FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 240866. October 8, 2018.]
SPOUSES DANIEL PERRIN AND SHIRLY PERRIN, petitioners,vs. SPOUSES NESTOR VILLARTA AND GLESA VILLARTA, SPOUSES EDDIE VILLARTA AND JESSICAL 1 VILLARTA AND MARY ANN V. ALSOL, respondents.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution dated October 8, 2018 which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 240866 — Spouses Daniel Perrin and Shirly Perrin, Petitioners, v. Spouses Nestor Villarta and Glesa Villarta, Spouses Eddie Villarta and Jessical Villarta and Mary Ann V. Alsol, Respondents.
Acting on petitioners' Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Review on Certiorari (Motion for Extension), the Court resolves to GRANT them thirty (30) days from the expiration of the reglementary period on July 21, 2018 within which to file a petition.
Considering the allegations contained in the instant Petition for Review on Certiorari, the Court notes that on July 6, 2018, petitioners received the June 14, 2018 Resolution denying their Motion for Reconsideration. As such, they had 15 days therefrom, or until July 21, 2018 within which to file a petition for review on certiorari or a motion for extension to file said petition with the Court. As cited above, the Court grants petitioners 30 days from the expiration of the reglementary period, or until August 20, 2018, within which to file a petition. However, petitioners filed this Petition for Review on Certiorari only on August 22, 2018. 2 Thus, the Petition is dismissible for having been filed out of time. Resultantly, the assailed Decision and Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CEB SP No. 09517 have already attained finality.
ACCORDINGLY, the Court resolves to DENY the Petition for Review on Certiorari. EcTCAD
SO ORDERED." Bersamin, J., on official travel.
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) LIBRADA C. BUENADivision Clerk of Court
Footnotes
1. Jesica in some parts of the records.
2. SECTION 2. Time for Filing; Extension. — The petition shall be filed within fifteen (15) days from notice of the judgment or final order or resolution appealed from, or of the denial of the petitioner's motion for new trial or reconsideration filed in due time after notice of the judgment. On motion duly filed and served, with full payment of the docket and other lawful fees and the deposit for costs before the expiration of the reglementary period, the Supreme Court may for justifiable reasons grant an extension of thirty (30) days only within which to file the petition. (1a, 5a).