Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT
SECOND DIVISION
A.M. No. 1946-CTJ March 30, 1981
AMALIO RONDAEL and AMALIA SALARO RONDAEL, complainants, CITY JUDGE LEONARDO E. LOZANO of Iloilo City, respondent.
AQUINO, J.:
The spouses Pilar G, Hedriana aand Jose Hedriana filed in the city court of Iloilo City a complaint for ejectment dated August 31, 1977 against the spouses Amalio Rondael and Amalia Salaño-Rondael on the ground for the nonbpayment of ren tals from Januar, 1976.
The premises involved were a portion of a building used for the residential purposes and leased on a month-to-month basis to the Rondael spouses since November, 1972 at a monthly ren tal of P200 (Civil Case No. 12028, pp. 5-7, Rollo).
The Rondael spouses in their answer alleged that they would pay the back rentals in October, 1977 when their palay would be harvested. They did not invoke Presidential Decree No. 20.
On October 17, 1977, they manifested that they deposited the sum of P3,200 as the net back rentals from January, 1976 to October, 1977 (P4,400 less P1,200 which the Hedriana spouses owed the Rondael spouses as expenses incurred for the release of the Hedrianas' rifle from Camp Crame).
On October 7, 1977, the Hedriana spouses filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings because the Rondaels' answer did not tender any triable issue. The Rondael spouses did not oppose that motion nor did their counsel appear in court on October 14, 1977 when it was set for hearing.
On October 19, 1977, the day of the trial, of which the counsel of the Rondael spouses was duly notified, they and their counsel did not appear.
Respondent city judge, in his decision of November 25, 1977, ordered the Rondael spouses to vacate the premises and to pay the net back rentals of P3,200 plus P500 as attorney's fees (p. 18, Rollo). The city court ignored the deposit of P3,200 made by the Rondael spouses.
A copy of that decision was served upon the counsel of the Rondael spouses .On December 9, 1977 . It became final and executory after December 24, the last day of the 15-day reglementary period for appeal.
On December 22, 1977, the Hedriana spouses filed an ex parte motion for execution of the judgment. The city court granted it in its order of January 17, 1978 On that same day, a writ of execution was issued.
On January 9, 1978, the Rondael spouses riled a motion for reconsideration. The city court denied it in its order of January 13, 1978.
Through another lawyer, the Rondael spouses filed in the court of First Instance of Iloilo a petition for prohibition dated ,June 2, 1978 against respondent judge, the sheriff and the Hedriana spouses to stop the enforcement of the writ of execution which was allegedly issued with grave abuse of discretion (Civil Case No. 12246). The petition was dismis (p. 51, Rollo).
The Rondael spouses in a verified petition dated May 30, 19"1 8 charged respondent city judge in this Court with gross ignorance of the law and grave abuse of discretion. They prayed that he be investigated, suspended and "disbarred".
They later alleged in their reply that respondent judge is the "compadre" of the Hedriana spouses and that their ejectment from the leased premises was a violation of Presidential Decree No. 20 (pp. 50-52, Rollo).
We find that there is no ground for taking disciplinary action against respondent judge. He acted within his jurisdiction in rendering the judgment against the herein complainants who were duly heard and were not deprived of due process. They did not present any evidence during the trial.
They did not seasonably file any motion for reconsideration nor interpose an appeal and they did not point out the errors committed by respondent judge. The complainants allowed the judgment to become final.
WHEREFORE, the complaint is dismissed for lack of merit. A copy of this resolution should be attached to the personal file of the respondent.
SO ORDERED.
Barredo (Chairman), Concepcion Jr., Fernandez and De Castro, JJ., concur.
Justice Abad Santos is on leave.
Justice Fernandez was designated to sit in the Second Division.
Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano
This is a civil case involving spouses Amalio Rondael and Amalia Salao-Rondael who were ordered by the City Judge of Iloilo to vacate a leased premise and pay back rentals for their non-payment from January 1976 to October 1977. The spouses Rondael failed to appear during the hearing and the city judge rendered a decision in favor of the lessors. The decision became final and executory but the spouses Rondael filed a petition for prohibition against the city judge, the sheriff, and the lessors. The petition was dismissed. Subsequently, the spouses Rondael filed a verified petition against the city judge, charging him with gross ignorance of the law and grave abuse of discretion. The Supreme Court found no ground for taking disciplinary action against the city judge and dismissed the complaint for lack of merit.
Quick Answers
- What is Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano about?
- This is a civil case involving spouses Amalio Rondael and Amalia Salao-Rondael who were ordered by the City Judge of Iloilo to vacate a leased premise and pay back rentals for their non-payment from January 1976 to October 1977. The spouses Rondael failed to appear during the hearing and the city judge rendered a decision in favor of the lessors. The decision became final and executory but the spouses Rondael filed a petition for prohibition against the city judge, the sheriff, and the lessors. The petition was dismissed. Subsequently, the spouses Rondael filed a verified petition against the city judge, charging him with gross ignorance of the law and grave abuse of discretion. The Supreme Court found no ground for taking disciplinary action against the city judge and dismissed the complaint for lack of merit.
- Which court decided Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano?
- Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
- When was Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano decided?
- Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano (A.M. No. 1946) was decided on Mar 30, 1981.
- What is the citation for Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano?
- Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano, A.M. No. 1946, Mar 30, 1981 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Case Information
- Case Number
- A.M. No. 1946
- Decision Date
- Court
- Supreme Court of the Philippines
- Jurisdiction
- Philippines
Full Decision Text
Cite This Case
Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano, A.M. No. 1946, Mar 30, 1981 (Supreme Court of the Philippines)
Supreme Court of the Philippines. (1981). Amalio Rondael vs.Leonardo E. Lozano (A.M. No. 1946). Retrieved from https://legaldex.com/jurisprudence/amalio-rondael-vsleonardo-e-lozano
Related Cases
- Rondael v. LozanoA.M. No. 1946-CTJ (Resolution) • Mar 30, 1981
- Maramba v. LozanoG.R. No. L-21533 • Jun 29, 1967
- People v. LozanoG.R. No. 90801 • Feb 13, 1992
- Lozano v. YoracG.R. Nos. 94521 & 94626 • Oct 28, 1991
- Lozano v. FernandezG.R. No. 212979 • Feb 18, 2019
- People v. LozanoG.R. No. 125080 • Sep 25, 1998
Need Help Understanding This Case?
Ask our AI assistant to explain the key points, implications, or related cases.
Ask AI About This Case