FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 205393. November 10, 2014.]
RODOLFO JUAN, BAYANI TINAO, ROGELIO ARGAMOSA, AND PABLITO BALUYO, petitioners,vs. METRO BUS SAINT ROSE TRANSIT AND/OR ALADIN A. SIMUNDAC, respondent.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution dated November 10, 2014 which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 205393 (Rodolfo Juan, Bayani Tinao, Rogelio Argamosa, and Pablito Baluyo v. Metro Bus Saint Rose Transit and/or Aladin A. Simundac). — After a careful perusal of the records, the Court resolves to DENY the petition and AFFIRM the August 31, 2012 Decision 1 and January 14, 2013 Resolution 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 120866 for failure of Rodolfo Juan, Bayani Tinao, Rogelio Argamosa, and Pablito Baluyo (petitioners) to show that the CA committed any reversible error in finding them not entitled to the payment of accrued backwages after June 30, 1995.
As correctly ruled by the CA, there was no legal basis on the part of the National Labor Relations Commission to uphold the award of accrued backwages in favor of petitioners, for their failure to abide by the condition attached to their right of reinstatement under the June 30, 1995 Decision of Labor Arbiter Pedro C. Ramos, which was to present themselves to respondent Metro Bus Saint Rose Transit for job assignment within ten (10) days from the finality thereof.
SO ORDERED." SERENO, C.J., on official travel; DEL CASTILLO, J., acting member per S.O. No. 1862 dated November 4, 2014. BERSAMIN, J., on official travel; VELASCO, JR., J., acting member per S.O. No. 1870 dated November 4, 2014. SDAaTC
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) EDGAR O. ARICHETADivision Clerk of Court
Footnotes
1.Rollo, pp. 42-56. Penned by Associate Justice Amelita G. Tolentino with Associate Justices Ramon R. Garcia and Socorro B. Inting, concurring.
2.Id. at 57-58.