Leong v. See
This is a civil case, G.R. No. 194077, involving petitioners Florentino W. Leong and Elena Leong, et al., who filed a petition for review on certiorari against respondent Edna C. See. The legal issue in this case is the reversal and setting aside of the Decision dated 19 May 2010 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 92289, as well as its subsequent Resolution dated 25 August 2010, and the July 9, 2008 consolidated Judgment of Branch 3 of the Regional Trial Court City of Manila in Civil Cases entitled 'Edna C. See vs. Elena Leong' and 'Florentino Leong vs. Edna C. See'. The Supreme Court granted the petition, gave due course to it, and required both parties to submit their respective memoranda within thirty (30) days from notice. The Supreme Court also required petitioners to submit and attach to their memoranda a certified true copy of the 9 July 2008 consolidated Judgment of Branch 3 of the Regional Trial Court City of Manila.
ADVERTISEMENT
THIRD DIVISION
[G.R. No. 194077. February 18, 2013.]
FLORENTINO W. LEONG AND ELENA LEONG, ET AL., petitioners, vs. EDNA C. SEE, respondent.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, Third Division, issued a Resolution dated February 18, 2013, which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 194077 (Florentino W. Leong and Elena Leong, et al. vs. Edna C. See). — In the Petition for Review on Certiorari filed on 2 December 2010, the petitioners ". . . most respectfully prayed that the Decision dated 19 May 2010 of the Honorable Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 92289 as well as its subsequent Resolution dated 25 August 2010 and the July 9, 2008 consolidated Judgment of Branch 3 of the Regional Trial Court City of Manila in Civil Cases entitled 'Edna C. See vs. Elena Leong['] docketed as Civil Case Nos. 97-82757 and Civil Case entitled 'Florentino Leong vs. Edna C. See' docketed as 97-83036 be REVERSED and SET ASIDE . . . ." (emphasis supplied)
Considering the allegations, issues, and arguments adduced in the petition for review on certiorari of the Decision and Resolution dated 19 May 2010 and 25 August 2010, respectively, of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 92289 as well as respondent's comment and petitioners' reply, the Court resolves: (a) to GIVE DUE COURSE to the petition; (b) to require both parties to SUBMIT their respective MEMORANDA within thirty (30) days from notice; and (c) to require petitioners to SUBMIT and attach to their memoranda a certified true copy of the 9 July 2008 consolidated Judgment of Branch 3 of the Regional Trial Court City of Manila in Civil Cases entitled "Edna C. See vs. Elena Leong," docketed as Civil Case Nos. 97-82757 and Civil Case entitled "Florentino Leong vs. Edna C. See" docketed as 97-83036. TCADEc
The memorandum of each party shall contain the following:
(a) A "Statement of the Case," which is a clear and concise statement of the nature of the action, a summary of the proceedings, the challenged decision, resolution or order of the court below, the nature of the judgment and any other matters necessary to an understanding of the nature of the controversy;
(b) A "Statement of the Facts," which is a clear and concise statement in a narrative form of the established facts;
(c) A "Statement of the Issues," which is a clear and concise statement of the issues to be submitted to the Court for its resolution;
(d) The "Argument," which is a clear and concise presentation of the argument in support of each issue; and
(e) The "Relief," which is a specification of the order or judgment that the party seeks to obtain.
No new issues may be raised by a party in his/her Memorandum and the issues raised in his/her pleadings but not included in the Memorandum shall be deemed waived or abandoned.
Being summations of the parties' previous pleadings, the Court may consider the Memoranda alone in deciding on this petition.
SO ORDERED."
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) LUCITA ABJELINA SORIANODivision Clerk of Court
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU