EN BANC
[A.M. No. RTJ-06-2010. January 30, 2008.]
MARISSA R. MONDALA, Legal Researcher, Regional Trial Court, Branch 136, Makati City, complainant, vs. PRESIDING JUDGE REBECCA R. MARIANO, Regional Trial Court, Branch 136, Makati City, respondent.
R E S O L U T I O N
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J p:
In the Decision dated January 25, 2007, respondent Judge Rebecca R. Mariano of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati City, Branch 136, was found guilty of misrepresenting that she had decided the case of "Amanet, Inc. v. Eastern Telecommunication" as of January 2005 and of making inaccurate entries in the monthly reports. Respondent judge was meted the penalty of fine of P40,000.00, with warning that commission of the same or similar offense will be dealt with more severely. Respondent judge moved for reconsideration but was denied with finality on February 27, 2007.
In the meantime, or on January 31, 2007, the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) submitted a Memorandum for the Court's consideration which contained the report of the team which conducted the judicial audit and physical inventory of pending cases at the RTC, Branch 136, Makati City, presided by respondent judge. The OCA recommended that respondent judge be directed to:
A. TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION on the following cases:
A.1. Cases without initial action since the time of filing:
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| SP M-6253 | In the Matter of Guardianship | Petition for Guardianship | |
| of Minor Kenneth Frank A. | |||
| Tumanar, et al. |
A.2. Cases which have not been set for hearing for a considerable length of time:
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 04-606 | M. Mitra vs. B. Mitra | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 2. | 05-1080 | C. Arinto vs. M. Arinto | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage |
A.3. Cases without further action for a considerable length of time due to the non-compliance by public prosecutors/parties concerned with the Court's directive:
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 04-764 | N. Galisim vs. G. Galisim | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 2. | 04-815 | R. Villanueva vs. C. Villanueva | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 3. | 04-844 | P. Salem vs. V. Reyes-Alonzo | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 4. | 04-910 | M. Medina vs. R. Medina | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 5. | 04-1145 | R. Perez vs. E. Mendoza | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 6. | 04-1159 | V. Beltran vs. J. Beltran | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 7. | 04-1240 | D. dela Cruz vs. J. dela Cruz | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 8. | 03-702 | E. Cayco vs. A. Cayco | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 9. | 03-385 | J. Garcia vs. J. Garcia | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 10. | 05-1080 | C. Arinto vs. M. Arinto | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 11. | 01-665 | Equitable PCI Bank vs. Phil. | Collection of Sum of |
| Wireless, Inc. | Money with Prelim. | ||
| Attachment | |||
| 12. | 06-047 | F. Dumlao vs. J. Dumlao | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 13. | 06-212 | E. Ferrer vs. R. Ferrer | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 14. | 06-468 | M. Macatubal vs. S. Macatubal | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 15. | 06-371 | V. Alap vs. Z. Alap | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 16. | 05-976 | D. Felix vs. P. Felix, Jr. | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 17. | 06-1094 | G. Wessels vs. H. Wessels | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 18. | 04-050 | A. Ramirez vs. N. Ramirez | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 19. | SP-M-6127 | H. Bayudan, DSWD-Petitioner | Petition for Involuntary |
| Commitment to DSWD | |||
| of Stephanie H. Rapeda | |||
| 20. | SP-M-6158 | Sps. C and E Payumo-Petitioner | In the Matter of |
| Adoption of Minor Von | |||
| Alvaro Payumo |
B. RESOLVE the pending motions/incidents submitted for resolution in these cases and FURNISH this Office copy of the resolution/order within ten (10) days from their resolution:
| CRIMINAL CASES | |||
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 06-1140 | ||
| 2. | 06-1141 | E. Gipan, et al. | Violation of R.A. 8049 |
| 3. | 06-1142 | ||
| CIVIL CASES | |||
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 99-1463 | Lucena Industrial Corp. vs. | Annulment of Mortgage |
| Phil. Banking Corp., et al. | and Foreclosure | ||
| 2. | 00-318 | Iba Finance vs. Wijds Food | Collection of Sum of |
| Manufacturing, et al. | Money | ||
| 3. | 01-071 | Actron Industries vs. B. Perez | Damages |
| 4. | 01-1506 | Sun Life Canada vs. Ma. D. | Rescission of Contract |
| Sibya | |||
| 5. | 01-1656 | Shorr Marketing vs. Manila | Collection of Sum of |
| Mining | Money | ||
| 6. | 01-1665 | ATR Professional Life vs. | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Loyola Life Plans | Individual Insurance | ||
| Coverage | |||
| 7. | 04-1031 | E. Ariola vs. E. Azucena | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 8. | 03-660 | V. Cruz vs. C. Cruz | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 9. | 97-3020 | D. Padilla vs. China Banking | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 10. | M-5413 | PDIC vs. DCB | Judicial Liquidation of |
