FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 243117. June 17, 2019.]
SPOUSES BENIGNO C. BORJA AND ESTEFANIA C. BORJA, 1petitioners, vs.VIRGINIA VERGEL DE DIOS, respondent.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution datedJune 17, 2019which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 243117 (Spouses Benigno C. Borja and Estefania C. Borja v. Virginia Vergel De Dios) — The petitioners' first and second motions for extension totaling sixty (60) days within which to file a petition for review on certiorari are GRANTED, counted from the expiration of the reglementary period.
After review of the records, the Court resolves to DENY the petition for failure to sufficiently show that the Court of Appeals (CA) committed any reversible error in its July 6, 2018 Decision 2 and November 12, 2018 Resolution, 3 as to warrant the exercise of the Court's appellate jurisdiction.
As correctly ruled by the CA, petitioners failed to show grave abuse in the Regional Trial Court's denial of their petition for relief from writ of execution of the compromise judgment. A compromise agreement that has been made and duly approved by the court attains the effect and authority of res judicata. It has the force of law and is conclusive between the parties. As such, compromise judgment is subject to execution in accordance with the Rules of Court. HTcADC
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The July 6, 2018 Decision and November 12, 2018 Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 154405 are AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED."
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) LIBRADA C. BUENADivision Clerk of Court
Footnotes
1. Referred to as Estefania L. Borja in other parts of the rollo.
2.Rollo, pp. 33-45; penned by Associate Justice Ramon R. Garcia, with Associate Justices Myra V. Garcia-Fernandez and Germano Francisco D. Legaspi, concurring.
3.Id. at 47-48.