Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program
The CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12 outlines the guidelines for identifying, supporting, and developing Centers of Excellence (COEs) and Centers of Development (CODs) for Journalism programs in the Philippines. The initiative aims to enhance journalism education and contribute to national development, as stipulated in the Higher Education Act of 1994. COEs and CODs must meet specific criteria related to instructional quality, research, and community linkages, and are evaluated through a rigorous selection process involving documentation and ocular inspections. Successful institutions receive recognition and potential funding to bolster their programs, with the status granted for three years, subject to ongoing compliance with established standards.
Quick Answers
- What is Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program about?
- The CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12 outlines the guidelines for identifying, supporting, and developing Centers of Excellence (COEs) and Centers of Development (CODs) for Journalism programs in the Philippines. The initiative aims to enhance journalism education and contribute to national development, as stipulated in the Higher Education Act of 1994. COEs and CODs must meet specific criteria related to instructional quality, research, and community linkages, and are evaluated through a rigorous selection process involving documentation and ocular inspections. Successful institutions receive recognition and potential funding to bolster their programs, with the status granted for three years, subject to ongoing compliance with established standards.
- What type of law is CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12?
- Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program (CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12) is a Philippine Other Rules and Procedures enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program enacted?
- Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program (CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12) was enacted on Jul 18, 2012.
- What is the citation for Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program?
- Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program, CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12, Jul 18, 2012 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Other Rules and Procedures
- Subcategory
- Commission on Higher Education
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
July 18, 2012
CHED MEMORANDUM ORDER NO. 020-12
| SUBJECT | : | Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of Centers of Excellence and Centers of Development for the Journalism Program |
In accordance with the pertinent provisions of Republic Act No. 7722, otherwise known as the "Higher Education Act of 1994," the CHED's policies and standards on the Centers of Excellence project, by virtue of the 393rd Commission en banc Resolution No. 131-2012 dated 11 June 2012 and for the purpose of establishing Centers of Excellence and Centers of Development (COEs/CODs) that serve as potent catalysts in journalism education needed for the development of world-class scholarships, nation building and national development, the following criteria and implementing guidelines for the identification, support and development of COEs and CODs for the Journalism program are hereby adopted and promulgated by the Commission, thus: IcCEDA
I. Rationale
A. Policy
Section 8 (f) of the "Higher Education Act of 1994" provides that the Commission develop Centers that can spearhead the nation's thrust toward development. It is, therefore, the policy of the Commission to promote quality and excellence in higher education by identifying, supporting and/or developing COEs/CODs in higher education institutions (HEIs). All HEIs offering the journalism program are hereby recognized as agencies needed to train professional journalists to constitute the bases for the development of a free and responsible press in the Philippines and contribute to nation building and national development.
B. Definition of Center of Excellence and Center of Development for Journalism Education
1. Center of Excellence — a unit within any higher education institution with the following characteristics:
a. Must have been accorded peer and industry recognition which will be further validated by a criteria to be set by the technical committee concerned;
b. Must have evidence of innovations/improvements on instruction and involvement in research and community extension;
c. Must have academic and research output recognized both locally and internationally; and
d. Must have strong local, national and international linkages;
e. Must have an updated alumni profile and active alumni programs; and
f. Must have a graduate program in journalism for at least five (5) years.
2. Center of Development — a unit within any higher education institution with the following characteristics:
a. Must have been accorded peer and industry recognition which will be further validated by a criteria to be set by the technical committee concerned;
b. Must have innovative academic and research output;
c. Must have a strong potential to develop its faculty in research;
d. Must have strong local and national extension and linkages; and
e. Must have an updated alumni profile and active alumni programs.
C. COE/COD Responsibilities and Minimum Expectations
|
For COEs
|
|
For CODs
|
|
| 1. | Enhance the quality of instructional | 1. | Enhance the quality of instructional |
| program through faculty development and | program through faculty development and | ||
| upgrading of facilities, equipment and | upgrading of facilities, equipment and | ||
| library holdings | library holdings | ||
| 2. | Undertake basic and applied research on | 2. | Undertake basic and applied research on |
| emerging trends and advancements in | emerging trends and advancements in | ||
| their field | their field | ||
| 3. | Undertake extension and linkage projects | 3. | Undertake extension and linkage projects |
| through regional, national and | through regional, national and | ||
| international agreements on curricular | international agreements on curricular | ||
| activities and industry-academe | activities and industry-academe | ||
| collaborations | collaborations | ||
| 4. | Accelerate the development of the | 4. | Accelerate the development of the |
| discipline through strategic | discipline through strategic | ||
| developmental programs and projects | developmental programs and projects | ||
| 5. | Act as role models/leaders in the local, | ||
| regional and national communities by | |||
| sharing best practices and development | |||
| programs (e.g., conducting practicum, | |||
| developing modules), and initiating | |||
| innovative approaches in curriculum | |||
| development, teaching-learning, | |||
| research, extension and other programs | |||
| 6. | Provide technical expertise (e.g., | ||
| consultancies, short-term trainings) to | |||
| other HEIs and industry | |||
| 7. | Undertake other activities/projects | ||
| necessary in developing quality | |||
| education in the discipline |
II. Identification Criteria (Quantitative and Qualitative)
For COEs:
The COEs shall be identified in accordance with the following minimum criteria:
|
Criteria
|
Weight
|
|||
|
|
||||
| I. | Instructional Quality |
|
||
|
|
||||
| A. | Administration |
4
|
||
| B. | Faculty |
10
|
||
| C. | Curriculum |
8
|
||
| D. | Laboratories, Facilities and Equipment |
7
|
||
| E. | Library |
5
|
||
| F. | Student Support System |
4
|
||
| G. | Student Performance |
4
|
||
| H. | Graduate Profile/Employment of Graduates/Tracer Study |
3
|
||
|
–––
|
||||
| Total |
45
|
|||
|
|
||||
| II. | Research and Publications |
|
||
|
|
||||
| A. | Discipline-Specific Research Plan |
5
|
||
| B. | Research/Journalistic Output by Faculty |
10
|
||
| C. | Production of Instructional Materials |
9
|
||
| D. | Research/Journalistic Output by Students |
6
|
||
|
–––
|
||||
| Total |
30
|
|||
| III. | Extension and Linkages |
|
||
|
|
||||
| A. | Academic Linkages |
5
|
||
| B. | Outreach Programs |
10
|
||
| C. | Participation as Resource Persons in National and International |
5
|
||
|
|
||||
| Conferences and Consultants to Public or Private Institutions |
–––
|
|||
| Total |
20
|
|||
| IV. | Institutional Recognition |
|
||
|
|
||||
| A. | Peer Assessment as Potential COE/COD |
3
|
||
| B. | Industry Assessment as Potential COE/COD |
2
|
||
|
–––
|
||||
| Total |
5
|
|||
|
–––
|
||||
| Grand Total |
100
|
|||
|
===
|
The details of the criteria and other guidelines are contained in "Annex A" hereof.