| Davao Cooperative | |||
| Bank | |||
| 11. | 97-1035 | Union Bank vs. Terra Marine | Collection of Sum of |
| Multi Ventures | Money |
C. DECIDE with DISPATCH the criminal and civil cases below and FURNISH this Office copy of the decisions/orders within ten (10) days from their promulgation/rendition:
| CRIMINAL CASES | |||
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 02-1877 | J. Beltran, et al. | Estafa |
| 2. | 04-2319 | M. Nicos, et al. | Grave Coercion |
| 3. | 05-1113 | J. Payaon, et al. | Theft |
| CIVIL CASES | |||
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 98-2433 | Rotary Textiles vs. Sps. F. | Collection of Sum of |
| Ty | Money | ||
| 2. | 99-1276 | Allied Banking vs. MBL | Collection of Sum of |
| Factors and Traders, Inc., | Money | ||
| et al. | |||
| 3. | 02-1524 | Subic Bay Distribution vs. | Collection of Sum of |
| Western Guaranty Corp. | Money | ||
| 4. | 03-264 | Protemps, Inc. vs. Ram | Collection of Sum of |
| Leasing | Money | ||
| 5. | 05-835 | H. Herrera vs. G. Herrera | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 6. | 03-298 | R. Gonzales vs. M. Devett | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 7. | 01-1546 | Metrobank vs. Ma. Batenga | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 8. | 06-160 | R. Vicente vs. R. Vicente | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 9. | 02-102 | BPI vs. Sps. B. Ong | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 10. | 02-1018 | Tokio Marine vs. KLM | Collection of Sum of |
| Royal Dutch Airlines | Money | ||
| 11. | 97-2840 | M. Reyes vs. Bank of | Damages |
| Southeast Asia | |||
| 12. | 99-284 | J. Sanatayana vs. Motivation | Collection of Sum of |
| Motors | Money | ||
| 13. | 97-084 | Prudential Guarantee and | Collection of Sum of |
| Assurance vs. Unknown | Money | ||
| Owner of Vessels M/V | |||
| Hanjin | |||
| 14. | 92-2012 | R. Tandoc vs. Pepsi-Cola | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 15. | 95-1516 | A. Capitan vs. Pepsi Cola | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 16. | 02-057 | N. Construction vs. Sps. H. | Collection of Sum of |
| Rivera, et al. | Money | ||
| 17. | 95-408 | Masaganang Sakahan vs. | Collection of Sum of |
| L. Po | Money | ||
| 18. | 94-1292 | Sps. E. Cruzado vs. Sps. B. | Specific Performance |
| Biluan | |||
| 19. | Spec. Pro. | Sps. M. Konishi, petitioners | Petition for Adoption of |
| Minor M-60-51 and | |||
| Change of Name | |||
| 20. | Spec. Pro. | I.G. Barona, petitioner | Petition for Adoption |
| M-5987 |
D. EXPLAIN within fifteen (15) days from receipt why she should not be held administratively liable for not resolving/deciding the following criminal and civil cases submitted for resolution/decision, within the reglementary period, to wit:
D.1. Cases Submitted for Resolution which are already beyond the reglementary period to resolve:
| CRIMINAL CASES | |||
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 01-071 | Actron Industries vs. B. | Damages |
| Perez | |||
| 2. | 01-1506 | Sun Life Canada vs. Ma. | Rescission |
| D. Sibya | |||
| 3. | 01-1665 | ATR Professional Life vs. | Nullity of Individual |
| Loyola Life Plans | Insurance Coverage | ||
| 4. | 04-1031 | E. Ariola vs. E. Azucena | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 5. | 03-660 | V. Cruz vs. C. Cruz | Declaration of Nullity of |
| Marriage | |||
| 6. | 97-3020 | D. Padilla vs. China | Collection of Sum of |
| Banking | Money | ||
| 7. | 97-1035 | Union Bank v. Terra | Collection of Sum of |
| Marine Multi Ventures | Money |
D.2. Cases submitted for decision which are already beyond the reglementary period to decide:
| CRIMINAL CASES | |||
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 02-1877 | J. Beltran, et al. | Estafa |
| CIVIL CASES | |||
| CASE NUMBER | TITLE | NATURE OF CASE | |
| 1. | 98-2433 | Rotary Textiles vs. Sps. F. Ty | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 2. | 99-1276 | Allied Banking vs. MBL Factors | Collection of Sum of |
| and Traders, Inc., et al. | Money | ||
| 3. | 02-1524 | Subic Bay Distribution vs. | Collection of Sum of |
| Western Guaranty Corp. | Money | ||
| 4. | 01-1546 | Metrobank vs. Ma. Batenga | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 5. | 02-102 | BPI vs. Sps. B. Ong | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 6. | 97-2840 | M. Reyes vs. Bank of Southeast | Damages |
| Asia | |||
| 7. | 97-084 | Prudential Guarantee and | Collection of Sum of |
| Assurance vs. Unknown | Money | ||
| Owner of Vessels M/V Hanjin | |||
| 8. | 92-2012 | R. Tandoc vs. Pepsi-Cola | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 9. | 95-1516 | A. Capitan vs. Pepsi Cola | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 10. | 02-057 | N. Construction vs. Sps. H. | Collection of Sum of |
| Rivera, et al. | Money | ||
| 11. | 95-408 | Masaganang Sakahan vs. L. Po | Collection of Sum of |
| Money | |||
| 12. | 94-1292 | Sps. E. Cruzado vs. Sps. B. | Specific Performance |
| Biluan |
On February 20, 2007, the Court noted OCA's Memorandum and adopted its recommendations. On March 15, 2007, respondent judge submitted her Compliance with the February 20, 2007 Resolution which was referred by the Court to the OCA for evaluation, report and recommendation.
