Skip to main content

Vicente T. Flores vs. Southern Rizal Institute, et al.

SEC-SICD Case No. 3461 • Securities and Exchange Commission Departments • Securities Investigation and Clearing Department (SICD) • Mar 20, 1989

Full text

[SEC-SICD * CASE NO. 3461. March 20, 1989.] VICENTE T. FLORES , petitioner , vs . SOUTHERN RIZAL INSTITUTE, ET AL. , respondents . AMENDED PARTIAL DECISION In the partial decision dated March 10, 1989, the amount reflected therein as paid by petitioner, through oversight, was Seventy Four Thousand Four Hundred Pesos (P74,400.00). However, the actual payment made by the petitioner and the receipt issued pursuant to said payment was Seventy Two Thousand Four Hundred Pesos (P72,400.00). LLjur WHEREFORE, this Hearing Officer, motu proprio, hereby amend the partial decision dated March 10, 1989, in the sense that the actual amount paid by petitioner should be Seventy Two Thousand Four Hundred Pesos (P72,400.00). SO ORDERED. (SGD.) JAMES K. ABUGAN Hearing Officer

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.