Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
EN BANC
G.R. No. L-9291 March 2, 1914
THE UNITED STATES, plaintiff-appellee, CAMILA CUNANAN, defendant-appellant.
John W. Haussermann for appellant.
TRENT, J.:
This is an appeal by the defendant, Camila Cunanan, from a judgment of the Court of First Instance of Tarlac, condemning her to fifteen years imprisonment in Bilibid, to indemnity the injured party, and to pay the cost of the case, for the crime of frustrated parricide.
The evidence of record establishes beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of the appellant of the crime charged. The penalty imposed is not in accordance with the law and the facts in the case. The information charges that the crime was committed with treachery. Treachery not being an element of the crime of frustrated parricide it must be taken as a generic aggravating circumstance. (U.S. vs. Villanueva, 2 Phil., Rep., 61.) There being no extenuating circumstances the minimum degree of the penalty must be imposed in accordance with the articles 65 and 95 of the Penal Code.
The judgment is therefore modified by substituting seventeen years four months and one day of reclusion temporal is also condemned to suffer the accessory penalties provided by law. In all other respect the judgment is affirmed.
Arellano, C.J., Carson, Moreland and Araullo, JJ., concur.
United States vs. Camila Cunanan
This is a criminal case decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on March 2, 1914, in the case of Republic of the Philippines v. Camila Cunanan. The accused, Camila Cunanan, was found guilty of frustrated parricide and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment in Bilibid, payment of indemnity to the injured party, and payment of costs. However, the Supreme Court found that the penalty imposed was not in accordance with the law and the facts of the case. The Court held that treachery, being not an element of the crime of frustrated parricide, must be taken as a generic aggravating circumstance. The Court modified the judgment by imposing the minimum degree of the penalty provided by articles 65 and 95 of the Penal Code, which is seventeen years, four months, and one day of reclusion temporal. The accused was also condemned to suffer the accessory penalties provided by law. In all other aspects, the judgment was affirmed.
Case Information
- Case Number
- G.R. No. L-9291
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
United States vs. Camila Cunanan, G.R. No. L-9291, Mar 2, 1914 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (1914). United States vs. Camila Cunanan (G.R. No. L-9291). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/united-states-vs-camila-cunanan
Related Cases
- U.S. v. CunananG.R. No. 9291 • Mar 2, 1914
- United States vs. Apolinario CunananG.R. No. L-8267 • Dec 27, 1913
- United States vs. Mateo Lapus, et al.G.R. No. 1222 • Jan 21, 1905
- Modesto Cunanan vs.. Atty. Rex C. RimorinA.C. No. 5315 • Aug 23, 2000
- Cunanan v. RimorinA.C. No. 5315 (ADM. CASE NO. CBD-98-518) • Aug 23, 2000
- U.S. v. CunananG.R. No. L-13177 • Mar 12, 1918
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case