Implementation Guidelines for the Phase II of the Support to the Philippine Health Sector Reform and Population Management Programs (GTZ) ( DOH Administrative Order No. 2004-0188 )
December 19, 2004
December 19, 2004
DOH ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2004-0188
SUBJECT | : | Implementation Guidelines for the Phase II of the Support to the Philippine Health Sector Reform and Population Management Programs (GTZ) |
I. Rationale
The Philippine German Cooperation Program (GTZ) entitled, "Support to the Philippine Health Sector Reform and Population Management Programs" has completed its first phase of implementation (formerly called: Unified GTZ Support to the Philippine Health Sector). A program review was carried out by a team composed of DOH, Philhealth and external evaluators to assess the achievements of the program, identify areas for improvement, and offer recommendations for enhancing the program's performance and strengthening the impact of its intended objectives in a second phase of four years. ESTDcC
In the previous structure (2001-2004), there were four (4) main components: a) Local Health Development Component, b) Family/Reproductive Health, (c) Social Health Insurance, (d) Pharmaceuticals.
A new framework for German Development Cooperation (AURA) presents a sharpened focus on program impact and an amended role of the GTZ from being a contributor to being a co-equal with partners (DOH, Philhealth, POPCOM) in the responsibility for achieving the program objectives. Corollary to this framework, GTZ will sign an agreement with the Philippine partners (DOH, PHIC, POPCOM) that will embody the implementing arrangements.
Based on the AURA challenge of program responsibility and impact, a revision of the current program structure was proposed and agreed upon. The program's result areas or deliverables were consolidated under two major components: 1) Policy support component, and 2) Local health systems development component. The proposed structure for 2004-2008, needs to further increase the synergy among the components, focus of GTZ support and make it more responsive to central level policy needs.
II. Goals and Objectives
A. Goals: The Health of the population, in particular the poor, is enhanced
B. Objectives:
1. To improve effectiveness and quality of decentralized health services and population programs;
2. To improve efficiency and synergy of program components for sharper directions of implementing the GTZ Program Planning Matrix objectives;
3. To improve quality of collaborative process for institutionalization and sustainability.
III. Components of the GTZ Program Phase II
A. Policy Support Component
The objective is to ensure the formulation of responsive policies, strategies and guidelines for local health system and population management based on field experience, policy research and evidence.
Specific objectives/activities under this component based on the DOH/GTZ program planning matrix, shall include the following:
1. Institutionalization of an effective mechanisms for translating LHS and population management experience into policy; cESDCa
2. Development of a method/tool for systematic assessment and analysis of experiences from LHS and population management;
3. Development of an infrastructure for knowledge sharing and management;
4. Prioritization and implementation of operations research supported by management.
B. Local Health Systems Development Component (implemented in Eastern Visayas)
The objective is to establish local health systems and local government-based population programs that ensure quality services, equitable and sustainable financing mechanisms, and effective resource management.
Specific objectives/activities under this component shall include the following:
1. Improvement of quality of health service provision by ILHZ;
2. Ensure equitable and sustainable financing of population and health programs/services;
3. Ensure an efficient and integrated management of ILHZ resources;
4. Strengthen the practice of population and development approach for local development planning.
A detailed program planning matrix is presented as annex A to this Administrative Order for reference.
IV. Implementing Arrangements:
The 2nd Phase of the Support to the Philippine Health Sector Reform and Population Management Programs shall be implemented according to the organizational structure shown in Annex B. The roles and responsibilities of the offices/committees reflected in the organogram shall include the following:
A. External Affairs Cluster
The head of this cluster, shall make important decisions and take necessary action to promptly and effectively carry out program implementation activities. Likewise, he/she shall determine important matters that require actions/decisions by the Execom, and/or the Secretary of Health together with the concerned officials or key staff within the DOH as well as other Government Agencies.
B. Program Steering Committee (PSC)
Under the Phase II GTZ program, the Health Sector Reform Agenda — Technical Coordination Group (HSRA-TCG) created under A.O. No. 227-G s. 2002 (mandated to oversee the overall implementation of all health sector reform related projects and activities), shall be the PSC. It shall perform the defined roles and functions provided under Administrative Order 73 s. 2003, for this purpose. Specifically, it is directed to manage and provide the venue for technical and policy discussions in the development of policies, plans and programs for the Phase II GTZ program. An implementation agreement shall be approved between GTZ, DOH, PHIC and POPCOM. cCSDaI
The HSRA-TCG meeting is regularly set every end week of the month. As such, it shall be the responsibility of the BIHC to: 1) ensure inclusion into the agenda the essential concerns of the GTZ program requiring PSC policy decisions/actions, and 2) monitor and provide feedback on the policy actions taken by the PSC as well as implementation of the agreements. The HSRA-TCG may be expanded on a case to case basis in accordance with the Program requirements that is elevated to its level for policy action.
C. HSRA-TCG Special Technical Partners Groups (STPG)
1. The HSRA-TCG shall create two (2) technical partners groups, fulfilling specific roles. This shall include:
a. Policy Support — this group shall be responsible for developing policy mechanisms pertaining to the Philippine health sector, decentralized health system and population management. The Health Policy Development and Planning Bureau (HPDPB) shall take the lead in this group.
b. Local Health System Development — this group shall be responsible for developing the local health systems component of the program. The Bureau of Local Health Development (BLHD) shall take the lead for the Local Health Systems Development Component.
2. The members of the STPGs shall include representatives from: GTZ Health Team, PhilHealth-FACO, DOH-BHIC, POPCOM, Centers for Health Development for Eastern Visayas, Philhealth Regional Office for Eastern Visayas and PopCom Regional 8 Office, NEDA representative and LGU representative.
3. The functions of the HSRA-TCG Special Technical Partners for Policy Support and Local Health Systems Development shall include the following:
a. Provide venue for technical and policy discussions in the development of plans and guidelines for Phase II GTZ Program in terms of:
i. Implementation of program components
ii. Formulation of research agenda and priority setting and research utilization plan
iii. Capacity building
iv. Monitoring and evaluation
b. Prepare inputs vital to each component for presentation and discussion with the TCG HSRA for final review and endorsement to External Affair Cluster Head and/or Execom
D. GTZ Health Team
This group shall be led by the Program Manager and the advisors. They shall be responsible for the day to day management of the Program, in particular:
1. Establish an effective financial, procurement and contract management system;
2. Establish a mechanism for coordination with the DOH and other concerned offices/agencies towards the formulation of Work and Financial Plans of the Program;
3. Monitor actual program implementation and regularly submit reports to DOH-BIHC;
4. Strengthen coordination with the DOH technical program key players;
5. Develop and maintain an effective filing, recording and inventory system for project documents, technical papers and project assets.
E. Unified Project Management Division, Bureau of International Health Cooperation (UPMD-BIHC) ETHaDC
This office shall have oversight functions over the administrative aspects of the program including monitoring the implementation progress and reporting the same to the oversight agencies of government. Likewise, this office shall ensure inclusion into the TCG meeting agenda of program issues/concerns, as well as monitoring the policy actions taken by the PSC and providing feedback accordingly.
V. Financing Arrangements
The German Technical Cooperation shall be responsible for the financial requirements of the 2nd Phase of the said Program with counterparts from the Philippine Government thru the Department of Health, POPCOM and the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (Philhealth) based on the budget that the respective units allocate from its budget line.
VI. Monitoring and Evaluation
The Baseline Monitoring System shall be implemented to place data on Indicators in the Project Matrix. The baseline for Phase II shall be the result of the conduct of the Household survey and different data gathering shall be performed to monitor the development of the program indicators. The periodic indicators will be generated by the GTZ support Health Team with the guidance of DOH, PHIC and POPCOM.
VII. Repealing Clause
The provisions under Administrative Order No. 73 s. 2002 which are inconsistent or contrary with the provisions of this Order are hereby revised, modified accordingly and/or repealed. All other provisions of existing issuances which are not affected by this Order, shall remain valid and in effect.
VIII. Effectivity
This Order shall take effect immediately.
