Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. L-35377-78 July 31, 1975
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, CAMILO PILOTIN, VINCENT CRISOLOGO, ISIDRO PUGAL and ERNING ABANO, defendants-appellants.
R E S O L U T I O N
AQUINO, J.:
Vincent Crisologo through counsel filed a verified motion praying for the transfer to the New Bilibid Prisons or, alternatively, to Camps Crame, Aguinaldo or Olivas, of the place of trial of Criminal Case No. 3949 of the municipal court of Vigan, Ilocos Sur, wherein he, as sole defendant, is charged with illegal possession of firearms and ammunitions.
As justificatory ground, he alleged that his life would be in jeopardy if he were to be confined in the Vigan municipal jail during the trial because there are many political enemies of the Crisologo family in that vicinity; some of the adherents of the Crisologos had in fact been murdered in Ilocos Sur, and his father, Congressman Floro Crisologo, was shot to death while hearing mass at the Vigan cathedral.
Bluntly, he affirmed that inside that jail he would be a sitting duck for a gunwielder or grenade-thrower who wants to assassinate him. He could even be lynched or shot to death on the specious pretext that he was trying to escape.
Asked to comment on the motion, the Provincial Fiscal of Ilocos Sur signified his conformity to the transfer of the venue of the trial to the New Bilibid Prisons.
Section 5(4), Article X of the Constitution expressly empowers this Court to "order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice". Here, what is involved is not merely a miscarriage of justice but the personal safety of movant Crisologo, the accused. It would be absurd to compel him to undergo trial in a place where his life would be imperilled.
Present hostile sentiment against the accused at the place of trial is a justification for transfer of venue (See State vs. Siers, 136 S. E. 503, 103, W. Va. 30; 22 C.J.S. 310).1äwphï1.ñët
We find Crisologo's motion to be meritorious. The change of venue involves not merely the change of the place of hearing but also the transfer of the expediente of Criminal Case No. 3949 to another court. According to Crisologo's motion, the alleged evidence against him is in the custody of the authorities at Camp Crame, Quezon City. The transfer of Criminal Case No. 3949 to the City Court of Quezon City and the holding of the trial at Camp Crame appear to be the most convenient arrangement.
WHEREFORE, the municipal court of Vigan is directed to transfer the record of Criminal Case No. 3949 to the City Court of Quezon City where it should be re-docketed and raffled to any Judge thereof. The case may be tried at Camp Crame. The usual precautions and security measures should be adopted in bringing defendant Crisologo to Camp Crame on the occasion of the hearing.
SO ORDERED.
Makalintal, C.J., Fernando, Barredo and Concepcion Jr., JJ., concur.
Antonio, J, took no part.
People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al.
This is a criminal case decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines in 1975. The case involves defendant Vincent Crisologo, who filed a motion to transfer the venue of his trial for illegal possession of firearms and ammunition from the municipal court of Vigan, Ilocos Sur to the New Bilibid Prisons or alternatively, to Camps Crame, Aguinaldo or Olivas. Crisologo claimed that his life would be in danger if he were to be confined in the Vigan municipal jail during the trial due to the presence of many political enemies of the Crisologo family in the area. The Supreme Court granted the motion, citing the constitutional provision that allows it to order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice. The Court noted that the situation involved not just a miscarriage of justice but the personal safety of the accused. The Court also noted that there was present hostile sentiment against the accused at the place of trial, which justified the transfer of venue. Accordingly, the municipal court of Vigan was directed to transfer the record of Criminal Case No. 3949 to the City Court of Quezon City where it should be re-docketed and raffled to any Judge thereof, and the case may be tried at Camp Crame.
Quick Answers
- What is People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al. about?
- This is a criminal case decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines in 1975. The case involves defendant Vincent Crisologo, who filed a motion to transfer the venue of his trial for illegal possession of firearms and ammunition from the municipal court of Vigan, Ilocos Sur to the New Bilibid Prisons or alternatively, to Camps Crame, Aguinaldo or Olivas. Crisologo claimed that his life would be in danger if he were to be confined in the Vigan municipal jail during the trial due to the presence of many political enemies of the Crisologo family in the area. The Supreme Court granted the motion, citing the constitutional provision that allows it to order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid a miscarriage of justice. The Court noted that the situation involved not just a miscarriage of justice but the personal safety of the accused. The Court also noted that there was present hostile sentiment against the accused at the place of trial, which justified the transfer of venue. Accordingly, the municipal court of Vigan was directed to transfer the record of Criminal Case No. 3949 to the City Court of Quezon City where it should be re-docketed and raffled to any Judge thereof, and the case may be tried at Camp Crame.
- Which court decided People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al.?
- People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al. was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
- When was People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al. decided?
- People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al. (G.R. No. L-35377-78) was decided on Jul 31, 1975.
- What is the citation for People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al.?
- People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al., G.R. No. L-35377-78, Jul 31, 1975 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Case Information
- Case Number
- G.R. No. L-35377-78
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al., G.R. No. L-35377-78, Jul 31, 1975 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (1975). People of the Philippines vs. Camilo Pilotin, et al. (G.R. No. L-35377-78). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/people-of-the-philippines-vs-camilo-pilotin-et-al
Related Cases
- People v. PilotinG.R. Nos. L-35377-78 (Resolution) • Jul 31, 1975
- Camilo L. Sabio, vs. Richard Gordon, et al.G.R. No. 174340, G.R. No. 174318 & G.R. No. 174177 • Oct 17, 2006
- People of the Philippines vs. Pedro Abungan @ "Pedring", et al.G.R. No. 136843 • Sep 28, 2000
- La Salette College v. PilotinG.R. No. 149227 • Dec 11, 2003
- Dan alcantara vs. Camilo E. Tamin, et al.A.M. No. RTJ-95-1305 • Apr 21, 1995
- Laingo v. CamiloG.R. No. L-35833 • Jun 29, 1984
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case