III. Identification Procedure/Process of Selection
The identification of the COEs/CODs shall follow this procedure:
A. Application
1. Application for COE/COD in Journalism shall be considered open upon issuance of these implementing guidelines.
2. Interested HEIs shall submit to the CHED Regional Office (CHEDRO) concerned a letter of intent together with the pertinent documents to support the application. The supporting documents must exhibit evidence of compliance with the selection criteria.
3. The CHEDRO then assesses the completeness of the documents submitted by the applicant HEIs and recommends those applications with complete and correct documents for evaluation by the Office of Programs and Standards (OPS). Applications with incomplete and/or incorrect supporting documents shall be returned to the applicant HEIs by the CHEDRO. cDIHES
4. The CHEDRO shall forward all applications with complete and correct documents to the OPS within seven (7) days after the deadline for the filing of application as specified herein.
5. The OPS shall endorse the applications to the Technical Committee for Journalism (TCJ) for evaluation and shortlisting.
B. Initial Paper Evaluation
The TCJ shall conduct the initial paper evaluation of all COE/COD applications. Once all applications have been completely evaluated, the TCJ prepares and submits to the OPS, copy furnished the CHEDROs, the shortlist of the potential COEs/CODs, together with the proposed schedules of ocular inspection.
C. Ocular Inspection
1. The OPS shall organize a Technical Review Committee (TRC) to visit the shortlisted schools.
2. The TRC shall be composed of at least two (2) members of the TCJ, one (1) representative from the OPS and one (1) representative from the CHEDRO. An orientation meeting shall be initially provided to the TRC prior to the ocular visit.
3. The OPS shall inform the HEI through the CHEDRO about the schedule of the ocular inspection at least one (1) week prior to the visit.
4. The CHEDRO shall inform the HEI to prepare an updated set of documents relative to the evaluation.
5. At the end of the ocular inspection, the TRC shall prepare a report to be submitted to the TCJ.
D. Identification
1. The TCJ shall prepare a shortlist of HEIs that meet the selection criteria based on the evaluation report of the TRC.
2. The TCJ shall recommend an HEI to be a COE for Journalism if it attains a rating of at least ninety percent (90%) in each criterion and an overall rating of at least ninety (90) points, and to be a COD if it attains a rating of at least seventy-five percent (75%) in each criterion and an overall rating of at least seventy-five (75) points, as illustrated in the following table:
|
|
Maximum
|
Minimum Points Required
|
||
|
Criteria
|
Points
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible
|
COE
|
COD
|
|
| I. | Instructional Quality |
45
|
40.5
|
34
|
| II. | Research and Publications |
30
|
27
|
22.5
|
| III. | Extension and Linkages |
20
|
18
|
15
|
| IV. | Institutional Recognition |
5
|
4.5
|
3.5
|
|
––––
|
–––
|
–––
|
||
| Total |
100
|
90
|
75
|
|
|
====
|
===
|
===
|
3. The TCJ shall recommend to the CHED Commission en banc (CEB), through the OPS, the conferment of COE or COD status on an HEI for approval, within forty-five (45) days after the completion of ocular inspection.
E. Notification of COEs/CODs
1. Upon approval by the CEB, the list of identified COEs and CODs for Journalism shall be released through the issuance of a CHED Memorandum Order (CMO).
2. The OPS, through the CHEDRO, shall notify the HEI of the CEB decision, copy furnished the TCJ.
IV. Benefits
The COEs/CODs are entitled to the following benefits:
1. Certificate of COE/COD shall be awarded to the selected HEI.
2. COEs and CODs may request funding and/or nonmonetary subsidies and awards such as:
a. Institutional Funding ADTCaI
i. Program Evaluation — review and evaluation of existing program
ii. Capacity Building — seminars, workshops, conferences for continuing education related and relevant to the journalism discipline
iii. Curricular Benchmarking — workshops on best practices, harmonization with global standards
iv. Extension and Linkages — national and international linkage with reputable institutions such as faculty/student exchange, collaborative research, etc.
v. Upgrading of Facilities, Equipment and Library Collection — acquisition of state-of-the-art facilities and equipment, up-to-date library collection including computer-based reference materials
vi. Instructional Materials Development — development of modules, teaching guides and manuals including those for distance education
b. Individual Funding
i. Faculty Development (for Graduate Studies)
ii. Thesis/Dissertation
iii. Training Fellowships
iv. Other Forms of Funding
COEs and CODs that would like to avail of funding/support from the CHED must submit project proposals for evaluation and approval.
3. COEs and CODs shall be given priority as CHED institutional partners for CHED developmental projects.
V. Duration of the Status as COEs/CODs
The designation as COE/COD for Journalism shall be for a period of three (3) years, but shall be revoked at any point if, based on the monitoring by the CHED, the Center fails to fulfill its functions/responsibilities and sustain its compliance with the criteria for COE/COD.
VI. Effectivity
This order shall take effect immediately.
Issued this 18th day of July 2012.
(SGD.) PATRICIA B. LICUANAN, Ph.D.Chairperson
ANNEX A
DETAILED CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR SELECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE (COE) AND CENTERS OF DEVELOPMENT (COD) FOR JOURNALISM PROGRAMS
| I. | Minimum Qualifier | ||||||
|
Nature of the
|
|
|
minimum
|
Existence of a graduate program/s (MA
|
|||
|
Program/Length
|
|
|
qualification
|
and/or Ph.D.) in the discipline for at least
|
|||
|
of its Existence
|
|
|
must be met; no
|
five (5) years
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
point attached
|
|
|
| II. | Criteria |
Pts.
|
|
Operational Indicators of COE and COD | |||
|
|
|
||||||
| A. | Instructional Quality |
|
|
||||
| (45%) |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
||||||
| 1. | Administration |
4
|
2
|
The department chair or the administrator | |||
|
|
|
(e.g., coordinator, head) in charge of the | |||||
|
|
|
journalism program holds a master's | |||||
|
|
|
degree or doctorate in the discipline or a | |||||
|
|
|
related field | |||||
|
2
|
|
The department or unit in charge of the | |||||
|
|
|
journalism program implements a faculty | |||||
|
|
|
development program, including faculty | |||||
|
|
|
mentoring | |||||
| 2. | Faculty |
6
|
2
|
At least eighty percent (80%) of full-time | |||
|
|
|
faculty members handling the major | |||||
|
|
|
courses have graduate degrees | |||||
| a. | Qualifications |
|
2
|
At least twenty percent (20%) of full-time | |||
|
|
|
faculty members handling the major | |||||
|
|
|
courses have Ph.D. degrees | |||||
|
|
2
|
At least forty percent (40%) of full-time | |||||
|
|
|
faculty have at least ten (10) years of work | |||||
|
|
|
experience in the discipline or related field | |||||
| b. | Performance |
4
|
2
|
The teaching quality receives faculty, | |||
|
|
|
student and peer evaluation ratings of at | |||||
|
|
|
least "Very Satisfactory" | |||||
|
|
2
|
At least forty percent (40%) of full-time | |||||
|
|
|
faculty members are recipients of national | |||||
|
|
|
or international awards, citations, | |||||
|
|
|
scholarships or other forms of recognition | |||||
|
|
|
as practitioners in the last ten (10) years | |||||
| 3. | Curriculum |
8
|
2
|
The curriculum is substantively compliant | |||
|
|
|
with international benchmarks | |||||
|
|
1
|
The curriculum exceeds CHED minimum | |||||
|
|
|
requirements | |||||
|
|
1
|
The curriculum is updated regularly and | |||||
|
|
|
reflective of current developments, trends | |||||
|
|
|
and innovations in the discipline | |||||
|
|
1
|
The curriculum is developed in | |||||
|
|
|
consultation with local industry groups, | |||||
|
|
|
professional organizations, experts and | |||||
|
|
|
other stakeholders | |||||
|
|
1
|
The program has a timely system of peer | |||||
|
|
|
and industry evaluation to provide | |||||
|
|
|
immediate feedback on quality of | |||||
|
|
|
instruction and effectiveness of | |||||
|
|
|
innovations | |||||
|
|
1
|
The curriculum incorporates innovative | |||||
|
|
|
approaches to teaching and learning | |||||
|
|
1
|
The major subjects in the curriculum | |||||
|
|
|
receive student and peer evaluation ratings | |||||
|
|
|
of at least "Very Good" | |||||
| 4. | Laboratories, |
7
|
3
|
The computer laboratory is equipped with | |||
| Facilities and |
|
|
Internet access and digital newsroom | ||||
| Equipment |
|
|
facilities | ||||
|
|
1
|
The program provides WiFi access to | |||||
|
|
|
faculty and students | |||||
|
|
2
|
The program has sufficient state-of-the-art | |||||
|
|
|
and multimedia production and | |||||
|
|
|
presentation equipment/facilities available | |||||
|
|
|
for regular use | |||||
|
|
1
|
A qualified technician is assigned full time | |||||
|
|
|
to maintain the laboratory, facilities and | |||||
|
|
|
equipment | |||||
| 5. | Library |
5
|
|
2.5 The library holdings include classical | |||
|
|
|
works in the discipline; at least ten (10) | |||||
|
|
|
titles available per subject area, all | |||||
|
|
|
published within the last five (5) years; at | |||||
|
|
|
least three (3) subscriptions to local and | |||||
