Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
SECOND DIVISION
A.M. No. P-06-2257 May 29, 2007
SPS. ARTHUR & LEONORA STILGROVE, Complainants, ERIBERTO SABAS, in his capacity as Clerk of Court and EX-OFICIO Sheriff, and ERNESTO SIMPLICIANO, Respondents.
R E S O L U T I O N
TINGA, J.:
Before this Court is a Motion for Reconsideration filed by respondent Sabas of this Courts Resolution promulgated on 29 November 2006. Let it be said at the outset that respondents motion for reconsideration presents no substantial matters that would warrant a reversal of this Courts finding that he is guilty of Grave Abuse of Authority and Conduct Unbecoming of a Court Personnel.
The fact that the spouses Stilgrove were subsequently found in Civil Case No. 1681 to have encroached on the property where the demolished structure was erected does not render moot and academic the administrative case against respondent. What is important for purposes of determining respondents administrative liability is that, at the time of the demolition, the spouses Stilgrove were at least the presumptive owners of Lot No. 18556.
However, for purposes of clarity, the dispositive portion of the 29 November 2006 Resolution has to be recast to the end that the fine imposed on respondent Sabas shall be in an amount equivalent to his salary for six (6) months plus the amount corresponding to fifteen (15) days of leave credits, deductible from his retirement pay.
IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, the Court hereby RESOLVES to PARTIALLY GRANT respondents motion for reconsideration. The dispositive portion of this Courts 29 November 2006 Resolution is hereby modified to read:
"WHEREFORE, premises considered, respondent Eriberto Sabas, former Clerk of Court and Ex-Officio Sheriff of the Municipal Trial Court of Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, is found GUILTY of Grave Abuse of Authority and Conduct Unbecoming of a Court Personnel, and accordingly FINED in an amount equivalent to his salary for six (6) months plus the amount corresponding to fifteen (15) days of leave credits, deductible from his retirement pay.1awphi1.nét
The charges of grave abuse of authority and conduct unbecoming a court officer against Ernesto Simpliciano, former Deputy Sheriff of the Municipal Trial Court of Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit.
The charge of violation of Sections 3(a), 3(e) and 4(b) of Republic Act No. 3019 against Eriberto Sabas and Ernesto Simpliciano is REFERRED to the Executive Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Puerto Princesa City for investigation, report and recommendation on respondents administrative liability within sixty (60) days from receipt of the record.
SO ORDERED."
SO ORDERED.
DANTE O. TINGA
WE CONCUR:
LEONARDO A. QUISUMBING
ANTONIO T. CARPIO CONCHITA CARPIO MORALES PRESBITERO J. VELASCO, JR.
Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al.
This is an administrative case, *Stilgrove v. Sabas*, decided by the Philippine Supreme Court in 2007. The Court found Eriberto Sabas, former Clerk of Court and Ex-Officio Sheriff, guilty of grave abuse of authority and conduct unbecoming of a court personnel. He was fined an amount equivalent to his salary for six months plus the amount corresponding to fifteen days of leave credits, deductible from his retirement pay. The case arose from the demolition of a structure on a lot owned by the Stilgroves. Sabas had acted without proper authority and caused damage to the Stilgroves property. The Court held that Sabas' position did not exempt him from liability for his actions.
Quick Answers
- What is Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al. about?
- This is an administrative case, *Stilgrove v. Sabas*, decided by the Philippine Supreme Court in 2007. The Court found Eriberto Sabas, former Clerk of Court and Ex-Officio Sheriff, guilty of grave abuse of authority and conduct unbecoming of a court personnel. He was fined an amount equivalent to his salary for six months plus the amount corresponding to fifteen days of leave credits, deductible from his retirement pay. The case arose from the demolition of a structure on a lot owned by the Stilgroves. Sabas had acted without proper authority and caused damage to the Stilgroves property. The Court held that Sabas' position did not exempt him from liability for his actions.
- Which court decided Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al.?
- Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al. was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
- When was Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al. decided?
- Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al. (A.M. No. P-06-2257) was decided on May 29, 2007.
- What is the citation for Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al.?
- Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al., A.M. No. P-06-2257, May 29, 2007 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Case Information
- Case Number
- A.M. No. P-06-2257
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al., A.M. No. P-06-2257, May 29, 2007 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (2007). Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto Sabas, et al. (A.M. No. P-06-2257). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/sps-arthur-leonora-stilgrove-vs-eriberto-sabas-et-al
Related Cases
- Sps. Arthur And Leonora Stilgrove vs. Eriberto R. Sabas, et al.A.M. No. P-06-2257 • Nov 29, 2006
- Sps. Arthur & Leonora Stilgrove vs. Clerk of Court Eriberto R. Sabas etc.A.M. No. P-06-2257 • Mar 28, 2008
- Spouses Stilgrove v. SabasA.M. No. P-06-2257 (Resolution) • Nov 29, 2006
- Spouses Stilgrove v. SabasA.M. No. P-06-2257 (Resolution) • May 29, 2007
- Stilgrove v. SabasA.M. No. P-06-2257 (Resolution) • Mar 28, 2008
- Judy Sismaet vs. Eriberto R. Sabas, et al.A.M No. P-03-1680 • May 27, 2004
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case