Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC
OCA Circular No. 158-2018 addresses the request from the Prosecutors League of the Philippines and the Chief Prosecutors Association of the Philippines to suspend the continuous trial system in all courts due to challenges like a shortage of competent legal personnel. The Supreme Court, however, denied this request, emphasizing the importance of upholding the constitutional right to a speedy trial as mandated by the Speedy Trial Act of 1998. The Court highlighted that suspending the continuous trial system would exacerbate existing delays in the judicial process and court congestion. The Circular serves as a reminder for judges and court officials to comply with the ongoing implementation of the continuous trial system, despite the noted challenges.
Quick Answers
- What is Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC about?
- OCA Circular No. 158-2018 addresses the request from the Prosecutors League of the Philippines and the Chief Prosecutors Association of the Philippines to suspend the continuous trial system in all courts due to challenges like a shortage of competent legal personnel. The Supreme Court, however, denied this request, emphasizing the importance of upholding the constitutional right to a speedy trial as mandated by the Speedy Trial Act of 1998. The Court highlighted that suspending the continuous trial system would exacerbate existing delays in the judicial process and court congestion. The Circular serves as a reminder for judges and court officials to comply with the ongoing implementation of the continuous trial system, despite the noted challenges.
- What type of law is OCA Circular No. 158-2018?
- Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC (OCA Circular No. 158-2018) is a Philippine Supreme Court Issuances enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC enacted?
- Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC (OCA Circular No. 158-2018) was enacted on Jul 20, 2018.
- What is the citation for Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC?
- Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC, OCA Circular No. 158-2018, Jul 20, 2018 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- OCA Circular No. 158-2018
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Office of the Court Administrator Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
July 20, 2018
OCA CIRCULAR NO. 158-2018
| TO | : | The Judges and Clerks of Court of the First and Second Level Courts, the Office of the Chief State Prosecutor, the Public Attorney's Office and the Integrated Bar of the Philippines |
| SUBJECT | : | Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC (Re: Letter of Secretary Vitaliano N. Aguirre II, Department of Justice Relative to the Request of the Prosecutors League of the Philippines [PLP] and the Chief Prosecutors Association of the Philippines [CIPROSA]) |
Pursuant to the 26 June 2018 Resolution in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC (Re: Letter of Secretary Vitaliano N. Aguirre II, Department of Justice Relative to the Request of the Prosecutors League of the Philippines [PLP] and the Chief Prosecutors Association of the Philippines [CIPROSA]), the Court En Banc NOTED the letter of Secretary Aguirre II, but DENIED the request of the concerned PLP and CIPROSA for the suspension of the continuous trial system in all courts, the relevant portions of which are quoted hereunder as follows:
In fine, the request of the CIPROSA and the PLP to suspend the full implementation of the continuous trial system cannot be granted because the Supreme Court has no power to suspend the effectivity of the substantive law on continuous trial, which upholds the constitutional right of all persons to speedy disposition of their cases. Shortage of competent and efficient lawyers, court officers and employees in urban areas, more so in rural areas, has been a problem since time immemorial. It is a sad commentary that the two-decade old Speedy Trial Act of 1998, which was envisioned to uphold the right of all persons to speedy, impartial and public trial, has been honored in breach more than in practice. To accept lack of prosecutors and heavy pressure of work as justification to suspend the full implementation of the continuous trial system, which has been in effect since 1990, will inevitably worsen the problems of delay in the administration of justice and court docket congestion. After all, regarded as mandatory by their very nature, "rules prescribing the time within which certain acts must be done, or certain proceedings taken, are considered absolutely indispensable to the prevention of needless delays and the orderly and speedy discharge of judicial business."
WHEREFORE, the Letter of Department of Justice Secretary Vitaliano N. Aguirre II relative to the request of the Prosecutors League of the Philippines and the Chief Prosecutors Association of the Philippines is duly NOTED and will be taken into account in the amendment or revision of Rules of Procedure, but the request for the suspension of the continuous trial system in all courts is DENIED. (Emphasis underlined)
For your information, guidance and strict compliance. CAIHTE
(SGD.) JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZCourt Administrator
Cite This Law
Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC, OCA Circular No. 158-2018, Jul 20, 2018 (Philippines)
Non-Suspension of the Continuous Trial System in All Courts Pursuant to the Resolution Dated 26 June 2018 in A.M. No. 18-03-09-SC, OCA Circular No. 158-2018 (Phil. 2018)
Related Laws
- Amendment of A.M. No. 03-03-03-SC Dated June 17, 2003, for the Expansion of the Coverage of Cases Cognizable by Special Commercial Courts to Include All Cases Governed by the Fria, Liquidation Cases Emanating from Administrative Proceedings, and Dissolution and Liquidation of Partnerships under the Civil Code<--!06212016-->A.M. No. 03-03-03-SC • Jun 21, 2016 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Amendment of A.M. No. 03-03-03-SC Dated June 17, 2003, for the Expansion of the Coverage of Cases Cognizable by Special Commercial Courts to Include All Cases on Insolvency and Liquidation under the FRIA<--!11162015-->A.M. No. 03-03-03-SC • Nov 16, 2015 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Amendment of A.M. No. 03-03-03-Sc Dated June 17, 2003, for the Expansion of the Coverage of Cases Cognizable by the Special Commercial Courts to Include All Cases on Insolvency and Liquidation under the FRIA<--!06162015-->A.M. No. 03-03-03-SC • Jun 16, 2015 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Court En Banc Resolution Dated 4 June 2019 in A.M. No. 18-03-16-SCOCA Circular No. 104-2019 • Jul 5, 2019 • Supreme Court Issuances
- En Banc Resolution dated 09 October 2018 in A.M. No. 00-4-07-SC (Re: Proposed Rule on Examination of a Child Witness)OCA Circular No. 101-2019 • Jul 3, 2019 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Approval of the Proposed Amendments to the Revised Rule on Children in Conflict with the Law Pursuant to the Supreme Court En Banc Resolution dated 26 June 2018OCA Circular No. 204-2018 • Sep 19, 2018 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law