EN BANC
[G.R. No. 209593. November 19, 2013.]
CASIMIRO A. YNARES III, petitioner, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND DANILO O. LEYBLE, respondents.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court en banc issued a Resolution dated NOVEMBER 19, 2013, which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 209593(Casimiro A. Ynares III vs. Commission on Elections and Danilo O. Leyble). — In accordance with Rule 64 and other related provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, as well as circulars, directives or orders of the Supreme Court, governing review of judgments and final orders or resolutions of the Commission on Elections, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court Resolved to DISMISS the instant petition for certiorari for non-compliance therewith, particularly for —
(a) failure to state all the material dates to show that the petition was filed on time pursuant to Section 5, Rule 64 in relation to Section 3 (2nd par.), Rule 46, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended;
(b) insufficient or defective verification and certification on non-forum shopping, as the affiant thereof was not personally known to the notary public or identified by the notary public through competent evidence of identity as required by the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice; and
(c) failure to attach a verified declaration that the pleading and annexes submitted electronically are complete and true copies of the printed document and annexes filed with the Supreme Court, as required in the Guidelines on Submission and Processing of Soft Copies of Supreme Court-bound Papers Pursuant to the Efficient Use of Paper Rule. cDAISC
In any event, the petition would still be dismissed for being the wrong remedy and for failure to sufficiently show that any grave abuse of discretion was committed by the Commission on Elections in rendering the challenged orders which, on the contrary, appear to be in accord with the facts and applicable law and jurisprudence.
The Court Resolved to NOTE the Manifestation dated October 29, 2013 filed by counsel for petitioner, stating that he was constrained to file the petition by registered mail on October 25, 2013." (adv66)
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) ENRIQUETA E. VIDALClerk of Court