Designation of Special Courts for Kidnapping, Robbery, Carnapping, Dangerous Drugs Cases and Other Heinous Crimes; Intellectual Property Rights Violations and Jurisdiction in Libel Cases

Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 104-96Supreme Court Issuances

Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 104-96, issued on October 21, 1996, designates specific Regional Trial Court branches to exclusively handle cases involving heinous crimes such as kidnapping, robbery, and violations of the Dangerous Drugs Act, as well as intellectual property rights violations and libel cases. The order mandates that these cases undergo a mandatory continuous trial, concluding within 60 days, with judgments delivered within 30 days of submission. It also emphasizes the priority of these cases in trial calendars and prohibits postponements except for compelling reasons, with dilatory motions resulting in contempt. This order supersedes previous administrative orders and aims to streamline the administration of justice in the Philippines.

October 21, 1996

SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 104-96

RE : Designation of Special Courts for Kidnapping, Robbery, Carnapping, Dangerous Drugs Cases and Other Heinous Crimes; Intellectual Property Rights Violations and Jurisdiction in Libel Cases

Pursuant to Sec. 23 of B.P. Blg. 129, in the interest of a speedy and efficient administration of justice, and subject to the guidelines hereinafter set forth, the following Branches of the Regional Trial Courts, except as hereinunder provided, are hereby designated exclusively to try and decide cases of —

A

Kidnapping and/or kidnapping for ransom, robbery in band, robbery committed against a banking or financial institution, violation of the dangerous drugs act of 1972 as amended regardless of the quantity involved, violation of the anti-carnapping act of 1972, as amended, and other heinous crimes (R.A. No. 7659) committed within their respective territorial jurisdictions:

 

National Capital Judicial Region
   
MANILA Br. 11, Judge Roberto A. Barrios
  Br. 18, Judge Perfecto A.S. Laguio, Jr.
  Br. 27, Judge Edgardo P. Cruz
  Br. 41, Judge Rodolfo A. Ponferrada
  Br. 53, Judge Maximo A. Savellano, Jr.
  Br. 54, Judge Manuel T. Muro
QUEZON CITY Br. 76, Judge Monina A. Zeñarosa
  Br. 102, Judge Perlita Tria-Tirona
  Br. 86, Judge Teodoro A. Bay
  Br. 103, Judge Jaime N. Salazar, Jr.
  Br. 95, Judge Diosdado M. Peralta
  Br. 219, Judge Jose C. Mendoza
PASAY CITY Br. 109, Judge Lilia C. Lopez 
  Br. 110, Judge Porfirio G. Macaraeg
  Br. 114, Judge Vicente L. Yap
  Br. 116, Judge Alfredo J. Gustilo
KALOOKAN CITY Br. 127, Judge Myrna D. Vidal
  Br. 128, Judge Silvestre H. Bello, Jr.
  Br. 129, Judge Bayani S. Rivera
MAKATI CITY Br. 36, Judge Jose R. Bautista
  Br. 62, Judge Roberto C. Diokno
  Br. 66, Judge Eriberto U. Rosario
  Br. 138, Judge Sixto C. Marella
  Br. 143, Judge Dennis M. Villa-Ignacio
PASIG CITY Br. 156, Judge Martin S. Villarama, Jr.
  Br. 163, Judge Aurelio C. Trampe
  Br. 166, Judge Jesus G. Bersamira
  Br. 262, Judge Gregory S. Ong
  Br. 265, Judge Edwin A. Villasor
MALABON Br. 72, Judge Benjamin A. Aquino, Jr.
  Br. 170, Judge Benjamin T. Antonio
MARIKINA Br. 272, Judge Reuben P. de la Cruz
PARAÑAQUE Br. 259, Judge Zosimo V. Escano
LAS PIÑAS Br. 275, Judge Bonifacio Sanz Maceda
MUNTINLUPA CITY Br. 276, Judge Norma C. Perello   
VALENZUELA Br. 171, Judge Adriano R. Osorio
   
