Estrella v. Brillantes
This is a civil case decided by the Philippine Supreme Court in 2015. The case involves Citizens for Clean and Credible Elections, represented by its co-convenors, and several other petitioners, who filed a certiorari petition against the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), COMELEC Bids and Awards Committee (BAC), Smartmatic TIM Corporation, Total Information Management Corporation, and Smartmatic International Corporation. The petitioners questioned the validity of the contract entered into by COMELEC and Smartmatic for the automation of the 2
ADVERTISEMENT
EN BANC
[G.R. No. 216070. March 24, 2015.]
CITIZENS FOR CLEAN AND CREDIBLE ELECTIONS [C3E], REPRESENTED BY CO-CONVENORS HERMENEGILDO R. ESTRELLA AND MELCHOR G. MAGDAMO, NATIONAL LABOR UNION [NLU], REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, DAVID L. DIWA, LEAGUE OF ELDER AND AGING PERSONS [LEAP], REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MISCHA NICANOR B. ELMAN, PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS [PAFLU], REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ELEUTERIO C. TUAZON, ANTI-TRAPO MOVEMENT OF THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, MYRLEON E. PERALTA, ALLIANCE OF GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE RETIRED EMPLOYEES [AGPREE], REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, JOEL A. SARZA, ACCO HOMES NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, LUCIANO DE LUNA GELLA, JR., AND KATIPUNAN NG MGA ANAK NG BAYAN ALL FILIPINO DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT [KAAKBAY PARTY-LIST], REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, ALAIN DEL B. PASCUA, petitioners, vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS [COMELEC], REPRESENTED BY CHAIRPERSON SIXTO S. BRILLANTES, JR., COMELEC BIDS AND AWARDS COMMITTEE [BAC], REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, SMARTMATIC TIM CORPORATION, TOTAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, AND SMARTMATIC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, respondents.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court en banc issued a Resolution datedMARCH 24, 2015, which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 216070 (Citizens for Clean and Credible Elections [C3E], represented by Co-convenors Hermenegildo R. Estrella and Melchor G. Magdamo, National Labor Union [NLU], represented by its President, David L. Diwa, League of Elder and Aging Persons [LEAP], represented by its President, Mischa Nicanor B. Elman, Philippine Association of Free Labor Unions [PAFLU], represented by its President, Eleuterio C. Tuazon, Anti-Trapo Movement of the Philippines, represented by its Chairperson, Myrleon E. Peralta, Alliance of Government and Private Retired Employees [AGPREE], represented by its President, Joel A. Sarza, ACCO Homes Neighborhood Association, represented by its President, Luciano De Luna Gella, Jr., and Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan All Filipino Democratic Movement [KAAKBAY Party-List], represented by its President, Alain Del B. Pascua v. Commission on Elections [COMELEC], represented by Chairperson Sixto S. Brillantes, Jr., COMELEC Bids and Awards Committee [BAC], represented by its Chairperson, Smartmatic TIM Corporation, Total Information Management Corporation, and Smartmatic International Corporation). —
The Court Resolved to NOTE the Consolidated Comment dated February 3, 2015 filed by the Office of the Solicitor General in compliance with the resolution dated February 3, 2015.
After a judicious review of the records, the Court resolves to DISMISS the instant certiorari petition 1 on the ground of prematurity in view of petitioners' failure to show that they have exhausted the available administrative remedies within the COMELEC. Verily, the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies ensures an orderly procedure which favors a preliminary sifting process, particularly with respect to matters peculiarly within the competence of the administrative agency, avoidance of interference with functions of the administrative agency by withholding judicial action until the administrative process had run its course, and prevention of attempts to swamp the courts by a resort to them in the first instance. 2 This Court, in a long line of cases, has consistently held that if a remedy within the administrative machinery can still be resorted to by giving the administrative officer concerned every opportunity to decide on a matter that comes within his jurisdiction, then such remedy should be exhausted first before the court's judicial power can be sought, 3 as in this case." Carpio, J., on leave. (47)
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) ENRIQUETA E. VIDALClerk of Court
Footnotes
1. Rollo, Vol. I, pp. 3-51.
2. Laguna CATV Network, Inc. v. Maraan, 440 Phil. 734, 741 (2002), citing Carale v. Abarintos, 336 Phil. 126, 135 (1997).
3. Id.
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU