Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects
Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00, issued on November 13, 2000, enforces Republic Act No. 8975, which prohibits lower courts from issuing temporary restraining orders or injunctions against government infrastructure projects. This law aims to ensure the swift execution and completion of such projects to minimize costs and maximize benefits for the public. It allows only the Supreme Court to issue such orders in cases of extreme urgency involving constitutional issues, while any contrary orders from lower courts are deemed void. Judges violating this prohibition face penalties, including suspension without pay. The circular mandates compliance among lower court judges to uphold the law's intent.
Quick Answers
- What is Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects about?
- Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00, issued on November 13, 2000, enforces Republic Act No. 8975, which prohibits lower courts from issuing temporary restraining orders or injunctions against government infrastructure projects. This law aims to ensure the swift execution and completion of such projects to minimize costs and maximize benefits for the public. It allows only the Supreme Court to issue such orders in cases of extreme urgency involving constitutional issues, while any contrary orders from lower courts are deemed void. Judges violating this prohibition face penalties, including suspension without pay. The circular mandates compliance among lower court judges to uphold the law's intent.
- What type of law is Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00?
- Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects (Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00) is a Philippine Supreme Court Issuances enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects enacted?
- Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects (Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00) was enacted on Nov 13, 2000.
- What is the citation for Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects?
- Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects, Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00, Nov 13, 2000 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Supreme Court Issuances
- Subcategory
- Administrative Circulars
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
November 13, 2000
SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO. 11-00
| TO | : | Judges of Lower Courts |
| RE | : | Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects |
Your attention is invited to Republic Act No. 8975, entitled AN ACT TO ENSURE THE EXPEDITIOUS IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLETION OF GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS BY PROHIBITING LOWER COURTS FROM ISSUING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS, PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIONS OR PRELIMINARY MANDATORY INJUNCTIONS, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES, which was approved by the President on 7 November 2000 and published in the 11 November 2000 issues of The Manila Bulletin and The Malaya, newspapers of general circulation in the Philippines. The law takes effect fifteen (15) days following such publication. CIDaTc
Pertinent provisions of the Act read as follows:
SECTION 1. Declaration of Policy. — Article XII, Section 6 of the Constitution states that the use of property bears a social function, and all economic agents shall contribute to the common good. Towards this end, the State shall ensure the expeditious and efficient implementation and completion of government infrastructure projects to avoid unnecessary increase in construction, maintenance and/or repair costs and to immediately enjoy the social and economic benefits therefrom.
SECTION 2. Definition of Terms. —
(a) "National government projects" shall refer to all current and future national government infrastructure, engineering works and service contracts, including projects undertaken by government-owned and -controlled corporations, all projects covered by Republic Act No. 6957, as amended by Republic Act No. 7718, otherwise known as the Build-Operate-and-Transfer Law, and other related and necessary activities such as site acquisition, supply and/or installation of equipment and materials, implementation, construction, completion, operation, maintenance, improvement, repair and rehabilitation, regardless of the source of funding.
(b) "Service contracts" shall refer to infrastructure contracts entered into by any department, office or agency of the national government with private entities and nongovernment organizations for services related or incidental to the functions and operations of the department, office or agency concerned. CAIaHS
SECTION 3. Prohibition on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders, Preliminary Injunctions and Preliminary Mandatory Injunctions. — No court, except the Supreme Court, shall issue any temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction or preliminary mandatory injunction against the government, or any of its subdivisions, officials or any person or entity, whether public or private, acting under the government's direction, to restrain, prohibit or compel the following acts:
(a) Acquisition, clearance and development of the right-of-way and/or site or location of any national government project;
(b) Bidding or awarding of contract/project of the national government as defined under Section 2 hereof;
(c) Commencement, prosecution, execution, implementation, operation of any such contract or project;
(d) Termination or rescission of any such contract/project; and
(e) The undertaking or authorization of any other lawful activity necessary for such contract/project.
This prohibition shall apply in all cases, disputes or controversies instituted by a private party, including but not limited to cases filed by bidders or those claiming to have rights through such bidders involving such contract/project. This prohibition shall not apply when the matter is of extreme urgency involving constitutional issue, such that unless a temporary restraining order is issued, grave injustice and irreparable injury will arise. The applicant shall file a bond, in an amount to be fixed by the court, which bond shall accrue in favor of the government if the court should finally decide that the applicant was not entitled to the relief sought. HEacAS
If after due hearing the court finds that the award of the contract is null and void, the court may, if appropriate under the circumstances, award the contract to the qualified and winning bidder or order a rebidding of the same, without prejudice to any liability that the guilty party may incur under existing laws.
SECTION 4. Nullity of Writs and Orders. — Any temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction or preliminary mandatory injunction issued in violation of Section 3 hereof is void and of no force and effect.
SECTION 5. Designation of Regional Trial Courts. — The Supreme Court may designate regional trial courts to act as commissioners with the sole function of receiving facts of the case involving acquisition clearance and development of right-of-way for government infrastructure projects. The designated regional trial court shall within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the referral, forward its findings of facts to the Supreme Court for appropriate action.
SECTION 6. Penal Sanction. — In addition to any civil and criminal liabilities he or she may incur under existing laws, any judge who shall issue a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction or preliminary mandatory injunction in violation of Section 3 hereof, shall suffer the penalty of suspension of at least sixty (60) days without pay.
Please be guided accordingly.
The Court Administrator shall immediately disseminate copies of this Administrative Circular to all lower court Judges and see to it that they strictly comply with the law. EDcICT
Issued this 13th day of November, 2000.
(SGD.) HILARIO G. DAVIDE, JR.Chief Justice
Cite This Law
Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects, Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00, Nov 13, 2000 (Philippines)
Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Prohibitory or Mandatory Injunctions in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure Projects, Supreme Court Administrative Circular No. 11-00 (Phil. 2000)
Related Laws
- Judicious Implementation of Court Issuances Concerning the Ban on the Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders or Writs of Preliminary Injunctions Involving Government Infrastructure ProjectsOCA Circular No. 38-14 • Mar 12, 2014 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Reiteration on the Prohibition on the Issuance of Restraining Orders or Writs of Injunction Against National Government Infrastructure ProjectsOCA Circular No. 289-2022 • Oct 19, 2022 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Submission of Report on the Status of Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) or Writs of Preliminary Injunction in Cases Involving Government Infrastructure ProjectsOCA Circular No. 134-2016 • Jun 14, 2016 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Exercise of Utmost Caution, Prudence, and Judiciousness in Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders and Writs of Preliminary InjunctionsSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 7-99 • Jun 25, 1999 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Submission of Reports on Status of TROs or Writs of Preliminary InjunctionSupreme Court Administrative Circular No. 62-02 • Nov 20, 2002 • Supreme Court Issuances
- Reminding Judges to Exercise Utmost Caution, Prudence and Judiciousness in Issuance of Temporary Restraining Orders and Writs of Preliminary InjunctionsOCA Circular No. 79-03 • Jun 12, 2003 • Supreme Court Issuances
Browse More Supreme Court Issuances
Explore other laws in the Supreme Court Issuances category.
View All Supreme Court IssuancesNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law