EN BANC
[G.R. No. 208898. October 1, 2013.]
JOSE CALANO CARODAN, petitioner vs. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS AND VIRGINOUS S. CATALON, respondents.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court en banc issued a Resolution dated OCTOBER 1, 2013, which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 208898 (Jose Calano Carodan vs. Commission on Elections and Virginous S. Catalon). — In accordance with Rule 64 and other related provisions of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, governing review of judgments and final orders or resolutions of the Commission on Elections, only petitions which are accompanied by or which comply strictly with the requirements specified therein shall be entertained. On the basis thereof, the Court Resolved to DISMISS the instant petition for certiorari for non-compliance therewith, particularly for —
(a) failure to state material dates showing when notice of judgment subject of the petition was received, when a motion for reconsideration, if any, was filed, and/or when notice of the denial thereof was received, to show that the petition was filed on time pursuant to Section 5, Rule 64 in relation to Section 3 (2nd par.), Rule 46; and
(b) failure to accompany the petition with a clearly legible duplicate original, or certified true copy of the assailed resolution in violation of Section 5, Rule 64. CAIaHS
In any event, the petition would still be dismissed for failure to sufficiently show that any grave abuse of discretion was committed by the Commission on Elections in rendering the challenged resolutions which, on the contrary, appear to be in accord with the facts and applicable law and jurisprudence." Bersamin, J., on official leave. Villarama, Jr., J., on leave. Mendoza, J., on official leave.
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) ENRIQUETA E. VIDALClerk of Court