Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184
Department Order No. 193-16 issued by the Philippine Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) establishes guidelines for managing contracts with negative slippage, categorized into three stages: "Early Warning," "ICU," and "Terminal." Contractors facing a slippage of 5% or more must submit catch-up programs, while those with 10% or more receive final warnings and intensified supervision. Contracts with slippage of 15% or more may be terminated, and contractors may be disqualified from future bids if delays are attributable to them. The order enforces accountability on the implementing offices and outlines penalties for failure to comply, including reprimands and dismissals for officials involved. The guidelines aim to ensure timely project delivery and effective project management within the DPWH framework.
Quick Answers
- What is Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184 about?
- Department Order No. 193-16 issued by the Philippine Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) establishes guidelines for managing contracts with negative slippage, categorized into three stages: "Early Warning," "ICU," and "Terminal." Contractors facing a slippage of 5% or more must submit catch-up programs, while those with 10% or more receive final warnings and intensified supervision. Contracts with slippage of 15% or more may be terminated, and contractors may be disqualified from future bids if delays are attributable to them. The order enforces accountability on the implementing offices and outlines penalties for failure to comply, including reprimands and dismissals for officials involved. The guidelines aim to ensure timely project delivery and effective project management within the DPWH framework.
- What type of law is DPWH Department Order No. 193-16?
- Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184 (DPWH Department Order No. 193-16) is a Philippine Other Rules and Procedures enacted by the Congress of the Philippines.
- When was Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184 enacted?
- Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184 (DPWH Department Order No. 193-16) was enacted on Sep 15, 2016.
- What is the citation for Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184?
- Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184, DPWH Department Order No. 193-16, Sep 15, 2016 (Philippines)
Law Information
- Reference Number
- DPWH Department Order No. 193-16
- Date Enacted
- Category
- Other Rules and Procedures
- Subcategory
- Department of Public Works and Highways
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
- Enacting Body
- Congress of the Philippines
Full Law Text
September 15, 2016
DPWH DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. 193-16
| SUBJECT | : | Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184 |
In line with the Department's goal to deliver projects on time, these guidelines concerning contracts with negative slippage attributable to the contractor are hereby issued, in accordance with the IRR of R.A. 9184 and related Department issuances:
A. Calibrated Actions
A.1 Negative slippage of 5% ("Early Warning" Stage): The contractor shall be given a warning and required to submit a detailed "catch-up" program on a fortnightly (two weeks) basis to eliminate the slippage. The contractor shall commit to accelerate his work and shall identify specific physical targets to be accomplished over a defined time period. Furthermore, the contractor shall be instructed to specify the additional input resources — money, manpower, materials, equipment, and management — which he should mobilize for this action program. The Implementing Office shall exercise closer supervision and meet the contractor every other week to evaluate the progress of work and resolve any problems and bottlenecks.
A.2 Negative slippage of 10% ("ICU" Stage): The contractor shall be issued a final warning and required to come-up with a more detailed program of activities with weekly physical targets, together with the required additional input resources. On-site supervision shall be intensified and evaluation of project performance shall be done at least once a week. At the same time, the Implementing Office shall prepare contingency plans for the termination of the contract and/or take-over of the work by administration or contract.
A.3 Negative slippage of 15% or more ("Terminal" Stage): In accordance with the IRR of R.A. 9184, the Implementing Offices shall initiate termination of the contract and/or take-over of the remaining work by administration or assignment to another contractor/appropriate agency. Proper transitory measures shall be taken to minimize work disruptions, e.g., take-over by administration while negotiation or rebidding is on-going. Procedures for termination of contracts under Item IV, Appendix 4-Guidelines on Termination of Contract shall be strictly followed.B. Penalty:
The procuring entity shall disqualify the contractor from participating in the bidding or award of contract for infrastructure projects if his firm incurred a delay in any of his ongoing contracts (government and private) which is considered attributable to him, pursuant to the provisions of IRR of RA 9184, in any of the following cases:
B.1 Where the firm incurred a negative slippage of at least 15% of his on-going contract in accordance with Section 34.3.b.ii of Rule X — Post Qualification, of RA 9184;
B.2 Where the delay in the completion of work has exceeded the time duration equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the specified contract time plus any approved time extension. The same shall be subject for rescission in accordance with Section 8.4 of Annex E of RA 9184; or,
B.3 Where the total sum of liquidated damages has exceeded ten per cent (10%) of the total contract price. The same shall automatically be taken over by the procuring entity or awarded to a qualified contractor through negotiation in accordance with Section 8.5 of Annex E of RA 9184.
