In the Matter of Petition for Voluntary Revocation: Central Azucarera de Tarlac
SEC-CFD Order No. 089-13 • Securities and Exchange Commission Departments • Corporate Governance and Finance Department (CGFD) • May 6, 2013
Full text
May 6, 2013 SEC-CFD ORDER NO. 089-13 IN THE MATTER OF PETITION FOR VOLUNTARY REVOCATION CENTRAL AZUCARERA DE TARLAC ORDER OF SUSPENSION The records on file with the Commission show that: cAEaSC 1. Central Azucarera de Tarlac (CAT) is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the Philippines with principal office address at Jose Cojuangco and Sons Building, 119 Dela Rosa Street, Legaspi Village, Makati City; 2. The company was granted a Permit to Sell Securities to the Public on May 23, 1990; 3. CAT committed the following violations: a. Late Filing of its 2003 Annual Report (1st violation); b. Late Filing of its 2007 Annual Report (2nd violation); c. Late Filing of its 2009 Annual Report (3rd violation); d. Late Filing of its 2011 Annual Report (4th violation); e. Late Filing of its 2008 2nd Quarter Report (1st violation); f. Late Filing of its 2009 1st Quarter Report (2nd violation); g. Late Filing of its 2010 3rd Quarter Report (3rd violation); and h. Late Filing of its 2012 3rd Quarter Report (4th violation). 4. In view of the company's 4th Violation of SRC Rule 17.1 (A) (i) and (ii), a hearing was conducted on December 27, 2012; 5. The corporation explained that the delay in filing the reports was due to financial issues ( i.e. , negotiations on the settlement of certain liabilities with a major customer) which commenced in 2007 and the terms were finally agreed upon only on December 2012; 6. The company filed its Annual Report on January 30, 2013 and its Quarterly Report on February 5, 2013. As the reports were belatedly filed 1 the same constitute the company's 4th violation; 7. A perusal of the Annual Report showed that it is not in full compliance with the requirements of SRC Rules 17.1 and 68.1, as amended. Deficiencies 2 include, among others: (a) non-disclosure of major risks involved in each of the businesses of the company and subsidiaries, material pending legal proceedings, plan of operation, executive compensation; (b) incomplete disclosure on its financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations for the last 2 fiscal years; (c) non-compliance with corporate governance disclosures; (d) incomplete signatories; and (e) the Report was not notarized; 8. The reasons cited by the company do not fully explain the circumstances why the Audited Financial Statements could not be finalized. Moreover, the allegation that the reason for the delay was due to circumstances beyond the company's control, including the confidentiality of the transactions, were not adequately established; TaHDAS Pursuant to the resolution of the Commission in its meeting on March 25, 2013, the corporation's Order of Registration and Permit to Sell Securities to the Public is hereby SUSPENDED for a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of this Order or until the company fully corrects the deficiencies in its Annual Report in accordance with the requirements of SRC Rules 17.1 and 68.1, as amended. If the company fails to fully address such deficiencies, the Commission shall immediately initiate proceedings for the revocation of its Order of Registration and Permit to Sell Securities to the Public. Let a copy of this Order be sent to the Philippine Stock Exchange and posted in the Commission's official website for the information and guidance of the public. May 6, 2013, Mandaluyong City. (SGD.) JUSTINA F. CALLANGAN Acting Director Footnotes 1. Due date of the Annual Report and Quarterly Report is October 28, 2012 and November 14, 2012, respectively. 2. CFD Comment Letter dated February 12, 2013.
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.