FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 243825. June 10, 2019.]
SANTIAGO ZAIDE, ARSENIO M. GONZALES, AND ERWIN MANTO, petitioners, vs.EMPIRE EAST LANDHOLDINGS, INC., GEMMA RIMERO, AND RICARDO GREGORIO, respondents.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution datedJune 10, 2019which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 243825 (Santiago Zaide, Arsenio M. Gonzales, and Erwin Manto v. Empire East Landholdings, Inc., Gemma Rimero, and Ricardo Gregorio). — The petitioners' motion for an extension of thirty (30) days within which to file a petition for review on certiorari is GRANTED, counted from the expiration of the reglementary period.
After review, the Court resolves to DENY the petition for failure to show that the Court of Appeals (CA) committed any reversible error in its ruling. The CA correctly found that the terms of the contract sufficiently appraised petitioners that their employment was for a specific period only since the project employment contracts were written in the vernacular and the terms therein were clear and unambiguous. Moreover, petitioners failed to present evidence to support their claim that their consents were vitiated or that the terms of the contract were in themselves difficult to understand. HTcADC
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The Decision dated August 6, 2018 and Resolution dated December 6, 2018 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 151763 are AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED."Carandang, J., on leave.
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) LIBRADA C. BUENADivision Clerk of Court