FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 216480. April 20, 2015.]
AMPARO SHIPPING CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. WELLMADE MOTORS AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, respondent.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution datedApril 20, 2015 which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 216480 (Amparo Shipping Corporation v. Wellmade Motors and Development Corporation). — The petitioner's motion for an extension of thirty (30) days within which to file a petition for review on certiorari is GRANTED, counted from the expiration of the reglementary period.
After a judicious perusal of the records, the Court resolves to DENY the instant petition and AFFIRM the July 22, 2014 Decision 1 and January 9, 2015 Resolution 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 03910 for failure of Amparo Shipping Corporation (petitioner) to sufficiently show that the CA committed any reversible error in dismissing the complaint for sum of money and damages against Wellmade Motors and Development Corporation (respondent).
Records show that other than the self-serving and bare allegations of damage, petitioner failed to discharge the required burden of proof to establish its claim against respondent. Moreover, the sole issue raised by petitioner is factual in nature requiring an evaluation of the probative value of the evidence presented, 3 which the Court is proscribed to review.
SO ORDERED." AaCTcI
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) EDGAR O. ARICHETADivision Clerk of Court
Footnotes
1. Rollo, pp. 32-46. Penned by Associate Justice Marie Christine Azcarraga-Jacob with Associate Justices Gabriel T. Ingles and Ma. Luisa C. Quijano-Padilla, concurring.
2. Id. at 48-49. Penned by Associate Justice Marie Christine Azcarraga-Jacob with Associate Justices Ramon Paul L. Hernando and Ma. Luisa C. Quijano-Padilla, concurring.
3. Republic v. De Guzman, G.R. No. 175021, June 15, 2011, 652 SCRA 101, 113-114; citation omitted.