(SGD.) MANUEL M. DAYRIT, MD, MScSecretary of Health
ANNEX A
Title: GTZ Support to the Health Sector | Estimated | Sheet No. 1 | ||
Reform and Population Management | period: | |||
Program | 2000-2008 | |||
DOH/PhilHealth/GTZ | Country: PHILIPPINES | Prepared on: | ||
No.: PN 2004.2047.1 | August 4, 2004 | |||
Summary of Objectives/ | Indicators | Means of | Assumptions | |
Activities | Verification | |||
Development Goal: | ||||
The Health of the population, | ||||
in particular the poor, is | ||||
enhanced | ||||
Purpose: | By the end of the program (2012) | Exodus of | ||
doctors and | ||||
The quality of decentralised | nurses does not | |||
health services and | • | Ind. P.1.: Utilization of RHU for | Annual BMS | reach critical |
population programs is | curative care by the poor increases | levels affecting | ||
improved | to 60% in 2012 in pilot areas (Scope: | essential posts. | ||
SOGOD ILHZ; BL 2002: 16%) | ||||
• | Ind. P.2.: Modern Contraceptive | Annual BMS and | ||
Prevalence Rate is-increased to | facility based | |||
40 % in pilot areas (Scope: pilot | ||||
ILHZ; BL 2002: 18%) | ||||
• | Ind. P.3.: User satisfaction with | Annual BMS | LGU | |
RHUs and public hospitals for (i) | expenditures for | |||
availability of drugs, (ii) cost of drugs | health are not | |||
and medical supplies, and (iii) | reduced to | |||
attitude of personnel is at least 80% | critical levels. | |||
for RHUs and remains at least | ||||
identical for hospitals (Scope: | ||||
SOGOD ILHZ) | ||||
- Availability of drugs: BL2003 | Change in | |||
RHU: 41%, Hosp: 95% | political | |||
leadership does | ||||
- Cost of drugs: BL2003 RHU: 66%, | not hamper | |||
Hosp: 87% | achievement of | |||
program | ||||
- Attitude of personnel: BL2003 | objectives | |||
RHU: 72%, Hop: 90% | ||||
Component 1: POLICY SUPPORT | ||||
Objective | By the end of the second phase | National level | ||
demand for | ||||
assistance in | ||||
policy | ||||
development | ||||
continues | ||||
To ensure the formulation | • | Ind. C1. 1.: Criteria for institutionalizing | List of criteria | |
of responsive policies, | experiences are defined | approved | ||
strategies and guidelines | by DOH | |||
for local health system/ | • | Ind. C1. 2.: 30% of AO/DO | Count of issuances | |
population management | (DOH & PhilHealth) based | from the time the | ||
based on field experience, | on local health system experience | system is in | ||
policy research and | underwent the selection criteria | place | ||
evidence | for institutionalization (BL: 0%) | |||
Result 1 | By the end of the second phase: | Agency budgets | ||
are maintained at | ||||
An effective mechanism | • | lnd. R1.1.: The mechanism is a regular | The effective | present level |
for institutionalization | agency activity with a corresponding | mechanism for LHS/ | ||
of LHS/population | appropriate budget and resource | population | ||
management experience | allocation | management | ||
into policy is in place | must be in the Work | HSRA and PPMP | ||
and Financial Plans | remain a priority | |||
of the concerned | ||||
offices and the policy | ||||
is in the DOH current | ||||
thrust and priorities | ||||
Result 2 | By the end of the second phase | Agency budgets | ||
are maintained | ||||
Experience from LHS | • | Ind. R2. 1.: A yearly review of | Check if yearly | at present |
and Population | LHS and population management | reviews take | level | |
management development | experience takes place with | place/HPDPB, | HSRA and PPMP | |
is systematically analyzed | participation of central and regional | HSRA TCG minutes | remain a | |
and assessed for future | offices, and LGUs | priority | ||
institutionalization | • | Ind. R2. 2.: A list of experiences | Check on availability | |
proposed for institutionalization is | of yearly list/HPDPB | |||
submitted on a yearly basis to | ||||
DOH/POPCOM/PhilHealth | ||||
Result 3 | By the end of the second phase | |||
The infrastructure for | • | lnd. R3. 1.: A system for knowledge | Based on the criteria | Hardware can be |
knowledge sharing and | management and sharing is | for an appropriate | sourced from | |
management is more | defined and established | KM system that will | outside GTZ | |
effective | be defined during | support | ||
the second phase | ||||
• | Ind. R3. 2.: Utilization of the | Count number of hits | ||
internet-based knowledge | ||||
management center increases by | ||||
10% yearly (BL: 0%) | ||||
Result 4 | • | Ind. R4. 1.: Operations research | ||
The program Management | supported by program | Check on relevance of | ||
supports selected relevant | management at central level is in | operations research | ||
operations research | line with priorities related to local | within the framework of | ||
health system development and | GTZ support | |||
population programs | ||||
Component 2: LOCAL HEALTH SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT | ||||
Objective | By the end of the second phase: | Count functional ILHZs | ||
Establish local health | • | Ind. C2. 1.: 8 Functional (cf DOH | based on DOH | |
systems and LGU- | definition) ILHZs in 4 provinces | list/CHD8 | ||
based population programs | (BL: 1) | |||
that ensure quality services, | ||||
equitable and sustainable | • | Ind. C2. 2.: A model of PopDev | Check if model is | |
financing mechanisms, | approach in ILHZ is developed and | operational | ||
and effective resources | implemented in at least two provinces | |||
management | ||||
• | Ind. C2. 3.: The proportion of referred | BMS | ||
hospital cases to total cases | ||||
increased by 50 % compared to | ||||
baseline level in Pilot areas | ||||
(Scope: SOGOD ILHZ; BL 2003: | ||||
6.8%) | ||||
• | lnd. C2. 4.: 95% of RHUs are awarded | |||
Sentrong Sigla status or accredited | CHD8/PRO8 | |||
by Philhealth in ILHZ that are | ||||
operational for at least a | ||||
year (Scope: all ILHZ: BL2003: 75%) | ||||
Results 5: | By the end of the second phase: | |||
Quality of Health Service | • | lnd. R5. 1.: Health staff satisfaction in | Appropriate | |
provided by ILHZ | RHUs and public hospitals with | health | ||
significantly improved | (i) working conditions. (ii) availability | personnel are | ||
of medicine for therapy, and | BMS | in place | ||
(iii) availability of laboratory instruments | ||||
and materials is at least 60% (Scope: | ||||
SOGOD ILHZ) | ||||
- Working conditions: BL2003 RHU: 23%, | ||||
Hop: 20% | ||||
- Availability of medicines for therapy: | ||||
BL2003 RHU: 2%, Hosp: -35% | ||||
- Availability of laboratory instruments | ||||
and materials: BL2003 RHU: 22%, | ||||
Hosp: -24% | ||||
Results 6: | By the end of the second phase: | LGU commitment | ||
to health | ||||
Financing of population | • | Ind. R6..1.: Total coverage of SHI | sustained | |
and health programs/ | (formal, informal, indigents) is | PRO8 | ||
services is more | increased by 50% (Scope: S. Leyte; | |||
equitable and | BL 2003: 20%) | Economic | ||
sustainable | • | Ind. R6.2.: Share of SHI on local | situation is | |
health expenditure increased by | favorable or does | |||
150 % compared to baseline level in | not deteriorate | |||
pilot areas (Scope: SOGOD | PhilHealth: | |||
ILHZ; BL 2002: 2.16%) | (capitation & | |||
• | Ind. R6. 3.: LGU expenditures on | reimbursement for | ||
purchase of modern contraceptives | hospitals); OOP: | |||
is 10% of market value of modern | yearly | |||
contraceptives in RHUs (Scope: 3 | extrapolation; | |||
selected ILHZ; BL2003: 0%) | DOH/CHD8 | |||
• | Ind. R6. 4.: 40% of enrolled indigent | |||
and individually paying members | BMS | |||
utilizing PhilHealth benefits | ||||
(Scope: Sogod; BL2003: | PR08, BMS | |||
25%) | ||||
Results 7: | By the end of the second phase | |||
ILHZ resources are | • | Ind. R7. 1.: Proportion of LGU MOOE | ||
managed more | pooled is increased by 100 % | BMS | ||
efficiently and in an | (Scope: SOGOD ILHZ; BL 2003: 7%) | |||
integrated manner | • | Ind. R7.2.: Average price level of | ||
selected LGU-pooled procured | ||||
medicines compared with non-pilot | ||||
areas is lower (Scope: | Survey (methodology | LGUs procure | ||
SOGOD&Biliran ILHZ; drugs: | to be determined) | through pooled | ||
cotrimoxazole tablet, amoxycilline | procurement | |||
tablet; paracetamol tablet; | ||||
contraceptive pills) | ||||
• | Ind. R7. 3.: 10% increase in yearly | |||
average sales in HEALTH Plus | ||||
Outlets (Scope: S.Leyte, Biliran, Leyte; | ||||
BL2003: S.Leyte: P.23,743, | NPF | |||
Biliran: P.32,117; Leyte: P.33,678) | ||||
Results 8: | By the end of the second phase: | LGUs are open | ||
Population and | • | Ind. R8. 1.: Increase in the | To be determined | to population and |
development approach | number of youth who seek/use | when services will | development | |
to local development | services and information sources | be available | issues and | |
planning is practiced | (Scope: pilot ILHZ; BL:?) | concerns in their | ||
in the ILHZ. | • | Ind. R8.2.: A model where | Check if report on | locality |
additional aspects in population | model testing is | |||
development approach (e.g. | available | Youth-led | ||
Adolescent Reproductive Health, | initiatives will | |||
non-clinical FP/RH services; ) are | overcome | |||
specified in the local development | opposition from | |||
plans through/within the framework | religious groups | |||
of the ILHZ structure is | ||||
developed and tested (BL: no model) |
ANNEX B
Organizational Structure for GTZ Program Phase II Implementation