Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
THIRD DIVISION
G.R. No. 112535 August 20, 1998
CINDERELLA MARKETING CORPORATION, petitioner, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, SECOND DIVISION, and JULIO DAET, JOSELITO ARAMBULO, FELINA PAGTALUNAN, MARIETA DAET, EMMA AGUSTIN, GINA CIRIACO, ROSEMARIE TONIO, ELLEN ILEDAN, EMMANUEL LUMBERA, ELIZABETH DELIGOS, CORA VILLA, ALICE FIGURA, GRETHEL GARCIA, EVANGELINE CASAS and LIGAYA HIDALGO, respondents.
G.R. No. 113758 August 20, 1998
CINDERELLA MARKETING CORPORATION, petitioner, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, SECOND DIVISION, and AIDA ARNAIZ, MA. ANA ARAMBULO, MAGDALENA CASTILLO ROWENA CONSTANTINO, JOJO MORILLO, IGNACIO RIMPOS, TERESA ROYECA, EVANGELINE SUMBILLA, LOLITA DE VEGA, FE MANGILIT, IRENE LUNA and NESTOR GUTIERREZ, respondents.
R E S O L U T I O N
ROMERO, J.:
In a decision dated June 22, 1998, consolidating the petitions of G.R. No. 112535 and G.R. No. 113758, the Court affirmed the award of money claims to the following respondents:
Julio B. Daet P31,881.33
Emma R. Agustin P31,901.88
Joselito A. Arambulo P32,861.94
Evangeline B. Casas P32,409.13
Gina Ciriaco P31,972.48
Marieta R. Daet P32,220.14
Elizabeth L. Deligos P12,440.06
Alice C. Figura P32,764.58
Grethel F. Garcia P32,478.43
Ligaya A. Hidalgo P32,639.09
Ellen I. Iledan P31,850.27
Felina C. Pagtalunan P22,520.92
Rosemarie Tonio P23,226.99
Emmanuel C. Lumbera P21,735.06
Cora Villa P23,038.39
On July 10, 1998, private respondents in G.R. No. 113758 filed a motion seeking a clarification of their omission in the grant of money claims and other benefits.
Upon a review of the records, it is apparent that the June 22, 1998 decision indeed covered those respondents in G.R. No. 112535 but was not clear about those in G.R. No. 113758.
WHEREFORE, in view of the foregoing, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, we MODIFY our decision dated June 22, 1998, to include private respondents in G.R. No. 113758, namely:
1. Aida Arnaiz P15,623.84
2. Ma. Ana Arambulo P12,077.00
3. Magdalena Castillo P15,310.28
4. Rowena Constantino P13,412.16
5. Jojo Morillo P12,251.05
6. Ignacio Rimpos P14,581.40
7. Teresa Royeca P13,792.82
8. Evangeline Sumbilla P15,774.72
9. Lolita de Vega P14,210.98
10. Fe Mangilit P15,507.51
11. Irene Luna P13,353.39
12. Nestor Gutierrez P13,410.04
SO ORDERED.
Narvasa, C.J., Kapunan and Purisima, JJ., concur.
Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al.
G.R. No. 1125352 min read
This is a labor case, Republic of the Philippines v. National Labor Relations Commission and Julio Daet, et al., G.R. No. 112535 and G.R. No. 113758, decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on August 20, 1998. The Court affirmed the award of money claims to several employees of Cinderella Marketing Corporation. However, it was later discovered that private respondents in G.R. No. 113758 were inadvertently omitted in the initial decision. Upon motion for reconsideration, the Court granted the motion and modified its decision to include private respondents in G.R. No. 113758, specifying the money claims for each of them.
Quick Answers
- What is Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al. about?
- This is a labor case, Republic of the Philippines v. National Labor Relations Commission and Julio Daet, et al., G.R. No. 112535 and G.R. No. 113758, decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on August 20, 1998. The Court affirmed the award of money claims to several employees of Cinderella Marketing Corporation. However, it was later discovered that private respondents in G.R. No. 113758 were inadvertently omitted in the initial decision. Upon motion for reconsideration, the Court granted the motion and modified its decision to include private respondents in G.R. No. 113758, specifying the money claims for each of them.
- Which court decided Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al.?
- Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al. was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
- When was Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al. decided?
- Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al. (G.R. No. 112535) was decided on Aug 20, 1998.
- What is the citation for Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al.?
- Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al., G.R. No. 112535, Aug 20, 1998 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Case Information
- Case Number
- G.R. No. 112535
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
Standard Citation
Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al., G.R. No. 112535, Aug 20, 1998 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
APA Style
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (1998). Cinderella Marketing Corp. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al. (G.R. No. 112535). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/cinderella-marketing-corp-vs-national-labor-relations-commission-et-al
Related Cases
- Cinderella Marketing Corp. v. National Labor Relations CommissionG.R. Nos. 112535 & 113758 (Resolution) • Aug 20, 1998
- Cinderella Marketing Corp. v. National Labor Relations CommissionG.R. Nos. 112535 & 113758 • Jun 22, 1998
- Shoemart, Inc. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al.G.R. Nos. 90795-96 • Aug 13, 1993
- Ushio Marketing v. National Labor Relations CommissionG.R. No. 124551 • Aug 28, 1998
- Skillworld Management and Marketing Corp. v. National Labor Relations CommissionG.R. No. 74412 • Jun 13, 1990
- Benigno Mariano, Jr. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al.G.R. No. 153584 • Jan 30, 2007
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case