En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al.
OCA Circular No. 88-2017, dated April 7, 2017, informs various Philippine courts and judicial personnel about an En Banc Resolution from March 14, 2017, regarding administrative cases against Judge Eliza B. Yu of the Metropolitan Trial Court in Pasay City. The circular lists several administrative matters involving Judge Yu, which include complaints from other judges and officials, as well as cases filed against her conduct in office. This notice serves to disseminate the Supreme Court's judgment to ensure all relevant parties are informed and guided accordingly. The resolution is appended for reference and is intended to be included in Judge Yu's personal record as a member of the Bar.
Quick Answers
- What is En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al. about?
- OCA Circular No. 88-2017, dated April 7, 2017, informs various Philippine courts and judicial personnel about an En Banc Resolution from March 14, 2017, regarding administrative cases against Judge Eliza B. Yu of the Metropolitan Trial Court in Pasay City. The circular lists several administrative matters involving Judge Yu, which include complaints from other judges and officials, as well as cases filed against her conduct in office. This notice serves to disseminate the Supreme Court's judgment to ensure all relevant parties are informed and guided accordingly. The resolution is appended for reference and is intended to be included in Judge Yu's personal record as a member of the Bar.
- What type of law is OCA Circular No. 88-2017?
- En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al. (OCA Circular No. 88-2017) is a Philippine Supreme Court Issuances enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al. enacted?
- En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al. (OCA Circular No. 88-2017) was enacted on Apr 7, 2017.
- What is the citation for En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al.?
- En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al., OCA Circular No. 88-2017, Apr 7, 2017 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- OCA Circular No. 88-2017
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Office of the Court Administrator Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
April 7, 2017
OCA CIRCULAR NO. 88-2017
| TO | : | The Court of Appeals, The Sandiganbayan, The Court of Tax Appeals, The Regional Trial Courts, The Shari'a District Courts, The Metropolitan Trial Courts, The Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, The Municipal Trial Courts, The Municipal Circuit Trial Courts and The Shari'a Circuit Courts |
| SUBJECT | : | En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al. |
Appended herein as Annex "A", for the information and guidance of all justices, judges, officials and personnel of the Judiciary, is the Resolution of the Court En Banc dated 14 March 2017 in the following administrative matters against Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City:
1. A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-MeTC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator versus Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City);
2. A.M. No. 12-1-09-MeTC (Re: Letter dated 21 July 2011 of Executive Judge Bibiano G. Colasito and Three (3) Other Judges of the Metropolitan Trial Court, Pasay City, for the Suspension or Detail to Another Station of Judge Eliza B. Yu, Branch 47, Same Court);
3. A.M. No. MTJ-13-1836 (Formerly A.M. No. 11-11-115-MeTC) (Re: Letter dated May 2, 2011 of Hon. Eliza B. Yu, Presiding Judge, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City);
4. A.M. No. MTJ-12-1815 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 11-2401-MTJ) (Re: Leilani A. Tejero-Lopez versus Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City);
5. OCA IPI No. 11-2398-MTJ (Re: Josefina G. Labid versus Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City);
6. OCA IPI No. 11-2399-MTJ (Re: Amor V. Abad, et al. versus Hon. Eliza B. Yu, Presiding Judge, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City);
7. OCA IPI No. 11-2378-MTJ (Re: Executive Judge Bibiano G. Colasito, et al. versus Hon. Eliza B. Yu, Presiding Judge, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City);
8. OCA IPI No. 12-2456-MTJ (Re: Judge Bibiano G. Colasito, et al. versus Hon. Eliza B. Yu, Presiding Judge, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City); and
9. A.M. No. MTJ-13-1821 (Re: Judge Emily L. San Gaspar-Gito, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 20, Manila versus Hon. Eliza B. Yu, Presiding Judge, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City).
(SGD.) RAUL BAUTISTA VILLANUEVADeputy Court AdministratorandOfficer-in-ChargeOffice of the Court Administrator
ANNEX A
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT
Sirs/Mesdames:
Please take notice that on March 14, 2017 a Decision/Resolution, copy attached herewith, was rendered by the Supreme Court in the above-entitled administrative matters, the original of which was received by this Office on March 30, 2017 at 2:15 p.m.
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) FELIPA G. BORLONGAN-ANAMA
|
JUDGE BONIFACIO S. PASCUA (x) JUDGE CATHERINE P. MANODON (x) JOSEFINA G. LABID (x) EXECUTIVE JUDGE BIBIANO G. COLASITO (x) JUDGE RESTITUTO V. MANGALINDAN, JR. (x) LEILANI A. TEJERO-LOPEZ (x) ATTY. GENER M. GITO *Court Administrator **INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES (x) ***ATTY. MA. CRISTINA B. LAYUSA (x) |
ELIZA B. YU (x) AMOR ABAD, ET AL. (x) MIGUEL INFANTE, ET AL. (x) HON. ANGELINA SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ (x) ATTY. ANNALIZA S. TY-CAPACITE (x) JUDGE EMILY L. SAN GASPAR-GITO (x) ATTY. CARIDAD A. PABELLO (x) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE (x) |
* Copy of this Resolution for dissemination to all courts throughout the country for their information and guidance
** Copy of this Resolution to be furnished to all its Chapters
*** Copy of this Resolution to be appended to the respondent's personal record as a member of the Bar
A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813
Cite This Law
En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al., OCA Circular No. 88-2017, Apr 7, 2017 (Philippines)
En Banc Resolution Dated 14 March 2017 in A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813 (Formerly A.M. No. 12-5-42-METC) (Re: Office of the Court Administrator vs. Judge Eliza B. Yu, Metropolitan Trial Court, Branch 47, Pasay City), et al., OCA Circular No. 88-2017 (Phil. 2017)
Related Laws
- Re: Proposed Changes in the Format of the Agenda of the Court En Banc<--!11202012-->A.M. No. 12-11-5-SC • Nov 20, 2012 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Petition for the Constitution of the Present Court Handling the Trial of the Massacre in Ampatuan, Maguindanao<--!06282011-->A.M. No. 10-11-6-SC • Jun 28, 2011 • Supreme Court Issuances
- The Supreme Court's Ruling in A.M. No. RTJ-22-022 [Formerly OCA I.P.I. No. 19-4966-RTJ]OCA Circular No. 264-2022 • Oct 5, 2022 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Court En Banc Resolution Dated 9 December 2020 in A.M. No. 20-12-01-SC (Re: Proposed Guidelines on the Conduct of Videoconferencing)OCA Circular No. 209-2020 • Dec 29, 2020 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Implementation of Sections 11 and 12 of the Guidelines for Decongesting Holding Jails by Enforcing the Rights of Accused Persons to Bail and to Speedy Trial (A.M. No. 12-11-12-SC), in Relation with the Full Roll Out of Hustisyeah! in Hustisyeah! Courts (A.M. No. 13-04-11-SC)OCA Circular No. 265-2016 • Dec 1, 2016 • Supreme Court Issuances
- En Banc Resolution in A.M. No. 22-08-16-SC (Re: Amendment of A.C. No. 12 on Guidelines and Procedure in the Service and Execution of Court Writs and Processes in the Reorganized Courts)OCA Circular No. 276-2022 • Oct 11, 2022 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law