Any approval of time suspension/extension shall strictly comply with the existing provisions under Annex E of the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184 and D.O. No. 144, series of 2016, or any latest issuance relative to the said D.O.
In all cases, the Head of the Implementing Office shall be held accountable for the success or failure of project implementation, including the slippages incurred and the elimination thereof.
The concerned Head of the Implementing Office shall see to it that this Order is strictly enforced. Failure to do so shall, after due process, make him and other officials/employees involved liable to the penalties prescribed for violation of reasonable office rules and regulations. For violation in the non-imposition of penalties under Item B — Penalty, pursuant to Section 46, F (3) of Civil Service Resolution No. 1101502 dated November 8, 2011:
| 1st Offense | — | Reprimand |
| 2nd Offense | — | Suspension for 1-30 days |
| 3rd Offense | — | Dismissal |
For violation in the non-observance of calibrated actions under Item A, the guidelines provided under Item 2.0-Physical Accomplishment of the Memorandum dated November 26, 2014 (Additional Guidelines on the Imposition of Administrative Sanctions on Erring Employees Involved in Project Implementation and Processing of Project Documents) shall be imposed.
Attached herewith as Annex A-1, Annex A-2, and Annex A-3 are the standard forms in the issuance of calibrated actions on contracts with negative slippage.
The Monitoring and Implementing Guidelines and Procedures of sanction mechanisms is provided in Annex B of this DO.
This Order takes effect immediately and supersedes the following issuances:
1) D.O. 37, series of 2015 — Disqualification of Contractors with Liquidated Damages on Ongoing DPWH Infrastructure Projects;
2) D.O. 102, series of 1988 — Calibrated Actions on Contracts with Negative Slippages;
3) D.O. 142, series of 1989 — Contracts with Negative Slippages of 15% or more; and
4) D.O. 202, series of 1993 — Right of Contractor to be Heard before Rescission of his Contract.
(SGD.) MARK A. VILLARActing Secretary
ANNEX A-1
Republic of the Philippines
________________(Date of Issuance)
_________________________(Authorized Managing Officer)Position
| SUBJECT | : | Notice for the Negative Slippage |
| 1st Warning (Early Warning Stage) |
Dear Mr./Ms. (Last Name):
This refers to your contract (Name of Project) in the amount of P (Contract Amount). Please be informed that as of (date the accomplishment was computed), you have incurred a negative slippage of (-) __ % due to your fault caused by (state the reason e.g., limited equipment, materials, manpower, etc.), which now falls under the "Early Warning Stage" pursuant to Department Order No. 193, Series of 2016 — Administrative Action on Contract with Negative Slippages in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184.
Based on the approved PERT/CPM Network, the planned accomplishment is __ % while your actual accomplishment is only __ %. DETACa
In view hereof, you are hereby directed to submit a detailed "catch-up" program on a fortnightly (two weeks) basis to eliminate the slippage.
In the action program being required, specify therein the additional input resources such as money, manpower, materials, equipment, and management to cope up and meet the desired result accordingly.
Your immediate compliance on this matter is hereby sought.
Very truly yours,
_________________________(Head of Implementing Office)Position
ANNEX A-2
________________(Date of Issuance)
_________________________(Authorized Managing Officer)Position
| SUBJECT | : | Notice for the Negative Slippage |
| Final Warning (ICU Stage) |
Dear Mr./Ms. (Last Name):
This refers to your contract (Name of Project) in the amount of P (Contract Amount). Please be informed that as of (date the accomplishment was computed), you have incurred a negative slippage of (-) __ % due to your fault caused by (state the reason e.g., limited equipment, materials, manpower, etc.), which now falls under the "ICU Stage" pursuant to Department Order No. 193, Series of 2016 — Administrative Action on Contract with Negative Slippages in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184.
