Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective
Senate Resolution No. 105-15 asserts that any treaty ratified by the President of the Philippines must also receive concurrence from the Senate to be valid and effective. This resolution specifically addresses the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) with the United States, which is currently under Supreme Court review regarding its validity due to the lack of Senate concurrence. The Senate emphasizes that the Constitution explicitly requires Senate approval for treaties, especially those involving foreign military bases, and that the mention of "executive agreements" lacks clear constitutional guidelines. Consequently, the Senate reaffirms its constitutional authority in treaty matters and formally submits this resolution to the Supreme Court for consideration.
Quick Answers
- What is Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective about?
- Senate Resolution No. 105-15 asserts that any treaty ratified by the President of the Philippines must also receive concurrence from the Senate to be valid and effective. This resolution specifically addresses the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) with the United States, which is currently under Supreme Court review regarding its validity due to the lack of Senate concurrence. The Senate emphasizes that the Constitution explicitly requires Senate approval for treaties, especially those involving foreign military bases, and that the mention of "executive agreements" lacks clear constitutional guidelines. Consequently, the Senate reaffirms its constitutional authority in treaty matters and formally submits this resolution to the Supreme Court for consideration.
- What type of law is Senate Resolution No. 105-15?
- Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective (Senate Resolution No. 105-15) is a Philippine Other Rules and Procedures enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective enacted?
- Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective (Senate Resolution No. 105-15) was enacted on Nov 10, 2015.
- What is the citation for Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective?
- Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective, Senate Resolution No. 105-15, Nov 10, 2015 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- Senate Resolution No. 105-15
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Other Rules and Procedures
- Subcategory
- Senate
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
November 10, 2015
SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 105-15
RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE STRONG SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT ANY TREATY RATIFIED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES SHOULD BE CONCURRED IN BY THE SENATE, OTHERWISE THE TREATY BECOMES INVALID AND INEFFECTIVE
WHEREAS, the treaty known as RP-US EDCA (Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement) is at present subject of Supreme Court proceedings on the question of whether this treaty is valid and effective, considering that the Senate has not concurred with the treaty;
WHEREAS, the Office of the President argues that the document is not a treaty but is instead an executive agreement that allegedly does not require Senate concurrence;
WHEREAS, the only constitutional ground for the position taken by the Executive is the mere inclusion of the term "executive agreement" in the Constitution which provides: "All cases involving the constitutionality of an . . . executive agreement . . ." (Article VIII, Section 4, paragraph 2) as one of items included in the list of cases which the Supreme Court has power to decide;
WHEREAS, there is no other provision in the Constitution concerning a so-called executive agreement, and there is no mention at all of its definition, its requirement, the role of the Senate, or any other characteristic of, or protocol for, any such so-called "executive agreement";
WHEREAS, "executive agreement" is a term wandering alone in the Constitution, bereft of provenance and an unidentified constitutional mystery;
WHEREAS, in stark contrast to the lone mention of the term "executive agreement," the Constitution provides categorically:
(a) "No treaty or international agreement shall be valid and effective unless concurred in by at least two-thirds of all the Members of the Senate", (Article VII, Section 21);
(b) "After the expiration in 1991 of the Agreement between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States of America concerning Military Bases, foreign military bases, troops, or facilities shall not be allowed in the Philippines except under a treaty duly concurred in by the Senate and, when the Congress so requires, ratified by a majority of the votes cast by the people in a national referendum held for that purpose, and recognized as a treaty by the other contracting State", (Article XVIII, Section 25);
WHEREAS, on the one hand, the Constitution is clear and categorical that Senate concurrence is absolutely necessary for the validity and effectivity of any treaty, particularly any treaty that promotes for foreign military bases, troops and facilities, such as the EDCA;
WHEREAS, under the rules of constitutional and statutory construction, the two constitutional provisions on Senate concurrence are specific provisions, while the lone constitutional provision merely mentioning an "executive agreement" is a general provision, and therefore, the specific provisions on Senate concurrence prevail over the general provision on "executive agreement";
WHEREAS, the Senate is aware of and obeys the ruling of the Supreme Court in Pimentel v. Office of the Executive Secretary, 462 SCRA 622 (2005);
WHEREAS, the ruling cited above does not apply to the EDCA case, because the Senate makes no attempt to force the President of the Philippines to submit the EDCA treaty for concurrence by the Senate, by this Resolution, the Senate merely takes a definitive stand on the non-negotiable power of the Senate to decide whether a treaty will be valid and effective, depending on the Senate concurrence:
WHEREFORE, be it hereby resolved by the Senate that the RP-US EDCA treaty requires Senate concurrence, in order to be valid and effective;
Be it further resolved, That this Resolution expressing the strong sense of the Senate be formally submitted to the Supreme Court through the Chief Justice.
Adopted,
(SGD.) FRANKLIN M. DRILONPresident of the Senate
This Resolution was adopted by the Senate on November 10, 2015.
(SGD.) OSCAR G. YABESSecretary of the Senate
Cite This Law
Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective, Senate Resolution No. 105-15, Nov 10, 2015 (Philippines)
Resolution Expressing the Strong Sense of the Senate that Any Treaty Ratified by the President of the Philippines should be Concurred in by the Senate, Otherwise the Treaty Becomes Invalid and Ineffective, Senate Resolution No. 105-15 (Phil. 2015)
Related Laws
- Resolution Expressing the Sense of the Senate for the President to Reconsider His Plan to Withdraw from the VFA with the USA in the Meantime that the Senate is Reviewing the SameSenate Resolution No. 37 • Feb 10, 2020 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Asking the Supreme Court of the Philippines to Rule on Whether or Not the Concurrence of the Senate is Necessary in the Abrogation of a Treaty Previously Concurred in by the SenateSenate Resolution No. 39 • Mar 2, 2020 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Resolution Concurring in the Ratification of the Treaty between the Republic of the Philippines and the Russian Federation on ExtraditionSenate Resolution No. 34 • Dec 18, 2019 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Resolution Concurring in the Ratification of the Extradition Treaty Between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of the Republic of IndiaSenate Resolution No. 037-14 • Mar 4, 2014 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Resolution Concurring in the Ratification of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear WeaponsSenate Resolution No. 83 • Feb 1, 2021 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Resolution Concurring in the Ratification of the Treaty between the Republic of the Philippines and the Russian Federation on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal MattersSenate Resolution No. 35 • Dec 18, 2019 • Other Rules and Procedures
Browse More Other Rules and Procedures
Explore other laws in the Other Rules and Procedures category.
View All Other Rules and ProceduresNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law