Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
EN BANC
MONTES VS RINCON August 8, 1911
RAMON MONTES REGUEIFEROS, as manager and liquidator for Ramirez and Company, plaintiff, MANUEL MARIA RINCON and FRANCISCO IZNART, defendants.
Jose Robles Lahesa for plaintiff.
CARSON, J.:
In the matter of the proceedings touching the taxation of costs in the case of Roman Montes Regueiferos, as manager and liquidator for Ramirez and Company, plaintiff, vs. Manuel Maria Rincon and Francisco Iznart, defendants, which appear to have been had at the instance of the clerk of this court, and in all other similar cases of taxation of costs in cases of appeals taken and conducted under the laws of procedure in force prior to the enactment of Act No. 190 of the Civil Commission, we are unanimously of the opinion that while the clerk appears to have been in the due performance of his duty in seeking to have the question of costs in these proceedings disposed of, nevertheless in the interests of justice and in the sound administration of the business submitted to this court, it is neither expedient nor necessary that the clerk of this court should take further action looking to the recovery of the alleged costs therein, unless moved so to do by some party in interest.
In all such cases therefore, the clerk is directed to file the record and definitely and permanently suspend further action in the matter of alleged costs accrued or accruing thereunder, until the further order of the court.
Mapa, Johnson, and Moreland, JJ., concur.
Ramon Montes Regueiferos vs. Manuel Maria Rincon, et al.
This is an administrative case, Montes vs. Rincon, decided by the Philippine Supreme Court on August 8, 1911. The case concerns the taxation of costs in the case of Roman Montes Regueiferos, as manager and liquidator for Ramirez and Company, plaintiff, vs. Manuel Maria Rincon and Francisco Iznart, defendants, which was initiated by the clerk of the court. The Supreme Court held that while the clerk was performing his duties, it is not necessary or expedient for him to take further action in the recovery of the alleged costs. The Court directed the clerk to file the record and suspend further action in the matter of costs until further order of the court. Justices Mapa, Johnson, and Moreland concurred.
Case Information
- Case Number
- MONTES VS RINCON
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
Ramon Montes Regueiferos vs. Manuel Maria Rincon, et al., MONTES VS RINCON, Aug 8, 1911 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (1911). Ramon Montes Regueiferos vs. Manuel Maria Rincon, et al. (MONTES VS RINCON). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/ramon-montes-regueiferos-vs-manuel-maria-rincon-et-al
Related Cases
- Regueiferos v. RinconNo G.R. Number Suppied • Aug 8, 1911
- Vicente Sison, et al. vs. Julian AmbalanaG.R. No. L-9943 • Mar 18, 1915
- Alejandra Siguiong vs. Manuel Siguiong, et al.G.R. No. 1921 • Mar 14, 1907
- Carlito L. Montes vs. Court of Appeals, et al.G.R. No. 143797 • May 4, 2006
- Francisco v. MontesG.R. No. 212801 (Notice) • Sep 1, 2014
- People v. MontesG.R. No. 30686 • Aug 12, 1929
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case