Based on the approved PERT/CPM Network, the planned accomplishment is __ % while your actual accomplishment is only __ %.
In view hereof, you are hereby directed to submit with a more detailed program of activities with weekly physical targets, together with the required additional input resources to accelerate your work accomplishment and reduce the slippage over a defined time period.
On-site supervision shall likewise be intensified and evaluation of project performance shall be done at least once a week.
Your immediate compliance on this matter is hereby sought.
Very truly yours,
_________________________(Head of Implementing Office)Position
ANNEX A-3
________________(Date of Issuance)
_________________________(Authorized Managing Officer)Position
| SUBJECT | : | Notice to Terminate Contract |
| (Terminal Stage) |
Dear Mr./Ms. (Last Name):
This refers to your contract (Name of Project) in the amount of P (Contract Amount). Please be informed that as of (date the accomplishment was computed), you have an actual accomplishment of __ % versus the planned accomplishment of __ %, thus, you have incurred a negative slippage of (-) __ % due to your fault caused by (state the reason e.g., limited equipment, materials, manpower, etc.), which now falls under the "Terminal Stage".
Pursuant to Section III.A.2.a Appendix 4 of R.A. 9184 and Department Order No. 193, Series of 2016 — Administrative Action on Contract with Negative Slippages in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184, the implementing office shall initiate the termination of contract. aDSIHc
In view hereof, you are directed to "show cause" within seven (7) calendar days from receipt hereof why your contract should not be terminated, pursuant to Section IV.3 Appendix 4 of R.A. 9184.
Your immediate compliance on this matter is hereby sought.
Very truly yours,
_________________________(Head of Implementing Office)Position
MONITORING AND IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES OF SANCTION MECHANISMS OF DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. 193, series of 2016
I. For Penalty "b", Non-observance of Calibrated Actions of the DO
|
Step
|
Guideline/Procedure
|
Responsible
|
Prescribed Time
|
|
|
|
Office
|
(working day)
|
| 1. | All IOs shall reflect in the Project Monitoring System | Implementing | On or before the 30th |
| (PMS)/Project Management Office-Monitoring System | Offices (IOs) | day of the month in | |
| (PMO-MS) under the Project Profile Module | (DEO/RO/ | the PMS/PMO-MS for | |
| (Attachments 1 & 2) or in the Contract Management | UPMO) | FY 2015 and prior | |
| Module of the Project and Contract Management | years' projects | ||
| Application (PCMA) (Attachment 3) the detailed and | |||
| updated project information as required in the | On or before the last | ||
| submission of Physical Status/Accomplishments for | calendar day of the | ||
| all infrastructure projects, pertaining to specific | month in the PCMA | ||
| reasons of project delays. The reasons of delay shall | for FY 2016 projects | ||
| be categorically stated as whether delay is due to | and onwards | ||
| contractor's fault or not. | |||
| 2. | All IOs concerned shall submit to BOC, thru the | Implementing | On or before the 5th |
| Project Monitoring Division (PMD), the list of | Offices (IOs) | day of the month | |
| contracts incurring (-) 10% slippage and above, | |||
| together with the documents relative to their action | |||
| taken, in accordance with the requirements | |||
| stipulated in the DO for projects with delay | |||
| attributable to the contractor (i.e., Notices, Intent to | |||
| Terminate, catch-up plans, etc.) | |||
| 3. | BOC-PMD, shall generate and validate the list of | BOC-PMD | Every 5th day of the |
| projects/contracts incurring (-)10% slippage and | month | ||
| above due to contractor's fault, based on the | |||
| submission of the IO. | |||
| The concerned Undersecretary/Assistant Secretary | |||
| for Operations shall be provided copy of the list of | |||
| projects/contracts incurring (-)10% slippage and | |||
| above due to contractor's fault. | |||
| 4. | QAU and CPES Teams who conducted project | QAU & CPES | Within five (5) days |
| assessments shall furnish BOC, thru BQS, a copy of | Teams | after conduct of | |
| the list of implementing offices who did not comply | inspection | ||
| with the provisions of this DO, for additional | |||
