FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 241396. October 3, 2018.]
BERNARDINA L. MIÑOZA, ET AL., petitioners,vs. SPOUSES JOSE RUBY I. LAURDIN AND IRIS CANDID LAURDIN, respondents.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution dated October 3, 2018 which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 241396 (Bernardina L. Miñoza, et al. v. Spouses Jose Ruby I. Laurdin and Iris Candid Laurdin). — After review, the Court resolves to DENY the petition for failure of petitioners to show any reversible error in the assailed ruling. The Court of Appeals correctly affirmed the Regional Trial Court's finding that petitioners failed to prove that the Deed of Absolute Sale subject of the complaint for reformation of instrument, reconveyance, damages, and attorney's fees failed to express the true intention of the parties. The evidence offered by petitioners to establish their cause was entirely grounded on hearsay evidence.
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the petition is DENIED. The November 24, 2017 Decision and May 18, 2018 Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. C.V. No. 04566-MIN are hereby AFFIRMED.
The Cash Collection and Disbursement Division is hereby directed to RETURN to petitioners the excess payment for the legal fees in the amount of P170.00 under O.R. No. 0223578-SC-EP dated September 4, 2018.
SO ORDERED." Bersamin, J., on official travel.
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) LIBRADA C. BUENADivision Clerk of Court