIVERY UNITS		POINT SYSTEMS	MOVs
	Accomplishments	No. of Points
All Branches	RANKING INDICATORS			Report on Budget Utilization Rate
1.	Budget Utilization Rate (BUR)	100%	12
	- Ratio of Total obligations to total releases	90%-99%	8
	- Ratio of Total Disbursement to total Obligations	80%-89%	4
		below 80%	0
2.	Physical Accomplishment Rates	95%-100%	12	Physical Performance Report as of Dec. 31, 2016
90%-94%	9
86%-89%	6
80%-85%	3
below 80%	0
3.	Branch monthly Physical Accomplishment Reports (PARs) based on targets and using the prescribed ISO forms submitted to Planning and Policy Division (PPD)	Submitted on deadline	12	PPR Monitoring Chart
1 day beyond deadline	10
2 days	8
3 days	6
4 days beyond	0
4.	2016 BPCR/DPCR Commitments/	submitted before deadline	12	Summary of submitted BPCRs/DPCRs
	accomplishments based on approved SPMS Guidelines submitted to NAMRIA PPD and HRMS	Submitted on deadline	11
		1 day beyond deadline	10
		2 days	9
		3 days	8
		4 days	7
		5 days	6
		6 days	5
		7 days	4
		8 days	3
		9 days	2
		10 days	1
		beyond 10 days	0
5.	Percentage of timely submission of IPCR Commitments/	100% Submitted	12	Summary of IPCR Submissions for January to June and July to December 2016
	accomplishments based on approved SPMS Guidelines submitted on prescribed due date	95%-99%	11
		90%-94%	10
		86%-89%	9
		80%-85%	8
		75%-79%	7
		70%-74%	6
		65%-69%	5
		60%-64%	4
		55%-59%	3
		50%-54%	2
		below 50%	0
6.	2017 Branch Project Procurement Management Plan (PPMP) based on Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of RA 9184 (Government Procurement Reform Act) submitted to Admin/Supplies	submitted before deadline	12	Branch Consolidated PPMP
Submitted on deadline	11
1 day beyond deadline	9
2 days	7
3 days	5
4 days	3
5 days	1
Office of the Administrator	7.	All incoming documents	within 5 days	12	Record Books/Receiving Copy/Routing Slip
	within 6 days	10
	within 7 days	8
	within 8 days	6
	within 9 days	4
	within 10 days	2
	within 11 days
	& beyond	0
8.	Continued implementation of Quality Management System (QMS) ISO 9001:2008
a. 2	Management Reviews conducted	2 reports	12	Management Review Reports (MRR)
	0	0
b. 1	External Audit Passed	100% (passed)	12	CIP Surveillance Audit Report
	Failed	0
9.	Representation in regional and international meetings, workshops and conferences	within 30 days	12	Official travel report/after conference reports
	within 45 days	8
	within 60 days	4
	beyond 60 days	0

Recommended by:	Approved by:

(SGD.) DR. PETER N. TIANGCO, CESO I	(SGD.) MARLO D. MENDOZA
Administrator	Undersecretary for Policy & Planning
	and Chair, PMG

Cite This Law

Standard Citation

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016, DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16, Dec 29, 2016 (Philippines)

Bluebook Style

Supplemental Guidelines on Ranking of Delivery Units as Basis for the Grant of the Performance-Based Bonus (PBB) for FY 2016, DENR Memorandum Circular No. 012-16 (Phil. 2016)

Quick Answers

Law Information

Full Law Text

Cite This Law

Related Laws

Browse More Other Rules and Procedures

Need Help Understanding This Law?

Quick Answers

Law Information

Full Law Text

Cite This Law

Related Laws

Browse More Other Rules and Procedures

Need Help Understanding This Law?