|
|
|
international periodicals and journals in | |||||
|
|
|
journalism and allied programs; at least | |||||
|
|
|
two hundred (200) audio-visual and | |||||
|
|
|
multimedia materials; and an archive of | |||||
|
|
|
student theses and productions | |||||
|
|
0 5
|
The library accommodates at least fifteen | |||||
|
|
|
percent (15%) of the student population at | |||||
|
|
|
any give time | |||||
|
|
1.0
|
The library has at least one full-time | |||||
|
|
|
professional librarian for every five | |||||
|
|
|
hundred (500) students | |||||
|
|
1
|
The HEI has a computerized university | |||||
|
|
|
library system | |||||
| 6. | Student Support |
4
|
1
|
The HEI provides scholarships in the | |||
| System |
|
|
program | ||||
|
|
1
|
The HEI provides counseling system and | |||||
|
|
|
job placement services to students in the | |||||
|
|
|
program | |||||
|
|
1
|
The HEI initiates or supports co-curricular | |||||
|
|
|
activities | |||||
|
|
1
|
The HEI makes facilities and equipment | |||||
|
|
|
such as video and still cameras, audio | |||||
|
|
|
recorders available for student use | |||||
| 7. | Student |
4
|
1
|
The program applies a student retention | |||
| Performance |
|
|
grade of 2.25, Good or B- or their | ||||
|
|
|
equivalent in the major courses | |||||
|
|
2
|
Students are recipients of scholarships, | |||||
|
|
|
awards, citations and other forms of | |||||
|
|
|
recognition from national and international | |||||
|
|
|
bodies | |||||
|
|
1
|
Students' journalistic outputs have been | |||||
|
|
|
published, aired, uploaded or filmed in | |||||
|
|
|
journalistic or academic outlets | |||||
| 8. | Graduate Tracer |
3
|
1
|
At least fifty percent (50%) of graduates of | |||
| Study/Employment |
|
|
the program in the last five (5) years are | ||||
| of Graduates/ |
|
|
employed in journalism and related fields | ||||
| Graduate Profile |
|
|
within one year after graduation | ||||
|
|
1
|
Graduates of the program in the last ten | |||||
|
|
|
(10) years have received recognition in the | |||||
|
|
|
form of awards, citations and scholarships | |||||
|
|
|
for their work in journalism or related | |||||
|
|
|
fields | |||||
|
|
1
|
Graduates of the program hold senior | |||||
|
|
|
positions (e.g., senior reporter, chief of | |||||
|
|
|
reporters, editor, producer, director) in | |||||
|
|
|
news media and related organizations | |||||
| B. | Research and |
30
|
5
|
The program has a research plan | |||
| Publications (30%) |
|
|
specifically for journalism purposes | ||||
|
|
10
|
At least seventy-five percent (75%) of full- | |||||
|
|
|
time faculty members have journalistic | |||||
|
|
|
works, books, researches or academic | |||||
|
|
|
articles published in reputable/refereed | |||||
|
|
|
journals in the last five (5) years | |||||
|
|
9
|
At least thirty percent (30%) of full-time | |||||
|
|
|
faculty members have produced | |||||
|
|
|
instructional materials that are used in the | |||||
|
|
|
department or unit, or in other Philippine | |||||
|
|
|
colleges and universities DCcIaE | |||||
|
|
3
|
The research outputs of students in the | |||||
|
|
|
program demonstrate academic rigor | |||||
|
|
3
|
The research outputs of students in the | |||||
|
|
|
program demonstrate relevance | |||||
| C. | Extension and |
20
|
5
|
The HEI has formed linkages with other | |||
| Linkages (20%) |
|
|
higher educational institutions and/or | ||||
|
|
|
industry partners through memoranda of | |||||
|
|
|
agreements, journals, faculty/student | |||||
|
|
|
exchange, research collaboration, and | |||||
|
|
|
networks for the journalism program | |||||
|
|
10
|
The department/college undertakes | |||||
|
|
|
community or institution-based outreach | |||||
|
|
|
programs | |||||
|
|
5
|
At least fifty percent (50%) of full-time | |||||
|
|
|
faculty members have served as resource | |||||
|
|
|
persons in national and international | |||||
|
|
|
conferences and workshops, or as | |||||
|
|
|
consultants to public or private institutions | |||||
| D. | Institutional |
5
|
3
|
Peer assessment as potential COE/COD | |||
| Qualifications (5%) |
|
|
(by discipline/professional organizations) | ||||
|
|
2
|
Industry assessment as potential COE/ | |||||
|
––––
|
––––
|
COD | |||||
| Total |
100
|
100
|
|||||
|
====
|
====
|
ANNEX B
APPLICATION FORM FOR CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE (COEs) AND CENTERS OF DEVELOPMENT (CODs) FOR JOURNALISM
Instructions: Please complete this form and attach all necessary supporting documents. This must be submitted to the CHED Regional Office on or before 5:00 p.m., July 15, 2012.