First Judicial Region
   
BANGUED Br. 2, Judge Benjamin A. Bongolan
BAGUIO CITY Br. 6, Judge Ruben C. Ayson
LA TRINIDAD Br. 62, Judge Fernando P. Cabato
LAOAG CITY Br. 16, Judge Conrado A. Ragucos
BATAC Br. 18, Judge Alejandrino C. Cabebe
VIGAN Br. 20. Judge Alipio V. Flores
NARVACAN Br. 22, Judge Ulpiano I. Campos
CANDON Br. 23, Judge Gavino B. Balbin, Jr.
SAN FERNANDO Br. 27, Judge Vicente A. Pacquing
AGOO Br. 32, Judge Leo M. Rapatalo
BAUANG Br. 67, Judge Jose G. Paneda
BONTOC Br. 35, Judge Manuel B. Bragado
LINGAYEN Br. 39, Judge Eugenio G. Ramos
DAGUPAN CITY Br. 42, Judge Luis M. Fontanilla
URDANETA Br. 46, Judge Modesto C. Juanson
TAYUG Br. 51, Judge Ulysses R. Butuyan
ALAMINOS Br. 54, Judge Jules A. Mejia   
SAN CARLOS CITY Br. 57, Judge Bienvenido R. Estrada
   
Second Judicial Region
   
TUGUEGARAO Br. 3, Judge Loreto C. Purugganan
APARRI Br. 8, Judge Segundo B. Catral
ILAGAN Br. 17, Judge Senen O. Casibang
CAUAYAN Br. 19, Judge Artemio R. Alivia
SANTIAGO CITY Br. 36, Judge Efren A. Lamorena
BAYOMBONG Br. 27, Judge Jose B. Rosales
BAMBANG Br. 30, Judge Vincent Eden C. Panay
CABARROGUIS Br. 31, Judge Wilfredo P. Ambrosio
   
Third Judicial Region
   
BALANGA Br. 3, Judge Lorenzo R. Silva, Jr.
MALOLOS Br. 11, Judge Basilio R. Gabo, Jr.
  Br. 12, Judge Crisanto C. Concepcion
CABANATUAN CITY Br. 27, Judge Feliciano V. Buenaventura
GUIMBA Br. 33, Judge Rogelio P. de Guzman
GAPAN Br. 36, Judge Arturo M. Bernardo 
STO. DOMINGO Br. 88, Judge Cholita Balbin-Santos
SAN JOSE CITY Br. 39, Judge Reynaldo A. Alhambra
SAN FERNANDO Br. 47, Judge Edgar Y. Chua
GUAGUA Br. 52, Judge Jose G. Montemayor
MACABEBE Br. 55, Judge Reynaldo V. Roura
ANGELES CITY Br. 59, Judge Eliezer R. de los Santos
TARLAC Br. 65, Judge Angel J. Parazo
IBA Br. 69, Judge Rodolfo V. Toledano
OLONGAPO CITY Br. 75, Judge Leopoldo T. Calderon, Jr.
   
Fourth Judicial Region
   
BATANGAS CITY Br. 4, Judge Conrado R. Antona
TANAUAN Br. 83, Judge Voltaire Y. Rosales
BALAYAN Br. 10, Judge Franchito N. Diamante
LIPA CITY Br. 12, Judge Vicente F. Landicho
CAVITE CITY Br. 88, Judge Christopher O. Lock
BACOOR Br. 89, Judge Eduardo I. Tanguanco
IMUS Br. 21, Judge Roy S. del Rosario
BIÑAN Br. 25, Judge Pablo B. Francisco (acting)
STA. CRUZ Br. 28, Judge Fernando M. Paclibon, Jr.
SAN PABLO CITY Br. 32, Judge Zorayda Herradura Salcedo
CALAMBA Br. 26, Judge Norberto Y. Geraldez   
SAN PEDRO Br. 31, Judge Stella Cabuco Andres
BOAC Br. 94, Judge Rodolfo B. Dimaano
CALAPAN Br. 40, Judge Arturo R. Quizon (acting)
PINAMALAYAN Br. 41, Judge Normelito J. Ballocanag
SAN JOSE Br. 45, Judge Ernesto P. Pagayatan (acting)
PUERTO PRINCESA CITY Br. 52, Judge Filomeno A. Vergara
LUCENA CITY Br. 53, Judge Guillermo R. Andaya
GUMACA Br. 61, Judge Proceso K. de Gala
BALER Br. 96, Judge Rebecca Reyes-Mariano
BINANGONAN Br. 67, Judge Felix P. Adanzo
ANTIPOLO Br. 73, Judge Mauricio M. Rivera
SAN MATEO Br. 76, Judge Jose C. Reyes, Jr.
MORONG Br. 79, Judge Alejandro A. Marquez
   
