Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. L-45121-22 June 16, 1978
ROSARIO P. ARCEO, petitioner, HON. NARCISO A. AQUINO, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan, Branch XIV at Rosales, and ANICETO SANDOVAL, respondents.
R E S O L U T I O N
AQUINO, J.:
In Special Proceeding No. 116-R, "Intestate Estate of Honorato L. Arceo," and Civil Case No. 283-R, "Rosario P. Arceo vs. Aniceto Sandoval," both of the Court of First instance of Pangasinan, Rosales Branch XIV, Rosario P. Arceo, as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Honorato Arceo, filed a pleading dated September 24, 1976, seeking to disqualify respondent Judge from sitting in the two cases on the ground that on some occasions he consorted with Aniceto Sandoval, a creditor in the intestate proceeding and the defendant in the other case, and that the two are members of the Lions Club.
That motion or recusation was denied by respondent Judge in his order also dated September 24, 1976. Mrs. Arceo filed a motion for reconsideration. She stressed in her motion that due to the close and intimate personal relationship between Sandoval and respondent Judge, the latter would not be able to hear the said cases with the "cold neutrality of an impartial judge."
Respondent Judge denied the motion for reconsideration. On November 29, 1976 Mrs. Arceo filed the instant petitions for certiorari and prohibition praying that respondent Judge be prohibited from hearing the two above-mentioned cases.
Respondent Judge and Sandoval were required to comment on the petitions. After the submission of respondents' comments, the petitions were given due course. The parties filed their respective memoranda.
These two cases were pending decision when the application of respondent Judge for disability retirement was approved effective on February 23, 1978 (See Resolution of that date in Administrative Matter No. 692-Ret.).
Inasmuch as that supervening fact had rendered these two cases moot and academic, the same are dismissed and considered closed. No costs.
SO ORDERED.
Fernando, Actg. C.J., Barredo, Antonio and Santos, JJ., concur.
Concepcion, Jr., is on leave.
Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino
This is a civil case involving a petition for certiorari and prohibition filed by Rosario P. Arceo, as the administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, against Hon. Narciso A. Aquino, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan, and Aniceto Sandoval. The petitioner sought to disqualify the respondent judge from hearing Special Proceeding No. 116-R and Civil Case No. 283-R due to his close and intimate personal relationship with Sandoval, who was a creditor in the intestate proceeding and the defendant in the other case. However, the petition was dismissed as moot and academic after the application of the respondent judge for disability retirement was approved, rendering the cases closed with no costs.
Quick Answers
- What is Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino about?
- This is a civil case involving a petition for certiorari and prohibition filed by Rosario P. Arceo, as the administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, against Hon. Narciso A. Aquino, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan, and Aniceto Sandoval. The petitioner sought to disqualify the respondent judge from hearing Special Proceeding No. 116-R and Civil Case No. 283-R due to his close and intimate personal relationship with Sandoval, who was a creditor in the intestate proceeding and the defendant in the other case. However, the petition was dismissed as moot and academic after the application of the respondent judge for disability retirement was approved, rendering the cases closed with no costs.
- Which court decided Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino?
- Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
- When was Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino decided?
- Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino (G.R. No. L-45121-22) was decided on Jun 16, 1978.
- What is the citation for Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino?
- Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino, G.R. No. L-45121-22, Jun 16, 1978 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Case Information
- Case Number
- G.R. No. L-45121-22
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino, G.R. No. L-45121-22, Jun 16, 1978 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (1978). Rosario P. Arceo vs. Narciso A. Aquino (G.R. No. L-45121-22). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/rosario-p-arceo-vs-narciso-a-aquino
Related Cases
- Arceo v. AquinoG.R. No. L-45121 and L-45122 (Resolution) • Jun 16, 1978
- Arceo v. AquinoG.R. No. L-45121 and L-45122 • Jan 9, 1979
- Talens-Dabon v. ArceoA.M. No. RTJ-96-1336 (Resolution) • Jun 2, 2020
- Vda. de Arceo v. GoG.R. No. L-24107 • Apr 30, 1979
- Arceo v. OliverosG.R. No. L-38251 • Jan 31, 1985
- Arceo v. BrionesA.C. No. 12417 (Notice) • Jun 3, 2019
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case