There should be a completed application for the program applied for. All annexes should be properly labeled. DCcTHa
Name of Institution:
__________________________________________________
Address:
__________________________________________________
CHED Government Recognition No. for the area/program applying for COE/COD status: __________________________ Date Issued: ________________
Total enrolment in the area/program applying for COE/COD status: __________
Total student enrolment of the HEI: ______________
Accreditation Level* of the Program Applied for as COE/COD: ______________
Accreditation Valid up to: _________________________________
Name of Accrediting Body: ________________________________
* Together with a certified true copy of the accreditation certificate
I. INSTRUCTIONAL QUALITY (Maximum Points — 45)
A. Criterion 1 — Administration (Maximum Points — 4)
1. Does the department chair or the administrator (e.g., coordinator, head) in charge of the journalism program hold a graduate degree in the discipline or a related field? ( ) Yes ( ) No
| The department chair or administrator holds a | 2 points |
| doctorate in the discipline or related field | |
| The department chair or administrator is pursuing a | 1.5 points |
| doctorate in the discipline or related field | |
| The department chair or administrator holds a | 1 point |
| master's degree in the discipline or related field |
Documentation Required:
Annex A — Certified true copy of the appointment papers of department chair or administrator (original may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex B — Certified true copy of diploma or transcript of records of department chair or administrator (original may be required during ocular inspection)
2. Does the department or unit in charge of the journalism program implement a faculty development program, including faculty mentoring? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points
Documentation Required:
Annex C — Certified true copy of the Faculty Development Program (original may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex D — Detailed status report of the implementation of the Faculty Development Program
B. Criterion 2 — Faculty (Maximum Points — 10)
1. Faculty Qualifications
a. Are full-time faculty members handling the journalism courses offered in the program holders of relevant master's degrees? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points
Relevant master's degrees:
| 80-100% of full-time faculty members handling |
2 points
|
| journalism courses hold relevant master's degrees |
|
| 60-79% of full-time faculty members handling |
1.5 points
|
| journalism courses hold relevant master's degrees |
|
| 40-59% of full-time faculty members handling |
1 point
|
| journalism courses hold relevant master's degrees |
|
| 20-39% of full-time faculty members handling |
.5 point
|
| journalism courses hold relevant master's degrees |
b. Are full-time faculty members handling the journalism courses offered in the program holders of relevant doctoral degrees? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points ACTISD
Relevant doctoral degrees
| 20% or more of full-time faculty members handling |
2 points
|
| journalism courses hold relevant doctoral degrees |
|
|
|
|
| 10-19% of full-time faculty members handling |
1 point
|
| journalism courses hold relevant doctoral degrees |
Documentation Required:
Annex E — Record of faculty teaching assignments for the last five (5) years certified by the Dean or the Registrar
Annex F — Certified true copy of diploma or transcript of records of faculty members showing highest degree obtained (original may be required during ocular inspection)
c. Do the full-time faculty members handling the major courses have at least 10 years of work experience in the discipline or related field? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points
Relevant work experience
| 40% or more of the full-time faculty members | 2 points |
| handling the major courses have at least 10 years | |
| of work experience in the discipline or related field | |
| 30-39% of the full-time faculty members | 1.5 points |
| handling the major courses have at least 10 years | |
| of work experience in the discipline or related field | |
| 20-29% of the full-time faculty members | 1 point |
| handling the major courses have at least 10 years | |
| of work experience in the discipline or related field | |
| 10-19% of the full-time faculty members | .5 point |
| handling the major courses have at least 10 years | |
| of work experience in the discipline or related field |
Documentation Required:
Annex G — Faculty profile showing their work experience certified by the Dean, the Personnel Department or its equivalent
2. Faculty Performance
a. Is the consolidated evaluation of the teaching quality done by the faculty members, their peers and their students at least "Very Satisfactory"? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points
Documentation Required:
Annex H — Summary of student, peer and self-evaluation ratings of faculty members handling major subjects for the last five (5) years certified by the Dean and/or the Head of the Academic Affairs Office or its equivalent (original of individual evaluation may be required during ocular inspection)
b. Are full-time faculty members recipients of national or international awards, citations, scholarships or other forms of recognition as practitioners in the last ten (10) years? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points
Faculty awards and citations
| 40% or more of full-time faculty members are | 2 points |
| recipients of national or international awards, | |
| citations, scholarships or other forms of | |
| recognition as practitioners in the last ten (10) years | |
| 30-39% of full-time faculty members are recipients | 1.5 points |
| of national or international awards, citations, | |
| scholarships or other forms of recognition as | |
| practitioners in the last ten (10) years | |
| 20-29% of full-time faculty members are recipients | 1 point |
| of national or international awards, citations, | |
| scholarships or other forms of recognition as | |
| practitioners in the last ten (10) years | |
| 10-19% of full-time faculty members are recipients | .5 point |
| of national or international awards, citations, | |
| scholarships or other forms of recognition as | |
| practitioners in the last ten (10) years |
International awards, citations and scholarships received by your faculty
|
Name of Recipient
|
Title of Award
|
Awarding Body
|
Date Awarded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
National awards, citations and scholarships received by your faculty
|
Name of Recipient
|
Title of Award
|
Awarding Body
|
Date Awarded
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
Documentation Required:
Annex I — Certified true copy of international and national awards, citations and scholarships received by faculty (original may be required during ocular inspection)
C. Criterion 3 — Curriculum (Maximum Points — 8)
1. Is the journalism curriculum substantively compliant with international benchmarks? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points
Please compare journalism curriculum with international benchmarks (e.g., subjects, methodologies, references, student load, etc.)
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
2. Does the curriculum exceed the minimum CHED requirements? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
If yes, by how many units? ______
Please give breakdown of units in your curriculum beyond CHED requirements, including course titles
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
3. Is the curriculum updated regularly and reflective of current developments, trends and innovations in the discipline? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
If yes, how often? ________
When was the curriculum last updated? ___________
Documentation Required:
Annex J — Copy of present and previous curricula accompanied by curriculum flowchart (Annex J-1, J-2, etc.)
