Conpharm Industries, Inc. vs. Alfredo A. Santillana
SEC Case No. 3210 • Securities and Exchange Commission • Orders • Sep 4, 1987
Full text
[SEC CASE NO. 3210. September 4, 1987.] CONPHARM INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. , petitioners , vs . ALBERTO A. SANTILLANA , respondent . O R D E R Exhibits "1", "1-A", "8", "9", "10", "10-B", "C", "12" and "12-A" of the respondent are all hereby admitted for the purpose for which they are being offered. However, there being objections to the purpose for which they are being offered, Exhibits "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7" and "11" are hereby admitted only as part of the testimonies of the witnesses presented. Petitioners' prayer for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction is now considered submitted for resolution. SO ORDERED. (SGD.) ALBERTO P. ATAS Hearing Officer
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.