Fifth Judicial Region
   
LEGASPI CITY Br. 3, Judge Wenceslao R. Villanueva, Jr.
LIGAO Br. 13, Judge Jose S. Sañez
TABACO Br. 15, Judge Arnulfo B. Cabredo
NAGA CITY Br. 28, Judge Antonio N. Gerona
LIBMANAN Br. 57, Judge Thelma Celevante Villareal
PILI Br. 32, Judge Nilo A. Malanyaon   
IRIGA CITY Br. 35, Judge Reno R. Gonzales
SAN JOSE (Tigaon) Br. 30, Judge Alfredo A. Cabral
DAET Br. 38, Judge Sancho A. Dames II
VIRAC Br. 42, Judge Nilo D. Barsaga
MASBATE Br. 44, Judge Felimon C. Abelita
SORSOGON Br. 52, Judge Honesto A. Villamor
   
Sixth Judicial Region
   
KALIBO Br. 3, Judge Sheila M. Cortez
SAN JOSE Br. 11, Judge Nery G. Duremdes
ROXAS CITY Br. 19, Judge Sergio L. Pestaño
ILOILO CITY Br. 23, Judge Tito G. Gustilo
  Br. 25, Judge Bartolome M. Fanuñal
  Br. 35, Judge Severino C. Aguilar
BACOLOD CITY Br. 44, Judge Anastacio I. Lobaton
  Br. 47, Judge Edgar G. Garvilles
  Br. 53, Judge Pepito B. Gellada
HIMAMAYLAN Br. 55, Judge Jose Y. Aguirre, Jr.
SAN CARLOS CITY Br. 59, Judge Roberto S.A. Javellana
   
Seventh Judicial Region
   
TAGBILARAN CITY Br. 2, Judge Baudilio K. Dosdos 
LAPU-LAPU CITY Br. 53, Judge Benedicto G. Cobarde
CEBU CITY Br. 7, Judge Martin A. Ocampo
  Br. 14, Judge Renato C. Dacudao
  Br. 15, Judge German G. Lee, Jr.
  Br. 18, Judge Galicano C. Arriesgado
  Br. 24, Judge Priscila S. Agana
MANDAUE CITY Br. 28, Judge Mercedes Gozo Dadole
TOLEDO CITY Br. 29, Judge Gualberto P. Delgado
DUMAGUETE CITY Br. 32, Judge Eleuterio E. Chiu
  Br. 34, Judge Rosendo B. Bandal, Jr.
   
Eighth Judicial Region
   
BORONGAN Br. 2, Judge Paterno T. Alvarez
TACLOBAN CITY Br. 6, Judge Getulio M. Francisco
ORMOC CITY Br. 35, Judge Fortunito L. Madrona
CARIGARA Br. 13, Judge Eriberto N. Maceda
CATARMAN Br. 19, Judge Cesar R. Cinco
LAOANG Br. 21, Judge Jose H. Mijares (acting)
MAASIN Br. 25, Judge Numeriano R. Avila, Jr.
CATBALOGAN Br. 29, Judge Auxencio C. Dacuycuy
CALBAYOG CITY Br. 32, Judge Clemente C. Rosales (acting)
   
Ninth Judicial Region
   
ISABELA Br. 2, Judge Salvador A. Memoracion   
DIPOLOG CITY Br. 8, Judge Pacifico M. Garcia
ZAMBOANGA CITY Br. 16, Judge Jesus C. Carbon, Jr.
PAGADIAN CITY Br. 20, Judge Briccio A. Almeda
   
Tenth Judicial Region
   
BUTUAN CITY Br. 4, Judge Cipriano B. Alvizo, Jr.
MALAYBALAY Br. 8, Judge Vivencio P. Estrada
OROQUIETA CITY Br. 12, Judge Celso L. Conol
OZAMIS CITY Br. 15, Judge Pedro L. Suan
CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY Br. 18, Judge Nazar U. Chavez
  Br. 19, Judge Anthony E. Santos
  Br. 25, Judge Noli T. Catli
GINGOOG CITY Br. 43, Judge Editho C. Lucagbo
SURIGAO CITY Br. 29, Judge Andres P. Enriquez
   