| information and reference, aside from the reports | |||
| coming from the IOs. | |||
| 5. | BOC shall prepare a Memorandum for signature of | BOC, | Every 7th day of the |
| the Undersecretary/Assistant Secretary for | U/Sec and | month | |
| Operations to all IOs concerned requiring them to | A/Sec for | ||
| explain/justify their action/inaction on the | Operations | ||
| observance of the Department Order. | concerned | ||
| 6. | Concerned lOs, who were issued Memorandum for | Implementing | Five (5) days after |
| non-observance/non-compliance to this DO, shall | Offices (lOs) | receipt of the BOC | |
| submit explanation/justification to BOC why sanction | Notice to Explain | ||
| shall not be imposed on them. | |||
| 7. | BOC, after evaluation of the documents/justification | BOC | Seven (7) days after |
| submitted by the IO, shall submit a report to the | receipt of the | ||
| concerned Undersecretary/Assistant Secretary for | documents from IOs | ||
| Operations the list of IOs who failed to comply with | |||
| the provisions of the DO, recommending imposition | |||
| of corresponding sanctions/penalties. | |||
| BOC may conduct actual field validation, if deemed | |||
| necessary, to verify reports submitted by the IOs. | |||
| 8. | Based on the evaluation report and recommendation | U/Sec or A/Sec | Within three (3) days |
| submitted by BOC, the Undersecretary/Assistant | for Operations | after receipt of BOC | |
| Secretary shall issue Memorandum imposing the | report | ||
| corresponding penalties prescribed under the DO. | |||
| 9. | The IOs concerned may request for reconsideration | Implementing | Within five (5) days |
| or an appeal on the imposed penalties under the DO. | Offices (IOs) | after receipt of the | |
| penalty | |||
| The IOs shall, aside from their justification, attach | |||
| documents as evidence/proof to support their plea. | |||
| 10. | The Committee, created for the purpose, shall | Committee, | Within seven (7) days |
| review and evaluate the appeal submitted by the | U/Sec or A/Sec | after receipt of | |
| IOs. If found lacking of merit, the Committee shall | for Operations | explanation and | |
| recommend that the imposed sanction/penalty as | complete documents | ||
| stipulated in the DO shall remain, copy furnish BOC | |||
| for reference and consolidation. If found to be | |||
| justifiable, a warning shall be issued that repetition | |||
| of the same shall be dealt with accordingly. | |||
| 11. | BOC shall consolidate the sanctions/penalties | BOC | Quarterly |
| imposed by the concerned Undersecretary/Assistant | |||
| Secretary for Operations, to the DPWH officials | |||
| involved for non-compliance to the DO, for | |||
| submission to the ManCom for their information | |||
| and reference. |
II. For Penalty "a", Non-imposition of penalties under Item B — Penalty of the DO
|
Step
|
Guideline/Procedure
|
Responsible
|
Prescribed Time
|
|
|
|
Office
|
(working day)
|
| 1. | The Implementing Office shall disqualify the | Head of IOs | As needed |
| contractor from participating in any bidding or award | |||
| of contract for infrastructure projects if their firm | |||
| incurred delays in their contracts which is considered | |||
| attributable to them, as indicated in Items B.1, B.2, | |||
| and B.3 under Item B Penalty clause of this DO. | |||
| 2. | The BAC of concerned IO shall submit list of these | Implementing | On or before every |
| disqualified contractors to the Procurement Service | Offices' BAC | 5th day of the month | |
| (PrS) for information and validation. | |||
| The concerned Undersecretary/Assistant Secretary | |||
| for Operations and BOC shall be provided copy of the | |||
| list of these disqualified contractors. | |||
| 3. | PrS shall check/validate the submitted list of | Procurement | Within three (3) days |
| contractors who have been disqualified from | Service (PrS) | after receipt of report | |
| participating in any bidding or award of contract for | from BAC of IOs | ||
| infrastructure projects against the data from the Civil | |||
| Works Registry (CWR). | |||
| If a particular contractor was not penalized, and/or | |||
| the IO failed to observed the penalties as stipulated | |||
| in Item B of the DO, PrS shall require the IO, thru a | |||
| Memorandum, to justify their action/inaction. | |||
| 4. | Concerned lOs, who did not observe/comply to this | Head of IOs | Within five (5) days |