In a Memorandum dated June 8, 2007, the OCA recommended that: a) respondent judge be adjudged administratively liable for undue delay in rendering decisions and be fined in the amount of P20,000.00; and b) she be directed to decide with dispatch the cases covered by this administrative matter and furnish the OCA with copies of the decision within 10 days from its rendition.
In the herein assailed Resolution dated July 3, 2007, the Court adopted the OCA's recommendations and resolved to:
(a) ADJUDGE Judge Rebecca B. Mariano administratively liable for undue delay in rendering decisions and orders;
(b) FINE Judge Mariano in the amount of Twenty Thousand Pesos (P20,000);
(c) DIRECT Judge Mariano to DECIDE WITH DISPATCH the cases covered by this administrative matter;
(d) FURNISH the Office of the Court Administrator with copies of the decision within ten (10) days from their rendition; and
(e) NOTE the Letter dated June 19, 2007 of respondent Judge Rebecca R. Mariano, in compliance with the resolution of February 20, 2007 furnishing the Court with copy of the decision in SP Proc. Case No. M-6158, Civil Case No. 00-318 and Civil Case No. 03-264.
On November 14, 2007, respondent judge filed the instant Motion for Reconsideration with Motion for Leave to Admit Motion for Reconsideration. Respondent judge alleges that the infractions for which she was being fined in the amount of P20,000.00 were the same infractions for which she was previously fined P40,000.00. She thus prays that the Resolution dated July 3, 2007 imposing a fine of P20,000.00 be reversed and set aside.
Moreover, she prays that the Decision dated July 25, 2007 imposing on her a fine of P40,000.00 be reconsidered in light of her admission of her oversight vis-à-vis the case of Amanet, Inc. v. Eastern Telecommunications, Inc. and her lack of malicious intent to deliberately misrepresent the status of said case and other undecided cases. She also prays that her 43 years of public service; the fact that this is her first infraction; her failing health and her impending compulsory retirement in October 2008; be considered as mitigating circumstances.
The motion for reconsideration is partly granted.
It appears from the records that the infractions mentioned in the Resolution of July 3, 2007 and for which a fine of P20,000.00 is being imposed, were the same infractions for which respondent judge was previously fined P40,000.00, pursuant to the Decision dated January 25, 2007. Accordingly, the July 3, 2007 Resolution is hereby set aside.
Anent the fine of P40,000.00 earlier imposed upon respondent judge, records show that a motion for reconsideration was filed but it was denied with finality on February 27, 2007. In fact, respondent judge has paid the amount of P40,000.00 to the Court's Cash Collection and Disbursement Division on April 11, 2007 per O.R. No. 7402054.
ACCORDINGLY, the Motion for Reconsideration of Judge Rebecca R. Mariano, Regional Trial Court, Makati City, Branch 136, is PARTLY GRANTED. The Resolution dated July 3, 2007 imposing on her a fine of P20,000.00 is REVERSED and SET ASIDE.
SO ORDERED.
Puno, C.J., Quisumbing, Sandoval-Gutierrez, Carpio, Austria-Martinez, Corona, Carpio-Morales, Azcuna, Tinga, Velasco, Jr., Nachura, Reyes and Leonardo-de Castro, JJ., concur.
Chico-Nazario, J., is on official leave.