Cloma, Jr. v. Cloma
SEC-SICD Case No. 10-94-4889 (Order) • Securities and Exchange Commission Departments • Securities Investigation and Clearing Department (SICD) • Mar 14, 1995
Full text
[SEC-SICD * CASE NO. 10-94-4889. March 14, 1995.] TOMAS CLOMA, JR. , petitioner , vs . JAIME CLOMA, ET AL. , respondents . O R D E R When this case was called neither petitioner nor his counsel appeared despite notice. Whereupon, counsel for respondents orally moved for the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute which was granted. WHEREFORE, let this case be, as it is hereby dismissed for failure to prosecute. LLphil SO ORDERED. (SGD.) MACARIO P. MALLARI Hearing Officer
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.