Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
SECOND DIVISION
A.M. No. 1422 October 27, 1983
JESUS V. MERRITT, complainant, HERMINIO H. CACANINDIN, respondent.
Jesus V Merritt in his own behalf.
Herminio H. Cacanindin for respondent.
AQUINO, J.:
Jesus V. Merritt seeks to disbar lawyer Herminio H. Cacanindin on the group of gross misconduct. Merritt is the president of Merriville Realty and Housing Corporation, the owner of a parcel of land (TCT No. T-8337) with an area of more than thirty hectares located at Barrios San Joaquin and San Nicolas, Agoo, La Union (Exh. B).
On July 29, 1969, MerRiville filed in the Court of First Instance of La Union an injunction suit against Filmag Mining Corporation to stop its mining operations in its Agoo property. Cacanindin was Filmags lawyer in that litigation (Exh. C).
Sometime later, or on September 10, 1969, Cacanindin prepared a contract between FilMag and Andrew V. Merritt, the brother of Jesus V. Merritt, authorizing FilMag to conduct mining operations on a portion of about 26,640 square meters of the said Agoo property (Exh. A). Andrew was misrepresented in the contract as the landowner when the truth was that the land was the registered property of MerRiville Realty and Housing Corporation.
No copies of said document were filed with the notarial office (Exh. E). Neither was it recorded in the mining recorder's office (Exh. I and J).
On January 15, 1975, Jesus V. Merritt filed a complaint for disbarment against Cacanindin. He answered the complaint. Merritt filed a reply. The case was referred to the Solicitor General for investigation, report and recommendation. Although duly notified, Cacanindin did not appear in any hearing in the Office of the Solicitor General. He did not present any evidence. Only the complainant presented his evidence.
In his answer to the Solicitor General's complaint for suspension, the respondent pleaded for compassion and understanding. He alleged that Jesus' full-blood brother, Andrew, and his half-brother, Nestor Pecson, who were not affluent, were the ones who negotiated with FilMag to conduct mining operations in the questioned area. They derived benefits from the contract.
We hold that respondent Cacanindin acted -in bad faith in preparing the said contract because he knew that Andrew was not the owner of the land (Exh. A). Therefore, he is guilty of gross misconduct.
In view thereof and following the Solicitor General's recommendation, he is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a three months. He is warned that more drastic discplinary action will be im posed if he commits another irregularity A copy of this decision should be attached to his record in the office of the Bar Confidant.
SO ORDERED.
Makasiar (Chairman), Concepcion, Jr., Abad Santos and Escolin, JJ., concur.
Guerrero, J., took no part.
De Castro, J., is on leave.
Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin
This is a civil disbarment case decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines in 1983. The complainant, Jesus V. Merritt, sought to disbar lawyer Herminio H. Cacanindin for gross misconduct. Cacanindin represented Filmag Mining Corporation in an injunction suit filed by Merriville Realty and Housing Corporation, owned by Merritt, to stop Filmag's mining operations on its property. Cacanindin prepared a contract authorizing Filmag to conduct mining operations on a portion of the property between Filmag and Andrew V. Merritt, Merritt's brother. However, Andrew was misrepresented as the landowner when the truth was that the land was the registered property of MerRiville Realty and Housing Corporation. The contract was not filed with the notarial office or recorded in the mining recorder's office. The court found that Cacanindin acted in bad faith and knowingly misrepresented the ownership of the land. Therefore, he was suspended from the practice of law for three months and warned that more drastic disciplinary action would be imposed if he commits another irregularity.
Quick Answers
- What is Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin about?
- This is a civil disbarment case decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines in 1983. The complainant, Jesus V. Merritt, sought to disbar lawyer Herminio H. Cacanindin for gross misconduct. Cacanindin represented Filmag Mining Corporation in an injunction suit filed by Merriville Realty and Housing Corporation, owned by Merritt, to stop Filmag's mining operations on its property. Cacanindin prepared a contract authorizing Filmag to conduct mining operations on a portion of the property between Filmag and Andrew V. Merritt, Merritt's brother. However, Andrew was misrepresented as the landowner when the truth was that the land was the registered property of MerRiville Realty and Housing Corporation. The contract was not filed with the notarial office or recorded in the mining recorder's office. The court found that Cacanindin acted in bad faith and knowingly misrepresented the ownership of the land. Therefore, he was suspended from the practice of law for three months and warned that more drastic disciplinary action would be imposed if he commits another irregularity.
- Which court decided Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin?
- Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
- When was Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin decided?
- Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin (A.M. No. 1422) was decided on Oct 27, 1983.
- What is the citation for Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin?
- Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin, A.M. No. 1422, Oct 27, 1983 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Case Information
- Case Number
- A.M. No. 1422
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin, A.M. No. 1422, Oct 27, 1983 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (1983). Jesus V. Merritt vs. Herminio H. Cacanindin (A.M. No. 1422). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/jesus-v-merritt-vs-herminio-h-cacanindin
Related Cases
- Merritt v. CacanindinAdm. Case No. 1422 • Oct 27, 1983
- People v. Cacanindin, Sr.G.R. No. 215792 (Notice) • Feb 22, 2016
- Tejada v. HernandoA.C. No. 2427 • May 8, 1992
- Maria Victoria Cano-Gutierrez vs. Herminio GutierrezG.R. No. 138584 • Oct 2, 2000
- Merritt v. Government of the Philippine IslandsG.R. No. 11154 • Mar 21, 1916
- Hipolito Balbarona vs. Herminio SantosA.C. No. 652 • Sep 30, 1969
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case