Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules
CIAC Resolution No. 18-06, adopted on October 30, 2006, amends Section 9.6 of the Revised CIAC Rules regarding the challenge of arbitrators. It clarifies that the original 10-day period for filing a challenge or motion for inhibition remains unaffected by any extensions granted for submitting written memoranda or draft decisions. The grounds for challenging an arbitrator include familial relationships, financial interests, bias, incompetence, and other valid reasons affecting impartiality. This amendment aims to ensure clarity and uphold the integrity of the arbitration process. The revision will take effect 15 days after notification to the Office of the National Administrative Register.
Quick Answers
- What is Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules about?
- CIAC Resolution No. 18-06, adopted on October 30, 2006, amends Section 9.6 of the Revised CIAC Rules regarding the challenge of arbitrators. It clarifies that the original 10-day period for filing a challenge or motion for inhibition remains unaffected by any extensions granted for submitting written memoranda or draft decisions. The grounds for challenging an arbitrator include familial relationships, financial interests, bias, incompetence, and other valid reasons affecting impartiality. This amendment aims to ensure clarity and uphold the integrity of the arbitration process. The revision will take effect 15 days after notification to the Office of the National Administrative Register.
- What type of law is CIAC Resolution No. 18-06?
- Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules (CIAC Resolution No. 18-06) is a Philippine Other Rules and Procedures enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules enacted?
- Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules (CIAC Resolution No. 18-06) was enacted on Oct 30, 2006.
- What is the citation for Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules?
- Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules, CIAC Resolution No. 18-06, Oct 30, 2006 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- CIAC Resolution No. 18-06
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Other Rules and Procedures
- Subcategory
- Construction Industry
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
October 30, 2006
CIAC RESOLUTION NO. 18-06
FURTHER AMENDING SECTION 9.6 (CHALLENGE), RULE 9 OF THE REVISED CIAC RULES
WHEREAS, Sections 6 and 21 of Executive Order No. 1008 empowers the CIAC "to enunciate policies and prescribe rules and procedures for construction arbitration" and "to formulate and adopt necessary rules and procedures for construction arbitration", respectively; DaAISH
WHEREAS, Section 13.16, Rule 13, Submission of memoranda or draft decisions, of the Revised CIAC Rules (as amended by CIAC Resolution No. 16-2006), provides that if any or both of the parties so desire, written memoranda or draft decisions may be submitted not later than ten (10) calendar days from the termination of the hearing or from the date of the filing of additional documents as previously agreed upon, whichever is later;
WHEREAS, on the other hand, Section 9.6, Rule 9, Challenge, of the Revised CIAC Rules (as amended by CIAC Resolution No. 16-2006), provides that an Arbitrator may be challenged by a party at any time after his appointment but before the lapse of the period for submission of memoranda or draft decision;
WHEREAS, the period prescribed for the filing of a Challenge or Motion for Inhibition under Section 9.6, Rule 9, is anchored on the period prescribed for the submission of written memoranda or draft decisions under Section 13.6, Rule 13;
WHEREAS, during the 90th CIAC Regular Meeting held on 26 September 2006, Atty. Alfredo F. Tadiar, CIAC Legal Counsel, observed that while Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules, as amended, already provides for a time bar for the filing of a Motion for Inhibition, the parties might move for an extension of time to file their written memoranda or draft decisions believing that the period prescribed for the filing of a Motion for Inhibition under Section 9.6, Rule 9 would also be extended;
WHEREAS, the Commission concurred with the opinion of Atty. Tadiar that although the arbitrator/s may extend the period for submission of written memoranda/draft decisions under Section 13.16, Rule 13, this should not affect the period prescribed under Section 9.6, Rule 9, as amended; and
WHEREAS, during the 91st CIAC Regular Meeting held on 30 October 2006, the Commission discussed the matter and agreed that further amendment to Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules is necessary to clarify that extensions of time for the filing of memoranda or draft decisions under Section 13.16, Rule 13, as amended by CIAC Resolution No. 16-2006, will not EXTEND the original 10-day period prescribed in Section 13.16 (as amended) for the filing of a challenge or motion for inhibition pursuant to Section 9.6, Rule 9, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, WE THE UNDERSIGNED COMMISSIONERS, by virtue of the powers vested in us by law, hereby RESOLVE, as it hereby resolved, to further amend Section 9.6, Rule 9, of the Revised Rules of CIAC to read as follows:
"SECTION 9.6. Challenge. — An Arbitrator may be challenged by a party at any time after his appointment but before the lapse of the original 10-day period for submission of memoranda or draft decision under Section 13.16, Rule 13 hereof. Any extension of time to file memoranda or draft decisions will not EXTEND the 10-day period to file a challenge or motion for inhibition. The challenge shall be based upon the following grounds:
a. relationship by blood or marriage within the sixth degree of either party to the controversy, or to counsels within the fourth degree, computed according to the rules of civil law;
b. financial, fiduciary or other interest in the controversy;
c. partiality or bias;
d. incompetence, or professional misconduct.
A party may also request the inhibition of an arbitrator upon other just and valid reasons affecting independence, impartiality and interest. TAEcSC
The foregoing revision shall take effect fifteen (15) days from receipt of a copy hereof by the Office of the National Administrative Register, U.P. Law Center, pursuant to Memorandum Circular No. 11 from the Office of the President.
UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
Adopted: 30 Oct. 2006
(SGD.) SEDFREY A. ORDONEZChairman
(SGD.) ISAAC S. DAVIDMember
(SGD.) SAMSON C. LAZOMember
Cite This Law
Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules, CIAC Resolution No. 18-06, Oct 30, 2006 (Philippines)
Further Amending Section 9.6, Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC Rules, CIAC Resolution No. 18-06 (Phil. 2006)
Related Laws
- Amending Section 18.6, Rule 18 of the Revised CIAC RulesCIAC Resolution No. 19-06 • Oct 30, 2006 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Amending Section 8.2 of Rules 8 and Sections 9.1.1 to 9.1.4 and 9.2.1 of Rule 9 of the Revised CIAC RulesCIAC Resolution No. 02-07 • Jan 24, 2007 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Clarifying Section 21.7, Rule 21 of the Revised CIAC RulesCIAC Resolution No. 06-07 • Apr 26, 2007 • Other Rules and Procedures
- CIAC Revised Rules of Procedure Governing Construction ArbitrationCIAC Revised Rules of Procedure Governing Construction Arbitration • Feb 28, 2019 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Amending Sections 2.3 and 2.4, Rule 2 of the Revised CIAC RulesCIAC Resolution No. 15-06 • Jul 21, 2006 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Amending Rule 4 (Effect of Agreement to Arbitrate), Rule 8 (Qualifications of Arbitrators) and Rule 9 (Nomination and Appointment of Arbitrators) of the CIAC Revised Rules of Procedure Governing Construction ArbitrationCIAC Resolution No. 07-16 • Nov 3, 2016 • Other Rules and Procedures
Browse More Other Rules and Procedures
Explore other laws in the Other Rules and Procedures category.
View All Other Rules and ProceduresNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law