4. Is the curriculum reviewed in consultation with: — 1 point
(1) Local industry groups? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Please cite name of local industry groups (e.g., Philippine Press Institute, Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster ng Pilipinas) consulted
1. ________________________________________________
2. ________________________________________________
3. ________________________________________________
(2) Professional organizations? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Please cite name of professional organizations (e.g., Philippine Association of Communication Educators) consulted DcIHSa
1. ________________________________________________
2. ________________________________________________
3. ________________________________________________
(3) Experts? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Please cite name of experts consulted
1. ________________________________________________
2. ________________________________________________
3. ________________________________________________
(4) Other stakeholders? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Please cite name of stakeholders consulted
1. _______________________________________________
2. _______________________________________________
3. _______________________________________________
Documentation Required:
Annex K — Description of the process of consultation undertaken in designing and reviewing the curriculum
Annexes K-1, K-2, etc. — Communications and pictures, if available
5. Is there a timely system of peer and industry evaluation in place to provide immediate feedback as to the quality of instruction and the effectiveness of the innovations in meeting industry needs? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Documentation Required:
Annex L — Copy of the evaluation forms and write-up of the evaluation and feedback process in place within the HEI
6. Does your curriculum incorporate innovative approaches to teaching and learning? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Please specify innovative approaches to teaching and learning adopted for the program
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Documentation Required:
Annex M — Detailed syllabus for each major course in the curriculum
7. Do the major subjects in the curriculum receive student and peer evaluation ratings of at least "Very Good"? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Documentation Required:
Annex N — Summary of student and peer evaluation ratings of all major subjects for the last five (5) years.
D. Criterion 4 — Laboratories, Facilities and Equipment (Maximum Points — 7)
1. Is the computer laboratory equipped with Internet access and digital newsroom facilities? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 3 points
a. Please specify the number of computers in the laboratory, computer-to-student ratio, hardware specifications and licensed software installed
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
b. Please give breakdown of newsroom equipment and the corresponding models (e.g., digital cameras, video cameras, radio studio equipment, TV studio equipment) HCSEcI
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
2. Does the program provide WiFi access to faculty and students? ( )Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Documentation Required:
Annex O — Copy of official receipts or proofs of purchase or donation of equipment and licenses to software (original may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex P — Copy of the receipt or agreement for Internet connection subscription (original may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex Q — Pictures of laboratories, facilities and equipment
3. Does the program have sufficient state-of-the-art multimedia production and presentation equipment/facilities available for regular use? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points
Please give breakdown of multimedia production and presentation equipment/facilities and the corresponding models
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________
Documentation Required:
Annex R — Copy of official receipts or proofs of purchase or donation of facilities/equipment (original may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex S — Pictures of facilities and equipment
Annex T — Copy of record showing use of equipment
4. Is a qualified technician assigned full time to maintain the laboratory, facilities and equipment? ( )Yes ( ) No — l point
Documentation Required:
Annex U — Proof of qualification of technician (original may be required during ocular inspection)
E. Criterion 5 — Library (Maximum Points — 5)
1. Do the library holdings include the following: — 2.5 points (Cumulative)
Please check
|
Library holdings
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
| Classical works in the discipline |
____
|
____
|
.5 point |
| At least ten (10) titles available per subject area, |
____
|
____
|
.5 point |
| all published within the last five (5) years |
|
|
|
| At least three (3) subscriptions to local and |
____
|
____
|
.5 point |
| international periodicals and journals in |
|
|
|
| journalism and allied programs |
|
|
|
| At least two hundred (200) audio-visual and |
____
|
____
|
.5 point |
| multimedia materials |
|
|
|
| Archive of student theses and productions |
____
|
____
|
.5 point |
2. Can the library accommodate at least fifteen (15) percent of the student population at any given time? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 0.5 point
3. Does the library have at least one full-time professional librarian for every five hundred (500) students? ( ) Yes ( ) No — l point
4. Does the HEI have a computerized university library system? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Documentation Required:
Annex V — List of classical works and professional books (author, title, year of publication and publisher) available in the library classified according to the course in the syllabi certified by the Chief Librarian (books ready to be shown during ocular inspection) aETASc
Annex W — List of subscriptions to professional magazines and periodicals certified by the Chief Librarian (periodicals ready to be shown during ocular inspection)
Annex X — Summary of the number and qualifications of library staff
Annex Y — Brief description of the online catalog software
F. Criterion 6 — Student Support System (Maximum Points — 4)
1. Does the HEI provide scholarships in the program? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Documentation Required:
Annex Z — List of scholarships provided by the HEI and recipients of the scholarships for the last five (5) years certified by the Dean and Office of Student Affairs or its equivalent
2. Does the HEI provide guidance, counselling and job placement services to students in the program? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Documentation Required:
Annex AA — Write-up of the guidance, counselling and job placement services available to students. Any additional documentation appropriate to substantiate the write-up
Annex BB — List of professionals providing guidance, counselling and placement services, indicating their qualifications certified by the Personnel Department Head and accompanied by certified true copies of their work credentials (original may be required during ocular inspection)
3. Does the HEI initiate and support co-curricular activities? ( ) Yes ( ) No — l point
Documentation Required:
Annex CC — List of co-curricular activities initiated or supported by the HEI for the program for the last five (5) years certified by the Dean
4. Are facilities and equipment such as video and still cameras, audio recorders available for student use? ( ) Yes ( ) No — l point
Documentation Required:
Annex DD — List of facilities and equipment made available for student use and summary of usage of facilities and equipment certified by the Dean
G. Criterion 7 — Student Performance (Maximum Points — 4)
1. Does the program apply a student retention grade of 2.25, Good or B- or its equivalent in the major courses? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Documentation Required:
Annex EE — Copy of HEI resolution, student manual and prospectus or similar document indicating the retention grade certified by the Dean (original may be required during ocular inspection)
2. Are your students recipients of scholarships, awards, citations and other forms of recognition from national and international bodies? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 2 points
Awards, citations and scholarships received by your students
|
Name of Recipient
|
Title of Award
|
Awarding Body
|
Date Awarded
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
Documentation Required:
Annex FF — Certified true copies of awards, citations and scholarships received by students (original may be required during ocular inspection)
3. Have your students' journalistic outputs been published, aired, uploaded or filmed in journalistic or academic outlets? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point cESDCa
Documentation Required:
Annex GG — Copies of print and online publications, audio and video files and films showing your students' journalistic output
H. Criterion 8 — Graduate Profile/Employment of Graduates/Tracer Study/(Maximum Points — 3)
1. Are graduates of the program in the last five (5) years employed in journalism and related fields within one year? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Employment of graduates
| 50% or more of all graduates in the last five (5) years | 1 point |
| are employed in journalism or related fields within | |
| one year after graduation | |
| 25-49% of all graduates in the last five (5) years | .5 points |
| are employed in journalism or related fields within | |
| one year after graduation |
Documentation Required:
Annex HH — Copy of the alumni tracer study or similar data certified by the Director of the Placement Office or equivalent administration official, and Dean.
2. Have graduates of the program in the last ten (10) years received recognition in the form of awards, citations and scholarships for their work in journalism or related fields? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Awards, citations and scholarships of graduates
| 10% or more of all graduates in the last ten (10) years | 1 point |
| received recognition in the form of awards, citations and | |
| scholarships for their work in journalism or related fields | |
| 5-9% of all graduates in the last ten (10) years received | .5 points |
| recognition in the form of awards, citations and | |
| scholarships for their work in journalism or related fields |
Awards, citations and scholarships received by your graduates
|
Name of Recipient
|
Title of Award
|
Awarding Body
|
Date Awarded
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
Documentation Required:
Annex II — List of awards, citations and scholarships received by graduates
3. Do graduates of the program hold senior positions (e.g., senior reporter or writer, chief of reporters, editor, producer, director) in news media and related organizations? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 1 point
Senior positions held in news media and related organizations by graduates
| 25% or more of the graduates hold senior positions | 1 point |
| in news media and related organizations | |
| 12-24% of the graduates hold senior positions in | .5 points |
| news media and related organizations |
Senior positions held in news media and related organizations by your graduates
|
Name of Graduate
|
Position
|
Organization
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
|
Appointment
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
|
_____________________
|
_______________
|
________________
|
______________
|
Documentation Required:
Annex JJ — List of graduates holding senior positions in news media and related organizations
II. RESEARCH AND PUBLICATIONS (Maximum Points — 30)
A. Criterion 1 — Discipline-Specific Research Plan (Maximum Points — 5 points)
1. Does your HEI/department/program have a research plan specifically for journalism purposes? ( ) Yes ( ) No (Cumulative)
Research plan
| It has a clearly articulated research agenda which will | 1 point |
| generate new knowledge in the field or contribute to | |
| the body of instructional materials (e.g., case studies) | |
| in the field. | |
| It has a well-conceived operational plan for pushing | 2 points |
| this agenda forward and generating the desired scholarly | |
| work and publications output. | |
| It has a system for generating and screening research | 1 point |
| proposals, awarding research grants and monitoring | |
| research output. | |
| It has a funding program (e.g., endowment, annual | 1 point |
| grants or professorial chairs) that can provide | |
| substantive support to individual as well as | |
| collaborative faculty research efforts, whether on a | |
| competitive or noncompetitive basis. |
Documentation Required:
Annex KK — Write-up of the HEI/department/program's (1) research agenda, (2) strategic plan for research, (3) research support system and process of evaluation, (4) funding sources available to support the unit's research efforts, certified by the Dean
B. Criterion 2 — Research/Journalistic Output by Faculty (Maximum Points — 10)
1. Have the journalistic works, books, researches or academic articles of full-time faculty members been published in reputable/refereed journals in the last five (5) years?( ) Yes ( ) No
Published output of faculty members
| 75% or more of full-time faculty members have | 10 points |
| journalistic works, books, researches or academic | |
| articles published in reputable/refereed journals in | |
| the last five (5) years | |
| 50-74% of full-time faculty members have journalistic | 7.5 points |
| works, books, researches or academic articles published | |
| in reputable/refereed journals in the last five (5) years | |
| 25-49% of full-time faculty members have journalistic | 5 points |
| works, books, researches or academic articles published | |
| in reputable/refereed journals in the last five (5) years |
Documentation Required:
Annex LL — Abstract of research projects conducted within the last five (5) years certified by the Research Coordinator/Head (complete research paper may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex MM — List of ongoing researches and their status certified by the Research Coordinator/Head (approved research proposals may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex NN — List of publications in peer-reviewed professional journals in the last five (5) years (original copies of the journals may be required during ocular inspection) aSITDC
C. Criterion 3 — Production of Instructional Materials (Maximum Points — 9)
1. Have full-time faculty members produced instructional materials (e.g., textbooks, teaching modules and other learning objects) that are used in the department or unit, or in other Philippine colleges and universities? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Instructional materials produced by faculty members
| 30% or more of full-time faculty members have produced |
9 points
|
| instructional materials that are used in the department or |
|
| unit, or in other Philippine colleges and universities |
|
|
|
|
| 20-29% of full-time faculty members have produced |
6 points
|
| instructional materials that are used in the department or |
|
| unit, or in other Philippine colleges and universities |
|
|
|
|
| 10-19% of full-time faculty members have produced |
3 points
|
| instructional materials that are used in the department or | |
| unit, or in other Philippine colleges and universities |
Documentation Required:
Annex OO — List of journalism and other substantial instructional materials produced by faculty members in the last five (5) years (original may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex PP — List of colleges and universities using instructional materials produced by faculty members certified by the Dean (original may be required during ocular inspection)
