Conpharm Industries, Inc., et al. vs. Alberto A. Santillana
SEC Case No. 3210 (Order) • Securities and Exchange Commission • Orders • Aug 25, 1987
Full text
[SEC CASE NO. 3210. August 25, 1987.] CONPHARM INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. , petitioners , vs . ALBERTO A. SANTILLANA , respondent . O R D E R Exhibits "A", "B", "D", "D-1", "D-2", "G" and "G-1" of the petitioners are all hereby admitted for the purpose for which they are being offered. However, there being objections to the purpose for which they are being offered, Exhibits "C", "E", "E-1", "E-2", "E-3", "E-4", "F", "F-1", "F-2", "F-3", and "F-4", are hereby admitted only as part of the testimony of witness Ney Chua. DAcaIE The hearing for the reception of the respondent's evidence on the incident of injunction is hereby set for August 27, 1987 at 9:00 o'clock in the morning. SO ORDERED. (SGD.) ALBERTO P. ATAS Hearing Officer
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.