Eleventh Judicial Region
   
TAGUM Br. 30, Judge Lucilo C. Rallos
MATI Br. 5, Judge Ricardo M. Berba
DAVAO CITY Br. 15, Judge Jesus R. Quitain
  Br. 17, Judge Renato A. Fuentes   
  Br. 33, Judge Wenceslao E. Ibabao
DIGOS Br. 19, Judge Hilario I. Mapayo
GENERAL SANTOS CITY Br. 35, Judge Antonio S. Alano
KORONADAL Br. 25, Judge Francisco S. Ampig, Jr.
TANDAG Br. 40, Judge Jesus M. Prado
   
Twelfth Judicial Region
   
ILIGAN CITY Br. 6, Judge Valerio M. Salazar
MARAWI CITY Br. 10, Judge Yusoph K. Pangadapun
MALABANG Br. 12, Judge Moslemen T. Macarambon
COTABATO CITY Br. 13, Judge Emmanuel D. Badoy
KABACAN Br. 22, Judge Braulio L. Hurtado
KIDAPAWAN Br. 17, Judge Rodolfo M. Serrano
MIDSAYAP Br. 18, Judge

 

B

Violations of intellectual property rights such as, but not limited to, violations of Art. 188 of the Revised Penal Code (substituting and altering trademarks, trade names, or service marks), Art. 189 of the Revised Penal Code (unfair competition, fraudulent registration of trademarks, trade names or service marks, fraudulent designation of origin, and false description), P.D. No. 49 (protection of intellectual property rights), P.D. No. 87 (an Act creating the Videogram Regulatory Board), R.A. No. 165 as amended (the Patent Law), and R.A. No. 166 as amended (the Trademark Law) shall be tried exclusively by the regional trial courts in accordance with the established raffle scheme except those covered by Administrative Order No. 113-95 dated 2 October 1995, in which case, the designated Regional Trial Courts shall continue to observe the provisions therein.

Considering that jurisdiction for violations of intellectual property rights hereinbefore mentioned is now confined exclusively to the regional trial courts, the designation of metropolitan trial courts and municipal trial courts in cities under Administrative Order No. 113-95 is deleted and withdrawn.

C

Libel cases shall be tried by the Regional Trial Courts having jurisdiction over them to the exclusion of the Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Courts in Cities, Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts.

For purposes of this administrative order, all single sala courts are considered special courts for all the cases covered under pars. A and B herein, and for this reason, shall give priority to these cases in their trial calendars.

The cases referred to herein shall undergo mandatory continuous trial and shall be terminated within sixty (60) days from commencement of the trial. Judgment thereon shall be rendered within thirty (30) days from the submission for decision unless a shorter period is provided by law or otherwise directed by this Court. aDHCAE

Where trial has already begun, the same shall continue to be heard by the respective branches to which they have been originally assigned. For purposes hereof, a criminal case is considered begun when the accused or any of them has already been arraigned; in a civil case, it is when pre-trial has already been conducted and a pre-trial order issued.

The Executive Judges of the Regional Trial Courts concerned shall exclude these designated Special Courts from the raffle of other cases, criminal and civil, whenever in their judgment the caseload of these courts shall prevent them from conducting daily trial of the special cases herein specified.

The Branches thus designated as Special Courts shall continue to perform their functions as such within the purview of this Administrative Order even after the retirement, transfer or detail of the incumbent judges appointed/designated to preside over them. Their successors, whether permanent or temporary, shall act as Presiding Judges of these Special Courts unless the Supreme Court otherwise directs.

No postponement or continuance shall be allowed except for clearly meritorious reasons. Pleadings or motions found to have been filed for dilatory purposes shall constitute direct contempt and shall be punished accordingly.

This Administrative Order amends or otherwise supersedes Adm. Order No. 173-94 dated 28 September 1994, Adm. Order No. 51-96 dated 3 May 1996, and Adm. Order No. 113-95 dated 2 October 1995, and such other orders, circulars, memoranda or issuances, if any, as may be inconsistent herewith.

This Order shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in a newspaper of general circulation.

 

(SGD.) ANDRES R. NARVASAChief Justice