D. Criterion 4 — Research/Journalistic Output by Students (Maximum Points — 6)
1. Do the research outputs of students in the program demonstrate academic rigor? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 3 points
* Evaluator may award fewer points as may be appropriate
2. Do the research outputs of students in the program demonstrate relevance? ( ) Yes ( ) No — 3 points
* Evaluator may award fewer points as may be appropriate
Documentation Required:
Annex QQ — List of graduate and undergraduate theses and other relevant research outputs produced by students in the last five (5) years (original of outstanding research output may be required presented during ocular inspection)
III. EXTENSION AND LINKAGES (Maximum Points — 20)
A. Criterion 1 — Academic Linkages (Maximum Points — 5)
1. Has the HEI formed linkages with other higher educational institutions and/or industry partners through memoranda of agreements, journals, faculty/student exchange, research collaboration, and networks for the journalism program? ( ) Yes ( ) No (Cumulative)
Academic linkages
| With foreign higher educational institutions and/or | 3 points |
| industry partners through MOAs, journals, faculty/ | |
| student exchange, research collaboration, and | |
| networks for the journalism program | |
| With local higher educational institutions and/or | 2 points |
| industry partners through MOAs, journals, faculty/ | |
| student exchange, research collaboration, and | |
| networks for the journalism program |
Documentation Required:
Annex RR — Certified true copy of agreements with foreign HEIs or appropriate documents attesting to linkages (original may be required during ocular inspection)
B. Criterion 2 — Outreach Programs (Maximum Points — 10)
1. Does the department/college undertake community or institution-based outreach programs? ( ) Yes ( ) No CAIHTE
Documentation Required:
Annex SS — List and description of community or institution-based outreach programs held in the last five (5) years certified by the Dean
Annex TT — Communications and pictures
C. Criterion 3 — Participation as Resource Persons in National and International Conferences and as Consultants to Public or Private Institutions (Maximum Points — 5)
1. Have full-time faculty members served as resource persons in national and international conferences and workshops, or as consultants to public or private institutions? ( ) Yes ( ) No
Resource persons or consultants
| 50% or more of full-time faculty members have served | 5 points |
| as resource persons in national and international | |
| conferences and workshops, or as consultants to public | |
| or private institutions | |
| 25-49% of full-time faculty members have served as | 2.5 points |
| resource persons in national and international | |
| conferences and workshops, or as consultants to public | |
| or private institutions |
Documentation:
Annex UU — List of papers presented by faculty at international and national conferences in the last five (5) years (original may be required during ocular inspection)
Annex VV — Conference programs or proceedings indicating the name and institutional affiliation of the paper presentors, as well as the title of the paper(s) presented (copy of paper may be required during ocular inspection)
IV. INSTITUTIONAL RECOGNITION (Maximum Points — 5)
A. Criterion 1 — Peer Assessment as Potential COE/COD (Maximum Points — 3)
Documentation Required:
Annex WW — Certification from at least three (3) HEIs offering the journalism program and at least two (2) professional organizations endorsing your COE/COD application and substantiating their endorsement (original may be required during ocular inspection)
B. Criterion 2 — Industry Assessment as Potential COE/COD (Maximum Points — 2)
Documentation Required:
Annex XX — Certification from at least three (3) reputable institutions engaged in journalism or related fields endorsing your COE/COD application and substantiating their endorsement (original may be during ocular inspection)
Certification
I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. TDSICH
Signed this _____ day of ___________, 2012 at __________________.
_____________________
President/Dean
Cite This Law
Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program, CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12, Jul 18, 2012 (Philippines)
Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of COEs/CODs for the Journalism Program, CHED Memorandum Order No. 020-12 (Phil. 2012)
Related Laws
- Criteria and Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of Centers of Excellence (COEs) and Centers of Development (CODs) for Criminology ProgramCHED Memorandum Order No. 048-06 • Nov 3, 2006 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support and Development of CODs for the Psychology ProgramCHED Memorandum Order No. 016-12 • Jun 26, 2012 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Implementing Guidelines for the Identification Support and Development of COEs and CODs for Health Related Education ProgramsCHED Memorandum Order No. 017-06 • Mar 31, 2006 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Policies and Procedures for the Identification, Support and Development of Centers of Excellence (COEs) and Centers for Development (CODs) in Maritime EducationCHED Memorandum Order No. 29-01 • Aug 14, 2001 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Implementing Guidelines for the Identification, Support, and Development of Centers of Excellence and Centers of Development for the Communication and Development Communication ProgramsCHED Memorandum Order No. 019-12 • Jul 18, 2012 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Guidelines for the Implementation, Support and Evaluation of Centers of Excellence (COEs) and Centers of Development (CODs) in Humanities, Social Sciences and Communication (HuSoComm)CHED Memorandum Order No. 001-02 • Jan 9, 2002 • Other Rules and Procedures
Browse More Other Rules and Procedures
Explore other laws in the Other Rules and Procedures category.
View All Other Rules and ProceduresNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law