Guidelines on the Utilization of the Early Language Literacy and Numeracy Program Funds: Professional Development Component
The Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines issued Order No. 024-18, which provides guidelines for utilizing funds from the Early Language Literacy and Numeracy (ELLN) Program, specifically focusing on the professional development of teachers from Kindergarten to Grade 3. The initiative aims to enhance literacy and numeracy skills among young learners in alignment with the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum. This order expands upon previous guidelines and emphasizes establishing a sustainable professional development system for educators, including training and mentoring through Learning Action Cells (LACs). It mandates compliance with the outlined procedures for fund allocation, training design, and program monitoring to ensure effective implementation and continuous improvement in teaching practices.
May 17, 2018
DEPED ORDER NO. 024-18
GUIDELINES ON THE UTILIZATION OF THE EARLY LANGUAGE LITERACY AND NUMERACY PROGRAM FUNDS: PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT
| TO | : | Undersecretaries |
| Assistant Secretaries | ||
| Bureau and Service Directors | ||
| Regional Directors | ||
| Schools Division Superintendents | ||
| Public Elementary and Secondary School Heads | ||
| All Others Concerned |
1. The Department of Education (DepEd) issues the enclosed Guidelines on the Utilization of the Early Language Literacy and Numeracy (ELLN) Program Funds: Professional Development Component. This is in line with the strengthening of its Reading and Numeracy Program through the implementation of the ELLN Program.
2. With the goal of the department to improve literacy and numeracy skills of learners from Kindergarten to Grade 3 following the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum by establishing a sustainable and cost-effective professional development system for teachers, the program aims to develop in Filipino children the literacy and numeracy skills, and attitudes, which will contribute to lifelong learning.
3. These guidelines shall cover the expansion of the professional development component of the program described in DepEd Order No. 12, 2015 entitled Guidelines on the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy Program: Professional Development Component.
4. For more information, contact the Bureau of Learning Delivery-Teaching and Learning Division (BLD-TLD), Department of Education (DepEd) Central Office, 4th Floor Bonifacio Building, DepEd Complex, Meralco Avenue, Pasig City at telephone nos. (02) 687-2948 and (02) 638-4799 or email at [email protected]. CAIHTE
5. Immediate dissemination of and strict compliance with this Order is directed.
(SGD.) LEONOR MAGTOLIS BRIONESSecretary
Reference: DepEd Order: No. 12, s. 2015Perpetual Index under the following subjects:
|
BASIC EDUCATION |
LEARNERS |
PROGRAMS |
|
FUNDS |
POLICY |
SCHOOLS |
|
FORMS |
SCHOOLS |
|
ATTACHMENT
(Enclosure to DepEd Order No. 024, s. 2018)
Utilization of the Early Language Literacy and Numeracy Program: Professional Development Component
I. Rationale
1. The Department is continuing the implementation of the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy program (ELLN) for Kinder to Grade 3, the first Key Stage of the K to 12 Basic Education Program.
2. The components of the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy program are:
a) establishment of baseline data (e.g., teacher and pupils' profile, language used by learners, existing and functional reading and numeracy program, and support mechanisms at the ground level);
b) materials development;
c) development of classroom-based (formative) assessment protocol for literacy and numeracy skills; and
d) professional development of teachers, school heads and region, division, district Supervisors.
3. These guidelines shall cover the professional development component of the program as stated in DO No. 12, s. 2015.
II. Scope of the Policy
4. These guidelines support and expand the coverage of the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy program. It covers the implementation of the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy under FY 2018 Budget. The program aims to develop a cost-effective professional development system through school-based mentoring or learning partnership program for primary school teachers and instructional leaders. More specifically, it targets to expand the number of schools covered during FYs 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.
5. Aside from the abovementioned use of the ELLN Budget and selection of schools, all the other guidelines in Department of Education Order No. 12, s. 2015 should still be followed. DETACa
6. For LEAPS regions (Regions V, VIII, IX, CAR, and CARAGA) where all the schools were covered during FY 2015, the downloaded funds shall be used for monitoring and evaluation of the continuous conduct of the Learning Action Cells (LACS) in at least 150 schools per division.
III. Definition of Terms
7. For the purposes of this Order, the following terms are defined and understood as follows:
A. Professional Development (PD) are activities that develop an individual's skills, knowledge, expertise and other characteristics. It is a long-term process that includes regular opportunities and experiences planned systematically to promote growth and development in the profession (DepEd Order No. 28, s. 2017 adopted in OECD, 2009; UNESCO, 2003).
B. Learning Action Cells (LACs) are forms of in-service training that function as support groups for innovative practices that are envisioned to solve problems at the school or district level.
C. Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy (ELLN) is an early grade program that focuses on literacy and numeracy.
IV. Policy Statement
8. These guidelines provide standardized procedures concerning the utilization of funds, selection of schools, and allocation of budget for the PD component of the program. These guidelines when strictly followed, should ensure that:
a. pedagogical knowledge, skills, and attitudes in early literacy and numeracy will be enhanced;
b. Education Program Supervisors and School Heads commitment in providing mentoring/coaching to Kto3 teachers in a SLAC will be sustained;
c. teachers' ability to assess learners' literacy and numeracy skills will be improved; and
d. literacy and numeracy instruction is learner-oriented and responsive to the strengths and needs of individual students and/or whole class.
e. it supports DepEd's continuing professional development of all its personnel towards the pursuit of providing quality education (Policy Statement per DepEd Order No. 28, s. 2017).
V. Procedure
9. Training Design
A. The professional development component shall be done in three phases:
1) National Training of Supervisors, and Subject Matter Specialists;
2) Regionwide Training of Selected Supervisors, School Heads, and Teachers; and aDSIHc
3) Mentoring through school-based Learning Action Cells (LACs).
B. One K to 3 teacher, and the school head from selected schools per region/division will attend the training program. From those Schools, Districts and Divisions, the district and the division supervisors who have not yet attended the training program will also attend. The criteria for selecting supervisors and teachers can be found in Annex 2 of DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2015.
C. The training program will have the following content: the nature of K to Grade 3 learners, early literacy and numeracy domains and strands, early literacy and numeracy teaching, and classroom-based assessment of early literacy and numeracy skills. Refer to the annexes in DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2015. Annex 4 contains the objectives and description of each phase. Annex 5 provides an overview of the whole training program. Annex 6 details the guidelines for the school-based Learning Action Cells (LACs), which are to be implemented in the third phase of the training. Annex 7 contains the training manual, session guides, and materials to be used by the trainers when they conduct the region-wide training, and LAC sessions.
10. Participating Schools
A. For the efficient and effective monitoring of the program especially in the conduct of the school-based Learning Action Cells (LACs), it is encouraged that the additional schools should come from the same schools, divisions and districts using the downloaded 2018 ECARP funds until all the schools in those identified divisions and districts are covered. Only then can other divisions and districts be covered. This is to ensure that no schools are left behind, and that all schools are covered after FY 2019.
11. Allocation and Eligible Expenses
A. ELLN Budget shall be utilized according to the detailed breakdown shown in Annex 1 which shows the allocation per region, and the amount to be downloaded. ETHIDa
B. The eligible expenses per activity are reflected as follows:
|
Activity |
Regional Training |
|
Eligible Expenses |
Board and lodging Payment for rental of venue or equipment Training Materials Administrative cost |
C. After the training, the School Heads, and the teacher-mentors are expected to implement a school-based mentoring/learning partnership program SLAC using regular school MOOE.
12. Procedures for Fund Release and Utilization
A. The training shall follow the procedure in requesting for approval of activities as stated in the most current DepEd Order on Implementing Guidelines on the Release and Use of Funds. Its conduct shall be governed by existing accounting and auditing rules and regulations.
B. For region-wide training, the ELLN funds already lodged at the Regional Offices (ROs) as part of the Comprehensive Release of Allotment (CRA) under the General Appropriations Act (GAA) shall be used. For FY 2018, additional schools participants shall be selected by the identified divisions and districts. For the succeeding years, the Department will provide the selection criteria of schools, and the budget allocation following the same procedure.
