Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88, issued on November 8, 1988, outlines the procedural requirements for petitions filed with the Supreme Court, effective January 1, 1989. It mandates strict compliance with the Rules of Court, including payment of docketing fees, proof of service to concerned lower courts and opposing parties, and submission of relevant judgments or resolutions. Petitions must also include a verified statement of material dates regarding notifications and motions for reconsideration. Non-compliance with these requirements may result in outright dismissal of the petition, and subsequent compliance will not lead to reconsideration unless compelling reasons are provided.
Quick Answers
- What is Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court about?
- Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88, issued on November 8, 1988, outlines the procedural requirements for petitions filed with the Supreme Court, effective January 1, 1989. It mandates strict compliance with the Rules of Court, including payment of docketing fees, proof of service to concerned lower courts and opposing parties, and submission of relevant judgments or resolutions. Petitions must also include a verified statement of material dates regarding notifications and motions for reconsideration. Non-compliance with these requirements may result in outright dismissal of the petition, and subsequent compliance will not lead to reconsideration unless compelling reasons are provided.
- What type of law is Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88?
- Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court (Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88) is a Philippine Supreme Court Issuances enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court enacted?
- Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court (Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88) was enacted on Nov 8, 1988.
- What is the citation for Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court?
- Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88, Nov 8, 1988 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
November 8, 1988
SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR NO. 1-88
| TO | : | All Members of the Bar |
| SUBJECT | : | Implementation of Sec. 12, Art. XVIII of the 1987 Constitution and complementing Administrative Circular No. 1 of January 28, 1988 on Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court |
Considering the provisions of Section 12, Article XVIII of the 1987 Constitution, mandating the adoption of a systematic plan to expedite the decision or resolution of cases or matters pending in the Supreme Court and complementing further the Court's resolution of April 7, 1988, implementing Administrative Circular No. 1 of January 28, 1988, the Supreme Court effective January 1, 1989, will entertain only petitions that comply strictly with the pertinent provisions of the Rules of Court more particularly the following: cd i
1. Payment of docketing and other fees. — Section 1 of Rule 45 requires that petitions for review be filed within the prescribed period paying at the same time the prescribed fees. Unless exempted by law or rule, such fees must be fully paid at the time of the filing of the petition; otherwise, the court may deny the petition outright. The same rule shall govern petitions under Rule 65.
The filing fees under rule 141 are as follows:
| ETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI Under Rule 45 | |
| Docket Fee |
P48.00
|
| Docket Fee (Judiciary Fund) |
352.00
|
| Legal Research Fund Fee |
20.00
|
|
——
|
|
| TOTAL |
P420.00
|
| SPECIAL CIVIL ACTION (Under Rule 65) |
|
| Docket Fee |
48.00
|
| Docket Fee (Judiciary Fund) |
352.00
|
| Legal Research Fund Fee |
20.00
|
| Deposit for Sheriffs Fee |
200.00
|
| Clerk's Commission |
4.00
|
|
——
|
|
| TOTAL |
P624.00
|
If a restraining is prayed for in connection with a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45, the sheriff's fees prescribed for special civil actions under Rule 65 in the aggregate amount of P200.00 shall also be paid.
If the petition involves more than one case, the docket and legal research fund fees will be multiplied by the number of cases. Payment should be made in cash, postal money order bank manager's or cashier's check.
2. Service of copies of the petition. — The Court shall not act on the petition under Rule 45 without proof of service of a copy thereof on the lower court concerned and on the adverse party. Henceforth, the petition may be denied outright if there is no such proof of service in accordance with Sections 3,5 and 10 of Rule 13 attached to the petition when filed. (See attached form of Affidavit of Service, Annex "A");
3. The copies of the judgment or resolution sought to be reviewed. — Petitions filed with the Supreme Court, whether under Rule 45, Rule 65, R.A. No. 5440 or P.D. No. 1606, shall be accompanied by a clearly legible duplicate original or certified true copy of the decision, judgment resolution or order subject thereof, and the requisite number of plain copies thereof. The certification shall be accomplished by the proper Clerk of Court of by his duly authorized representative or be the proper officer of the board, commission, or office involved, or by his duly authorized representative. Certification by the parties themselves, their counsel or any other person shall not be allowed.
Non-compliance with these requirements shall be a ground for dismissal.
4. Verified statement of material dates. — A petition under Rule 45 or 65 shall in all cases contain a verified statement of the date when notice of the judgment, order or resolution subject thereof was received when a motion for reconsideration, if any, was filed and when notice of the denial thereof was received; otherwise, the petition may be dismissed.
5. Effect of subsequent compliance. — Subsequent compliance with the above requirements will not warrant reconsideration of the order of dismissal unless it be shown that such non-compliance was due to compelling reasons.
6. Effectivity Date. — This Circular shall take effect on January 1, 1989.
November 8, 1988
(SGD.) MARCELO B. FERNANChief Justice
ANNEX A
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES)
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
I, ____________________, as _____________________ (relation to party or counsel) of, _________________ with office address at ______________________, after being duly sworn, depose and say: ITCHSa
Nature of Pleading/Paper
In Case No. ___________________ entitled _______________________________, by depositing a copy in the post office, in a sealed envelope, plainly addressed to the party or his attorney at his office/residence with postage fully prepaid, as evidenced (in case of registered mail) by Registry Receipt No. ___________ hereto attached, and with instructions to the postmaster to return the mail to the sender after ten (10) days if undelivered.
That the addressee(s) is/are as follows:
_____________________________
___________________ Manila, Philippines.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this _____ day of ____________, 198__ at _________________________ Philippines, affiant exhibiting to me his/her Residence Certificate No. ___________, issued at ______________ on __________.
Officer Administering the Oath
(Note: This Circular was published in the Bulletin Today on November 29, 1988)
Cite This Law
Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88, Nov 8, 1988 (Philippines)
Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme Court, Supreme Court Circular No. 1-88 (Phil. 1988)
Related Laws
- Expeditious Disposition of Criminal Cases Involving TouristsSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 58-02 • Nov 14, 2002 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Expeditious Disposition of Cases Involving TouristsSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 05-90 • Feb 15, 1990 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Expeditious Disposition of CasesSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 04-88 • Sep 22, 1988 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Implementation of Sec. 12, Art. XVIII of the 1987 Constitution and Complementing Administrative Circular No. 1 of January 28, 1988 on Expeditious Disposition of Cases Pending in the Supreme CourtSupreme Court Revised Circular No. 1-88 • Jul 1, 1991 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Expeditious Decision or Resolution of Pending Cases or MattersSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 2 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Supreme Court Circular No. 2-86Supreme Court Circular No. 2-86 • Mar 11, 1986 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law