Samahang Magkakapitbahay ng Sto. Rosario-Silangan v. Esposo
SEC-SICD Case No. 03-95-5022 (Order) • Securities and Exchange Commission Departments • Securities Investigation and Clearing Department (SICD) • Mar 30, 1995
Full text
[SEC-SICD * CASE NO. 03-95-5022. March 30, 1995.] SAMAHANG MAGKAKAPITBAHAY NG STO. ROSARIO-SILANGAN, PATEROS, METRO-MANILA, INC. (SAMASIPAT) , petitioner , vs . ALFREDO ESPOSO, TERESITA PAJE, EVANGELINE MACATIGUIB, EDITHA TARLIZO, RAUL CORTEZ, REYNALDO RECTO, LUCIA DELOS SANTOS, LUISITA MAIK and AURORA SULAT , respondents . O R D E R It appearing that the instant petition is not verified as required under Rule IV, Section 1, SEC Revised Rules of Procedures, which states: "Any action may be commanded by filing a verified complaint or position with the Commission. . . ." the same should be, as it is hereby, DISMISSED. Moreover, it appearing that the petitioner, Samahang Magkakapitbahay Ng Sto. Rosario-Silangan, Pateros, Metro-Manila, Inc. is a homeowner association within the contemplation of Executive Order No. 535, Series of 1979, is/therefore, under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Home Insurance and Guaranty Corporation. cdll SO ORDERED. (SGD.) MACARIO P. MALLARI Hearing Officer
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.