FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 241400. February 18, 2019.]
SUNVAR REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, petitioner,vs. SIXTO DELOS ANGELES,1HEIRS OF MA. ELENA M. POSADAS AND THE REGISTER OF DEEDS, MUNTINLUPA CITY, respondents.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution datedFebruary 18, 2019which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 241400 — (Sunvar Realty Development Corporation v. Sixto Delos Angeles,Heirs of Ma. Elena M. Posadas and the Register of Deeds, Muntinlupa City)
After review of the records, the Court resolves to DENY the petition for failure to sufficiently show that the Court of Appeals (CA) committed any reversible error in its Decision 2 dated March 22, 2018, and Resolution 3 dated August 7, 2018, as to warrant the exercise of the Court's appellate jurisdiction.
As correctly ruled by the CA, a tax delinquency sale is void if no actual notice is given to the registered owner. Considering that no notice was sent to Ma. Elena M. Posadas prior to the scheduled public auction, the certificate of sale and deed of sale in favor of Sunvar Realty Development Corporation are deemed null and void.
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The Decision dated March 22, 2018 and the Resolution dated August 7, 2018, of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 105268 are AFFIRMED.
The petitioner is required to SUBMIT within five (5) days from notice hereof, a verified declaration of the signed petition for review on certiorari and its annexes pursuant to A.M. Nos. 10-3-7-SC and 11-9-4-SC.
SO ORDERED."
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) LIBRADA C. BUENADivision Clerk of Court
Footnotes
1. Referred to as "Sixto De los Angeles" which appears in Notice of Judgment, rollo, p. 37; CA Decision, rollo, pp. 38-53; Notice of Resolution, rollo, p. 54; and CA Resolution, rollo, pp. 55-56.
2.Rollo, pp. 38-53; penned by Associate Justice Renato C. Francisco, with Associate Justices Magdangal M. De Leon and Rodil V. Zalameda, concurring.
3.Id. at 55-56.