| DO, shall submit explanation/justification to PrS why | after receipt of | ||
| sanction shall not be imposed on them. | Memorandum from PS | ||
| 5. | PrS, after evaluation of the documents/justification | Procurement | Seven (7) days after |
| submitted by the IO, shall submit a report to the | Service(PrS) | receipt of the | |
| concerned Undersecretary/Assistant Secretary for | documents from IOs | ||
| Support Services the list of IOs who failed to comply | |||
| with the provisions of the DO, recommending | |||
| imposition of corresponding sanctions/penalties. | |||
| 6. | Based on the evaluation report and recommendation | U/Sec or A/Sec | Within three (3) days |
| submitted by PrS, the Undersecretary/Assistant | for Support | after receipt of BOC | |
| Secretary shall issue Memorandum imposing the | Services | report | |
| corresponding penalties prescribed under the DO. | |||
| 7. | The IOs concerned may request for reconsideration | Implementing | Within five (5) days |
| or an appeal on the imposed penalties under the DO. | Offices (lOs) | after receipt of the | |
| penalty | |||
| 8. | The Committee, created for the purpose, shall review | Committee, | Within seven (7) |
| and evaluate the appeal submitted by the IOs. If | U/Sec or A/Sec | days after receipt of | |
| found lacking of merit, the Committee shall | for Support | explanation and | |
| recommend that the imposed sanction/penalty as | Services | complete documents | |
| stipulated in the DO shall remain, copy furnish PrS | |||
| and BOC for reference and consolidation. If found to | |||
| be justifiable, a warning shall be issued that | |||
| repetition of the same shall be dealt with accordingly. | |||
| 9. | PrS shall consolidate the sanctions/penalties imposed | Procurement | Quarterly |
| to the IOs for non-compliance to the DO, for | Service (PrS) | ||
| submission to the ManCom for their information and | |||
| reference. |
III. Committee to Review and Evaluate the Appeal submitted by the IOs
The Committee, created for this purpose, shall be composed of the following officials:
| Chairman | : | Concerned Assistant Secretary for Operations |
| Undersecretary for UPMO Operations (in case of | ||
| UPMO projects) | ||
| Vice-Chairman | : | Assistant Director, BOC |
| Members | : | Director, Legal Service |
| Director, Planning Service | ||
| Assistant Director, BOD | ||
| Assistant Director, BQS | ||
| Division Chief, Civil Works Division, PrS |
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Cite This Law
Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184, DPWH Department Order No. 193-16, Sep 15, 2016 (Philippines)
Administrative Action on Contracts with Negative Slippage in Accordance with the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184, DPWH Department Order No. 193-16 (Phil. 2016)
Related Laws
- Harmonizing the Rules on Imposition of Liquidated Damages Provided Under Annexes "D" And "E" Of The 2016 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 9184 With GPPB Resolution No. 07-2019GPPB Resolution No. 02-2020 • Feb 27, 2020 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Revised Guidelines for the Implementation of DPWH Projects (By Administration or Contract) by Local Government Units (LGUs)DPWH Department Order No. 62, s. 2018 • Apr 13, 2018 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Implementing Guidelines on Agency-to-Agency Arrangements under Section 53 (E) of the IRR-A of R.A. 9184GPPB Resolution No. 18-07 • May 31, 2007 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Revised Guidelines on the Extension of Contracts for General Support ServicesGPPB Resolution No. 23-07 • Sep 28, 2007 • Other Rules and Procedures
- Interim Guidelines in the Procurement Process Based on the Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of R.A. No. 9184DPWH Department Order No. 01-10 • Jan 4, 2010 • Other Rules and Procedures
- The 2016 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 9184, Otherwise known as the Government Procurement Reform Act (Updated as of 30 September 2022)IRR of RA 9184 • Sep 30, 2022 • Implementing Rules and Regulations
Browse More Other Rules and Procedures
Explore other laws in the Other Rules and Procedures category.
View All Other Rules and ProceduresNeed Help Understanding This Law?
Ask our AI assistant to explain provisions, implications, or related laws.
Ask AI About This Law