FIRST DIVISION
[G.R. No. 248221. January 8, 2020.]
CRISOSTOMO E. BAUTISTA, AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT OF MULTI-ASIAN PROPERTIES, INC. AND LUIS R. VILLAFUERTE, petitioner, vs.INTERNATIONAL MARITIME AND TECHNICAL FOUNDATION, INC., REPRESENTED BY MAURO S. ABALOS, respondent.
NOTICE
Sirs/Mesdames :
Please take notice that the Court, First Division, issued a Resolution datedJanuary 8, 2020which reads as follows:
"G.R. No. 248221 — (CRISOSTOMO E. BAUTISTA, as attorney-in-fact of MULTI-ASIAN PROPERTIES, INC. and LUIS R. VILLAFUERTE, petitioner, versus INTERNATIONAL MARITIME AND TECHNICAL FOUNDATION, INC., represented by MAURO S. ABALOS, respondent.)
After reviewing the instant Petition and its annexes, inclusive of the assailed Court of Appeals' (CA) Decision 1 dated December 20, 2018 and Resolution 2 dated July 10, 2019 in CA-G.R. CV No. 108594, the Court finds that petitioner Crisostomo E. Bautista failed to present any cogent and convincing argument warranting the reversal of the assailed CA Decision and Resolution. There is no reversible error committed by the court a quo that warrants the Court's discretionary exercise of its appellate jurisdiction. HTcADC
Therefore, the Court denies the instant Petition for lack of merit.
SO ORDERED."Peralta, C.J., no part; Carandang, J., additional Member per Raffle dated December 11, 2019. Lopez, J., on official leave.
Very truly yours,
(SGD.) LIBRADA C. BUENADivision Clerk of Court
Footnotes
1.Rollo, pp. 44-51. Penned by Associate Justice Rodil V. Zalameda (now a Member of the Court), with Associate Justices Fernanda Lampas Peralta and Ronaldo Roberto B. Martin concurring.
2.Id. at 52-53.