Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
EN BANC
A.C. No. 518 April 23, 1962
DOMINADOR CARLOS, complainant, BENIGNO PALAGANAS, respondent.
R E S O L U T I O N
DIZON, J.:
Respondent Benigno Palaganas having filed a verified answer to the complaint filed against him by complainant Dominador Carlos, alleging therein facts which, if true, would constitute a valid defense, the Court resolves to refer this case to Ricardo Paras, Jr. for investigation.
The answer filed by respondent also makes the following allegations: .
2. Respondent also accuses said Dominador Carlos with the crime of contempt committed against the Honorable Tribunal for making public the proceedings of the said Tribunal by furnishing the Boy Scouts of the Philippines, the Organization where respondent works with a photostat copy of an Order issued by the Honorable Supreme Court dated February 20, 1962, "requesting him to submit documented evidence", thereby making public the proceedings in this case before it has been finally decided, with no apparent motive but to make the respondent out of the good graces of his employer, which act is contrary to and is disregard of Section 10 of Rule 128 of the Rules of Court. All of the foregoing acts of said complainant amount to insults against decency and all that are noble and dignified in this of in this way of life, and reveals nothing more but his ignoble tendencies for criminality which is a direct attack against the very heart of society.
In view of the charge thus made against complainant, the latter is hereby required to answer the same, within five days from notice hereof, to explain why proceedings for contempt should not be had against him.
Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes, J.B.L. and Paredes, JJ., concur.1äwphï1.ñët
Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al.
This is a civil case (A.C. No. 518) decided by the Supreme Court En Banc on April 23, 1962. The case was referred to Ricardo Paras, Jr. for investigation due to the verified answer filed by respondent Benigno Palaganas, which contained allegations that, if true, would constitute a valid defense. The respondent also accused complainant Dominador Carlos of contempt for making public the proceedings of the case by furnishing a photostat copy of an Order issued by the Supreme Court to the Boy Scouts of the Philippines, where the respondent works. The Supreme Court required the complainant to answer the charge of contempt and explain why proceedings for contempt should not be had against him.
Quick Answers
- What is Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al. about?
- This is a civil case (A.C. No. 518) decided by the Supreme Court En Banc on April 23, 1962. The case was referred to Ricardo Paras, Jr. for investigation due to the verified answer filed by respondent Benigno Palaganas, which contained allegations that, if true, would constitute a valid defense. The respondent also accused complainant Dominador Carlos of contempt for making public the proceedings of the case by furnishing a photostat copy of an Order issued by the Supreme Court to the Boy Scouts of the Philippines, where the respondent works. The Supreme Court required the complainant to answer the charge of contempt and explain why proceedings for contempt should not be had against him.
- Which court decided Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al.?
- Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al. was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
- When was Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al. decided?
- Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al. (A.C. No. 518) was decided on Apr 23, 1962.
- What is the citation for Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al.?
- Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al., A.C. No. 518, Apr 23, 1962 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Case Information
- Case Number
- A.C. No. 518
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al., A.C. No. 518, Apr 23, 1962 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (1962). Dominador Carlos vs. Benigno Palaganas, et al. (A.C. No. 518). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/dominador-carlos-vs-benigno-palaganas-et-al
Related Cases
- Carlos v. PalaganasA.C. No. 518 (Resolution) • Apr 23, 1962
- Palaganas v. PalaganasG.R. No. 169144 • Jan 26, 2011
- Bernabe Navida, et al. vs. Shell Oil Co., et al./The Dow Chemical Company, et al. vs. Bernabe Navida, et al./Cornelio Abella, Jr., et al. vs. Shell Oil Co., et al./Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., et al. vs. Jesus Abayon, et al./Chiqita Brands, Inc. and Chiquita Brands International, Inc. vs. Hon. Anita Alfelor Alagaban, et al.G.R. No. 125078/G.R. No. 125598/G.R. No. 126654/G.R. No. 127856/G.R. No. 128398 • May 30, 2011
- Marciana Vda. De Hoyo-A, et al. vs. Dominador VirataG.R. No. 71171 • Jul 23, 1985
- Alejandro Danan, et al. vs. The Honorable Court of Appeals, et al.G.R. No. 132759 • Oct 25, 2005
- Benigno Mariano, Jr. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al.G.R. No. 153584 • Jan 30, 2007
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case