C. To facilitate availability of funds, the Regional Office shall request the release of Notice of Cash Allocation (NCA) from their respective Department of Budget and Management Regional Offices (DBM-ROs).
D. Each region shall be accountable for the disbursement of funds based on the eligible items and activities set forth in this Order, and based on the Regional Training Plan to be developed in the National Training, subject to the usual budgeting, accounting, auditing, and procurement rules and regulations.
VI. Monitoring and Evaluation
13. For the proper guidance on the accomplishment of the monitoring tools (see Annex 3), the table below shows the responsibility of personnel at the different field levels to ensure the effective implementation of the program.
|
M & E Tool |
Who will accomplish |
When to submit |
Whom to submit |
|
School LAC Monitoring Tool 1 |
Division Supervisor/Coordinator in charge of ELLN |
Once a semester |
Regional Supervisor/Coordinator incharge of ELLN |
|
School LAC Monitoring Tool 2 |
Division Supervisor/Coordinator in charge of ELLN |
Once a semester |
Division Supervisor/Coordinator in charge of ELLN |
|
School LAC Monitoring Tool 3 |
District/Division LAC Coordinator |
Once a semester |
Division Supervisor/Coordinator in charge of ELLN |
VII. References
DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2015, "Guidelines on the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy Program: Professional Development Component" cSEDTC
VIII. Effectivity
14. All existing Orders and Memoranda inconsistent with this Order are rescinded. These guidelines shall remain in force and effect, unless sooner repealed, amended, or rescinded.
ANNEX 1
Allocation Funds
Bureau of Learning Delivery
BUDGET SUMMARY
|
REGION |
NO. OF PARTICIPANTS (untrained Regional, Division, District Supervisors, School Heads & 1 Kto3 teacher in the target schools) |
TRAINING COST |
|
I |
320 |
4,800,000.00 |
|
II |
320 |
4,800,000.00 |
|
III |
320 |
4,800,000.00 |
|
IV-A |
320 |
4,800,000.00 |
|
IV-B |
160 |
2,400,000.00 |
|
V |
At least 150 schools per division are monitored |
1,200,000.00 |
|
VI |
320 |
4,800,000.00 |
|
VII |
240 |
3,600,000.00 |
|
VIII |
At least 150 schools per division are monitored |
1,200,000.00 |
|
IX |
At least 150 schools per division are monitored |
1,200,000.00 |
|
X |
320 |
4,800,000.00 |
|
XI |
320 |
4,800,000.00 |
|
XII |
320 |
4,800,000.00 |
|
CARAGA |
At least 150 schools per division are monitored |
1,200,000.00 |
|
ARMM |
245 |
3,687,000.00 |
|
CAR |
At least 150 schools per division are monitored |
1,200,000.00 |
|
NCR |
160 |
2,400,000.00 |
|
|
TOTAL |
56,487,000.00 |
ANNEX 2
Early Language Literacy and Numeracy Region-wide Training Accomplishment Report Form
Region ______
Amount Downloaded (2018 ECARP Funds): __________
|
Divisions |
Total No. of Schools |
Total Schools Reached as of December 2017 |
Target for 2018 |
Actual Reached |
|||||
|
Div. EPS |
PSDS |
SH |
Teacher/Mentor |
Total |
Div. EPS |
PSDS |
SH |
Teacher/Mentor |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write a brief report containing:
1. Training design followed
2. General comments and issues encountered
3. Strengths and areas for improvement based on the accomplished training evaluation forms submitted by the trainees
4. Training management
5. Recommendations
ANNEX 3
LAC M&E Tools
SCHOOL LEARNING ACTION CELL MONITORING TOOL 1
To the Supervising Personnel:
Name of School: _____________________________ District: _______________________
SCHOOL LAC MANAGEMENT (may be accomplished once a semester)
|
ACTIVITIES |
Yes |
No |
Comments |
Suggestions |
|
1. The school has developed a LAC Plan identifying the topics, schedule, facilitators, LAC groupings |
|
|
|
|
|
2. The school has identified LAC leaders |
|
|
|
|
|
3. The school has identified resources for the LAC implementation |
|
|
|
|
|
4. The school has conducted an orientation for the LAC |
|
|
|
|
SCHOOL LEARNING ACTION CELL MONITORING TOOL 2
To the Supervising Personnel: acEHCD
Name of School: _____________________________ District: _______________________
LAC ACTIVITIES/LAC PROPER
|
Name of the LAC Leader |
|
|
Name of the LAC Facilitator |
|
|
Name of the LAC Members |
|
|
Name of the LAC Documenter |
|
|
LAC Topic |
|
THE LAC LEADER
|
ACTIVITIES |
Yes |
No |
Comments |
Suggestions |
|
BEFORE THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Has secured resources for the LAC session |
|
|
|
|
|
Has prepared the venue for the LAC session |
|
|
|
|
|
DURING THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Observes the LAC Session |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the session and the facilitator |
|
|
|
|
|
AFTER THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Conducts debriefing |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifies plans for improvement for the next session |
|
|
|
|
|
Gathers from the documenter the individual plans of the team members |
|
|
|
|
|
Observes the implementation of the plan |
|
|
|
|
|
Gathers evidences of implementation of the plan |
|
|
|
|
|
Develops with members the next session plan |
|
|
|
|
THE LAC FACILITATOR
|
ACTIVITIES |
Yes |
No |
Comments |
Suggestions |
|
BEFORE THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Has prepared a session guide |
|
|
|
|
|
Has announced the schedule and venue of the session |
|
|
|
|
|
Has announced the schedule and venue of the session |
|
|
|
|
|
DURING THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibited skills in facilitating the session |
|
|
|
|
|
Manage the members' participation |
|
|
|
|
|
Was able to successfully bring out agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
Used the materials appropriately |
|
|
|
|
|
AFTER THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Discusses with the LAC Leader the results of the session |
|
|
|
|
|
Identifies areas for improvement for the session |
|
|
|
|
|
Develops plan for improvement of the session |
|
|
|
|
THE LAC MEMBERS
|
ACTIVITIES |
Yes |
No |
Comments |
Suggestions |
|
BEFORE THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Have obtained the information about the LAC session |
|
|
|
|
|
Have prepared relevant materials for the LAC session, where applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
DURING THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Are all present in the session |
|
|
|
|
|
Actively participated in the discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
Observed norms of behaviour |
|
|
|
|
|
Developed plans for implementation |
|
|
|
|
|
AFTER THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Allows the LAC leaders and other members to observe the implementation of plan in the classroom |
|
|
|
|
|
Submits to the LAC leader evidences of implementation |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares with others in informal meetings practices |
|
|
|
|
THE LAC DOCUMENTER
|
ACTIVITIES |
Yes |
No |
Comments |
Suggestions |
|
BEFORE THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepares the materials necessary for documentation |
|
|
|
|
|
Discusses with the facilitator and LAC leader the manner of documentation |
|
|
|
|
|
DURING THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Takes down the minutes of the meeting, as well as the agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
Gathers all documents |
|
|
|
|
|
AFTER THE SESSION |
|
|
|
|
|
Arranges the documents |
|
|
|
|
|
Finalizes the reports |
|
|
|
|
|
Submits the report to the LAC Leader |
|
|
|
|
Name and Signature of Supervising Personnel _____________________________
Name and Signature of LAC Leader/School Head __________________________
Submitted to: ____________________________ Date: ______________________
SCHOOL LEARNING ACTION CELL MONITORING TOOL 3
To the District/ Division LAC Coordinator
Accomplish the LAC Implementation Report below
|
School |
Contact details (school phone, email address or mobile number) |
SLAC schedule/frequency (period of coverage, days, time) |
School Head/LAC Leader |
LAC Facilitators |
No. of LAC Groupings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepared by: _____________________
Submitted to: ____________________ Date: _________________________