Prohibition Against Solicitation for Contributions by Court Personnel
OCA Circular No. 47-11, issued on April 1, 2011, reiterates the prohibition against solicitation for contributions by personnel in the first and second level courts in the Philippines. It emphasizes adherence to the Code of Conduct for Court Personnel, which strictly forbids soliciting donations from lawyers and litigants. Violations of this prohibition will result in severe penalties, including dismissal for a first offense, which also entails the cancellation of eligibility and forfeiture of retirement benefits. Court personnel are reminded that improper solicitation is a grave offense that carries significant legal consequences.
Law Information
- Reference Number
- OCA Circular No. 47-11
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Office of the Court Administrator Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
April 1, 2011
OCA CIRCULAR NO. 47-11
| TO | : | All Judges and Court Personnel of the First and Second Level Courts |
| SUBJECT | : | Prohibition Against Solicitation for Contributions by Court Personnel |
Reports had reached this Court that despite prohibition, solicitations for contributions/donations by court personnel from lawyers and litigants remain rampant.
Accordingly, all court personnel of the first and second level courts are hereby REMINDED to strictly observe the mandate of (a) Section 2, Canon I and Section 2 (e), Canon III of Administrative Matter No. 03-06-13-SC (Code of Conduct for Court Personnel) on improper solicitation; and (b) Circular No. 4-91 dated 31 May 1991 (Re: Letter-Complaint Against Solicitations for Contributions by Court Personnel), to quote:
"xxx xxx xxx
Henceforth, all personnel of the lower courts under the administrative supervision of the Office of the Court Administrator are strictly enjoined from making any form of solicitation for contributions as it is strictly prohibited by law. (emphasis supplied)
Consequently, all those found soliciting for and/or receiving contributions, in cash or in kind, from any person, whether or not a litigant or lawyer, will be dealt with severely in accordance with the sanctions prescribed by law."
Further, all court personnel are reminded that committing improper solicitation is an offense which merit a grave penalty. Under Section 52 (A) (11) of Rule IV of the Uniform Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service, dismissal is the penalty for improper solicitation at the first offense. Section 58 (a) of the same Rule provides that the penalty of dismissal shall carry with it the cancellation of eligibility, forfeiture of retirement benefits, and perpetual disqualification of reemployment in the government service, unless otherwise provided in the decision. aEcSIH
(SGD.) JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZCourt Administrator
Cite This Law
Prohibition Against Solicitation for Contributions by Court Personnel, OCA Circular No. 47-11, Apr 1, 2011 (Philippines)
Prohibition Against Solicitation for Contributions by Court Personnel, OCA Circular No. 47-11 (Phil. 2011)
Related Laws
- Letter-Complaint against Solicitations for Contributions by Court PersonnelOCA Circular No. 4-91 • May 31, 1991 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Prohibition Against Use of Halls of Justice for Residential or Commercial PurposesSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 3-92 • Aug 31, 1992 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Enjoining All Officials and Employees of the Judiciary to Strictly Observe the Prohibition Against Gambling or Engaging in Other Forms of Gambling within Court PremisesSupreme Court Memorandum Circular No. 09-07 • Jun 18, 2007 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Prohibition Against Dual Appointments and Double Compensation of a Government EmployeeOCA Circular No. 146-06 • Oct 27, 2006 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Prohibition against the Issuance of Injunctions or Restraining Orders against Government Agencies Enforcing Environmental Laws and Preventing Violations ThereofOCA Circular No. 87-2016 • Apr 4, 2016 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Prohibition Against Allowing Staggered Payments in Favor of Surety CompaniesOCA Circular No. 142-03 • Oct 10, 2003 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law